2026-10-06T18:10:05Z https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/oai.php

10.3897/oneeco.1.e9255 2016-05-25 oneecosystem

Kiel University, Kiel, Germany author Burkhard, Benjamin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-9009 European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Maes, Joachim https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-1607 Planning and Design for Sustainable Places Lab, DICAM - University of Trento, Trento, Italy author Geneletti, Davide https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5528-3365 National Museum of Natural History and Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Bulgaria author Stoev, Pavel https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5702-5677 Pensoft Publishers & Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria author Penev, Lyubomir https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2186-5033 2016-05-25 2016-05-25 2016 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 1 e9255 2016 10.1371/journal.pone.0024357 10.1017/s1049096515000827 10.1186/1471-2105-12-s15-s2 10.1525/bio.2009.59.4.10 European Commission author 2011 An engine for innovation, growth and transparent governance http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0882:FIN:EN:HTML 2011 COM(2011) 882 Final Fact sheet: Open Access in Horizon 2020 European Commission author text https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/sites/horizon2020/files/FactSheet_Open_Access.pdf 10.3233/ISU-2010-0613 10.1111/conl.12216 10.1126/science.1197962 10.1016/j.tree.2010.11.006 10.3897/oneeco.1.e9255 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/9255/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/9255/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/9255/download/xml/ text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers One Ecosystem: Innovation in ecology and sustainability research publishing Editorial

10.3897/oneeco.1.e9501 2016-06-14 oneecosystem

Curriculum for the Environment and Ecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America author Lopez, Bianca Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States of America author Burgio, Kevin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8375-2501 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil author Carlucci, Marcos Department of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, United States of America author Palmquist, Kyle Instituo de Ciencias Ambientales y Evolutivas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile author Parada, Andres Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile author Weinberger, Vanessa Curriculum for the Environment and Ecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America author Hurlbert, Allen 2016-06-14 2016-06-14 2016 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 1 e9501 2016 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.01006.x 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[50:neaart]2.0.co;2 10.1007/s00442-015-3406-3 10.1111/ele.12157 10.1890/11-2279.1 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01795.x 10.1111/ecog.01938 10.1111/jvs.12048 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90088-4 10.1111/ecog.01370 10.1890/11-1204.1 10.1890/11-0401.1 10.1111/ele.12161 10.1371/journal.pone.0005695 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01339.x 10.1890/11-0502.1 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01314.x 10.1086/386375 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 10.1111/1365-2656.12201 10.1111/ecog.00473 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04298.x 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00682.x 10.1890/10-1961.1 10.1111/ecog.00971 10.1111/ele.12403 10.1126/science.1098982 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[150:tgtahs]2.0.co;2 10.1111/1365-2745.12160 10.1890/10-0291.1 10.1002/ece3.1349 10.1111/1365-2435.12425 10.1111/jvs.12288 10.1111/ele.12341 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01725.x 10.1890/11-0493.1 10.1073/pnas.0901649106 10.1126/science.1128374 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02444.x 10.1086/511334 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160411 10.1890/08-1841.1 Plant rarity and the type of clonal growth L. Klimeš author 2000 text Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz 2000 9 43 52 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02433.x 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02300.x 10.1890/09-1672 10.1073/pnas.1413650112 10.1111/oik.01311 10.1086/519400 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x 10.1017/s0376892914000307 10.1086/684128 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01229.x 10.1038/nature01814 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[14:seopnc]2.0.co;2 10.1086/282505 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06629.x 10.1111/jvs.12033 10.1016/j.ppees.2013.08.002 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01509.x 10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00647.x 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00884.x 10.1111/nph.13644 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00171.x 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02768.x 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00924.x 10.2307/1938238 10.1080/10635150802302427 10.1126/science.235.4785.167 10.1002/ece3.2081 10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.003 10.1890/11-0406.1 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[39:pathoo]2.0.co;2 10.1098/rspb.2005.3288 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01945.x 10.1371/journal.pone.0020906 10.1371/journal.pone.0151744 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.00121.x 10.3732/ajb.94.3.451 10.1890/08-1025.1 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15559.x 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448 10.2307/3545686 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150452 10.2307/4445419 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102803.095431 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01515.x 10.3897/oneeco.1.e9501 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/9501/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/9501/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/9501/download/xml/ text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers ecology environmental filtering phylogenetics environmental gradients functional biodiversity phylogenetic biodiversity community assembly A new framework for inferring community assembly processes using phylogenetic information, relevant traits and environmental gradients Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.1.e8621 2016-06-27 oneecosystem

The Ronin Institute for Independent Scholarship, Montclair, United States of America author Thessen, Anne https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2908-3327 2016-06-27 2016-06-27 2016 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 1 e8621 2016 funder National Aeronautics and Space Administration 10.13039/100000104 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2009.06.005 Ethem Alpaydin author 2014 Introduction to Machine Learning 2014 615 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.08.001 10.1080/014311697218700 10.3386/w21788 10.1093/plankt/14.4.575 Stochastic models that predict trouts population densities or biomass on macrohabitat scale P. Baran author 1996 text Hydrobiologia 1996 337 1 9 J. Bell author A. H. Fielding author 1999 Machine Learning Methods for Ecological Applications 1999 89-106 Support vector clustering Asa Ben-Hur author 2001 text Journal of Machine Learning Research 2001 2 125 137 10.1038/sdata.2015.57 Machine learning for bioclimatic modelling M. Bhattacharya author 2013 text Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 2013 4 2 8 C. Bishop author 2006 Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning 978-0-387-31073-2 2006 738 10.1111/cobi.12372 L. Boddy author A. H. Fielding author 1999 Machine Learning Methods for Ecological Applications 1999 37-88 10.1002/cyto.990150403 10.1023/a:1018054314350 Statistical modeling: The two cultures L. Breiman author 2001 text Stat Sci 2001 16 3 199 231 10.1023/a:1010933404324 L. Breiman author 1984 Classification and Regression Trees 0412048418 1984 368 Artificial neural network versus multiple linear regression: Predicting P/B ratios from empirical data T Brey author 1996 text Marine Ecology Progress Series 1996 140 251 256 10.1080/00288330.2001.9516983 A simulated map of the potential natural forest vegetation of Switzerland B. Brzeziecki author 1993 text J Veg Sci http://www.jstor.org/stable/3236077 1993 4 4 499 508 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.09.021 Specification of training sets and the number of hidden neurons for multilayer perceptrons LS Camargo author 2001 text Neural Comput 2001 13 12 2673 2680 Linear and nonlinear postprocessing of numerical forecasted surface temperature M. Casaioli author 2003 text Nonlinear Process Geophys 2003 10 373 383 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)0152.0.CO;2 10.1007/0-387-25465-X_40 10.1139/f00-141 Automated bioacoustic identification of species D. Chesmore author 2004 text Ann Brazilian Acad Sci 2004 76 2 435 440 10.1016/0304-3800(95)00148-4 Intelligent Strategies for Effective Quantitative Structure-Toxicity Relationship (QSTR) Screening Daniel D Corkill author 2016 text in proof 2016 1 1 Classifying individuals among infraspecific taxa using microsatellite data and neural networks J. Cornuet author 1996 text Comptes Rendus l’Académie des Sci Série III, Sci la vie 1996 319 12 1167 1177 10.3354/meps247017 10.1890/07-0539.1 10.1139/f95-782 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[243:BTFEMA]2.0.CO;2 Classification and regression trees: A powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis G. De’ath author 2000 text Ecology 2000 81 11 3178 3192 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00411-7 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.01.003 A test of a pattern recognition system for identification of spiders M. Do author 1999 text Bull Entomol Res 1999 89 217 224 10.1145/2347736.2347755 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01141.x 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.08.007 10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.031 10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.020 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00312-X S. Džeroski author S. Haupt author 2009 Artificial Intelligence Methods in the Environmental Sciences 2009 397-412 Experiments in predicting biodegradability S. Džeroski author S. Džeroski author 1999 text Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming. 1999 80-81 10.1093/bioinformatics/3.1.1 10.1890/04-0608 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x 10.1.1.61.5991 10.1155/2007/38637 Discovering comprehensible classification rules using a genetic algorithm MV Fidelis author 2000 text Proceedings of CEC-2000, conference on evolutionary computation 2000 1 805-811 A. H. Fielding author 1999 Machine Learning Methods for Ecological Applications 1999 261 A. H. Fielding author A. H. Fielding author 1999 Machine Learning Methods for Ecological Applications 1999 1-36 A. H. Fielding author 2007 Cluster and Classification Techniques in the BioSciences 9780521618007 2007 260 Simulating the distribution of plant communities in an alpine landscape H. Fischer author 1990 text Coenoses 1990 5 37 43 The application of neural networks to the floristic classification of remote sensing and GIS data in complex terrain R. Fitzgerald author American Society of Photogrametry and Remote Sensing author 1992 text Proceedings of the XVII Congress ASPRS 1992 570-573 Tristan Fletcher author 2016 Machine Learning for Financial Market Prediction 2016 207 10.5194/gmdd-8-3653-2015 GIS and the random forest predictor: Integration in R for tick-borne disease risk assessment C Furlanello author K. Hornik author 2003 text Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing 2003 Johannes Fürnkranz author Johannes Fürnkranz author 2012 Foundations of Rule Learning 2012 19-55 10.1007/978-3-540-75197-7 10.1007/978-94-011-5686-8_5 10.1007/978-3-319-02931-3_45 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.015 Classes of Kernels for Machine Learning: A Statistics Perspective MG Genton author 2001 text Journal of Machine Learning Research 2001 2 299 312 10.1023/a:1008864517488 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.08.011 10.1023/a:1022602019183 10.4319/lom.2014.12.548 10.1038/34899 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9 10.1111/ele.12189 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.07.012 10.1007/b106568 Martin T Hagan author 2014 Neural Network Design 2014 1012 10.1109/tgrs.2004.842481 10.1002/0471671746 S. Haupt author S. Haupt author 2009 Artificial Intelligence Methods in the Environmental Sciences 2009 379-396 S. Haupt author S. Haupt author 2009 Artificial Intelligence Methods in the Environmental Sciences 2009 269-296 10.1007/978-1-4020-9119-3 10.1021/ci0342472 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.06.007 J. Holland author 1975 Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence 1975 211 W. Hsieh author 2009 Machine Learning Methods in the Environmental Sciences. 978-0-521-79192-2 2009 349 10.1175/1520-0434(2003)0182.0.CO;2 A machine-learning approach to automated knowledge-base building for remote sensing image analysis with GIS data. X. Huang author 1997 text Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 1997 63 10 1185 1194 L. Iverson author R. Smithers author 2004 Landscape Ecology of Trees and Forests, Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual IALE(UK) Conference 2004 317-320 10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011 Gareth James author 2013 An Introduction to Statistical Learning 2013 426 The class imbalance problem: A systematic study Nathalie Japkowicz author 2002 text Intelligent Data Analysis 2002 6 5 429 449 J. Jeffers author A. H. Fielding author 1999 Machine Learning Methods for Ecological Applications 1999 107-122 10.1139/z08-009 10.1016/j.artmed.2010.05.002 10.1007/s10531-005-4316-1 10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00147-9 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.06.003 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.02.003 Feedforward backpropagation neural networks in prediction of farmer risk preference T. Kastens author 1996 text Am J Agric Econ http://www.jstor.org/stable/1243712 1996 78 2 400 415 10.1023/a:1012431217818 10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_192 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.11.008 10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.007 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00384-7 10.1007/978-3-642-88163-3 Information complexity of neural networks MA Kon author 2000 text Neural Netw 2000 13 3 365 375 Supervised Machine Learning: A Review of Classification Techniques S. B. Kotsiantis author 2007 text Informatica 2007 31 249 268 10.1007/s10462-007-9052-3 J. Koza author 1992 Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection 1992 836 V. Krasnopolsky author S. Haupt author 2009 Artificial Intelligence Methods in the Environmental Sciences 2009 191-206 V. Lakshmanan author S. Haupt author 2009 Artificial Intelligence Methods in the Environmental Sciences 2009 2009 329-346 10.1214/ss/1177013621 Predicting climate-induced range shifts: Model differences and model reliability J. Lawler author 2006 text Glob Chang Biol 2006 12 8 1568 1584 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.033 B. Lees author M. Goodchild author 1996 GIS and Environmental Modeling: Progress and Issues 978-0-470-23677-2 1996 39-42 10.1007/bf02394820 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00092-7 10.1007/978-3-642-57030-8 10.1051/alr:1996004 10.1016/0304-3800(95)00142-5 Classifying soil-structure using neural networks E. Levine author 1996 text Ecol Modell 1996 92 101 108 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.004 10.1023/a:1007608224229 10.1111/insr.12016 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.031 Deterministic non-periodic flow E. Lorenz author 1963 text J Atmos Sci 1963 20 130 141 N. MacLeod author 2007 Automated Taxon Identification in Systematics: Theory, Approaches and Applications 9780849382055 2007 368 10.1016/S1364-8152(99)00007-9 10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00440.x A neural network for post-processing model output: ARPS C. Marzban author 2003 text Mon Weather Rev 2003 131 1103 1111 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00209.x 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00309-X Application of neural networks to prediction of fish diversity and salmonid production in the Lake Ontario basin J. Jr. McKenna author 2005 text Trans Am Fish Soc 2005 134 1 28 43 10.1111/ecog.00845 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01720.x 10.1145/507533.507538 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00196-5 M. Mitchell author 1998 An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms 1998 221 10.1016/j.dss.2015.02.007 Support vector machines with applications J. M. Moguerza author 2006 text Statistical Science 2006 21 3 322 336 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001 10.1007/bf03037227 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1998)124:3(202) 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.018 10.1086/587826 Machine learning techniques for anomaly detection: An overview Salima Omar author 2013 text International Journal of Computer Applications 2013 79 2 33 41 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.11.012 10.1080/01431160412331269698 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.039 Acoustic identification of twelve species of echoloating bat by discriminant function analysis and artificial neural networks S. Parsons author 2000 text J Exp Biol 2000 203 2641 2656 A. Pasini author S. Haupt author 2009 Artificial Intelligence Methods in the Environmental Sciences 2009 235-254 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.05.011 10.1038/416626a 10.1103/physrevlett.59.2229 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.03.003 10.1007/s10651-010-0147-7 10.1007/s10021-005-0054-1 10.1007/bf03037228 10.7717/peerj.703 C. Rasmussen author 2006 Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning 026218253X 2006 248 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00074.x ANNA - artificial neural network model for predicting species abundance and succession of blue-green algae F. Recknagel author 1997 text Hydrobiologia 1997 349 47 57 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00316-7 Multivariate time-series modelling of algal blooms in freshwater lakes by machine learning F. Recknagel author P. Vanrolleghem author 2000 text Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium WATERMATEX’2000 on Systems Analysis and Computing in Water Quality Management 2000 Comparative application of artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms for multivariate time-series modelling of algal blooms in freshwater lakes F. Recknagel author 2002 text J Hydroinformatics 2002 4 2 125 133 10.1007/b101880 10.1006/jmsc.1997.0244 10.1016/j.rse.2007.10.004 10.1111/ibi.12333 B. Ruck author G. Rzevski author 1993 Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering VIII. 1993 361-372 D. Rumelhart author D. Rumelhart author 1986 Parallel Distributed Processing 1986 318-362 Handling Missing Values when Applying Classification Models Maytal Saar-Tsechansky author 2007 text Journal of Machine Learning Research 2007 8 1625 1657 10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042606.085844 10.1007/978-1-4614-6940-7_4 Artificial neural networks as empirical models for estimating phytoplankton production M. Scardi author 1996 text Marine Ecology Progress Series 1996 139 289 299 Developing an empirical model of phytoplankton primary production: a neural network case study M. Scardi author 1999 text Ecological Modelling 1999 120 213 223 10.1016/S0168-1699(00)00137-X 10.1006/jaer.1994.1078 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01076.x Modeling Ocean Circulation A. Semtner author 1995 text Science 1995 269 1379 1380 10.1109/ijcnn.2001.938792 Species identification using wideband backscatter with neural network and discriminant analysis E. Simmonds author 1996 text ICES J Mar Sci. 1996 53 189 195 Algorithms That Learn with Less Data Could Expand AI’s Power Tom Simonite author 2016 text MIT Technology Review https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601551/algorithms-that-learn-with-less-data-could-expand-ais-power/ 2016 601551 e Robert R Sokal author 2011 Biometry 0716786044 2011 937 10.4319/lom.2007.5.204 10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00400.x A. Srinivasan author N Lavrač author 1997 Intelligent Data Analysis in Medicine and Pharmacology 1997 243-260 D. Stockwell author A. H. Fielding author 1999 Machine Learning Methods for Ecological Applications 1999 123-144 10.1016/0378-4754(92)90126-2 10.1080/136588199241391 10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.018 10.1016/0304-3800(94)00131-6 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.009 10.3897/zookeys.150.1766 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00666.x 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.02.010 10.1890/02-5036 10.2307/3236575 Controlling the sensitivity of support vector machines K Veropoulos author 1999 text Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 1999 K. Wagstaff author J. Langford author 2012 Proceedings of the 29th International Conferene on Machine Learning 2012 298-303 10.1007/978-0-387-34951-0_20 W. Walley author D. Grierson author 1992 Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering VII 1992 1030-1047 W. Walley author R. Denzer author 2000 Environmental Software Systems: Environmental Information and Decision Support 2000 27-41 10.1007/978-3-540-71258-9 10.1128/aem.00062-07 10.1371/journal.pone.0010223 R. Wieland author S Jørgensen author 2008 Encyclopedia of Ecology 2008 1717-1726 10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.06.004 10.5670/oceanog.2003.42 J. Williams author S. Haupt author 2009 Artificial Intelligence Methods in the Environmental Sciences 2009 347-378 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01202.x Neural networks forecasts of the tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures A. Wu author 2006 text Neural Networks 2006 19 145 154 10.1109/ecnn.2000.886232 G. Young author S. Haupt author 2009 Artificial Intelligence Methods in the Environmental Sciences 2009 207-216 10.14358/pers.74.10.1223 10.1016/j.rse.2011.04.001 10.3897/oneeco.1.e8621 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/8621/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/8621/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/8621/download/xml/ text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers ecology machine learning earth science statistical learning Adoption of Machine Learning Techniques in Ecology and Earth Science Review Article

10.3897/oneeco.1.e9990 2016-11-01 oneecosystem

European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Polce, Chiara https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7065-8647 European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Maes, Joachim https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-1607 Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands author M Brander, Luke https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5862-4030 European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Cescatti, Alessandro European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Baranzelli, Claudia European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Lavalle, Carlo European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Zulian, Grazia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9951-6765 2016-11-01 2016-11-01 2016 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 1 e9990 2016 K. J. Bagstad author 2011 ARIES: Artifical Intelligence for Ecosystem Services: A guide to models and data, version 1.0 http://aries.integratedmodelling.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/ARIESModelingGuide1.0.pdf 2011 128 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.025 10.2788/85104 10.1007/s13280-014-0507-x 10.1002/ieam.1327 L. M. Brander author 2013 Guidance manual on value transfer methods for ecosystem services. United Nations Environment Programme 978-92-807-3362-4 2013 77 10.1007/s10640-011-9535-1 10.3097/LO.201434 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 10.1002/esp.3248 J Cain author 2001 Planning improvements in natural resources management: Guidelines for using Bayesian networks to support the planning and management of development programmes in the water sector and beyond 0 903741 00 9 2001 132 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.10.014 10.1007/978-3-319-12039-3_3 10.1073/pnas.1011612108 10.2791/7409 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.07.077 10.1017/S0032247400023779 10.2765/877631 10.5751/es-07145-200123 10.1051/agro:2008066 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501479 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.016 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.06.001 10.5751/es-05800-180334 10.1073/pnas.0704243104 Roy Haines-Young author D. Raffaelli author 2010 Ecosystem Ecology: a new synthesis. BES Ecological Reviews Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (iE) 2010 S S Hussain author 2011 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. The quantitative Assessment. Final Report to the United Nations Environment Programme https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241870310_The_Economics_of_Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity_the_Quantitative_Assessment 2011 243 IPCC author 2000 Emissions Scenarios. Summary for Policymakers. 92-9169-113-5 https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/spm/sres-en.pdf 2000 27 10.1007/s00267-011-9804-3 10.1007/s11069-014-1529-1 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.037 10.1073/pnas.1211349110 Rattan Lal author 1994 Soil erosion research methods 1884015093 http://tinyurl.com/lmhxwth 1994 352 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.011 10.1073/pnas.0705414105 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.02.013 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.01.002 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 10.2788/341839 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment author 2005 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis 2005 155 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.038 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.007 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01231.x 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00245.x KW Oleson author 2010 Technical Description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model (CLM) 2153-2397 2010 257 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.021 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.012 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018 10.1029/2007wr006603 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.018 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.07.008 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.055 10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044003 10.1126/science.1115233 10.1126/science.1259855 TEEB author 2012 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations 978-0415501088 2012 456 Terrence J Toy author 2002 Soil erosion: processes, prediction, measurement, and control 0471383694 2002 352 The TEEB Valuation Database – a searchable database of 1310 estimates of monetary values of ecosystem services S Van der Ploeg author 2010 text Foundation for Sustainable Development http://www.fsd.nl/esp/80763/5/0/50 2010 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.040 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.10.021 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.058 ESTIMAP: A GIS-based model to map ecosystem services in the European Union G Zulian author 2014 text Annali di Botanica http://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/Annalidibotanica/article/view/11807/11810 2014 4 1 7 10.3897/oneeco.1.e9990 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/9990/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/9990/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/9990/download/xml/ text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Bayesian Network climate ecosystem impact assessment LUISA modelling regulating services Global change impacts on ecosystem services: a spatially explicit assessment for Europe Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.1.e9280 2016-11-15 oneecosystem

Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany author Sprondel, Nora Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany author Donner, Julie Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany author Mahlkow, Nicole Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany author Koeppel, Johann 2016-11-15 2016-11-15 2016 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 1 e9280 2016 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.06.004. 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10.001. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.09.006. F. Bartfelder author 1987 Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Funktion von Fassadenbegrünungen 1987 612 10.1007/s10113-013-0421-y 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006. Guidelines for the use of Bayesian networks as a participatory tool for Water Resource Management. Based on the results of the MERIT project J. Bromley author 2005 text Center for Ecology and Hydrology Wallingford 2005 1 1 118 10.1080/00420980600936491 Planning improvements in natural resources management, Guidelines for using Bayesian networks to support the planning and management of development programmes in the water sector and beyond J. Cain author 2001 text Center for Ecology and Hydrology 2001 1 1 124 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.12.005. Progress and Challenges in Urban Climate Adaptation Planning: Results of a Global Survey J. Carmin author 2012 text Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2012 MIT 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.012. U. Debus author 2009 Vertikale Flächenpotenziale zur Biomasseproduktion im urbanen Raum – Beispiel Berlin 2009 ? 10.1142/S1464333215500209. 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.010. Supporting the Implementation of Green Infrastructure. Final Report. European Commission, Directorate-General for the Environment European Comission author text http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/ecosystems/docs/green_infrastructures/GI%20Final%20Report.pdf 10.1016/j.uclim.2014.02.004 FLL author 2000 Richtlinie für die Planung, Ausführung und Pflege von Fassadenbegrünungen mit Kletterpflanzen 2000 54 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.05.009 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.047 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.12.021 Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report IPCC author text http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/ 10.1155/2015/747259 10.5751/ES-08373-210239 C. Kappis author 2014 Handbuch Gleisbegrünung- Planung Ausführung Pflege 2014 184 10.1007/bf00140244 10.1016/j.apenergy.2005.06.001 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.06.004 10.1007/s11252-008-0063-x M. Köhler author 2012 Handbuch Bauwerksbegrünung. Planung – Konstruktion – Ausführung 2012 250 M. Köhler author 1997 Landschaftsentwicklung und Umweltforschung – Schriftenreihe im Fachbereich Umwelt und Gesellschaft Nr. 105 1997 Climate Change in urban areas. Part 2 W. Kuttler author text http://www.enveurope.com/content/pdf/2190-4715-23-21.pdf 10.1007/s11027-013-9480-0 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.10.007 Climate Change and the cultural landscape of Berlin H. Lotze-Campen author 2009 text edited by Senate Department for Urban Development Berlin, Berliner Stadtgüter GmbH, Berliner Forsten, Joint Spatial Planning Department Berlin-Brandenburg 2009 2009 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01857.x M. Mahammadzadeh author 2009 Klimaschutz und Anpassung an die Klimafolgen-Strategien, Maßnahmen und Anwendungsbeispiele 2009 310 10.1177/0739456X16664787 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.03.005 10.1029/2010GL042845. 10.1023/a:1014350822458 10.5751/ES-06639-190258 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.11.022 M. G. Morgan author 1990 Uncertainty. A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis 1990 331 10.1073/pnas.1007887107 nature-based approaches for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Bundesamt für Naturschutz S. Naumann author text http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/publication/2014/eco_bfn_nature-based-solutions_sept2014_en.pdf T. Nehls author 2010 Ungenutztes Flächenpotenzial für die Fassadenbegrünung am Beispiel Berlin 2010 42 Netica Software Norsys author text https://www.norsys.com/netica.html 10.1016/0378-7788(88)90026-6 10.5194/hessd-4-439-2007 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.06.032 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.05.009 Bayesian networks: A guide for their application in natural management and policy C. A. Pollino author 2010 text Landscape Logic technical report http://www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/588474/TR_14_BNs_a_resource_guide.pdf 2010 48 14 48 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.07.013 Climate change and cities D. Satterthwaite author 2006 text Sustainable Development http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/11055IIED.pdf 2006 1 1 2 SenStadtUm author 2011 Stadtentwicklungsplan Klima http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/planen/stadtentwicklungsplanung/download/klima/step_klima_broschuere.pdf 2011 79 Anteil öffentlicher Grünflächen in Berlin [share of public green in berlin] SenStadtUm author text http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/umwelt/stadtgruen/gruenanlagen/index.shtml 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.05.062 10.1196/annals.1319.004 Statistical Office Berlin-Brandenburg Statistical Office author text https://www.statistik-berlin-brandenburg.de/presse/presse_pm.asp?Sageb=120&PTyp=100&creg=BBB&anzwer=2 TEEB manual for cities. Ecosystem Services in urban Management TEEB author text www.teebweb.org 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001 Building resilience of Ecosystems for Adaptation United Nations Environment Programme author text http://www.unep.org/climatechange/adaptation/EcosystemBasedAdaptation/tabid/29583/Default.aspx 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.11.033 10.1007/s10584-016-1660-y 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.008 H. Wang author 2002 Using Sensitivity Analysis for Selective Parameter Update in Bayesian Network Learning http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Spring/2002/SS-02-03/SS02-03-005.pdf 2002 8 10.3897/oneeco.1.e9280 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/9280/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/9280/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/9280/download/xml/ text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Bayesian networks façade greening implementation ecosystem services climate change adaptation Berlin Urban climate and heat stress: how likely is the implementation of adaptation measures in mid-latitude cities? The case of façade greening analyzed with Bayesian networks Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.1.e9869 2016-11-29 oneecosystem

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden author Palo, Thomas Skåne Association of Local Authorities, Lund, Sweden author Lagercrantz, Karen Lund University, Helsingborg, Sweden author Bramryd, Torleif Lund University, Helsingborg, Sweden author Johansson, Michael Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden author Beery, Thomas Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden author Jönsson, K Lund University, Lund, Sweden author Wamsler, Christine Lund University, Lund, Sweden author Brink, Ebba Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden author Schubert, Per Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden author Ekelund, Nils 2016-11-29 2016-11-29 2016 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 1 e9869 2016 10.1007/s13280-012-0372-4 Making the value of ecosystem services visible text http://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/ba53cd9f18b74f348eb0ff31e8280d60/engelsk-version-sammanfattning-av-sou-201368 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.11.004 10.1016/s0195-9255(99)00015-3 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.002 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.05.003 10.1017/s0376892900016805 10.1016/j.eiar.2003.12.002 10.1038/387253a0 10.1073/pnas.0706559105 10.1016/j.eiar.2006.11.001 10.1098/rspb.2015.1348 10.1038/nature11157 L Emmelin author 2006 Effective environmental assessment tools- criterial reflections on concepts an practice 1103-1581;3 2006 - 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0347:pbaest]2.3.co;2 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.02.005 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 10.1073/pnas.1503751112 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.06.031 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.12.002 10.1016/j.eiar.2006.12.001 Social change and social sustainability: challenges for the planning profession. L. Kerr author 2010 text Planning pathways 2010 D. P. Lawrence author 2003 Environmental impact Assessment. Practical solutions to recurrent problems 2003 - 10.1017/s1367943098221123 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00073.x 10.1007/s13280-015-0743-8 10.1890/1540-9295-12.10.539 10.13016/M2CH07 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.011 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.005 10.1007/s10531-010-9838-5 10.1142/s1464333212500081 10.4324/9780203124307 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.09.036 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.12.002 10.5751/es-07489-200230 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.008 Web of Science Web of Science author text http://ipscience.thomsonreuters.com/product/web-of-science/?utm_source=Adwords&utm_medium=paid&utm_campaign=WoS&gclid=Cj0KEQjwnIm7BRDSs42KxLS8-6YBEiQAfDWP6NXQtB8Lk3UlfakpRw11HDXnqVxGgvHekTyySmnsdPgaAloF8P8HAQ&gclsrc=aw.ds 10.3897/oneeco.1.e9869 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/9869/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/9869/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/9869/download/xml/ text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem Services Environmental Impact Assessment Municipalities Planning Tools Priority areas in municipality planning: ecosystem services, environmental impact assessments and research areas Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.2.e11402 2017-01-19 oneecosystem

Politecnico di Torino, Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning, Torino, Italy author Salata, Stefano Politecnico di Milano, Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Milano, Italy author Ronchi, Silvia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9793-0287 Politecnico di Milano, Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Milano, Italy author Arcidiacono, Andrea Politecnico di Milano, Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Milano, Italy author Ghirardelli, Federico 2017-01-19 2017-01-19 2017 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 2 e11402 2017 Andrea Arcidiacono author 2015 Computational Science and Its Applications -ICCSA 2015 2015 14 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.03.008 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.016 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.010 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379 10.1038/387253a0 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.037 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.02.005 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.019 Landscape biodiversity changes in forest vegetation and the case study of the Lavazé Pass (Trentino, Italy) Vittorio Ingegnoli author 2008 text Annuali di botanica 2008 8 21 29 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.008 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.12.008 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Millenium Ecosystem Assessment author 2005 text World Resources Institute 2005 1 10.1073/pnas.0707823105 Elisabetta Peccol author 2012 Evaluating land consumption and soil functions to inform Spatial planning 2012 10 10.1108/MEQ-12-2012-0079 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.002 10.3897/oneeco.2.e11402 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/11402/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/11402/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/11402/download/xml/ This paper reports a case study which examines the how mapping ecosystem services can be used to identify areas of significant natural value to be protected or restored. We mapped habitat quality in Lombardy (northwest Italy) using the InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoff) model. Model outputs were used to approximate the spatial distribution of ecological quality across the region provided a framework to support the implementation of the Lombardy Regional Landscape Plan. This resulted in a proposal for introduction of new protected areas in the updated Landscape Plan, while other areas were proposed to be removed. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem services Landscape planning Mapping Habitat quality Legislative tools Mapping Habitat Quality in the Lombardy Region, Italy Case Study

10.3897/oneeco.2.e11613 2017-02-15 oneecosystem

Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute of Landscape Systems Analysis, Müncheberg, Germany author Schmidt, Martin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5802-1432 Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute of Land Use Systems, Müncheberg, Germany author Weißhuhn, Peter Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute for Landscape Biogeochemistry, Müncheberg, Germany author Augustin, Jürgen Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute of Soil Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany author Funk, Roger Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute of Socio-Economics, Müncheberg, Germany author Häfner, Kati Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute of Land Use Systems, Müncheberg, Germany author Koennig, Hannes Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute of Socio-Economics, Müncheberg, Germany author Loft, Lasse Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute of Landscape Hydrology, Müncheberg, Germany author Merz, Christoph Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute of Socio-Economics, Müncheberg, Germany author Meyer, Claas Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute of Socio-Economics, Müncheberg, Germany author Piorr, Annette Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute of Socio-Economics, Müncheberg, Germany author Reutter, Michaela Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute of Land Use Systems, Müncheberg, Germany author Stachow, Ulrich Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute of Land Use Systems, Müncheberg, Germany author Stein-Bachinger, Karin Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute of Socio-Economics, Müncheberg, Germany author Matzdorf, Bettina 2017-02-15 2017-02-15 2017 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 2 e11613 2017 10.3097/lo.201434 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.008 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.003 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Statistics Division. Domain Inputs - Land FAOSTAT author text http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/download/R/RL/E 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007 Delphi and cognitive psychology: an access point to the theoretical foundations of the Delphi method Michael Häder author 1995 text ZUMA Nachrichten http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-208882 1995 19 37 8 34 R. Haines-Young author D. Raffaelli author 2010 Ecosystem Ecology: a new synthesis 978-0-521-51349-4 www.cambridge.org/9780521513494 2010 174 CICES - Towards a common classification of ecosystem services Roy Haines-Young author text http://cices.eu/ 10.1007/s10531-010-9789-x The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. C. -C. Hsu author 2007 text Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=10 2007 12 10 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.020 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2005.00001.x Bettina Matzdorf author Christina von Haaren author 2016 Ökosystemleistungen in ländlichen Räumen. Grundlage für menschliches Wohlergehen und nachhaltige wirtschaftliche Entwicklung 978-3-944280-25-7 http://www.naturkapital-teeb.de/fileadmin/Downloads/Projekteigene_Publikationen/TEEB_Broschueren/TEEB_DE_Landbericht_Langfassung.pdf 2016 MEA author 2005 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends 1-55963-227-5 2005 1 948 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.009 10.5751/es-06159-190259 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.019 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.020 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.004 Composition of macro geographical (continental) regions, geographical sub-regions, and selected economic and other groupings United Nations Statistics Division author text http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm#ftnc 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.01.001 10.1007/s13280-010-0048-x 10.3097/lo.201649 10.3897/oneeco.2.e11613 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/11613/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/11613/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/11613/download/xml/ text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Adapted Delphi Experts Scopus Advanced Search Search algorithm concept implementation Evaluation of the ecosystem services approach in agricultural literature Data Paper (Generic)

10.3897/oneeco.2.e12290 2017-05-05 oneecosystem

Facultade de Ciencias Políticas e Sociais, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain Campus Do*Mar - International Campus of Excellence, Vigo, Spain author Garcia Rodrigues, João https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0234-5710 Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute for Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, Anavyssos, Greece author Conides, Alexis Centro Tecnológico del Mar, Vigo, Spain author Rivero Rodriguez, Susana Institute of Marine Sciences, National Research Council (ISMAR-CNR), Ancona, Italy Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Chioggia, Italy author Raicevich, Sasa Campus Do*Mar - International Campus of Excellence, Vigo, Spain Facultade de Ciencias Políticas e Sociais, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain author Pita, Pablo Northeast Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Woods Hole, United States of America author Kleisner, Kristin Department of Environment and Planning & Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal author Pita, Cristina Fisheries and Food Institute, Santos, Brazil Fishing Ecology, Management and Economics Group, Department of Ecology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil author Lopes, Priscila F. M. Instituto Patagónico para el Estudio de los Ecosistemas Continentales (IPEEC) - CONICET, Puerto Madryn, Argentina author Alonso Roldán, Virginia Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR), University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal Institute of Estuarine and Coastal Studies, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom author Ramos, Sandra Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute for Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, Anavyssos, Greece author Klaoudatos, Dimitris Aquatic Ecosystem Research Laboratory, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Facultade de Ciencias Políticas e Sociais, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain author Outeiro, Luís University of Tromsø, Tromso, Norway author Armstrong, Claire Center for Oceans, Conservation International, Honolulu, United States of America author Teneva, Lida Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, United States of America author Stefanski, Stephanie Foundation for Sustainable Development, Wageningen, Netherlands Environmental Systems Analysis Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands author Böhnke-Henrichs, Anne Department of Ecosystem Management, Institute for Natural Resource Conservation, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany author Kruse, Marion https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0789-0045 Department of Environment and Planning & Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal author Lillebø, Ana Department of Natural Resource Sciences and McGill School of Environment, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Canada author Bennett, Elena Department of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Marine Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lysekil, Sweden Swedish Institute for the Marine Environment (SIME), Gothenburg, Sweden author Belgrano, Andrea Marine Research Division, AZTI, Sukarrieta Bizkaia, Spain author Murillas, Arantza Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR), University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal author Sousa Pinto, Isabel Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research ZALF, Müncheberg, Germany author Burkhard, Benjamin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-9009 Campus Do*Mar - International Campus of Excellence, Vigo, Spain Facultade de Ciencias Políticas e Sociais, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain author Villasante, Sebastián 2017-05-05 2017-05-05 2017 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 2 e12290 2017 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.013 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.11.013 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.12.003 10.1002/9781444392241.ch2 Fikret Berkes author Fikret Berkes author 1998 Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience 9780521591409 1998 459 10.2307/2641280 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.027 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.006 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.023 Claire Brown author 2006 Marine and coastal ecosystems and human well being: synthesis 2006 10.1080/08941920590881853 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.015 10.5751/es-05207-170432 10.1080/21513732.2011.618465 10.5751/es-05165-170434 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588992.003.0012 10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7 10.1073/pnas.1525002113 10.1016/j.tree.2009.10.008 10.1371/journal.pone.0133856 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.007 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.024 10.1038/387253a0 Liz Creel author 2003 Ripple effects: population and coastal regions 2003 10.1073/pnas.1114773109 10.1007/s12237-012-9498-7 10.5751/es-08173-210211 10.1016/b978-0-12-419964-4.00001-9 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.008 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002 10.14430/arctic126 10.1080/15564890600639504 10.1002/aqc.1114 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.009 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0121:leaefe]2.0.co;2 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.05.001 10.1007/978-94-017-9846-4_3 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.02.008 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019 10.1890/130298 10.1016/b978-0-12-374711-2.01202-x 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005 10.1057/dev.2011.86 10.1371/journal.pone.0013113 10.1002/sd.410 10.1017/cbo9780511750458.007 R Haines-Young author 2013 Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003 www.cices.eu 2013 10.1126/science.1149345 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.013 10.1007/s11625-014-0285-1 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.005 10.1007/s10640-012-9572-4 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.006 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.019 10.1080/19425120.2012.703162 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.006 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.008 10.1057/dev.2014.43 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.008 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.03.008 10.1371/journal.pone.0067737 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.12.022 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.004 Joan Martinez-Alier author 2002 The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation 1-84064-909-7 2002 10.1007/s10980-015-0254-9 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003 10.1371/journal.pone.0038970 M. Max-Neef author Paul Ekins author 1992 Real-life economics: Understanding wealth creation 0415079764 1992 460 10.5751/es-05790-180344 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment author 2005 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis 1-56973-597-2 2005 137 10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00009-9 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.03.017 Richard B. Norgaard author 1994 Development betrayed: The end of progress and a co-evolutionary revisioning of the future 9780415068628 1994 280 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.028 10.3197/096327100129342191 10.5751/es-07985-200432 10.1007/s13280-013-0457-8 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.004 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.004 10.5751/es-03862-160123 10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.09.003 10.1890/070135 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.150 10.1007/s10750-011-0665-9 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.006 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013 10.1007/s00267-012-9900-z Quantum GIS Geographic Information System Quantum GIS Development Team author 2016 text Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project http://qgis.osgeo.org 2016 10.1073/pnas.0907284107 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing R Core Team author 2015 text http://www.r-project.org 2015 10.1890/120144 10.1098/rstb.2013.0273 10.5751/es-01667-110128 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[534:egasfs]2.0.co;2 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.023 10.1146/annurev-environ-012312-110838 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.033 Linking Ecosystem Services with Cultural Landscape Research Harald Schaich author 2010 text GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 2010 19 4 269 277 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.005 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007 10.1111/conl.12091 Commons thinking, ecological intelligence and the ethical and moral framework of Ubuntu: An imperative for sustainable development Overson Shumba author 2011 text Journal of Media and Communication Studies 2011 3 3 84 96 10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.007 10.2112/si65-178.1 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.004 10.1017/s0030605313001543 TEEB author 2010 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB 9783981341034 2010 36 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006 10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3 10.1007/s13280-015-0647-7 10.5194/bg-11-3941-2014 10.1016/b978-0-12-419964-4.00018-4 UK National Ecosystem Assessment author 2011 UK National Ecosystem Assessment:Technical report 9789280731644 2011 United Nations author 2015 World Population Prospects 2015 - Data Booklet https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2015_DataBooklet.pdf 2015 10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00084 Package ‘gplots’ Gregory R. Warnes author 2016 text http://cran.r-project.or 2016 10.5063/AA/NCEAS.302.1 10.3897/oneeco.2.e12290 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/12290/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/12290/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/12290/download/xml/ Cultural ecosystem services (CES) reflect peoples’ physical and cognitive interactions with nature and are increasingly recognised for providing non-material benefits to human societies. Whereas coasts, seas, and oceans sustain a great proportion of the human population, CES provided by these ecosystems have remained largely unexplored. Therefore, our aims were (1) to analyse the state of research on marine and coastal CES, (2) to identify knowledge gaps, and (3) to pinpoint research priorities and the way forward. To accomplish these objectives, we did a systematic review of the scientific literature and synthesised a subset of 72 peer-reviewed publications. Results show that research on marine and coastal CES is scarce compared to other ecosystem service categories. It is primarily focused on local and regional sociocultural or economic assessments of coastal ecosystems from Western Europe and North America. Such research bias narrows the understanding of social-ecological interactions to a western cultural setting, undermining the role of other worldviews in the understanding of a wide range of interactions between cultural practices and ecosystems worldwide. Additionally, we have identified clusters of co-occurring drivers of change affecting marine and coastal habitats and their CES. Our systematic review highlights knowledge gaps in: (1) the lack of integrated valuation assessments; (2) linking the contribution of CES benefits to human wellbeing; (3) assessing more subjective and intangible CES classes; (4) identifying the role of open-ocean and deep-sea areas in providing CES; and (5) understanding the role of non-natural capital in the co-production of marine and coastal CES. Research priorities should be aimed at filling these knowledge gaps. Overcoming such challenges can result in increased appreciation of marine and coastal CES, and more balanced decision-supporting mechanisms that will ultimately contribute to more sustainable interactions between humans and marine ecosystems. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Human wellbeing non-material benefits integrated valuation value pluralism drivers of change co-production synergies trade-offs social-ecological systems systematic review global assessment. Marine and Coastal Cultural Ecosystem Services: knowledge gaps and research priorities Review Article

10.3897/oneeco.2.e14062 2017-07-04 oneecosystem

National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria author Koulov, Boian https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0732-254X Space Research and Technology Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria author Ivanova, Ekaterina Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Sofia, Bulgaria author Borisova, Bilyana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3225-9514 Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Sofia, Bulgaria author Assenov, Assen Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria author Ravnachka, Aleksandra https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3502-7815 2017-07-04 2017-07-04 2017 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 2 e14062 2017 Management Plan 2016-2025, Central Balkan National Park author text http://visitcentralbalkan.net/assets/userfiles/file/Administration/APU_CBNP_2016-2025_ENG.pdf 10.14207/ejsd.2016.v5n4p409 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x A synthesis of approaches to assess and value ecosystem services in the EU in the context of TEEB. R. Brouwer author 2013 text TEEB follow-up study for Europe 2013 the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Com/2011/0244 Final. Commission to the European Parliament author 2011 Our Life Insurance, Our Natural Capital: An EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 2011 10.1038/387253a0 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 Valuation of ecosystem services provided by forests of Central Balkan National Park L. Dimitrova author 2015 text Operational Program “Environment 2007–2013” 2015 A. Gerginova author 2015 Agrostatistical Reference Book 2000-2014 http://www.mzh.government.bg/MZH/en/ShortLinks/SelskaPolitika/Agrostatistics.aspx 2015 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007 Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle region, Germany D. Haase author 2012 text Ecology and Society 2012 17 3 22 CICES V4.3 - Report prepared following consultation on CICES Version 4. August-December 2012. R Haines-Young author 2013 text EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003 2013 Mapping ecosystem services: an integrated biophysical and economic evaluation T. Hayha author 2014 text YSSP Interim Report IR-14-007, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria 2014 10.14207/ejsd.2016.v5n4p335 S. Jacobs author 2014 Ecosystem Services. Global Issues, Local Practices 978-0-12-419964-4 2014 456 R. J. Johnston author 2015 Benefit transfer of environmental and resource values: A handbook for researchers and practitioners 978-94-017-9929-4 2015 Plan for Development of the Karlovo Municipality for 2014-2020 Karlovo Municipality author text http://www.karlovo.bg/bg/ Karlovo Municipality author http://www.karlovo.bg/ P. Kumar author 2010 TEEB: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Ecological and Economic Foundations http://www.teebweb.org/our-publications/teeb-study-reports/ecological-and-economic-foundations/ 2010 An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 MAES author text http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/knowledge/ecosystem_assessment/pdf/MAESWorkingPaper2013.pdf Indicators for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 MAES author text http://catalogue.biodiversity.europa.eu/uploads/document/file/1230/2ndMAESWorkingPaper.pdf Results of the Agricultural Farms Tally in 2010 Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Agriculture and Food author text http://www.mzh.government.bg National ecological network NATURA 2000, Ministry of Environment and Waters, Republic of Bulgaria MoEW author 2017 text http://natura2000.moew.government.bg/Home/Natura2000ProtectedSites 2017 S. Naeem author 2009 Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective 2009 Ministry of Environment and Water NRC author http://eea.government.bg/bg/projects/korine-14/kzp-danni-clc-data Prices of agricultural production data series NSI author 2015 text http://www.nsi.bg/en/content/4247/prices-agricultural-production-data-series 2015 Regional statistics data series NSI author 2015 text http://www.nsi.bg/en/content/11252/regional-statistics-and-indicators-monitoring 2015 Demography NSI author 2016 text 2016 M. Potschin author 2016 Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services. Routledge 9781317687030 2016 658 10.1073/pnas.1310539110 10.1073/pnas.0907284107 10.3390/land2030472 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14062 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14062/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14062/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14062/download/xml/ This study aims to apply approaches, methods, and indicators from the conceptual framework of ecosystem services valuation to a real world, local level case study. It tests a GIS-based mapping and valuation of ecosystem services model in a typical mountain municipality in Bulgaria. Investigation results address opportunities, challenges and limitations in the practical application of the ecosystem services concept. They include an integrated assessment of the ecosystem services in a specific administrative territorial unit and suggest its Total Economic Value. The introduction of the term “ecosystem services dysergy” should contribute to valuation theory and practice. The study upgrades the currently available knowledge base that supports geospatial planning and sustainable development of the Karlovo Municipality and offers recommendations for improvement of the municipal ecosystem services utilization, which include identification, analysis, and visualization of hotspots and dysergy areas. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers ecosystem services mapping and valuation ecosystem services dysergy sustainable governance mountain regions Bulgaria GIS-based Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Mountain Regions: A Case Study of the Karlovo Municipality in Bulgaria Case Study

10.3897/oneeco.2.e13714 2017-07-05 oneecosystem

University of Patras, Department of Biology, Division of Plant Biology, Botanical Institute, Rion, Patras, GR-26504, Greece author Dimopoulos, Panayotis https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-9954 Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), P.O. Box 6, 7500 AA, Enschede, Netherlands author Drakou, Evangelia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4404-629X University of Patras, Department of Biology, Division of Plant Biology, Botanical Institute, Rion, Patras, GR-26504, Greece author Kokkoris, Ioannis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-3445 University of the Aegean, Department of Marine Sciences, Mytilene 81100, Greece author Katsanevakis, Stelios https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5137-7540 Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Biology, Department of Ecology, Thessaloniki, GR-54124, Greece author Kallimanis, Athanasios https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7103-9971 Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Biology, Department of Ecology, Thessaloniki, GR-54124, Greece author Tsiafouli, Maria https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0203-8347 The University of Kent, School of Anthropology and Conservation, Marlowe Building, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR, United Kingdom author Bormpoudakis, Dimitrios Department of Ichthyology & Aquatic Environment, School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Thessaly, 384 46 Volos, Greece author Kormas, Konstantinos https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8214-0175 South East Europe Development -SEEDEV, Mihajlo Pupin 10d, Belgrade, Serbia author Arends, Jeroen 2017-07-05 2017-07-05 2017 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 2 e13714 2017 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.050 C Anagnostou author Papathanassiou E author 2005 SoHelME - State of the Hellenic Marine Environment 2005 360 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.003 10.1111/anti.12102 R Barbieri author 2015 Freshwater Fishes and Lampreys of Greece: An annotated checklist. Monographs on Marine Sciences No. 8 2015 130 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.07.003 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.002 10.1371/journal.pone.0082996 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 10.1080/10455752.2016.1260147 Convention on Biological Divesity CBD author text http://www.cbd.int/cop10/insession/ 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.087 10.1525/bio.2012.62.7.8 10.1353/mgs.2002.0021 10.1038/387253a0 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001 G. C. Daily author 1997 Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems 1-55963-475-8 1997 10.1016/0743-0167(96)00017-4 10.1017/s0032247400023779 10.1073/pnas.1305198110 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002 10.1007/s13132-016-0364-x Planning settlements in the Greek islands D, P Dimelli author 2016 text Regional Science Inquiry 2016 8 1 23 38 10.3318/bioe.2006.106.3.175 EASAC author 2009 The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: an interim report. European Communities 2009 10.13140/2.1.3420.2565 10.1017/s0068245400016233 10.1016/j.tree.2015.06.015 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.04.006 10.3389/fenvs.2016.00047 10.17660/actahortic.2000.525.66 10.1016/s0167-8809(98)00119-4 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30016-2 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.054 10.1007/s11629-007-0209-y 10.1017/cbo9780511750458.007 10.1016/j.jep.2004.01.007 Hellenic Ministry of the Environment Energy and Climate Change author 2014 Prioritised action framework (PAF) for Natura 2000 for the EU multiannual financing period 2014-2020 2014 75 Energy and Climate Change Hellenic Ministry of the Environment author 2014 National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 978-960-7284-33-4 2014 132 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.006 10.12681/mms.312 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.023 10.1016/j.socec.2007.06.002 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.05.001 10.5194/nhess-14-143-2014 10.1111/ddi.12429 10.3391/ai.2014.9.4.01 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.07.013 S. Katsanevakis author 2017 Marine Spatial Planning in the Aegean Sea for the Protection and Conervation of Biodiversity (MARISCA), Final Report 2017 10.1007/s11284-015-1314-y 10.1002/ffj.2730040102 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.019 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.006 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.023 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.055 10.1023/A:1008286001085 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.008 10.1080/09640568.2012.738602 10.1504/ier.2015.069413 A. Legakis author 2009 The Red Data Book of Threatened Animals of Greece 2009 528 10.1080/09640560010801 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.02.013 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.06.021 10.1016/j.flora.2007.07.003 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.024 10.1080/13657300701530357 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment author 2005 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis  1-59726-040-1 2005 141 NCMA author http://gis.ktimanet.gr/wms/forestsuspension/default.aspx 10.1007/s00267-010-9575-2 C. Papaconstantinou author 2007 State of Hellenic Fisheries 2007 466 10.1080/14775080801972056 T. Petanidou author R. Neves author 2005 ALAS (All About Salt) – Salt and salinas in the Mediterranean http://www.aegean.gr/alas/final_publ.htm 2005 10.1007/s00267-007-9054-6 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01170.x 10.1093/cjres/rsv028 D Phitos author 2009 The Red Data Book of Rare and Threatened Plants of Greece 2009 D. Phitos author 1995 The Red Data Book of rare and threatened plants of Greece 1995 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.11.019 10.1111/rsp3.12032 D Sakellariou author E Papathanasiou author 2005 SoHelME - State of the Hellenic Marine Environment 2005 360 10.12681/mms.23 10.1016/j.scs.2015.02.001 10.1111/brv.12332 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.014 10.1021/jf950540t 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2003.08.002 10.1007/s10531-009-9722-3 10.1142/s1464333215500374 10.1006/jmsc.2000.0927 E. Sohier author Maria Gravari-Barbas author 2016 Tourism imaginaries at the disciplinary crossroads: Place, practice, media 2016 294 10.1007/s10745-014-9706-0 10.1007/978-3-319-26315-1_15 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.10.005 M. Stithou author 2017 Valuation of basic goods and services of important ecosystems in the Aegean Sea. Marine Spatial Planning for the Protection and Conservation of Biodiversity in the Aegean Sea (MARISCA), Deliverable 4.1 2017 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.010 K. Tan author 2001 Endemic plants of Greece. The Peloponnese 2001 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB T.E.E.B. author 2010 text Environment 2010 69 10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00204-3 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.006 10.1017/s0007485311000149 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.11.007 10.1371/journal.pone.0091001 Tourism planning and policy in selected mountainous areas of Greece A Vlami author 2012 text Tourismos: An international multidisciplinary journal of tourism 2012 7 2 481 494 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.211 10.1016/0378-8741(93)90035-4 10.1016/0167-8809(93)90124-8 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.028 10.1016/j.tmp.2014.02.001 10.1080/09603123.2013.800965 Marine invertebrate diversity in Aristotle's zoology E. Voultsiadou author 2007 text Contributions to Zoology 2007 76 103 120 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.008 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00015 10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.12.006 10.1093/erae/25.1.19 10.1111/j.1365-2664.1998.tb00019.x 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.12.006 10.3897/oneeco.2.e13714 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/13714/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/13714/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/13714/download/xml/ This paper presents the establishment and the first outcomes of the Hellenic Ecosystem Services Partnership (HESP), a scientific-technical committee aiming at the guidance and coordination of the Ecosystem Services (ES) assessment in Greece. HESP consists of experts from different disciplines (ecology, marine biology, socio-ecological system science) and aims to: i) coordinate ES assessment efforts under a shared framework; ii) promote the ES approach in Greece; iii) support the European implementation of ES at the national level (Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem and their Services initiative), and iv) fulfill priority actions regarding the ES implementation and the obligations derived from the National Biodiversity Strategy. In this paper, we present the first drafting of the National Agenda including short- and long-term objectives towards the national implementation of MAES, we outline the HESP Action Plan to 2020, as well as the timeline of the basic steps to be taken, to achieve decision making on the basis of ES maintenance and enhancement. It will also serve as a call for action to encourage more ES assessments at the national level, but also as a primer for the inclusion of protected areas and other areas of special importance for ES assessments at the EU level. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem service mapping IPBES Knowledge overview MAES National biodiversity targets NBSAPs National Committee The need for the implementation of an Ecosystem Services assessment in Greece: drafting the national agenda Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.2.e14021 2017-07-06 oneecosystem

Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Dresden, Germany author Grunewald, Karsten https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5064-3843 Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Dresden, Germany author Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden, Dresden, Germany author Walz, Ulrich https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2001-2386 Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Dresden, Germany author Richter, Benjamin Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Dresden, Germany author Meinel, Gotthard https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9201-7664 Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Dresden, Germany author Herold, Hendrik Ifuplan - Institut für Umweltplanung und Raumentwicklung, Munich, Germany author Marzelli, Stefan 2017-07-06 2017-07-06 2017 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 2 e14021 2017 10.1007/s00038-009-0069-z C. Albert author Bundesverband Beruflicher Naturschutz author 2015 Verantwortung für die Zukunft – Naturschutz im Spannungsfeld gesellschaftlicher Interessen 2015 Development of National Indicators for Ecosystem Services Recommendations for Germany C. Albert author 2015 text Discussion Paper https://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/BfN/service/Dokumente/skripten/skript411.pdf 2015 411 10.14512/gaia.26.1.8 Karte der Bodenarten in Oberböden 1:1.000.000 [Map of topsoils] (BOART1000OB). BGR author text http://www.bgr.bund.de/DE/Themen/Boden/Informationsgrundlagen/Bodenkundliche_Karten_Datenbanken/Themenkarten/BOART1000OB/boart1000ob_node.html Indicator report 2010 to the National Strategy on Biological Diversity. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) BMU author text http://www.biologischevielfalt.de/fileadmin/NBS/indikatoren/Indicator_Report_2010_NBS_Web.pdf R. Brouwer author 2013 A synthesis of approaches to assess and value ecosystem services in the EU in the context of TEEB. Final Report 2013 B Burkhard author 2017 Handbook of Ecosystem Services Mapping 2017 10.3097/LO.201434 Our life insurance, our natural capital: An EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions EC author 2011 text COM 244 final 2011 Ökosysteme und ihre Leistungen erfassen und räumlich darstellen econcept/WSL author text http://www.econcept.ch/uploads/media/Schlussbericht_Oekosysteme_Leistungen_erfassen_raeumlich-darstellen.pdf CLC2006 technical guidelines. EEA Technical report No. 17/2007 EEA author text http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/technical_report_2007_17 SOER 2015 -The European environment - state and outlook 2015. European briefings. Natural capital and ecosystem services EEA author text https://www.eea.europa.eu/soer Digital Basic Landscape Model (AAA Modelling): Basis-DLM (AAA) Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy author text http://www.geodatenzentrum.de/docpdf/basis-dlm-aaa_eng.pdf 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.027 K. Grunewald author 2015 Ecosystem Services. Concept, Methods and Case Studies 2015 10.1080/21513732.2017.1283361 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.010 C. von Haaren author 2004 Landschaftsplanung 2004 W. Haber author 2013 Nachhaltiges Landmanagement, differenzierte Landnutzung und Klimaschutz 2013 Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4 R. Haines-Young author text www.cices.eu and a full spread sheet showing the classification 10.1371/journal.pone.0164460 M. Hovenbitzer author I. Manakos author 2014 Land Use and Land Cover Mapping in Europe: Practices & Trends. Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing 18 2014 J. P. Jäppinen author 2015 Towards A Sustainable and Genuinely Green Economy. The value and social significance of ecosystem services in Finland https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/152815 2015 Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. Indicators for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 J. Maes author 2014 text – Final http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/knowledge/ecosystem_assessment/pdf/2ndMAESWorkingPaper.pdf 2014 080 Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020.Technical Report - 2013 – 067, Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg J. Maes author text http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/knowledge/ecosystem_assessment/pdf/MAESWorkingPaper2013.pdf Die Erfassung von Ökosystemleistungen. Erste Schritte für eine Nutzung des Konzepts auf nationaler Ebene für Deutschland S. Marzelli author 2014 text Natur und Landschaft 2014 89 66 73 Ecosystems and human well-being. Synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC MEA author text http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018 10.1093/biosci/biw101 Indikatoren für Ökosystemdienstleistungen: Systematik, Methodik und Umsetzungsempfehlung für eine wohlfahrtsbezogene Umweltberichterstattung C. Staub author text http://www.bafu.admin.ch/publikationen/publikation/01587/index.html?lang=de Indicators of a nationwide monitoring of ecosystem services exemplified by the mitigation of water erosion R. U. Syrbe author 2017 text Ecol. Indicators 2017 R. U. Syrbe author B. Burkhard author 2017 Ecosystem Services Mapping 2017 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.040 Indikatoren zur „Regulationsleistung von Auen“ - Ein Beitrag zum Konzept nationale Ökosystemleistungs-Indikatoren Deutschland U. Walz author 2017 text Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 2017 49 3 93 100 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14021 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14021/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14021/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14021/download/xml/ The obligations of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 are generating a need to create national maps and monitoring systems for the state of biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES) on the basis of indicators. The paper gives an overview of the ecosystem services indicators being developed for Germany in the context of ongoing research projects. Additionally, it provides the indicator specifications, which are aligned with the EU MAES framework concepts (initiative on Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services). We illustrate aspects of data selection, calculation and negotiation procedures, results and target values in general and by way of examples. The German indicator-based approach presents measures and sums up ES in their spatial expression and temporal change and compares them with objectives. As far as possible, this is carried out according to the demand-supply concept. A prioritization of ES classes to be processed was carried out in the framework of an expert-based assessment. The results indicated that 21 of the 48 CICES classes (Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services) were most relevant for Germany in recent years. We proposed a total of 51 indicators, of which 14 indicators for 4 ES classes were accepted, implemented and published by the end of 2016. The development of ES maps and the indicator-based assessment on a national scale is a process. Consequently, the necessary further steps are shown. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Biodiversity CICES-classification ecosystem condition flood protection MAES-framework soil erosion urban green space wood accrual Germany’s Ecosystem Services – State of the Indicator Development for a Nationwide Assessment and Monitoring Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.2.e13738 2017-07-26 oneecosystem

Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Montpellier, France Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (ULg), Gembloux, Belgium author Jacquemin, Floriane Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Montpellier, France author Violle, Cyrille Université de Mons, Mons, Belgium author Rasmont, Pierre https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0891-2189 Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (ULg), Gembloux, Belgium author Dufrêne, Marc https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5664-9955 2017-07-26 2017-07-26 2017 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 2 e13738 2017 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01306.x 10.1007/s10530-012-0311-0 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00011-9 W. Beyou author 2016 EFESE - Le service de pollinisation 2016 46 10.1126/science.1127863 10.1007/s10646-012-0863-x 10.1007/s13593-015-0302-5 10.1073/pnas.1014743108 10.1111/ele.12121 Etat des lieux des flux céréaliers en Wallonie selon différentes filières d'utilisation A. Delcour author 2014 text Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement 2014 18 2 181 192 N. Gallai author 2009 Guidelines for the economic valuation of pollination services at a national scale 2009 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.014 10.1126/science.1230200 10.4161/cib.2.1.7425 10.1126/science.1255957 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2010.00098.x 10.1098/rspb.2008.0405 IPBES author 2016 The assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production 2016 552 10.1073/pnas.1208682110 10.1890/07-1275.1 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721 10.1017/S0030605307001597 C. Kremen author A. J. A. Stewart author 2007 Insect Conservation Biology: Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society's 23nd Symposium 978-1-84593-254-1 2007 Analyse des 1600 premieres cartes de l' atlas provisoire des insectes de Belgique, et premiere liste rouge d' insectes menaces dans la faune belge. J. Leclercq author 1980 text Notes Fauniques de Gembloux (Belgium) 1980 4 1 104 10.1093/aob/mcp069 10.1007/s13592-012-0170-9 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007 10.1038/nature20588 First estimation of faunistic drift by bumblebees of Belgium, (Hymenoptera: Apidae). - Première estimation de la dérive faunique chez les bourdons de la Belgique (Hymenoptera : Apidae) P. Rasmont author 1988 text Annales de la Societe Royale Zoologique de Belgique 1988 118 141 147 10.3897/biorisk.10.4749 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x 10.1111/ele.12128 10.1098/rspb.2015.0294 I. Steffan-Dewenter author N. M. Nickolas author 2006 Plant-pollination interactions; from specialization to generalization 0-226-87400-1 2006 10.1098/rspb.2008.0709 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.001 10.1890/08-1245.1 10.3897/oneeco.2.e13738 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/13738/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/13738/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/13738/download/xml/ text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Crop biodiversity pollination service dependency ratio vulnerability index. Mapping the dependency of crops on pollinators in Belgium Ecosystem Service Mapping

10.3897/oneeco.2.e13708 2017-08-30 oneecosystem

Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM), 52109 Kepong, Selangor, Malaysia author Salleh, Norzielawati Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM), 52109 Kepong, Selangor, Malaysia author Azeman, Syazwani Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM), 52109 Kepong, Selangor, Malaysia author Kiew, Ruth Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM), 52109 Kepong, Selangor, Malaysia author Kamin, Imin Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM), 52109 Kepong, Selangor, Malaysia author Chung, Richard Cheng Kong https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2438-6126 2017-08-30 2017-08-30 2017 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 2 e13708 2017 D. Bridson author 1992 The Herbarium Handbook 1992 303 I. H Burkill author 1927 Botanical Collectors, Collections and Collecting Places in the Malay Peninsula. 1927 4 113-202 L. S.L Chua author 2010 Malaysia Plant Red List: Peninsular Malaysian Dipterocarpaceae. 2010 210 E. J.H Corner author 1988 Wayside Trees of Malaya 1988 1&2 774 M. R. Henderson author 1928 The Flowering Plants of Kuala Lumpur, in The Malay Peninsula. 1928 4 211-373 IUCN author 2001 IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1.IUCN Species Survival Commission. 2001 JPSM author 2007 Rancangan Pengurusan Hutan Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur. 2007 289 B. H. Kiew author 1985 Malaysia’s 10 most endangered animals, plants and areas. 1985 38 2-6 R. Kiew author 1997 Asystasia (Acanthaceae) in Malaysia. 1997 52 965-971 R. Kiew author 2010 Seed Plants. Flora of Peninsular Malaysia. Series II. 2010 1 235 R. Kiew author 2011 Seed Plants. Flora of Peninsular Malaysia. Series II 2011 2 235 R. Kiew author 2012 Seed Plants. Flora of Peninsular Malaysia, Series II. 2012 3 385 R. Kiew author 2013 Seed Plants. Flora of Peninsular Malaysia, Series II. 2013 4 405 R. Kiew author 2015 Seed Plants. Flora of Peninsular Malaysia, Series II. 2015 5 319 J. ). K.M Kochummen (Wyatt-Smith author 1999 Pocket checklist of timber trees. 3rd revision. Malayan Forest Records No. 17 1999 367 A. Latiff author 2010 Bukit Nanas Forest Reserve Green Lung of Kuala Lumpur. 2010 98 B. C. Min author 2014 Plants in Tropical Cities. 2014 990 Bukit Nanas secret tunnel found V. Nair author text http://www.thestar.com.my/metro/community/2015/01/19/part-of-bukit-nanas-secret-tunnel-made-public/ F. S. P. Ng author 1978 Tree Flora of Malaya 1978 3 339 F. S. P. Ng author 1989 Tree Flora of Malaya 1989 4 54 B. S. Parris author 2013 Ferns and lycophytes. Flora of Peninsular Malaysia, Series I. 2013 2 24 B. S. Parris author 2010 Ferns and lycophytes. Flora of Peninsular Malaysia, Series I. 2010 1 249 F. E. Putz author 1978 A survey of virgin jungle reserves in Peninsular Malaysia.Research Pamphlet 1978 73 H. N. Ridley author 1922 The Flora of the Malay Peninsula 1922 1 912 H. N. Ridley author 1923 The flora of the Malay Peninsula 1923 2 672 H. N. Ridley author 1924 The Flora of the Malay Peninsula 1924 3 405 H. N. Ridley author 1924 The Flora of the Malay Peninsula 1924 4 383 H. N. Ridley author 1925 The flora of the Malay Peninsula 1925 5 470 L. G. Saw author R. Kiew author 2010 Flora of Peninsular Malaysia, Serie II. Seed plants 2010 1 21-45 Van Steenis-Kruseman author 1950 Malaysian plant collectors and collections being a cyclopaedia of botanical exploration in Malaysia and a guide to the concerned literature up to the year 1950 1950 115 The Plant List: A Working List of All Plant Species The Plant List author text http://www.theplantlist.org/ The Star author 1986 Malayan Naturalist 1986 1 34 I. M. Turner author 1997 A catalogue of the vascular plants of Malaya 1997 47 1-757 T. C. Whitmore author 1972 Tree Flora of Malaya 1972 1 473 T. C. Whitmore author 1973 Tree Flora of Malaya 1973 2 444 10.3897/oneeco.2.e13708 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/13708/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/13708/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/13708/download/xml/ Bukit Nanas Forest Reserve, the oldest forest reserve in Malaysia established in 1900, lies in the center of Kuala Lumpur, the capital city. Over time it has been reduced from 17.5 ha to 9.37 ha but still retains important biodiversity. Its lowland equatorial rain forest has never been logged and tall emergent species to 35 m tall and 124 cm diameter persist. Since 1900, 499 plant species (2 lycophytes, 25 ferns, 39 monocots and 433 dicots) have been recorded. This year-long survey refound 425 species, including the rare Tarenna rudis (Rubiaceae), a local endemic found only in Selangor state. The multi-layered structure of lowland dipterocarp forest (16 Diperocarpaceae species were recorded) is intact. However, with diminishing size, the edge effect is more pronounced with secondary forest species, from trees to herbs, becoming established. In 2009, declared as the KL Forest Eco Park, it is important for its biodiversity, history, accessibility to the public for recreation (forest walks), scientific study, education (natural history, bird-watching, etc), as well as serving as a green lung in the bustling city. Baseline data, such as this survey, enables scientific management that will maintain the forest structure and biodiversity. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Inventory Bukit Nanas Forest Reserve biodiversity common species invasive species cultivated species Plant Checklist of the Bukit Nanas Forest Reserve, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Ecosystem Inventory

10.3897/oneeco.2.e13718 2017-09-08 oneecosystem

Department of Biological Applications & Technology, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece author Nikolaidou, Charitini Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece author Votsi, Nefta Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece author Sgardelis, Steanos Department of Biological Applications & Technology, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece author Halley, John Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece author Pantis, John Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece author Tsiafouli, Maria https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0203-8347 2017-09-08 2017-09-08 2017 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 2 e13718 2017 project Securing the Conservation of biodiversity across Administrative Levels and spatial, temporal, and Ecological Scales SCALES 226852 funder European Commission 10.13039/501100000780 10.1111/1467-9523.00185 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.021 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.016 G. Bennett author 2004 Integrating biodiversity conservation and sustainable use: lessons learned from ecological networks. 2004 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.009 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011 H. Briassoulis author 2009 Factors influencing land-use and land-cover change. UNESCO encyclopedia of life support systems 2009 126 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007 10.3097/LO.200915 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.02.012 10.1073/pnas.1525002113 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.028 R. Costanza author 2016 The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital (1997) 2016 117 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 10.1002/eet.553 10.1080/13504509.2016.1146176 10.1080/07438140809354065 10.1371/journal.pone.0166595 Elevation map of Europe EEA author 2004 text www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/digital-elevation-model-of-europe 2004 Natura 2000 Network EEA author 2014 text www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/natura-6/natura-2000-spatial-data/natura-2000-shapefile-1 2014 Corine Land Cover 2000 seamless vector data EEA author 2016 text www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/clc-2000-vector-6 2016 ArcGIS ESRI author 2010 text 2010 10.3389/fenvs.2016.00047 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.010 Water Basins (Special Secretariat for Water) Geodata.gov author text http://geodata.gov.gr/en/dataset/lekanes-aporroes-eidike-grammateia-udaton 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.019 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.004 IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows IBM Corp author 2012 text IBM Corp 2012 S. Jackson author 2008 Tranquility Mapping: Developing a robust methodology for planning support. Report to the Campaign to Protect Rural England: Centre for Environmental & Spatial Analysis 2008 218 Arable land and habitat diversity in Natura 2000 sites in Greece A. S. Kallimanis author 2008 text Journal of Biological Research 2008 9 55 66 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.006 P Kumar author 2010 Valuation of regulating services of ecosystems: methodology and applications 2010 10.1080/09644010412331308254 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.004 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.016 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 10.3389/fenvs.2016.00074 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.05.025 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.010 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.11.003 10.1016/S0003-682X(02)00103-2. 10.1073/pnas.0907284107 Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services J. P. Rodriguez author 2006 text Ecology and Society http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art28/ 2006 11 1 28 10.1007/s00267-011-9751-z 10.1016/S0303-2434(01)85024-8 Reducing unavoidable nutrient losses from Florida's horticultural crops S. Shukla author 2010 text HortTechnology 2010 20 1 52 66 10.3389/fpls.2016.00363 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x 10.3389/fevo.2017.00097 10.1007/s00267-013-0036-6 10.1111/gcb.12752 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.021 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.012 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.211 10.1017/S0376892913000362 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.004 D Wallace author 2008 Technical Report: Noise Action Plans Strategic Environmental Assessment: Environmental Report 2008 67 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00015 10.3897/oneeco.2.e13718 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/13718/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/13718/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/13718/download/xml/ The implementation of the Ecosystem Service (ES) concept into practice might be a challenging task as it has to take into account previous “traditional” policies and approaches that have evaluated nature and biodiversity differently. Among them the Habitat (92/43/EC) and Bird Directives (79/409/EC), the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC), and the Noise Directive (2002/49/EC) have led to the evaluation/designation of areas in Europe with different criteria. In this study our goal was to understand how the ES capacity of an area is related to its designation and if areas with multiple designations have higher capacity in providing ES.We selected four catchments in Greece with a great variety of characteristics covering over 25% of the national territory. Inside the catchments we assessed the ES capacity (following the methodology of Burkhard et al. 2009) of areas designated as Natura 2000 sites, Quiet areas and Wetlands or Water bodies and found those areas that have multiple designations. Data were analyzed by GLM to reveal differences regarding the ES capacity among the different types of areas. We also investigated by PCA synergies and trade-offs among different kinds of ES and tested for correlations among landscape properties, such as elevation, aspect and slope and the ES potential.Our results show that areas with different types or multiple designations have a different capacity in providing ES. Areas of one designation type (Protected or Quiet Areas) had in general intermediate scores in most ES but scores were higher compared to areas with no designation, which displayed stronger capacity in provisioning services. Among Protected Areas and Quiet Areas the latter scored better in general. Areas that combined both designation types (Protected and Quiet Areas) showed the highest capacity in 13 out of 29 ES, that were mostly linked with natural and forest ecosystems. We found significant synergies among most regulating, supporting and cultural ES which in turn display trade-offs with provisioning services. The different ES are spatially related and display strong correlation with landscape properties, such as elevation and slope. We suggest that the designation status of an area can be used as an alternative tool for environmental policy, indicating the capacity for ES provision. Multiple designations of areas can be used as proxies for locating ES “hotspots”. This integration of “traditional” evaluation and designation and the “newer” ES concept forms a time- and cost-effective way to be adopted by stakeholders and policy-makers in order to start complying with new standards and demands for nature conservation and environmental management. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem Services hotspots Natura 2000 Quiet Protected Areas Biodiversity Agriculture Elevation Slope Ecosystem Service trade-offs and synergies  cultural services provisioning services regulating services supporting services Ecosystem Service capacity is higher in areas of multiple designation types Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.2.e14814 2017-10-09 oneecosystem

Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute, Ås, Norway author Skre, Oddvar 2017-10-09 2017-10-09 2017 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 2 e14814 2017 O. Andersen author 2009 Spørreundersøkelse blant rypejegere etter jaktsesongen 2006/07. Datagrunnlag og noen sentrale funn 2006-2011. NINA Rapport 379 2009 O. Andersen author 2010 Undersøkelse blant rettighetshavere i Rypeforvaltnings- prosjektet 2006-2011. Datagrunnlag og noen sentrale funn. NINA Rapport 433 2010 C. W. Armstrong author 2008 Økonomisk verdsetting av havmiljø – Anvendelse på havområdene i Lofoten-Vesterålen 2008 L. Asheim author 2006 Verdi av for frå utmarksbeite og sysselsetting I beitebaserte næringar. Notat 2006-15 0805-9691 2006 Naturens flomdemping – hva er den økonomiske verdien av flomdemping fra et nedbørsfelt? D. Barton author 2013 text Samfunnsøkonomen 2013 4 44 54 10.6027/tn2012-506 10.6027/tn2009-591 I. Bjørdal author 2007 Markslagklassifikasjon I økonomisk kartverk 2007 10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00013-0 H O Bråtå author 2010 Villrein og villreinfjellet som kolde til verdiskaping og samfunnsutvikling 2010 G. Breivik author 2011 Fysisk aktivitet; omfang, tilrettelegging og sosial ulikhet, (UMB) Report 2011 P. Brink author 2008 Measuring Benefits from Ecosystem Services – Integrating Monetary and non-monetary Estimates 2008 R. Brouwer author 2013 A synthesis of approaches to assess and value ecosystem services in the EU in the context of TEEB 2013 144 10.1080/00291950802517551 10.1038/nature11148 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.028 Estimates of monetary values of ecosystem services R. S. De Groot author P. Kumar author 2010 text The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations 2010 S. Hågvar author 2001 Norsk naturarv – våre naturverdier I internasjonalt lys 2001 254 R Haines-Young author 2013 Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES). Consultation on Version 4 (2012) 2013 N. Hanley author 2009 Pricing Nature: Cost-benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy 9781845427894 2009 K. Henriksen author 2012 Verdiskaping og sysselsetting i norsk sjømatnæring 2010 – en ringvirkningsanalyse 2012 10.6027/tn2012-559 Elvene rundt Trondheimsfjorden: laks og verdiskaping J. Kjelden author 2012 text Temabooklet 48 2012 l. Klethagen author 2005 Er økt oljevernberedskap samfunnsøkonomisk lønnsomt? En betinget verdssettingsstudie av økt oljevernberedskap M.Sc. Thesis 2005 N. Kurtze author 2009 Analyse og dokumentasjon av friluftslivets effect på folkehelse og livskvalitet 2009 10.3354/cr01454 A. Lindgaard author 2011 Norsk rødliste for naturtyper 2011 2011 10.1016/j.jfe.2006.09.003 Henrik Lindhjem author 2012 Verdier av økosystemtjenester i skog i Norge. NINA Rapport 894 2012 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.002 H. Lindhjem author 2012 Urbane økosystemtjenester I Norge; Status, utvikling, Verdi og kunnskapshull. Report Vista Analysis no. 2012/37 2012 10.2779/12398 K. Magnussen author 1992 Valuation of Reduced Water Pollution Using the Contingent Valuation Method; Methodology and Empirical Results 1992 K. Magnussen author 1995 Overføring av nytte-estimater: Status for Norge og utprøving knyttet til vannkvalitet. NIVA-rapport 3257 1995 K. Magnussen author 2010 Verdsetting av marine økosystemtjenester; Metoder og eksempler, Report TA-2582 2010 10.4337/9781845420680.00014 10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00082-9 A. Norderhaug author 2013 Skjøtselboka for kulturlandskap og gamle norske kulturmarker 2013 NOU author 2013 Naturens goder – om verdier av økosystemtjenester https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/c7ffd2c437bf4dcb9880ceeb8b03b3d5/no/pdfs/nou201320130010000dddpdfs.pdf 2013 10 430 10.1080/00291951.2012.743168 T. Olafsen author 2012 Verdiskaping baser på productive hav i 2050. Report KNVS/NTVA 2012 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.01.001 S. Pagiola author 2004 How much is an ecosystem worth? Assessing the economic value of conservation 2004 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.12.001 10.2307/3802260 G. M. Rusch author 2012 Klima og økosystemtjenester. Norske økosystemers potensial for avbøting av og tilpasning til klima endringer. NINA Rapport 792 2012 N. Sælthun author 2000 Økonomisk risikoanalyse for flommer.HYDRA rapport R03 2000 Rypejakt i Norge Forvaltning og økonomi A. Skonhoft author 2010 text Samfunnsøkonomen 2010 8 41 53 SSB author 2012 Statistical Yearbook of Norway 978-82-537-8490-8 2012 131 397 SSB author 2013 Statistical Yearbook of Norway 978-82-537-8738-1 2013 132 397 Statens Kartverk author 1996 Nasjonalatlas for Norge 82-573-0746-7 1996 TEEB author 2008 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity - An Interim Report 2008 TEEB author 2009 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for National and International Policy Makers - Summary: Responding to the Value of Nature 2009 10.1046/j.1365-2400.2003.00376.x 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.08.038 Overvåking av vinterbeite i Indre Finnmark 2013 H. A. Tømmervik author 2013 text NINA Report 1066 2013 Ø. Totland author 2013 Kunnskapsstatus for insektpollinering i Norge – betydningen av det komplekse samspillet mellom planter og insekter 2013 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14814 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14814/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14814/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14814/download/xml/ The present study is reviewing public reports and research articles in order to estimate and validate ecosystem services in Norway, and investigate conflicts between stakeholders representing different ecosystem services, by means of direct and indirect methods, for different main ecosystem categories,e.g. mountain ecosystems, forests,agricultural areas, freshwater ecosystems, marine ecosystems and urban areas. The ecosystem services (ES) are based on the three main well-known categories (providing, regulating and cultural services). The provisional services in Norway include some very important ES like fish & seafood production, timber and pulp products, bioenergy and genetic resources, while the regulating services in Norway include important services like flood and landslide protection, pest and disease control in forestry and farming, carbon fixation in forests and air quality regulation. These services are also influenced by climate, pollution, urbanization and invasive species. Finally, the cultural services, like recreation & ecotourism, health and well-being, knowledge & learning and spiritual enrichment, are included. The values of the ES are estimated and quantified by direct (market based) and indirect methods (e.g. preferences). The relative importance of these ES is estimated by questionnaires and cost/benefit analysis, and administrative measures are suggested to compensate for threats and lack of sustainability. However, non-renewable resources like oil, gas and minerals are not included in the present overview. Among the ES in mountains, the value of outdoor activity as estimated from preference studies is totally dominating over the value of hunting and reindeer husbandry. Among the ES in forests the highest values are related to the health benefit from recreation, followed by the value of carbon fixation. The willingness to protect certain forests with high biodiversity is also high. Among ES from agricultural areas the provisional services (food and food processing) are dominating, while in freshwater ecosystems the value of wild salmon fishing measured by payment willingness, is dominating over the willingness to pay for improved water quality. Finally, the most important ES in Norway in monetary terms are found in marine ecosystems. Among the urban ES, the value of outdoor recreation and improved air quality represent the highest values. The most frequent conflicts in Norway are probably those dealing with energy production (windmills, hydropower production, oil drilling) and sea farming vs. biodiversity and recreation, between mass tourism and nature conservation and between sheep farming and conservation of big predators like wolf, bear, lynx and wolverine. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem services validation use and non-use values conflicts between ES employment Climate land-use direct/indirect methods. Ecosystem services in Norway Review Article

10.3897/oneeco.2.e14808 2017-10-09 oneecosystem

The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, United Kingdom author Nijnik, Maria The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, United Kingdom author Miller, David 2017-10-09 2017-10-09 2017 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 2 e14808 2017 project Social Innovation in Marginalised Rural Areas SIMRA 677622 funder European Commission 10.13039/501100000780 W. L. Adamowicz author K. G. Willis author 1995 Environmental Valuation: New Perspectives 1995 K. Arrow author 2001 Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation 2001 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.005 Virtual Reality for Mutual Understanding in Landscape Planning J. Ball author 2007 text International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering http://waset.org/publications/15015 2007 1 11 661 671 I. J. Bateman author 1999 Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries 1999 10.1007/s10640-010-9418-x I. J. Bateman author 2002 Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual 2002 W. J. Baumol author 1988 The Theory of Environmental Policy 1988 R. C. Bishop author 1998 Environmental Resource Valuation: Applications of the Contingent Valuation Method in Italy 1998 E. S. Brondizio author E. F. Moran author 2005 Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Human-Environment Interactions in Forest Ecosystems 2005 K. Brown author 1993 Economics and the conservation of global biological diversity. Global Environment Facility (GEF) working paper; no. 2. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/539651467997912719/Economics-and-the-conservation-of-global-biological-diversity 1993 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.004 Multi-Scale Modelling of Ecosystem Services - an Iterative Approach M. S. Castellazzi author D. A. Swayne author 2010 text Proceedings - Conference Edition http://www.iemss.org/iemss2010/papers/S06/S.06.07.Multiscale%20modelling%20of%20ecosystem%20services%20an%20iterative%20approach%20-%20MARIE%20CASTELLAZZI.pdf 2010 10.1073/pnas.1525002113 10.1016/j.jfe.2007.02.005 S. V. Ciriacy-Wantrup author 1968 Resource conservation: economics and policies 1968 M. Clawson author 1966 Economics of Outdoor Recreation. 1966 R. Costanza author G. C. Daily author 1997 Nature's Services: Societal Dependence On Natural Ecosystems 1997 10.1038/387253a0 B. Czech author 2001 The Endangered Species Act 2001 G. C. Daily author 2002 The New Economy of Nature: The Quest to Make Conservation Profitable 2002 10.4337/9781847206947 10.1073/pnas.1114773109 Recreation planning as an economic problem R. K. Davis author 1963 text Natural Resources Journal 1963 3 2 239 249 10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00089-7 Food and Rural Affairs Department for Environment author 2007 An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69192/pb12852-eco-valuing-071205.pdf 2007 Food and Rural Affairs Department for Environment author 2010 Payments for Ecosystem Services: A short introduction 2010 Food and Rural Affairs Department for Environment author 2011 The Natural Choice: securing the value of nature https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228842/8082.pdf 2011 J. A. Dixon author 1994 Economic analysis of environmental impacts http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/272091487845936282/pdf/110201-PUB-Box396328B-PUBLIC-Economic-Analysis-Of-Environmental-Impacts-1994.pdf 1994 A. Eastwood author 2013 Nature conservation and ecosystem service delivery. JNCC Report 492 http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/pdf/Report492_webc.pdf 2013 D. Edwards author 2009 A valuation of the economic and social contribution of forestry for people in Scotland https://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/fcrp101.pdf/$FILE/fcrp101.pdf 2009 European Environment Agency author 2010 Europe's ecological backbone: recognising the true value of our mountains. EEA Report 6/2010 https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/europes-ecological-backbone/at_download/file 2010 10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00088-5 10.1080/00207238308710059 10.1007/s10531-011-9998-y Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations author text http://www.fao.org/forestry/fra/fra2010/en/ 10.1016/s0921-8009(96)00092-4 A. Gelan author 2007 Examining the commercial potential of recreation on the National Forest Estate in Scotland 2007 P. Glaves author 2009 Valuing Ecosystem Services in the East of England 2009 10.1016/s1389-9341(02)00012-6 10.1007/bf00691932 N. Hanley author 1993 Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment 1 85278455 5 1993 N. Hanley author 2002 Social & Environmental Benefits of Forestry Phase 2: Valuing the benefits of biodiversity in forests. Report to Forestry Commission Edinburgh https://www.cbd.int/financial/values/unitedkingdom-valueforests.pdf 2002 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005 10.12942/lrlr-2011-1 G. Hill author 2003 Forests' Role in Tourism: Phase 2. Main report - final for the Forestry Group (Economics & Statistics) of the Forestry Commission 2003 HM Treasury author 2011 The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/220541/green_book_complete.pdf 2011 K. M. Jakobsson author 1996 Contingent Valuation and Endangered Species: Methodological Issues and Applications 1996 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.002 10.1016/j.forpol.2004.03.005 Stakeholder Perspectives on Appropriate Forest Management in the Pacific Northwest A. R. Kearney author 1999 text Forest Science 1999 45 1 62 73 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.006 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.001 10.1080/09640560500067558 M. Kettunen author 2006 Value of biodiversity: Documenting EU exampleswhere biodiversity loss has led to the loss of ecosystem services. Final report for theEuropean Commission http://www.ieep.org.uk/publications/pdfs/2006/Value_of_biodiversity-June_06.pdf 2006 N. Landell-Mills author 2002 Silver bullet or fools' gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor. Instruments for sustainable private sector forestry series. https://www.cbd.int/doc/external/iied/iied-silver-report-2002-en.pdf 2002 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.008 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment author 2005 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf 2005 10.1007/978-1-4020-8952-7_16 D. R. Miller author 2006 Visualization tools for public participation in the management of landscape changes (VisuLands). Final Report 2006 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.12.040 10.1023/a:1016234224819 Natural England author 2010 Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment: The national survey on people and the natural environment. Annual Report from the 2009-10 survey. http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/file/72039 2010 Valuation Methods and Guidelines. The Economic, Social and Ecological Value of Ecosystem Services Nature Valuation Organization author text http://www.fsd.nl/naturevaluation/72915/71609 10.1016/0377-841x(79)90041-x 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.03.007 Linking Multi-Functional Forestry Goals with Sustainable Development Objectives: A Multi-National Q-Study M. Nijnik author 2013 text Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning http://geografie.ubbcluj.ro/ccau/jssp/arhiva_si2_2013/01JSSPSI022013.pdf 2013 2 185 190 10.1139/cjfr-2015-0399 10.1155/2012/295414 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.10.002 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.03.001 10.1080/14728028.2010.9752677 10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v05i11/51954 10.1016/s0921-8009(01)00233-6 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.013 S. O'Gorman author 2008 Valuing England's Terrestrial Ecosystem Services, a report to Defra. http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=NR0108_7324_FRA.pdf 2008 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[3275:iittbt]2.0.co;2 S. Pagiola author S. Pagiola author 2002 Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-based mechanisms for conservation and development 2002 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006 D. Pearce author 2002 Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: Summary Guide http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120919132719/http:/www.communities.gov.uk/documents/corporate/pdf/146871.pdf 2002 C. Phillips author 2009 What is Cost-Effectiveness? www.bandolier.org.uk/painres/download/whatis/Cost-effect.pdf 2009 The value of valuing ecosystem services I. Porras author text https://www.iied.org/value-valuing-ecosystem-services 10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00183-4 A. Randall author R. Dorfman author 1993 Economics of the Environment: Selected Readings 1993 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.033 10.1007/bf01405730 10.1086/260169 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.006 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007 Scottish Executive author 2006 The Scottish Forestry Strategy http://scotland.forestry.gov.uk/images/corporate/pdf/scottish-forestry-strategy-2006.pdf 2006 Scottish Executive author 2007 Community Engagement: "Planning with People". Planning Advice Note 81 2007 Scottish Government author 2009 The Scottish Government's Rationale for Woodland Expansion http://scotland.forestry.gov.uk/images/corporate/pdf/ForestExpansion.pdf 2009 Scottish Government author 2016 An introduction to Scotland's National Performance Framework (NPF) http://www.gov.scot/Resource/0049/00495539.pdf 2016 Scottish Government author 2016 Getting the best from our land: A Land Use Strategy for Scotland 2016-2021 http://www.gov.scot/Resource/0050/00505253.pdf 2016 Co-constructing a new framework for evaluating social innovation in marginalised rural areas. L. Secco author European Society for Rural Sociology author 2017 text XXVII European Societyfor Rural Sociology conference 2017 L. Shabman author 2004 Past, Present, and Future of Wetlands Credit Sales. Discussion Paper 04-48 http://www.rff.org/Documents/RFF-DP-04-48.pdf 2004 Public Good Valuation at Macaulay: An Introduction B. Slee author 2008 text MLURI working paper 2008 10.3197/096327108x303882 10.3197/096327110x12699420220473 R. N. Stavins author J. D. Donahue author 2002 Market-based governance: supply side, demand side, upside, and downside 2002 10.1002/(sici)1520-6688(199922)18:33.0.co;2-k 10.1023/A:1008344604392 TEEB author 2010 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB http://doc.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/Study%20and%20Reports/Reports/Synthesis%20report/TEEB%20Synthesis%20Report%202010.pdf 2010 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05280.x Sustainable Development Goals United Nations author text http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) author 1998 Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention). (entered into force on 30 October 2001) http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/pp/documents/cep43e.pdf 1998 URS Scott Wilson Ltd. author 2011 Barriers and Opportunities to the Use of Payments for Ecosystem Services: Final Report http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=PESFinalReport28September2011(FINAL).pdf 2011 10.1016/s0167-8809(97)00017-0 S. Vermeulen author 2002 Integrating global and local values: A review of biodiversity assessment http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/9100IIED.pdf 2002 K. G. Willis author 2003 Social & Environmental Benefits of Forestry Phase 2: The social and environmental benefits of forests in Great Britain. Report to Forestry Commission Edinburgh https://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/sebreport0703.pdf/$file/sebreport0703.pdf 2003 10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00092-7 B. T. Yates author 1999 Measuring and Improving Cost, Cost-Effectiveness, and Cost-Benefit for Substance Abuse Treatment Programs: A Manual https://archives.drugabuse.gov/pdf/Costs.pdf 1999 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14808 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14808/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14808/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14808/download/xml/ The valuation of ecosystem services (ES) employs a range of methods. Based on a literature review and selected empirical examples, we consider major opportunities and challenges in ecosystem services valuation. We analyse when different valuation methods are appropriate and most useful. We demonstrate that mechanisms to capture benefits and costs are needed; and that the use of valuation should be incorporated more widely in decision-making. However, we argue that ecosystems are complex systems: neither the ecosystems or the services that they provide are a sum, but are an interrelated system of components. If a component vanishes the whole system may collapse. Therefore, critical natural capital management, in particular, cannot rely on monetary values; whilst the maintanance of the whole system should be considered. Monetary valuation of biodiversity and landscapes is also problematic because of their uniqueness and distinctiveness, a shortage of robust primary valuations, and numerous complexities and uncertainties. We conclude that mixed method and deliberative discourse techniques, as well as proper integration of research tools, should be more widely applied to help decision-makers and the public to understand and assess changes in ES. The approaches developed and tested by us, as presented in this paper, can provide more complete, comprehensive and impartial insights into a range of benefits that humans derive from ecosystems. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Natural assets public goods forest sustainability non-monetary valuation mixed methods Scotland Valuation of ecosystem services: paradox or Pandora’s box for decision-makers? Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.2.e14014 2017-11-23 oneecosystem

Norwegian Institution for Nature Research, Lillehammer, Norway author Stange, Erik https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6939-7972 European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate D - Sustainable Resources, Unit D3 - Land Resources, Ispra, Italy author Zulian, Grazia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9951-6765 Norwegian Institution for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway author Rusch, Graciela https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3769-8345 Norwegian Institution for Nature Research, Oslo, Norway author Barton, David N. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6501-9381 Norwegian Institution for Nature Research, Oslo, Norway author Nowell, Megan 2017-11-23 2017-11-23 2017 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 2 e14014 2017 project OPERATIONALISATION OF NATURAL CAPITAL AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: FROM CONCEPTS TO REAL-WORLD APPLICATIONS OPENNESS 308428 funder European Commission 10.13039/501100000780 Dharam P Abrol author 2012 Pollination Biology 2012 45 10.1371/journal.pone.0005574 To Bee or Not to Bee Karin Alton author 2013 text The Biologist 2013 60 4 12 15 10.1098/rspb.2014.2849 10.1111/afe.12204 10.1007/s10841-011-9419-2 10.1073/pnas.1218503110 Integrated valuation of ecosystem services. Guidelines and experiences. D. Barton author 2017 text EU FP7 OpenNESS Project Deliverable 33-44 2017 (Dis)integrated valuation: narrowing the gap between ecosystem service appraisals and governance support. D. N. Barton author in press text Ecosystem Services in press 10.1371/journal.pone.0023459 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00443.x 10.1139/gen-2015-0200 10.1111/icad.12019 10.1007/s11252-015-0488-y 10.1111/een.12227 10.1111/icad.12071 10.1086/419860 10.1111/conl.12263 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0632:CRWADB]2.0.CO;2 10.1603/EN13078 10.1016/j.agee.2009.05.001 10.1111/ele.12121 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01587.x 10.1890/10-0677.1 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.008 10.1073/pnas.1525002113 10.1080/00218839.1997.11100932 10.3389/fevo.2015.00044 10.1371/journal.pone.0093495 10.1007/s13592-014-0302-5 Dancing Bees Communicate a Foraging Preference for Rural Lands in High-Level Agri-Environment Schemes M. J. Couvillon author 2014 text Current Biology 2014 24 1212 1215 10.1242/bio.20121099 E Crane author 1990 Bees and beekeeping: science, practice and world resources 1990 Practical pollination ecology A. Dafni author A. Dafni author 2005 text Practical pollination ecology 0968012307 2005 590 10.1038/268228a0 10.1111/plb.12437 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.011 10.1111/een.12226 Land Cover 2000 (CLC2000) raster data—version 13 (02/2010) EEA author 2010 text Land Cover 2000 (CLC2000) raster data—version 13 (02/2010) 2010 10.1603/0013-8746-101.6.1067 10.2317/0407.08.1 10.1371/journal.pone.0109363 10.1111/icad.12085 10.1007/s11252-014-0403-y 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00641.x 10.1038/srep02779 10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.008 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132355 10.1007/s10841-008-9140-y 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.06.017 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01872.x 10.1007/s10980-015-0337-7 Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) Software Grass Development Team author 2016 text Open Source Geospatial Foundation 2016 10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9 10.1007/s10841-014-9729-2 10.1111/cobi.12840 Norsk rødliste for arter 2015 S Henriksen author 2015 text Artsdatabanken, Norge 2015 10.1016/j.baae.2016.05.001 Ecology of urban bees: a review of current knowledge and directions for future study Jennifer L Hernandez author 2009 text Cities and the Environment (CATE) 2009 2 1 article 3 10.1098/rspb.2011.0268 10.1007/s10841-013-9609-1 IPBES author 2016 IPBES Thematic assessment of Pollinators, Pollination and Food Production 2016 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.010 10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.039 C. A. Kearns author 1993 Techniques for pollination biologists 1993 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.83 10.1111/ele.12082 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00044-4 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721 Lov om forvaltning av naturens mangfold (Naturmangfoldloven) Klima- og Miljødepartementet author 2009 text 2009 10.1890/12-2012.1 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.08.030 The Bee Inventory Plot H. LeBuhn author 2002 author 2002 text The Bee Inventory Plot 2002 10.1371/journal.pone.0086357 A Light author Platt RH author 2006 The Humane Metropolis: People and Nature in the 21st Century City 2006 10.1098/rspb.2016.1641 10.1093/aob/mcp069 Bumble bee abundance in New York City community gardens: implications for urban agriculture Kevin C Matteson author 2009 text Cities and the Environment (CATE) 2009 2 1 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20229.x Lisa Jean Moore author 2013 Buzz: Urban beekeeping and the power of the bee 1479874337 2013 10.2779/77003 Basis for action plan for Bombus distinguendus, Bombus subterraineus and Bombus humilis F. Ødegaard author 2013 author 2013 text Norwegian Institute for Nature Researc 2013 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.08.009 Statistikkbanken Oslo kommune author 2017 author 2017 text Statistikkbanken http://statistikkbanken.oslo.kommune.no 2017 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2004.01376.x 10.1051/apido:2005046 10.1038/nature20588 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00662.x 10.3896/IBRA.1.49.1.02 QGIS 2.18.6 (Las Palmas) QGIS Development Team author QGIS author 2017 text Team,2017QGIS 2.18.6 (Las Palmas) 2017 10.1038/nature18451 10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144802 RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Rstudio Team author 2016 text RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA 2016 C Saure author 1996 Urban habitats for bees: the example of the city of Berlin 0161-6366 1996 18 7 10.1007/s00606-004-0246-8 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.003 Thomas D. Seeley author 1995 The wisdom of the hive : the social physiology of honey bee colonies ISBN 0-674-95376-2 1995 10.1007/bf00175458 10.1007/s10531-014-0788-1 10.1890/06-1323.1 10.2307/3071954 MultiNet® Shapefile Format Specification Teleatlas® Multinet™ Dataset author 2013 text 2013 10.1890/02-0626 10.4039/n04-010 10.1016/j.baae.2015.11.004 10.1371/journal.pone.0097255 Basic Texts of the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, 2016 Edition UNESCO author 2016 text Intangible Cultural Heritage Section, Division for Creativity, Culture Sector 2016 132 World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Volume I: Comprehensive Tables. ST/ESA/SER.A/379. United Nations author 2015 text United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division 2015 10.1890/120126 10.2307/1940121 K von Frisch author 1967 The dance language and orientation of bees 1967 10.1023/A:1007740315207 10.1051/apido:2006035 10.1890/07-1292.1 P. Westrich author A. Matheson author 1996 The Conservation of Bees 1996 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05449.x 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00574.x 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.023 10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.020 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.02.003 Linking Land Cover Data and Crop Yields for Mapping and Assessment of Pollination Services in Europe Grazia Zulian author 2013 text Land http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/2/3/472 2013 2 3 472 492 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14014 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14014/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14014/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14014/download/xml/ Pollinating insects are an integral part of cities’ natural capital and perform an important ecosystem function with a high degree of relevance to many cultural ecosystem services. Consequently, pollinators serve as a useful proxy for assessing urban biodiversity. Beekeeping has recently emerged as a popular activity in many urban areas and a good deal of the motivation for urban beekeeping for many stems from the cultural and non-consumptive aspects of beekeeping. Yet the recent increases in domestic honeybee densities in urban landscapes has raised concern regarding the potential threat that honeybees might pose to local populations of threatened bumblebee and solitary bee species. This issue constitutes a trade-off between the cultural ecosystem services associated with urban beekeeping and the regulation and maintenance ecosystem services of maintaining nursery populations of rare and threatened species. Municipal authorities in Oslo, Norway have proposed establishing eight “precautionary zones”, within which placement of honeybee hives could be more strictly regulated. We propose a mapping and assessment approach for informing zoning decisions regarding urban honeybees, utilising a model of an urban landscape’s biophysical capacity to support pollinating insects (ESTIMAP). Together with an additional model describing the approximate distrubtion of honeybees in Oslo, we identify areas in the city where domestic honeybees may be more likely to exhaust floral resources. This case also tests the policy relevance of ecosystem service mapping tools beyond awareness raising, with broader general lessons for ecosystem mapping and assessment . text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem services Pollination Honeybees Wild bees Urban Mapping Trade-offs Ecosystem services mapping for municipal policy: ESTIMAP and zoning for urban beekeeping Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.2.e14499 2017-12-04 oneecosystem

National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, BAS, Acad. Georgi Bonchev Str., bl.3, Sofia, Bulgaria author Nedkov, Stoyan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-9815 Forest Research Institute - BAS, 132 "Kl. Ohridski" Blvd., 1756 Sofia, Bulgaria author Zhiyanski, Miglena https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4843-6770 Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria author Dimitrov, Stelian https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3007-9659 Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria author Borisova, Bilyana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3225-9514 Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria author Popov, Anton National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, BAS, Acad. Georgi Bonchev Str., bl.3, Sofia, Bulgaria author Ihtimanski, Ivo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1204-1275 Forest Research Institute - BAS, 132 "Kl. Ohridski" Blvd., 1756 Sofia, Bulgaria author Yaneva, Rositsa https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4092-8340 National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, BAS, Acad. Georgi Bonchev Str., bl.3, Sofia, Bulgaria author Nikolov, Petar https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3196-4389 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research - BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria author Bratanova-Doncheva, Svetla 2017-12-04 2017-12-04 2017 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 2 e14499 2017 project Enhancing ecoSysteM sERvices mApping for poLicy and Decision mAking ESMERALDA 642007 funder European Commission 10.13039/501100000780 10.3390/atmos5040755 10.1201/b19796-4 10.1007/0-387-24091-8_13 10.1109/jstars.2008.2003310 10.1109/jstars.2012.2189873 10.3390/ijgi4010199 10.3097/lo.200915 10.3097/lo.201434 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.008 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[80:shiuer]2.0.co;2 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.11.004 EUNIS habitat classification, revised 2004 C. E. Davies author 2004 text European Environment Agency, Copenhagen and European Topic Centre on Nature Protection and Biodiversity, Paris 2004 Ian Douglas author 2015 Urban Ecology 2015 European ecosystem assessment: Concept, data, and implementation EEA author 2015 text EEA Technical Report http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/europeanecosystem-assessment 2015 6/2015 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.01.020 Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. Mapping and assessing the condition of Europe’s ecosystems: Progress and challenges M. Erhard author 2016 text Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg 2016 3rd MAES report 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014 10.1515/mgr-2016-0012 10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1 Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems N. B. Grimm author 2000 text BioScience 2000 50 571 – 584 571 – 584 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 10.1007/s13280-014-0503-1 CICES V4.3 - Report prepared following consultation on CICES Version 4. R. Haines-Young author 2013 text EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003 https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaRev/GCComments/CICES_Report.pdf 2013 10.14358/pers.69.9.991 S. E. Jørgensen author 2000 Handbook of Ecosystem Theories and Management 2000 10.3846/enviro.2014.122 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.10.022 V. Koynov author 1998 Atlas of soils in Bulgaria ISBN 954-05-0116-4 1998 321 Estimation of spatial air temperature distribution at sub-mesoclimatic scale using the LCZ scheme and mobile measurements F. Leconte author 2015 text 9th International Conference on Urban Climate jointly with 12th Symposium on the Urban Environment https:// www.researchgate.net/profile/Francois_Leconte2/publication/280317934_Estimation_of_spatial_air_temperature_distribution_at_submesoclimatic_scale_using_the_LCZ_scheme_and_mobile_measurements/ links/55b25cb308ae9289a0854590.pdf 2015 10.1007/s00704-014-1309-6 10.3354/cr01220 M. Lotfian author 2016 Urban Climate Modeling. Case study of Milan city. Master Thesis, School of Civil Environmental and Land Management Engineering https://www.politesi.polimi.it/handle/10589/125023 2016 Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. J. Maes author 2013 text Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg 2013 1st MAES report Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. Urban Ecosystems J. Maes author 2016 text Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg 2016 4th MAES report An Introduction to the WUDAPT project G. Mills author 2015 text Proceedings 2015 10.1002/joc.3678 10.1109/36.377948 10.1073/pnas.0707823105 Mapping of carbon storage in urban ecosystems: a Case study of Pleven District, Bulgaria S. Nedkov author 2016 text Proceedings 2016 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00214-7 10.1007/978-0-387-68854-1_66 Initial guidance to obtain representative meteorological observations at urban sites Tim R. Oke author 2004 text INSTRUMENTS AND OBSERVING METHODS Report https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/IMOP/publications/IOM-81/IOM-81-UrbanMetObs.pdf 2004 WMO/TD-No. 1250 No. 81 10.1007/s00704-005-0153-0 Newly developed “thermal climate zones” for defining and measuring urban heat island magnitude in the canopy layer I. D. Stewart author 2009 text Preprints, T.R. Oke 2009 10.1175/bams-d-11-00019.1 10.1109/urs.2007.371828 Urban climate monitoring networks based on LCZ concept J. Unger author 2015 text Proceedings http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/5869/1/POSTER_15_1_1511110_a_u.pdf 2015 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.018 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.018 Role of different components of urban and peri-urban forests to store carbon – a case-study of the Sandanski region, Bulgaria M. Zhiyanski author 2015 text Journal of Chemical, Biological and Physical Sciences 2015 Vol. 5, No. 3 JCBPS, Section D 3114 3128 M. Zhiyanski author 2017 Methodology for assessment and Mapping of Urban ecosystems their state, and the services that they provide in Bulgaria 2017 The social aspects and role of green infrastructure in mitigating climatic changes at regional level М. Zhiyanski author 2013 text Proceedings 2013 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14499 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14499/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14499/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/14499/download/xml/ Urban ecosystems are the areas where built infrastructure covers a large proportion of the land surface but the main source of ecosystem services provision is the green infrastructure. This provision is very much dependent on the particular combination of green spaces such as parks or vegetation belts and paved areas such as buildings and streets. The spatial arrangement of these elements is an important parameter which could be used for the assessment of the ecosystem condition in the urban areas. An integrated index of spatial structure is proposed which incorporates built types and land cover from the Local Climate Zones (LCZ) concept with urban ecosystems' classes developed on the basis of MAES typology. An algorithm has been developed for index generation using an urban ecosystems' database and remote sensing data. The index is used to define vegetation cover in urban ecosystems and assess their condition as a part of the assessment framework. It is also applied in the assessment of several ecosystem services through quantification of ecosystem services' indicators or as an indicator in a complex assessment. The results show that, although most urban ecosystems in Bulgaria are assessed as moderate and good condition, very few of them have very good condition and about 3.5% have very bad condition. The highest scores are defined for urban green areas while the lowest are for transport networks. The use of an integrated index in urban ecosystem services' assessment is represented by examples for global and local climate regulation. The results are used to develop maps of ecosystem services supply capacity for selected cities. The overall analysis indicates that the urban ecosystems in Bulgaria have a moderate to good capacity for local climate regulation and moderate to low capacity for global climate regulation. The integrated index of spatial structure provides an appropriate basis for characterisation and assessment of the urban ecosystems condition and ecosystem services following the requirements of the EU Biodiversity Strategy and the MAES process. The proposed approach enables the internal heterogeneity of the urban ecosystems at national level to be defined, this being one of the main challenges in studying urban ecological systems. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Urban ecosystems MAES green infrastructure land cover built type carbon storage climate regulation Mapping and assessment of urban ecosystem condition and services using integrated index of spatial structure Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.2.e20834 2017-12-18 oneecosystem

European Commission- Joint Research Centre, Directorate for Sustainable Resources, Land Resources Unit, Ispra, Italy author La Notte, Alessandra https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6951-709X European Commission- Joint Research Centre, Directorate for Competences, Modelling, Indicators and Impact Evaluation Unit, Ispra, Italy author Marques, Alexandra 2017-12-18 2017-12-18 2017 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 2 e20834 2017 10.5751/es-06523-190264 10.1111/roiw.12056 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.066 10.2785/51610 European Commission author 2016 Report on phase 1 of the knowledge innovation project on an integrated system of natural capital and ecosystem services accounting in the EU http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/capital_accounting/pdf/KIP_INCA_final_report_phase-1.pdf 2016 European Commission author 2009 System of National Accounts 2008 http://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/SNA2008.pdf 2009 Defining Ecosystem Assets for Natural Capital Accounting L. Hein author 2016 text PLoS https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164460 2016 11 11 0164460 10.2788/72082 10.2760/214137 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.002 MA author 2005 Ecosystem Assesment - Ecosystems and Human Well-Being http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf. 2005 10.1038/461472a 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018 TEEB author 2010 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, Ecological and Economic Foundations 2010 410 United Nations author 2014 System of Environmental-Economic Accounting. Experimental Ecosystem Accounting http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaRev/eea_final_en.pdf 2014 United Nations author 2003 Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting. Studies in Methods - Handbook of National Accounting https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seea2003.pdf 2003 United Nations author 2014 System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012—Experimental Ecosystem Accounting 978-92-79-43926-1 http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaRev/eea_final_en.pdf 2014 ST/ESA/STAT/Ser.F/112 194 United Nations author 2014 System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012. Central Framework http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaRev/SEEA_CF_Final_en.pdf 2014 United Nations Environmental Program author 2017 SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting: Technical Recommendations. Consultation Draft https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/ceea/meetings/twelfth_meeting/SEEA%20EEA%20Tech%20Rec%20Consultation%20Draft%20II%20v4.1%20March2017.pdf 2017 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004 WAVES author 2014 The Global Partnership on Wealth Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services The https://www.wavespartnership.org/sites/waves/files/documents/WAVES%20Brochure-web.pdf 2014 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016 10.3897/oneeco.2.e20834 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/20834/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/20834/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/20834/download/xml/ When accounting for ecosystem services, it is important to distinguish between the flow of services and the flow of benefits (which can be part of economic accounts or not) generated by those services. To disentangle services and benefits, particular attention has to be paid in allocating each category of flows in the use table to those institutional sectors that generate the need for the services and have the power to modify them - the enabling actors - and to final beneficiaries. The general concept of use, without specifying whether services or benefits are referred to, could in fact lead to misinterpretations. This paper discusses the issue of the allocation of ecosystem services and the role of enabling actors through a practical example of water purification accounts in the Netherlands. In particular, the role of the agricultural sector as an enabling actor is disentangled from the cleaned water as benefit and from water supply companies as beneficiaries. The proper allocation of the flow of the service can in fact facilitate the establishment of a causal relationship between the actions of economic actors and ecological consequences and vice versa. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Experimental Ecosystem Accounts (SEEA-EEA) ecosystem services enabling actors Water purification The role of enabling actors in ecosystem service accounting Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.3.e20713 2018-01-03 oneecosystem

Laboratorio de socio-ecosistemas, Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain Basque Centre for Climate Change, Bilbao, Spain author Palomo, Ignacio https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4573-5989 Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands author Willemen, Louise Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands author Drakou, Evangelia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4404-629X Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research ZALF, Müncheberg, Germany Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany author Burkhard, Benjamin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-9009 School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia author Crossman, Neville Forest Research, Centre for Ecosystems, Society and Biosecurity, Northern Research Station, Edinburgh, United Kingdom author Bellamy, Chloe Leibniz Universität Hannover, Institute of Environmental Planning, Hannover, Germany author Burkhard, Kremena Irstea, Aix-en-Provence, France author Campagne, C. Sylvie https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2566-7827 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Leuven, Belgium author Dangol, Anuja RSS - Remote Sensing Solutions GmbH, Baierbrun, Germany author Franke, Jonas University of Warsaw, Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, Warszawa, Poland author Kulczyk, Sylwia Agricultural Economics and Policy Group, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland LETG Rennes, Université Rennes , Rennes, France author Le Clec'h, Solen https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7886-2899 European Topic Centre-University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain author Malak, Dania Departement of Arctic and Marine BiologyUiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway author Muñoz, Lorena Vilnius University, Life Sciences Centre, Sauletekio ave. 7, LT-10223, Vilnius, Lithuania author Narusevicius, Vytautas PXL Bio-Research, PXL University College, Diepenbeek, Belgium author Ottoy, Sam https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1216-9570 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium author Roelens, Jennifer Forest Research, Centre for Ecosystems, Society and Biosecurity, Northern Research Station, Edinburgh, United Kingdom author Sing, Louise Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Environment Centre Wales, Bangor, United Kingdom author Thomas, Amy Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, 8000 , Aarhus C, Denmark Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE), Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, 8000 , Aarhus C, Denmark author Van Meerbeek, Koenraad Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen, Netherlands author Verweij, Peter 2018-01-03 2018-01-03 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e20713 2018 project Enhancing ecoSysteM sERvices mApping for poLicy and Decision mAking ESMERALDA 642007 funder European Commission 10.13039/501100000780 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.08.001 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.029 10.1126/science.aaj1987 10.1007/s10980-016-0430-6 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.023 Benjamin Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.043 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.021 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001 Open Data Strategy draft food and Rural Affairs Department for Environment author 2013 text version 2013 9 1 32 10.1093/icesjms/fsx026 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.002 10.1007/978-3-319-17738-0_20 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.06.007 10.1016/j.jnc.2012.02.001 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.006 10.1057/ivs.2008.31 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 Haines-Young author 2012 Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES, Version 4.1). 2012 33 R. Haines‐Young author M. Potschin author 2014 OpenNESS Ecosystem Services Reference Book http://www.openness‐project.eu/library/reference‐book 2014 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.11.003 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.006 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.04.002 Ecosystem services in tourism and recreation. Revisiting the classification problem S. , Kulczyk author 2014 text Ekonomia i Środowisko 2014 4 51 84 92 10.1007/s10113-011-0214-0 10.1007/s10980-014-0045-8 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003 10.1371/journal.pone.0038970 10.1002/fee.1425 10.5751/es-08676-210324 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.116 10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.09.003 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.001 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006 10.1007/s10980-015-0254-9 10.1007/s10980-014-0032-0 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.04.001 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.015 10.1016/j.jag.2016.08.003 10.1002/2016ef000501 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.003 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.160 Possibilities of using the concept of ecosystem services at the regional level in experts’ opinions M. Stępniewska author 2017 text Ekologia I Środowisko 2017 1 60 81 91 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013 10.1073/pnas.1614158113 10.1111/cobi.12872 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.010 10.1371/journal.pone.0091001 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.07.007 Hammen Werf B Van Der author 2009 SERONTO: A Socio-Ecological Research and Observation Ontology: the core ontology: A Long-Term Biodiversity, Ecosystem and Awareness Research Network 2009 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.038 10.1371/journal.pone.0129785 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.008 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.05.009 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.002 10.3897/oneeco.3.e20713 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/20713/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/20713/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/20713/download/xml/ Ecosystem services (ES) mapping is becoming mainstream in many sustainability assessments, but its impact on real world decision-making is still limited. Robustness, end-user relevance and transparency have been identified as key attributes needed for effective ES mapping. However, these requirements are not always met due to multiple challenges, referred to here as bottlenecks, that scientists, practitioners, policy makers and users from other public and private sectors encounter along the mapping process.A selection of commonly encountered ES mapping bottlenecks that relate to seven themes: i) map-maker map-user interaction; ii) nomenclature and ontologies; iii) skills and background; iv) data and maps availability; v) methods-selection; vi) technical difficulties; and vii) over-simplification of mapping process/output. The authors synthesise the variety of solutions already applied by map-makers and map-users to mitigate or cope with these bottlenecks and discuss the emerging trade-offs amongst different solutions. Tackling the bottlenecks described here is a crucial first step towards more effective ES mapping, which can in turn ensure the adequate impact of ES mapping in decision-making. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem services mapping solutions spatial analysis sustainability. Practical solutions for bottlenecks in ecosystem services mapping Ecosystem Service Mapping

10.3897/oneeco.3.e23156 2018-02-21 oneecosystem

Forest Research Institute - BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria author Yaneva, Rositsa https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4092-8340 Forest Research Institute - BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria author Zhiyanski, Miglena https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4843-6770 Forest Research Institute - BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria author Markoff, Ivailo Forest Research Institute - BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria author Sokolovska, Maria National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, Sofia, Bulgaria author Nedkov, Stoyan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-9815 2018-02-21 2018-02-21 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e23156 2018 10.1002/ieam.1389 10.1007/978-3-319-27905-3_13 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004 10.1007/978-3-319-08180-9_18 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.008 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001 10.3354/cr01465 Roots biomass and carbon in representative Forest ecosystems in Bulgaria V. Dimitrova author 2015 text Journal of Chemical, Biological and Physical Sciences 2015 5 2 2090 2108 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.03.003 Ecological status of xerothermic oak ecosystems in SCI “Zapadna Stara planina i Predbalkan N. Georgieva author 2014 text Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 2014 20 Supplement 1 105 109 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.012 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 Methodologies for defining and assessing ecosystem services R. Haines-Young author 2009 text JNCC, Project Code C08-0170-0062 2009 14 T. Haussmann author 2005 Monitoring and Indicators of Forest Biodiversity in Europe - From Ideas to Operationality 2005 10.2788/33102 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.024 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.006 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.05.003 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 10.2779/12398 10.1111/conl.12216 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment author Robert T. Watson author 2005 The Millenium Ecosystem Assessment 2005 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.001 Mapping of ecosystems in Bulgaria based on MAES typology S. Nedkov author S. , al. et Chankova author 2017 text Proceedings. 21-22 April 2016 979-853-476-132-4 2017 Monitoring on health stat us of Pinus nigra arn. plantations in Middle and East Stara Planina B. Rossnev author 2008 text Forest science 2008 2 3 14 Investigations on the health status of tree species from genus Quеrcus (Q. rubra, Q. petraea, Q. frainetto, Q. cerris) in Middle and East Balkan range B. Rossnev author 2010 text Forest science 2010 3 3 16 Monitoring of the health status of Fagus sylvatica l. and Fagus orientalis lypski in Middle and East Stara Planina B. Rossnev author 2010 text Forest science 2010 4 15 30 Harmonizing methods for assessing carbon in forest soils M. Sokolovska author 2007 text Management and Sustainable Development http://oldweb.ltu.bg/jmsd/files/articles/16/16-14_M_Sokolovska_M_Zhiyanski.pdf 2007 16 1 130 135 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.008 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.007 10.13140/RG.2.2.33019.92964 Land-use Change Effects on Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Contents in Ecosystems from Central Balkan Mountains, Bulgaria M. Zhiyanski author 2008 text Journal of Balkan Ecology 2008 11 4 397 411 10.2298/gsgd0904099z 10.1007/978-3-319-27905-3 10.3897/oneeco.3.e23156 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/23156/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/23156/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/23156/download/xml/ Forests set natural conditions and embody a repository of biological diversity that represents a myriad of ecosystem services for human well-being. The spatial patterns and the forest ecosystems’ dynamics over time make the forests of particular environmental significance for the provision of ecosystem services. The terrestrial biodiversity and the sustainable management strategies' demand for mapping and assessment of the dynamics for the condition of forest ecosystems by drawing attention to the soil properties. In order to take on that task, the data series obtained by the International Co-operative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests (ICP Forests) for the period 1986–2016 were found as appropriate quantitative indicators that convey information about the ecosystem’s capacity to provide certain regulating ecosystem services. The ICP Forests Level I sites, located in the Central Balkan region, provide consistent information, which is collected on a regular basis about observed forest stands. The primary focus of the present research is to conduct a biophysical assessment of the forest ecosystems and to define their overall condition regarding two time series – the periods 1992/1993 and 2015. This study attempts to introduce an innovative approach and aims at linking the existing ICP Forests network dataset with the ecosystem services concept and the identified spatial units from the CORINE Land Cover (CLC) polygons for the territory of Central Balkan National Park. On this basis and through the implementation of GIS techniques, the dynamics of soil properties in selected forest ecosystems was analysed with regard to their capacity to supply relevant ecosystems services, which were assessed and mapped. The biophysical data provides robust information on the ecosystem services and the results show the variations in the capacity of different forest sub-types to provide ecosystem services within a well-defined land cover unit. Additionally, the research work intended to review the generated outcomes with reference to the DPSIR (driver-pressure-state-impact-response) method by giving feedback on the changes in the terrestrial ecosystems in the last 25 years. Further application of the mapping approach in assisting the communication in the decision- making process is also discussed. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers ICP Forests Level I soil dynamics ecosystem services mapping Assessment and mapping the dynamics of soil properties in selected forest stands from the region of Central Balkan National Park in the context of ecosystem services Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.3.e21610 2018-02-21 oneecosystem

Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski", Sofia, Bulgaria author Dimitrov, Stelian https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3007-9659 Forest Research Institute - Bulgarian academy of sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria author Georgiev, Georgi https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5703-2597 Forest Research Institute - Bulgarian academy of sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria author Georgieva, Margarita https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3165-1992 Forest Research Institute - Bulgarian academy of sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria author Glushkova, Maria https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4098-7498 Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski", Sofia, Bulgaria author Chepisheva, Ventsislava Forest Research Institute - Bulgarian academy of sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria author Mirchev, Plamen https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8373-0769 Forest Research Institute - Bulgarian academy of sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria author Zhiyanski, Miglena https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4843-6770 2018-02-21 2018-02-21 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e21610 2018 S. Bencheva author 2014 Silva balcanica https://silvabalcanica.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/sb_152-2014_101-104.pdf 2014 15(2) 101-104 Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae: Spilomelinae). New invasive pest moth in Bulgaria S. Beshkov author 2015 text Entomologist’s Record and Journal of Vaiation 2015 127 18 22 L. S. Bulman author 2005 Evaluation of remote sensing technologies for forest health applications. Contract Report to Forest Biosecurity Research Council. 2005 39 Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems G. C. Daily author 1997 text Issues in Ecology 1997 2 1 18 10.13140/RG.2.2.32902.88644 First Record of Corythucha arcuata (Say) (Heteroptera: Tingidae) on Balkan Peninsula M. Dobreva author 2013 text Acta zoologica bulgarica 2013 65 3 409 412 G. Douzon author 2007 Bilan de la santé des forêts en 2006. Département de la santé des forêts 2007 2 J. Eichhorn author UNECE ICP Forests author 2010 Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests http://www.icp-forests.org/Manual.htm 2010 49 10.1023/A:1005748702893 First record of the pathogen Botryosphaeria dothidea associated with Sequoiadendron giganteum in Bulgaria M. Georgieva author 2017 text Silva balcanica 2017 17 2 57 62 G. Georgiev author 2017 Main Insect Pests and Fungal Pathogens on Tree and Shrub Vegetation in Urban Ecosystems 2017 54 10.4039/tce.2016.11 On the appearance of the nearctic species Corytucha ciliata (Say, 1832) (Heteroptera, Tingidae) in Bulgaria M. Josifov author 1990 text Acta zoologica bulgarica 1990 39 53 55 Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 al Maes author 2013 text Publications office of the European Union 2013 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment author 2003 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment http://pdf.wri.org/ecosystems_human_wellbeing.pdf 2003 266 Forest protection problems in coniferous plantations in Bulgaria. P. Mirchev author 2016 text Forest protection problems in coniferous plantations in Bulgaria 2016 89-112 10.1109/36.377948 V. Pelov author 1993 Camerariaohridella Deschka et Dimic (Gracillariidae, Lepidoptera) – a new pest of Aesculushippocastanum L. in Bulgaria. In: Second national conference for forest protection 1993 95-99 W. A. Sinclair author 1987 Diseases of Trees and Shrubs 1987 68 A new insect pest on Douglas fir in Bulgaria G. Tsankov author 1990 text Forestry 1990 8 17 18 10.5772/8283 St. Wratten author 2013 Ecosystem Services in Agricultural and Urban Landscapes 978-1-4051-7008-6 2013 218 10.1007/s11252-005-4867-7 M. Zhiyanski author 2017 Methodological framework for assessment and mapping of ecosystem condition and ecosystem services in Bulgaria 978-619-7379-03-7 2017 52 10.3897/oneeco.3.e21610 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/21610/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/21610/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/21610/download/xml/ The knowledge about urban green infrastructure (UGI) is important for maintaining the quality of life in cities, suburbs and the fringes of metropolitan areas. The perspective of rapid urban sprawl generates the need for establishment and use of adequate systems for monitoring the condition of the urban ecosystems and green spaces. This triggers the search for a stronger link between the condition of urban green infrastructure and its capacity to supply ecosystem services (ES). In this paper are presented the results of the assessment of the health status of tree and shrub vegetation in UGI of Karlovo through an integrated application of in-situ observation and remote sensing using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) technology. The study showed that the implementation of this flexible approach provides rapid and low-cost results, with good quality of the generated information. This makes the approach appropriate as a basis for monitoring of green systems in urbanised areas, with subsequent detailed investigation of solitary trees for cataclysms and epiphytotics of native species and rapid detection for the population of invasive insect and pathogen’s in order to prevent their distribution in new areas. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Urban green system ecosystem services Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) phytosanitary status Integrated assessment of urban green infrastructure condition in Karlovo urban area by in-situ observations and remote sensing Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831 2018-03-14 oneecosystem

Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research ZALF, Müncheberg, Germany Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany author Burkhard, Benjamin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-9009 Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain author Santos, Fernando https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0861-4520 National Institute of Geophysics Geodesy and Geography, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria author Nedkov, Stoyan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-9815 Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Maes, Joachim https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-1607 2018-03-14 2018-03-14 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e22831 2018 project Enhancing ecoSysteM sERvices mApping for poLicy and Decision mAking ESMERALDA 642007 funder Horizon 2020 10.13039/501100007601 funder European Commission 10.13039/501100000780 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.09.002 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.008 10.3897/ab.e12837 EEA author 2016 Mapping and assessing the condition of Europe's ecosystems: progress and challenges 978-92-9213-726-7 http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/mapping-europes-ecosystems/at_download/file 2016 No 3/2016 148 10.3897/ab.e1283 ESMERALDA author 2015 Description of Action (DoA) 2015 178 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14021 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.111 10.1017/cbo9780511750458.007 R. Haines-Young author 2013 EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003 https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaRev/GCComments/CICES_Report.pdf 2013 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.014 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.018 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.006 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 J. Maes author 2013 Technical Report - 2013 – 067 http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/knowledge/ecosystem_assessment/pdf/MAESWorkingPaper2013.pdf 2013 57 10.2779/75203 Joachim Maes author Marion Potschin author 2016 Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services 2016 188 - 204 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023 10.2779/41384 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.03.017 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14499 10.1126/science.1223250 Marion Potschin author 2015 Glossary for Ecosystem Service mapping and assessment terminology. Deliverable D1.4 report 2015 28 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01449-9 10.1080/21513732.2014.966149 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/22831/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/22831/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/22831/download/xml/ Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) are central to the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Action 5 of the Strategy’s second target asks all EU member states to map and assess the state of ecosystems and their services in their national territories. Such comprehensive mapping and assessment builds on several individual tasks and their systematic integration. Therefore, an integrated and operational framework is needed, supporting and coordinating these activities. The presented framework builds on existing work done by the European Commission’s MAES Working Group and provides a clear nine-step approach including the identification of relevant questions or themes to be addressed, identification and mapping of ecosystem types, ecosystem condition and ecosystem services, their integration and dissemination of results. This framework can be used to set-up related research and development initiatives and to guide involved scientists, decision-makers and practitioners through the different steps and related tasks of the process. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers ecosystem services MAES integrated assessment stakeholder EU policy An operational framework for integrated Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) Short Communication

10.3897/oneeco.3.e24720 2018-03-16 oneecosystem

Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Maes, Joachim https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-1607 Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research ZALF, Müncheberg, Germany author Burkhard, Benjamin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-9009 University of Trento, Trento, Italy author Geneletti, Davide https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5528-3365 2018-03-16 2018-03-16 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e24720 2018 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007 10.3097/lo.200915 10.3897/ab.e12837 10.1126/science.aap8826 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.011 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.012 10.1111/conl.12216 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.022 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008 10.1371/journal.pone.0073249 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.013 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24720 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24720/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24720/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24720/download/xml/ A recent policy forum article in Science by Díaz et al. (2018) introduces nature's contributions to people (NCP) as an innovative approach to inform policy and decision-making. According to the authors, the NCP concept extends beyond the notion of ecosystem services by incorporating a more inclusive and interdisciplinary approach. Here this claim is challenged. Based on our experiences in Europe, we argue that the science, policy and practice of ecosystem services have progressed much beyond a mere economic and ecological rationale. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem services Nature's contributions to people Ecosystem services are inclusive and deliver multiple values. A comment on the concept of nature's contributions to people Commentary

10.3897/oneeco.3.e22509 2018-04-05 oneecosystem

Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany CAU Kiel, Kiel, Germany author Lange, Sabine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4595-4292 Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research ZALF, Müncheberg, Germany Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany author Burkhard, Benjamin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-9009 CAU Kiel, Kiel, Germany author Kruse, Marion https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0789-0045 CAU Kiel, Kiel, Germany author Müller, Felix 2018-04-05 2018-04-05 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e22509 2018 project Enhancing ecoSysteM sERvices mApping for poLicy and Decision mAking ESMERALDA 642007 funder European Commission 10.13039/501100000780 Durchschnittliche Leistung Biogasanlagen (SH) Agentur für Erneuerbare Energien e.V author text https://www.foederal-erneuerbar.de/landesinfo/bundesland/SH/kategorie/bioenergie/auswahl/560-durchschnittliche_le/versatz/2/#goto_560 Berechnung von Stickstoff-Flächenbilanzen für die Bundesländer - Jahre 2003 bis 2011 M Bach author 2014 text Methodenbeschreibung zum Indikator der Länder-Initiative Kernindikatoren (LIKI)2., überarbeitete Fassung (ohne Berücksichtigung Biogas) 2014 Schleswig-Holstein. J. Bähr author 1987 text Sammlung Geographischer Führer 1987 15 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.014 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.003 Faustzahlen für die Biogaserzeugung Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft author 2008 text Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Animal Husbandry 2008 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.008 10.3097/lo.201434 B. Burkhard author B. Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 374 F. S. Chapin author 2002 Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. 2002 Zeitreihen für Gebietsmittel für Bundesländer und Kombinationen von Bundesländer. Climate Data Center author text ftp://ftp-cdc.dwd.de/pub/CDC/regional_averages_DE/annual/precipitation/regional_averages_rr_year.txt 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 Verordnung über die Anwendung von Düngemitteln, Bodenhilfsstoffen, Kultursubstraten und Pflanzenhilfsmitteln nach den Grundsätzen der guten fachlichen Praxis beim Düngen DüV author 2007 text [Düngeverordnung] Bundesgesetzblatt Jahrgang 2007 Teil I 2007 7 222 240 EEA author 1995 CORINE Land Cover Report – Part 2: Nomenclature http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/COR0-part2 1995 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.007 European Commission author 2016 Press release - Water: Commission refers GERMANY to the Court of Justice of the EU over water pollution caused by nitrates. 2016 COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 91/676/EEC - concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources European Council author 1991 text Official Journal of the European Communities L 375 / 1 1991 Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy European Parliament author 2000 text Official Journal of the European Communities 2000 L 327 DIRECTIVE 2006/118/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 12 December 2006 on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration European Parliament author 2006 text Official Journal of the European Union 2006 L 372/19 10.2307/2641261 10.5675/HYWA_2012,4_1 10.1007/978-3-540-75811-2 10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.011 10.1080/00103629409369207 CORINE Land Cover 2012 GeoBasis-DE / BKG author 2017 text GeoBasis-DE / BKG [Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie] 2017 2017 Verwaltungsgebiete 1:250‘000 GeoBasis-DE / BKG author 2017 text GeoBasis-DE / BKG [Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie] 2017 2017 10.2307/1941208 C. Heidecke author 2012 Entwicklung eines Instrumentes für eine landesweites Nährstoffmanagement in Schleswig-Holstein 2012 HELCOM author 2004 The Fourth Baltic Sea Pollution Load Compilation (PLC-4) 2004 10.1016/s1040-6182(03)00063-6 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.002 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.001 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.006 Zukunft der Klärschlammverwertung in Schleswig-Holstein R. Kleinhans author text https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjZkpmZjpjXAhXIYVAKHZQJD-IQFggnMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.shgt.de%2Fdocs%2FKleinhansZukunftKlaerschlammverwertungSH.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1J9evQlM-QPMkqv9KniDZ8 P. Kreins author 2015 Entwicklung eines Instrumentes für ein landesweites Nährstoffmanagement in Schleswig-Holstein - regionale Erweiterung des AGRUM+ Projektes. 2015 KTBL author 2009 Faustzahlen für die Landwirtschaft. 2009 1180 Modelling ecosystem services using Bayesian belief networks: Burggravenstroom case study. D. Landuyt author R. Seppelt author 2012 text Managing Resources of a Limited Planet 2012 N-Fixierung Leguminosen (Stand: 01.03.2016). Landwirtschaftskammer Niedersachsen author text http://www.lwk-niedersachsen.de/index.cfm/portal/96/nav/2207/article/8505.html Tabelle 1 – Anzurechnende N-Mindestwerte nach Abzug der Stall-, Lagerungs- und Ausbringungsverluste (Stand: 27.02.2014). Landwirtschaftskammer Niedersachsen author text http://www.lwk-niedersachsen.de/index.cfm/portal/96/nav/2207/article/8505.html 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.003 Bodenbewertung in Schleswig-Holstein - Begleittext zu den Bodenbewertungskarten im Landwirtschafts- und Umweltatlas [Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume]. LLUR author text https://www.schleswig-holstein.de/DE/Fachinhalte/B/boden/Downloads/ErlaeuterungenNutzer.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3 Bodenbewertung in Schleswig-Holstein [Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume] LLUR author 2011 text 2011 Nährstoffe in Gewässern Schleswig-Holsteins – Entwicklung und Bewirtschaftungsziele LLUR author 2014 text Schriftenreihe LLUR [Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume] SH - Gewässer 2014 D 24 Biogasanlagen in Schleswig-Holstein [Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume] LLUR author 2016 text 2016 Naturräume in Schleswig-Holstein [Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume] LLUR author 2017 text 2017 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 Groundwater nitrate concentration. Wasserkörper- und Nährstoffinformationssystem Schleswig-Holstein [Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume Schleswig-Holstein; now MELUND] MELUR author text http://zebis.landsh.de/webauswertung/;jsessionid=8DCF61C8116FF9235CD53740C5AACC49.nodeTC02 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment author 2005 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf 2005 Richtwerte für die Untersuchung und Beratung zur Umsetzung der Düngeverordnung in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ministerium für Landwirtschaft author 2008 text 2008 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.017 C. J.M. Ondersteijn author 2002 Nutrient management strategies on Dutch dairy farms: An empirical analysis. 2002 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143 S. Rumohr author 1996 Ökosystemforschung im Bereich der Bornhöveder Seenkette - Abschlußbericht der I. und II. Projektphase (1988-1995) Teilvorhaben 2.4 & 3.5. 1996 C. Schott author 1956 Die Naturlandschaften Schleswig-Holsteins. 1956 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018 10.1371/journal.pone.0109643 Eutrophication: Policies, Actions, and Strategies to Address Nutrient Pollution. M. Selman author 2009 text World Resources Institute Policy Note – Water Quality: Eutrophication and Hypoxia 2009 3 1 16 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x R. Smith author 2012 Extending a Bayesian Belief Network for ecosystem evaluation. 2012 Agricultural census in Schleswig-Holstein 2010 Statistikamt Nord author 2010 text 2010 R. Stewig author 1982 Geocolleg 5 - Landeskunde von Schleswig-Holstein. 1982 216 R. U. Syrbe author B. Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 374 10.12767/BUEL.V0I219.29 10.13140/RG.2.1.2965.0005 TEEB author 2015 TEEB for Agriculture & Food – Interim Report [The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity] 2015 10.1073/pnas.96.11.5995 10.1016/0143-6228(87)90044-0 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2016.03.001 UBA author 2015 Atmospheric deposition to German natural and semi-natural ecosystems during 2009. PINETI 2 intermediate report 2009. 2015 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004 10.1126/science.277.5325.494 10.1126/science.1170261 10.1007/s10980-014-0084-1 Räumlich differenzierte Quantifizierung der Stickstoffeinträgeins Grundwasser und die Oberflächengewässer Schleswig-Holsteins. F. Wendland author 2014 text Korrespondenz Wasserwirtschaft 2014 6 327 332 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.030 10.3097/lo.201649 10.3390/su6095853 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22509 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/22509/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/22509/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/22509/download/xml/ This study deals with one of the regulating ecosystem services, nutrient regulation. In order to guarantee sustainable land management, it is of great relevance to gain spatial information on this ecosystem service. Unsustainable land management with regard to nutrient regulation may, for example, result in eutrophication which has been identified as a major threat for the environmental state of our water bodies. In the first step of research, the potential supplies and demands of/for nutrient regulation were assessed and mapped at two different spatial scales: The German federal state of Schleswig-Holstein (regional scale) and the Bornhöved Lakes District (local scale). The assessment was undertaken for nitrogen, as an exemplary nutrient. Subsequently, potential supply and demand, combined with the nitrate leaching potential and the groundwater nitrate concentration, were incorporated into a correlation analysis. The data was statistically analysed with varying pre-processing and spatial resolutions. The statistical analysis reveals that large scale data with low resolution leads to more uncertain results. Decreasing the spatial scale and increasing the resolution of the data through a spatially more explicit assessment, leads to more explicit results. It is striking that the study reveals a spatial mismatch between the potential supply and demand for the ecosystem service nutrient regulation, which denotes unsustainable land management in the study areas. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Bornhöved Lakes District eutrophication fertiliser application nitrogen budget groundwater nitrate concentration nutrient status correlation analysis local scale regional scale Mapping of nutrient regulating ecosystem service supply and demand on different scales in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.3.e24487 2018-05-02 oneecosystem

Laboratorio de Socioecosistemas, Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Darwin 2, Edificio de Biología, 28049, Madrid, Spain Departamento de Investigación Aplicada y Extensión Agraria, Instituto Madrileño de Investigación y Desarrollo Rural, Agrario y Alimentario (IMIDRA), Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona (N-II) KM. 38.200, 28802, Madrid, Spain author Palomo-Campesino, Sara Laboratorio de Socioecosistemas, Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Darwin 2, Edificio de Biología, 28049, Madrid, Spain BC3-Centro Vasco para el Cambio Climático, Edificio 1, primera planta, Campus de la Universidad del País Vasco, 48940, Bilbao, Spain author Palomo, Ignacio https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4573-5989 Grupo de Investigación Social y Acción Participativa, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Carretera de Utrera km 1, 41013, Sevilla, Spain Pasos, Participación y Sostenibilidad. Avenida Francisco Ayala 79, 18014, Granada, Spain author Moreno, Javier Laboratorio de Socioecosistemas, Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Darwin 2, Edificio de Biología, 28049, Madrid, Spain author González, José 2018-05-02 2018-05-02 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e24487 2018 funder Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria 10.13039/100007652 funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad 10.13039/501100003329 La repoblación forestal en la vertiente norte de Sierra Nevada J. A. Abellán author 1981 text Cuadernos Geográficos de la Universidad de Granada 1981 11 283 306 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.021 10.1007/s10021-008-9170-z 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.12.007 10.1080/08941920.2011.621511 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001345 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.005 10.3097/lo.201434 10.1080/10871209.2014.871663 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.003 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001 10.1016/j.agee.2008.03.013 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.004 10.1007/s00267-013-0121-x 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.03.003 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.006 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019 10.1073/pnas.1503751112 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.027 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.11.003 Good practices in participatory mapping IFAD author text https://www.ifad.org/documents/10180/d1383979-4976-4c8e-ba5d-53419e37cbcc Decreto 238/2011, de 12 de julio, por el que se establece la ordenación y gestión de Sierra Nevada Junta de Andalucía author text https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/medioambiente/web/aplicaciones/Normativa/ficheros/decreto%20orden.%20s.nevada.pdf 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.008 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008 10.1126/science.1258832 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assesssment) author text https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf La participación ciudadana en la ordenación del territorio: posibilidades y limitaciones F. Manero author 2010 text Cuadernos Geográficos [online] http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=17118691003 2010 10.1371/journal.pone.0038970 Transformaciones recientes en la organización territorial de la Vega de Granada: Del espacio agrario tradicional a la aglomeración urbana actual J. Menor Toribio author 1997 text Estudios Regionales 1997 48 189 214 Reflexiones en torno a los modelos productivista y postproductivista en la Vega de Granada J. Menor Toribio author 2000 text Cuadernos Geográficos 2000 30 415 427 10.1007/s10980-014-0053-8 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.12.004 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.031 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.001 10.1007/s10113-013-0488-5 10.1093/biosci/bit033 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-16-00110.1 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7392 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.007 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.006 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.001 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009 J. F. Ruiz author 2017 Gestión del agua y resiliencia en los sistemas de riego tradicionales. Una comparativa socio-ecológica entre los agroecosistemas del sureste español y los de México central http://0-hera.ugr.es.adrastea.ugr.es/tesisugr/26764155.pdf 2017 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.019 10.1073/pnas.1210595110 10.1002/fee.1225 10.1080/00343404.2012.753142 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.004 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.06.008 El espacio metropolitano de Granada: De lo rural a lo urbano F. Villegas Molina author 1997 text Espacios Rurais e Sociedades Campesiñas 1997 9 17 36 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.006 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24487 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24487/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24487/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24487/download/xml/ The application of the ecosystem services (ES) framework in landscape planning has become particularly relevant in rural-urban gradients since it allows for the integration of the complex interactions between ES supply and demand. This framework might be a powerful tool to inform landscape planning and decision-making intended to maintain the current and future flow of ES. In this study, we developed a process of participatory mapping of ES in a rural-urban gradient in southern Spain, which comprises the Sierra Nevada mountain range, the Granada valley and the city of Granada. First, we interviewed 21 key stakeholders from different professional sectors and gradient zones. These stakeholders prioritised nine ES in terms of their importance for local human well-being and their vulnerability to current drivers of change. Then, a workshop was organised in which 23 local actors shared their experience and knowledge regarding ES in the studied landscape. Sorted into five groups (composed of stakeholders with different profiles), the participants spatially mapped the most important supply and demand areas for the nine ES previously prioritised. The results show that the city of Granada has a very high demand for ES and a very low supply, while the Sierra Nevada mountain range and the valley of Granada appear to be very important ES supply areas. According to 95% of the stakeholders that attended the workshop, participatory mapping of ES is a very important (69%) or an important (26%) methodology to elicit the views and perceptions of the population, to identify the main conflicts and potential solutions for the territory and to visualise the high dependence of urban areas on the ES provided by adjacent rural areas. Our results also highlight the importance of incorporating the analysis of ES flows to inform landscape planning at the regional scale. Participatory mapping of ES can enhance decision-making regarding the maintenance of human well-being and the sustainability of social-ecological systems. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem services landscape planning participatory mapping rural-urban gradient supply-demand Characterising the rural-urban gradient through the participatory mapping of ecosystem services: insights for landscape planning Methods

10.3897/oneeco.3.e24134 2018-05-03 oneecosystem

UR RECOVER, EMR, IRSTEA, Aix-en-Provence, France author Campagne, C. Sylvie https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2566-7827 UR RECOVER, EMR, IRSTEA, Aix-en-Provence, France author Roche, Philip https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4443-7434 2018-05-03 2018-05-03 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e24134 2018 10.3368/le.82.2.141 10.1037/a0014201 B. Burkard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 374 10.3097/LO.200915 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.004 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 10.3097/lo.201434 B. Burkhard author B. Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 374 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.003 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.043 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.005 10.1016/j.ecocom.2016.04.002 10.1890/07-1886.1 Suzanne Cottillon author 2013 Impacts of Land Cover Changes on Ecosystem Services Delivery in the Black Hills Ecoregion from 1950 to 2010. Theses and Dissertations. 2013 162 10.1007/s10980-015-0260-y 10.1080/13504509.2016.1146176 10.1890/es12-00415.1 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.209 10.1017/S037689290600275X R. E. Freeman author 1984 Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach 1984 10.5334/irsp.33 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.02.005 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.05.019 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008 A Grêt-Regamey author B Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 374 R. Haines-Young author 2013 CICES V4.3 – Report Prepared FollowingConsultation on CICES Version 4 2013 Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. R. Haines-Young author 2018 text EEA www.cices.eu 2018 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.019 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.002 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.015 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.024 Sander Jacobs author Benjamin Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 374 10.5194/nhess-13-3095-2013 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.001 10.1007/s00267-009-9384-7 10.1007/s10980-014-0014-2 Leena Kopperoinen author Benjamin Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 374 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010 K. Krippendorff author 1980 Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology 1980 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008 10.1002/ejsp.113 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01806.x 10.1111/2041-210X.12940 10.1002/sim.4780132310 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.05.010 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.007 10.1073/pnas.1502452113 Joerg A. Priess author B Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 374 R: A language and environment for statistical computing R Development Core Team author 2017 text R Foundation for Statistical Computing https://www.R-project.org/. 2017 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.002 A Deliberative Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity A. Rodríguez-Vargas author 2011 text 9th Conference of European Society for Ecological Economics ‘‘Advancing Ecological Economics: Theory and Practice” Istanbul 2011 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.025 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.007 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.06.019 C. Surun author 2017 Évaluation socio-économique du projet LIFE des Alpilles: Impacts sur l’économie de la gestion intégrée des habitats pour les oiseaux d’intérêt communautaire. Master thesis EEET-EDDEE. 2017 103 Ralf-Uwe Syrbe author B. Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 374 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.051 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.011 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.12.002 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24134 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24134/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24134/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24134/download/xml/ Matrices or look-up tables are increasingly popular flexible tools for ecosystem services mapping and assessment. The matrix approach links ecosystem types or land cover types to ecosystem services by providing a score for ecosystem service (ES) capacity, supply, use, demand or other concepts. Using expert elicitation enables quick and integrative ES scoring that can meet general demand for validated ES mapping and assessment at different scales. Nevertheless, guidance is needed on how to collect and integrate expert knowledge to address some of the biases and limits of the expert elicitation method. This paper aims to propose a set of guidelines to produce ES matrices based on expert knowledge. It builds on existing literature and experience acquired through the production of several ES matrices in several ES assessments carried out in France. We propose a 7-steps methodology for the expert-based matrix approach that aims to promote cogency in the method and coherency in the matrices produced. The aim here is to use collective knowledge to produce semi-quantitative estimates of ES quantities and not to analyse individual or societal preferences or importance of ES. The definition of the objectives and the preparation phase is particularly important in order to define the components of capacity to demand ES chain to be addressed. The objectives and the ES components addressed will influence the composition of the expert panel. We recommend an individual filling of an empty matrix in order to strengthen the statistical analysis of the scores' variability and the analysis of congruency between experts. Expert scoring should follow a process of discussion, information-sharing and collective appropriation of a list of ecosystem types and ES to be assessed. We suggest that the ES matrix should not only focus on ES central scores but also address the variabilities and uncertainties as part of the ES assessment. The analysis of these sources of variability allows the documentation of variations in the ES quantity but also an exploration into the lack of consensus or knowledge gaps that needs to be addressed. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem services mapping tool Expert elicitation matrix approach methodology scoring look-up table May the matrix be with you! Guidelines for the application of expert-based matrix approach for ecosystem services assessment and mapping Methods

10.3897/oneeco.3.e24295 2018-05-09 oneecosystem

University of Potsdam, Institute of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Potsdam, Germany Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany author Schmidt, Martin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5802-1432 University of Potsdam, Institute of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Potsdam, Germany Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany author Lischeid, Gunnar Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany author Nendel, Claas https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7608-9097 2018-05-09 2018-05-09 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e24295 2018 FAO author 2014 World reference base for soil resources 2014 10.5194/hessd-4-439-2007 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130148 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.10.022 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24295 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24295/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24295/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24295/download/xml/ text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Edge effects Ecological boundaries Matter cycling Fragmentation Ecosystem services Carbon Nitrogen Data on and methodology for measurements of microclimate and matter dynamics in transition zones between forest and adjacent arable land Data Paper (Generic)

10.3897/oneeco.3.e25309 2018-05-18 oneecosystem

European Commission – Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Maes, Joachim https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-1607 Flemish Institute for Technological Research VITO, Mol, Belgium author Liekens, Inge https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-7592 UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambrigde, United Kingdom author Brown, Claire 2018-05-18 2018-05-18 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e25309 2018 10.1068/c11104 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.014 J. M. Bullock author 2018 A Guide to Selecting Ecosystem Service Models for Decision-Making: Lessons from Sub-Saharan Africa 978-1-56973-933-1 2018 10.3897/ab.e12837 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831 10.1073/pnas.0706559105 10.1890/080025 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.013 D Geneletti author 2016 Handbook on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Impact Assessment 2016 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019 IPIECA author http://www.ipieca.org/resources/good-practice/ecosystem-services-guidance-biodiversity-and-ecosystem-services-guide/ 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 10.2779/12398 Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services (MAES): Highlights and uncertainties of a science-policy interface on biodiversity and ecosystem services Joachim Maes author 2016 text Ekonomia i Środowisko http://ekonomiaisrodowisko.pl/uploads/ei%C5%9B%2059/04_maes.pdf 2016 4 59 54 64 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.024 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.005 Natural Capital Coalition author www.naturalcapitalcoalition.org/protocol The new user story backlog is a map Jeff Patton author text https://jpattonassociates.com/the-new-backlog/ 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.002 Online interface to browse the method database for mapping and assessing ecosystem services Steffen Reichel author 2018 text One Ecosystem 2018 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.01.020 Creating an operational database for Ecosystems Services Mapping and Assessment Methods Fernando Santos-Martín author 2018 text One Ecosystem 2018 A. Viinikka author 2017 ESMERALDA WORKSHOP V on Testing the methods across biomes and regions. 2017 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25309 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25309/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25309/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25309/download/xml/ Action 5 of the European Union's Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 asks that Member States map and assess the state of ecosystems and their services in their national territory. Policymakers and stakeholders of these countries frequently ask why this work is necessary. This article shows that this question can be broken down into a number of specific questions which, in turn, bring specific requests for knowledge and guidance to the surface. This paper develops a typology of questions and identifies the following five categories: knowledge requests, policy support questions, questions on resources and responsibilities, application questions and technical and methodological guidance questions. Next, this typology of questions is framed in an adaptive policy cycle and coupled to a set of available solutions. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Mapping and assessment Ecosystem services Policy questions Societal questions Business questions Management Biodiversity Which questions drive the Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy? Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.3.e25508 2018-05-24 oneecosystem

Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic author Vackaru, Dava https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6185-200X Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic author Grammatikopoulou, Ioanna Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic author Danek, Jan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2445-7614 Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic author Lorencova, Eliska 2018-05-24 2018-05-24 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e25508 2018 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.001 I. Bateman author UNEP WCMC author 2011 The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Technical Report 2011 1068-1151 10.1007/s10640-013-9662-y 10.1126/science.1234379 10.1007/s10640-011-9535-1 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.003 L. M. Brander author 2013 Guidance manual on value transfer methods for ecosystem services 978-92-807-3362-4 2013 77 Mapping and assessing ecosystems services in the EU – The ESMERALDA coordination and support action approach of integration. Benjamin Burkhard author in prep text One Ecosystem in prep 10.1007/s10640-011-9478-6 Guidelines for Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis in Environmental Management Collaboration for Environmental Evidence author text www.environmentalevidence.org/Documents/Guidelines/Guidelines4.2.pdf 10.1111/cobi.12114 10.1038/387253a0 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.018 10.1111/aec.12179 10.1890/07-1537.1 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001 10.1029/2010wr009071 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005 10.1111/cobi.12541 Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure R. Haines-Young author text www.cices.eu 10.1111/1365-2664.12093 10.1007/s10640-013-9730-3 10.1007/978-94-017-9930-0_2 P. Kareiva author 2011 Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services 2011 392 Updated CLC illustrated nomenclature guidelines. European Topic Centre on urban, land and soil systems B. Kosztra author 2017 text European Environment Agency https://land.copernicus.eu/user-corner/technical-library/corine-land-cover-nomenclature-guidelines/docs/pdf/CLC2018_Nomenclature_illustrated_guide_20170930.pdf 2017 124 pp. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.11.004 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.004 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05167.x 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.006 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.023 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14808 10.1016/j.envdev.2017.09.003 10.1007/s10640-015-9921-1 10.1007/s10640-010-9381-6 10.1002/ece3.1248 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.001 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.001 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.018 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.003 10.1371/journal.pone.0148524 10.1111/conl.12091 10.1093/biosci/biw101 10.1371/journal.pone.0027374 TEEB author 2013 Guidance Manual for TEEB Country Studies. Version 1.0. 2013 94 10.1111/1467-8551.00375 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.007 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25508 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25508/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25508/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25508/download/xml/ Ecosystem service valuations focusing on the assessment of ecosystem service values in space and time have recently been receiving considerable attention. Ecosystem service valuation data are critical for developing national ecosystem accounts and for assessment of costs and benefits associated with national strategies and plans. In this article, we discuss selected methodological aspects of ecosystem service valuation at the national level for the Czech Republic. We present a classification of ecosystems based on CORINE Land Cover and Consolidated Layer of Ecosystems of the Czech Republic. The focal point of our article is a systematic review of ecosystem service values. A systematic review requires a standardised protocol for incorporation of valuation studies. To illustrate the proposed methodology, we conducted a search of ecosystem service valuation studies at the European level. While there is a significant number of ecosystem service valuation studies, the number of studies which could be used for an effective value transfer is limited. We discuss the limitations of the value transfer approach and suggest further steps for improving the scientific basis for national level valuations. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem services Value transfer Systematic review Ecosystem classification Methodological aspects of ecosystem service valuation at the national level Methods

10.3897/oneeco.3.e25470 2018-05-24 oneecosystem

ETH, Zurich, Switzerland author Weibel, Bettina ETH, Zurich, Switzerland author Rabe, Sven-Erik https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7375-7739 Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research ZALF, Müncheberg, Germany author Burkhard, Benjamin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-9009 ETH, Zurich, Switzerland author Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8156-9503 2018-05-24 2018-05-24 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e25470 2018 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 10.3897/ab.e12837 10.1073/pnas.0808772106 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.025 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008 10.1890/080025 ESMERALDA author 2015 Description of Action DoA 2015 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.012 10.3897/ab.e12837 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.011 Peter M. Kareiva author 2011 Natural capital. Theory & practice of mapping ecosystem services 9780199588992 http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1112/2010942945-b.html 2011 Leena Kopperoinen author 2016 Ecosystem service mapping and assessment gaps in EU member states and recommendations to overcome them; Deliverable 2.2 2016 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.006 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment author 2005 Ecosystems and human well-being. Synthesis 1-59726-040-1 2005 10.1016/j.tree.2011.04.007 Marion Potschin author 2017 ESMERALDA Method Database guidelines 2017 Fernando Santos Martín author 2017 ESMERALDA Workshop V on testing the methods across biomes and regions 2017 Ina Sieber author 2017 ESMERALDA Mid-term project Meeting and Workshop VI on Flexible methods for mapping and assessing ecosystem services 2017 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676880.001.0001 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25470 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25470/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25470/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25470/download/xml/ As the concept of ecosystem services is being operationalised and implemented in policies, a better guidance on the selection of suitable methods for ecosystem services mapping and assessment is needed to allow more sound, transparent and comparable processes. A vast range of assessments focusing on different sets of ecosystem services at various scales is existing and the applied methods cover different disciplines from ecology to economy and social sciences. This complicates the assessment of single or bundles of ecosystem services across spatio-temporal scales and requires a broad expertise. A tiered approach for ecosystem services assessment allows selecting the appropriate application of a certain method for tackling a specific question at a given scale. In this publication, we illustrate how the EU H2020 project ESMERALDA supported the development of such a tiered approach for assessing ecosystem services. The iterative exchanges between experienced researchers and practitioners in mapping and assessing ecosystem services in various contexts allowed the co-production of an approach to guide the choice of methods. Ultimately, the proposed tiered approach will not only support communication of the ecosystem services concept, but will also reduce the tendency for selecting an unsuitable approach for solving complex problems linked to ecosystem services-based resource management. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Operationalization mapping iterative process transdisciplinary process On the importance of a broad stakeholder network for developing a credible, salient and legitimate tiered approach for assessing ecosystem services Short Communication

10.3897/oneeco.3.e24490 2018-06-05 oneecosystem

Institute of Applied Sciences, Malta College of Arts, Science and Technology, Paola, Malta author Balzan, Mario https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2016-3937 Institute of Applied Sciences, Malta College of Arts, Science and Technology, Paola, Malta author Debono, Iain 2018-06-05 2018-06-05 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e24490 2018 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.010 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.025 M. V. Balzan author 2017 The Fourth Valletta 2018 Annual International Conference - Living Cities, Liveable Spaces: Placemaking & Identity. Valletta 2018: European Capital of Culture 2017 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.003 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.08.015 10.1073/pnas.1114773109 R. de Groot author 2010 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity : The Ecological and Economic Foundations 2010 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.01.003 10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.026 N. Fagerholm author 2017 Participatory GIS approaches for mapping ecosystem services, in: Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 10.1080/09640568.2016.1151772 10.1080/10556788.2011.597854 A tiered approach for ecosystem services mapping A. Gret-Regamey author 2017 text Mapping Ecosystem Services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia 2017 213 217 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008 Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012 R Haines-Young author text www.cices.eu 10.1111/conl.12343 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.029 10.1560/IJEE.57.1-2.151 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.022 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.015 M.A. author 2005 Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment 2005 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.016 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023 10.2779/75203 M.E.P.A. author 2010 The Environment Report 2008 2010 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.001 The Role of Community and Groupware in Geocache Creation and Maintenance C. Neustaedter author 2010 text Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2010 N.S.O. author 2014 Malta in Figures 2014 2014 N.S.O. author 2017 Regional Statistics Malta 2017 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.005 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018 10.4324/9780203433331 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.021 10.1177/0309133311423172 QGIS Geographic Information System QGIS Development Team author 2016 text 2016 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.007 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing R Development Team author 2016 text R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna 2016 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.034 10.1023/A:1006828706452 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018 Planning for landscape multifunctionality P. Selman author 2009 text Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 2009 5 45 52 Generalized Linear Mixed Models using AD Model Builder. R package version 0.7.3. H Skaug author 2013 text 2013 A Large-Scale Quantitative Survey of the German Geocaching Community in 2007 D. Telaar author 2014 text Adv. Human-Computer Interact 2014 275815 10.1038/s41598-017-18007-4 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.05.003 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.014 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.001 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.023 10.1108/14777831311322668 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24490 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24490/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24490/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24490/download/xml/ Recreation is an important cultural ecosystem service and is one way in which communities experience the direct and indirect benefits arising from the experiential use of their environment. The recent rise in popularity of Global Positioning System (GPS) game applications, which combine information technology with an activity that increases mobility and encourages outdoor enjoyment, provides ecosystem service practitioners with an opportunity to make use of this georeferenced data to assess recreational ecosystem services. Geocaching is one such worldwide outdoor game. It has fixed points of incursion where people can hide and look for caches. This study explores the possibility of using geocaching data as a proxy for recreational ecosystems services in the Maltese Islands. A quantitative analysis of the georeferenced caches was used together with their visit rates and number of favourite points. This was supplemented by two questionnaires that investigated the preferences and experiences of both geocache placers (n=39) and hunters (n=21). Results show that the highest number of caches were placed and searched for in urban areas and that geocaching is strongly associated with the presence and accessibility of urban green infrastructure. The number of geocachers who stated preference for experiences in nature did not translate into high visit rates to sites of high conservation value (protected areas) but landscape value was significantly associated with recreational ecosystem services flow. The results presented here provide evidence that geocaching spatial data can act as an indicator for assessing and mapping recreational ecosystem services in urban environments and in cultural landscapes. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Cultural Ecosystem Services Ecosystem Service Capacity Ecosystem Service Flow Global Positioning System Green Infrastructure Urban Ecosystem Service Assessing urban recreation ecosystem services through the use of geocache visitation and preference data: a case-study from an urbanised island environment Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.3.e25428 2018-06-11 oneecosystem

National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, Sofia, Bulgaria author Nedkov, Stoyan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-9815 Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria author Borisova, Bilyana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3225-9514 National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, Sofia, Bulgaria author Koulov, Boian https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0732-254X Forest Research Institute - BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria author Zhiyanski, Miglena https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4843-6770 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research - BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria author Bratanova-Doncheva, Svetla National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, Sofia, Bulgaria author Nikolova, Mariyana https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4878-3051 National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, Sofia, Bulgaria author Kroumova, Julia 2018-06-11 2018-06-11 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e25428 2018 project Enhancing ecoSysteM sERvices mApping for poLicy and Decision mAking ESMERALDA 642007 funder European Commission 10.13039/501100000780 Value of Ecosystems (Landscape) Services in the Area of the Towns of Apriltsi, Kalofer and Smolyan. A. Assenov author 2016 text Annuals, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski 2016 2 107 141 163 Research of the Biotope Diversity for the Purposes of Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Chepelare Municipality (The Rhodopes Region of Bulgaria). In A. Assenov author 2016 text European Journal of Sustainable Development, Special Issue – 2016 5 4 409 420 D. Avetisyan author 2016 Determination of the Landscapes Regulation Capacity and Their Role in the Prevention of Catastrophic Events: A Case Study from the 978-3-319-27903-9. http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319279039 2016 Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation "For the Balkans and the Humans" Project won an European Commission BBF author 2016 text "NATURA 2000" award http://bbf.biodiversity.bg/bg/PROEKTYT-ZA-BALKANA-I-HORATA-SPEChELI-NAGRADATA-NATURA-2000-NA-EVROPEYSKATA-KOMISIYa.p1633 (accessed on 25.01.2018) 2016 B. Borisova author 2013 Landscape ecology and landscape planning. ISBN 978-954-332-670-2 2013 284 10.1007/978-3-319-13527-4_6 10.1007/978-3-319-08180-9_18 K. Boyanova author 2015 Spatial analysis and assessment of ecosystem services in mountain watersheds using geospatial technologies 2015 175 10.1007/978-3-319-27905-3_3 10.17660/actahortic.2014.1043.24 Methodological framework for assessment and mapping of ecosystem services in Bulgaria – conceptual basis and principles of application. Clorind S. Bratanova-Doncheva author 2017 text Clorind ISBN 978-619-7379-21-1 2017 Landscapes capacities to provide ecosystem services – a concept for land-cover based assessments B. Burkhard author 2009 text Landscape Online 2009 15 1 22 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.07.001 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 10.3097/lo.201434 Mapping and assessing ecosystems services in the EU – The ESMERALDA coordination and support action approach of integration B Burkhard author 2018 text One Ecosystem 2018 (in preparation) 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831 N. Chipev author 2017 Clorind 978-619-7379-25-9 2017 L. Dimitrova author 2015 Central Balkan National Park http://visitcentralbalkan.net/assets/userfiles/%D0%91%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%8A%D1%82/NPCB_EcosystemServicess.pdf 2015 10.3897/oneeco.3.e21610 ESMERALDA author 2015 Description of Action (DoA) 2015 178 Identifying representative case studies for ecosystem services mapping and assessment across Europe D Geneletti author 2018 text One Ecosystem 2018 10.1659/mrd.0951 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008 10.1073/pnas.1503751112 R. Haines-Young author 2013 Undefined EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003 https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaRev/GCComments/CICES_Report.pdf 2013 GIS-based Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Mountain Regions: A Case Study of the Chepelare Municipality in Bulgaria E. Ivanova author 2016 text European Journal of Sustainable Development, Special Issue – http://www.ecsdev.org/index.php/publications/ejsd 2016 5 4 335 346 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14062 B. Koulov author 2018 Scientific Works of USB - Plovdiv. Series B. Natural Sciences and Humanities ISSN 1311-9192 (in press) 2018 V. Koynov author 1998 Atlas of soils in Bulgaria 954-05-0116-4 1998 321 LAP author 2016 Lima Action Plan for UNESCO’s Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme and its World Network of Biosphere Reserves http://www.unesco.org/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/Lima_Action_Plan_en_final.pdf 2016 Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under J. Maes author 2013 text Publications office of the European Union, Luxemburg http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/knowledge/ecosystem_assessment/pdf/MAESWorkingPaper2013.pdf 2013 57 pp Enhancing Resilience Of Urban Ecosystems through Green Infrastructure J Maes author 2017 text Publications Office of the European. Union, Luxemburg http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC106443/enrouteinceptionreportfinal.pdf 2017 MAF author 2014 Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Republic of Bulgaria: Agrostatistical Reference Book http://www.mzh.government.bg/MZH/en/ShortLinks/SelskaPolitika/Agrostatistics.aspx 2014 Mapping of erosion regulation ecosystem services Proceedings, 6th International Conference on Cartography and GIS B. Markov author T. Bandrova author 2016 text Proceedings, 6th International Conference on Cartography and GIS, 13-17 June 2016 2016 10.1007/978-94-007-0131-1_8 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022 S. Nedkov author T. Bandrova author 2014 5th International conference on Cartography and GIS 2014 488-497 Mapping of carbon storage in urban ecosystems: a Case study of Pleven District, Bulgaria. S. Nedkov author 2016 text Proceedings of the scientific conference “Geographical aspects of land use and planning under climate change” ISBN: 978-619-90446-1-2 http://geography.bg/images/dokladi/33.pdf 2016 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14499 National Reference Centre NRC author 2014 text Ministry of Environment and Water http://www.nsi.bg/en/content/4247/prices-agricultural-production-data-series 2014 National Statistical Institute, Republic of Bulgaria: Regional statistics data series NSI author 2015 text National Statistial Institute http://www.nsi.bg/en/content/11252/regional-statistics-and-indicators-monitoring 2015 National Statistical Institute, Republic of Bulgaria: Prices of agricultural production data series NSI author 2015 text Nationla Statistical Institute http://www.nsi.bg/en/content/4247/prices-agricultural-production-data-series 2015 National Statistical Institute, Republic of Bulgaria. Demography NSI author 2016 text National Statistical Institute 2016 L. Pehlivanov author 2014 Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 2014 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.008 B. Rashev author 2003 Alternative Economic Valuation of Pirin National Park, Bulgaria 2003 10.1080/21513732.2014.966149 10.1093/biosci/biw101 ESMERALDA Mid-term project Meeting and Workshop VI on Flexible methods for mapping and assessing ecosystem services I. Sieber author 2017 text ESMERALDA Project, Grant Agreement 2017 642007 Biosphere Reserves under the UNESCO’s “Man and Biosphere” Programme as a Tool for Regional Development and Understanding the Complete Potential of Ecosystem Services (Using the Example of Central Balkan National Park) K Tomova author 2018 text Annuals, Sofia University St.Kliment Ohridski 2018 2 120 143 UK author 2011 The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings 2011 UNESCO author 1996 Biosphere reserves: The Seville Strategy and the Statutory Framework of the World Network 1996 М. Zevurdakis author 2007 Review of the ecosystem services and the values they provide. Rhodope project 2007 Role of different components of urban and peri-urban forests to store carbon – a case-study of the Sandanski region, Bulgaria M. Zhiyanski author 2015 text Journal of Chemical, Biological and Physical Sciences. JCBPS, Section D 2015 2015 5 3114 3128 10.1007/978-3-319-27905-3_4 M. Zhiyanski author 2017 Methodology for assessment and Mapping of Urban ecosystems their state, and the services that they provide in Bulgaria 2017 58 The social aspects and role of green infrastructure in mitigating climatic changes at regional level М. Zhiyanski author 2013 text Proceedings of 3rd International Conference “Ecology of urban areas 2013” 2013 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25428 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25428/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25428/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25428/download/xml/ The aim of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 isto maintain and enhance ecosystem services (ES) in Europe and requires all Member States to map and assess the state of ecosystems and their services in the respective national territories. The EU-funded project ESMERALDA analyses ES mapping and assessment methods and approaches in their biophysical, social and economical perspectives, as well as their application in different case studies. The project also aims at the development of an integrated and consistent assessment framework. In Bulgaria, methodological guides for evaluation and mapping of the services provided by the nine main types of ecosystems have been prepared together with the respective proposals for their implementation in the national assessment. The Bulgarian research team analyses and tests various aspects of ecosystem services mapping and assessment, such as alternative economic assessments, multi-criteria analyses and biophysical assessment approaches, mapping challenges and local population surveys. In this paper paper, we review the ES activities in Bulgaria and present selected mapping and assessment methods tested in the Central Balkan case study area. It provides relevant examples for the implementation of integrated mapping and assessment of ecosystem services at local and regional level, where different mapping approaches and techniques are embedded within diverse policy contexts. The main goal of the study is to investigate how the assessment results can support the integration of the ecological functions of the Central Balkan National Park with the economic opportunities that it creates for the local and regional communities. A tiered approach has been used to organise the mapping and assessment exercises in the study area, in order to meet the needs for integrated ecosystem assessment and overcome the limitations of data availability. At tier 1, the study performs identification and initial ES mapping of the whole area. At tier 2, it applies economic valuation for the Municipality of Karlovo by using statistical data and the contingent valuation method. At tier 3, the investigation applies modelling methods to assess carbon storage and flood regulation on a larger scale. The results are presented in the form of maps at all levels, which use a uniform 0 to 5 assessment scale. The integrated approach presented here ensures a clear communication of the end results to the respective decision-makers. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Integrated assessment economic valuation flood regulation carbon storage ecosystem services dysergy Karlovo Municipality national park biosphere reserve Towards integrated mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services in Bulgaria: The Central Balkan case study Case Study

10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108 2018-06-11 oneecosystem

Fabis Consulting Ltd, Barton In Fabis, United Kingdom author Haines-Young, Roy Fabis Consulting Ltd, Barton In Fabis, United Kingdom author Potschin-Young, Marion 2018-06-11 2018-06-11 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e27108 2018 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.018 R. H. Haines-Young author 2018 Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdf 2018 10.1073/pnas.1406490112 M. Potschin author M. Potschin author 2016 Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services 978-138-02508-0 http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9781138025080/ 2016 25-42 10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/27108/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/27108/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/27108/download/xml/ The Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) is widely used for mapping, ecosystem assessment, and natural capital ecosystem accounting. On the basis of the experience gained in using it since the first version was published in 2013, it has been updated for version 5.1. This policy brief summarises what has been done and how the classification can be used. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers CICES ecosystem service classification MAES ESMERALDA KIP-INCA Revision of the Common International Classification for Ecosystem Services (CICES V5.1): A Policy Brief Policy Brief

10.3897/oneeco.3.e26382 2018-06-12 oneecosystem

Leibniz Universität Hannover, Institute of Physical Geography and Landscape Ecology, Hannover, Germany author Steinhoff-Knopp, Bastian https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9926-8028 Leibniz Universität Hannover, Institute of Physical Geography and Landscape Ecology, Hannover, Germany Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research ZALF, Müncheberg, Germany author Burkhard, Benjamin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-9009 2018-06-12 2018-06-12 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e26382 2018 10.1016/j.catena.2014.01.008 10.1002/0470859202.ch36 10.3897/ab.e12837 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001 Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V. (DIN) author 2017 DIN 19708: Bodenbeschaffenheit - Ermittlung der Erosionsgefährdung von Böden durch Wasser mit Hilfe der ABAG 2017 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002 10.1002/ieam.1400 DVWK author 1996 Bodenerosion durch Wasser. DVWK-Merkblatt 239: Kartieranleitung zur Erfassung aktueller Erosionsformen 1996 Potentielle Erosionsgefährdung durch Wasser Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) author text https://www.bgr.bund.de/DE/Themen/Boden/Ressourcenbewertung/Bodenerosion/Wasser/Karte_Erosionsgefahr_node.html;jsessionid=E5B1B3AD002A32890AA010AD64F0C020.1_cid292 10.1016/j.ecocom.2011.07.003 10.1007/s10021-014-9766-4 10.1007/s10980-015-0241-1 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.043 Roy Haines-Young author 2017 Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. www.cices.eu 2017 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.11.014 10.1002/ldr.1008 10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000050042x Thomas Mosimann author Gerold Richter author 1998 Bodenerosion. Analyse eine Umweltproblems 1998 264 10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100030029x 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.012 10.1016/s0341-8162(02)00143-1 K. G. Renard author 1997 Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation. Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) 1997 703 10.1038/s41598-017-06819-3 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.09.008 W. Rohr author 1990 Kartieranleitung zur Aufnahme von Bodenerosionsformen und -schäden auf Ackerflächen 1990 56 Aktuelle Bodenerosionsgefährdung durch Wind und Wasser in Deutschland Philipp Saggau author 2017 text Bodenschutz https://www.BODENSCHUTZdigital.de/Zbos.04.2017.120 2017 22 4 120 125 Petra Sauerborn author 1994 Die Erosivität der Niederschläge in Deutschland : ein Beitrag zur quantitativen Prognose der Bodenerosion durch Wasser in Mitteleuropa 1994 189 10.1016/j.catena.2011.01.007 10.1016/j.catena.2018.02.017 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.035 Umweltbundesamt author 2011 Wirkungen der Klimaänderungen auf die Böden - Untersuchungen zu Auswirkungen desKlimawandels auf die Bodenerosion durch Wasser 2011 202 Walter H. Wischmeier author 1978 Predicting rainfall erosion losses - a guide to conservation planning 1978 69 10.3897/oneeco.3.e26382 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/26382/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/26382/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/26382/download/xml/ Control of erosion rates (CER) is a key ecosystem service for soil protection. It is mandatory for sustaining the capacity, especially of agroecosystems, to provide ecosystem services. By applying an established framework to assess soil regulating services, this study compares two approaches to assess CER provision for 466 ha of cropland in Lower Saxony (Central Northern Germany). In a "sealed modelling approach", the structural and the mitigated structural impact were modelled by applying the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE). The second approach uses spatially explicit long-term monitoring data on soil loss rates obtained in the investigation area as an alternative to the USLE-based modelled mitigated structural impact. Assuming that the monitoring data have a higher reliability than the modelled data, the comparison of both approaches demonstrated the uncertainties of the USLE-based assessment of CER. The calculated indicators based on a sound monitoring database on soil loss rates showed that, due to limitations of the USLE model, the structural impact in thalwegs has been underestimated. Incorporating models with the ability to estimate soil loss by rilling und gullying can help to overcome this uncertainty. The produced set of complementary large-scale CER maps enables an integrated analyses of CER. In the entire investigation area, the provision of CER regulating ecosystem services was generally high, indicating good management practices. Differences at the field scale and between the different regions can be explained by variations of the structural impact and the management practices. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers regulating ecosystem service control of erosion rates biophysical method USLE soil erosion monitoring Mapping Control of Erosion Rates: Comparing Model and Monitoring Data for Croplands in Northern Germany Methods

10.3897/oneeco.3.e24719 2018-06-12 oneecosystem

Leibniz Universität Hannover, Institute of Physical Geography and Landscape Ecology, Hannover, Germany author Sieber, Ina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2134-0429 CE3C – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes / Azorean Biodiversity Group and Universidade dos Açores, Dep. de Ciências e Engenharia do Ambiente, Angra do Heroísmo, Açores, Portugal author Borges, Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8448-7623 Leibniz Universität Hannover, Institute of Physical Geography and Landscape Ecology, Hannover, Germany Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research ZALF, Müncheberg, Germany author Burkhard, Benjamin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-9009 2018-06-12 2018-06-12 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e24719 2018 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.014 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.12.003 10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00085-3 P. A.V. Borges author H. M. Pereira author 2009 Ecossistemas e bem-estar humano em Portugal: Avaliação para Portugal do Millennium Ecosystem Assessment http://hdl.handle.net/10400.3/2011 2009 463-510 10.1093/jisesa/ieu034 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.014 ESMERALDA Integrated Ecosystem Assessment C Brown author 2018 text One Ecosystem https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e25482 2018 3 e25482 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 Benjamin Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 9789546428295 2017 Yvonne Cerqueira author Henrique M. Pereira author 2015 Rewilding European Landscapes 978-3-319-12039-3 2015 223 Stuart Chape author 2006 Review of environmental issues in the pacific region and the role of the pacific regional environment programme. Workshop and symposium on Collaboration for sustainable development of the Pacific Islands: Towards effective e-learning systems on environment. 2006 10.1080/21513732.2012.695229 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001 B. De Knegt author 2014 Alterra 2014 13 227 10.1186/s12889-017-4557-4 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.002 10.2788/41823 10.14512/gaia.21.1.14 Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. In: Official EU author 2016 text Journal of the European Union C 2016 202 1 195 European Commission author 2008 Message from Reunion Island 2008 20 European Commission author 2011 Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 2011 17 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153554 10.1038/ncomms4794 10.2112/si70-078.1 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.006 10.1639/0044-7447(2003)032[0140:rsdicm]2.0.co;2 10.1603/ec13501 10.1017/cbo9780511750458.007 10.1073/pnas.0908503107 10.1038/srep38402 10.1038/35022565 Message from Guadeloupe IUCN author text https://www.iucn.org/sites/dev/files/import/downloads/message__from_guadeloupe_en__2_.pdf 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.05.005 The Application of EU Law in the EU’s Overseas Regions, Countries, and Territories After the Entry into Force of The Treaty of Lisbon Dimitry Kochenov author 2013 text International Law Review https://digitalcommons.law.msu.edu/ilr/vol20/iss3/1 2013 20 3 269 743 L. Kopperoinen author 2016 Ecosystem service mapping and assessment gaps in EU member states and recommendations to overcome them. 2016 41 10.1002/app5.147 10.1007/s00300-012-1281-5 10.1016/b978-0-12-417015-5.00009-8 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.020 10.1371/journal.pone.0067737 10.2779/12398 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.006 10.1080/21513732.2012.663792 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment author 2005 Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends 9781559632270 2005 948 Cadre conceptuel et glossaire. L’Évaluation Française des Écosystèmes et des Services Écosystémiques (EFESE) de l’Énergie, et de la Mer [MEDDE] Ministère de l'Environnement author 2015 text [MEDDE] 2015 Ministerie van Economische Zaken author 2013 Nature Policy Plan - The Caribbean Netherlands 2013-2017 https://www.government.nl/documents/publications/2014/02/03/nature-policy-plan-the-caribbean-netherlands 2013 54 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 10.1016/s0006-3207(98)00108-6 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01383.x Paulo ALD Nunes author 2014 Guidance manual on valuation and accounting of ecosystem services for small island developing states 978-92-807-3407-2 2014 128 Henrique M. Pereira author 2015 Rewilding European Landscapes 2015 H. M Pereira author 2009 Portugal Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: State of the Assessment Report http://ecossistemas.org 2009 Jérôme Petit author 2008 Climate Change and Biodiversity in the European Union Overseas Entities 2008 192 10.3897/natureconservation.18.11523 10.1111/icad.12216 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.001 10.1111/ddi.12655 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.070 10.3897/oneeco.2.e12290 Non-native species in the Antarctic. Proceedings. Michelle Rogan-Finnemore author 2008 text Christchurch, N.Z: Gateway Antarctica, Centre for Antarctic Studies and Research, University of Canterbury (Gateway Antarctica special publication series, no. 0801). 2008 D Russi author 2016 Socio-Economic Benefits of the EU Marine Protected Areas 2016 96 Fernando Santos-Martín author 2016 Spanish National Ecosystem Assessment: Socio-economic valuation of ecosystem services in Spain. Synthesis of key findings. 978-84-608-8776-8 2016 68 Stijn Schep author 2012 IVM Institute for Enironmental Studies 2012 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.021 10.1093/biosci/biw101 L. Silva author 2008 Invasive terrestrial flora & fauna of Macaronesia. TOP 100 in Azores, Madeira and Canaries 978-989-95910-1-1 https://repositorio.uac.pt/handle/10400.3/1978 2008 R. Slootweg author R. , Slootweg author 2008 Biodiversity in environmental assessment: enhancing ecosystem services for human well-being. 2008 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.008 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.035 P ten Brink author 2017 Expert Group on Green and Circular Economy in the Outermost Regions: Final Report. 2017 30 10.1371/journal.pone.0176862 10.1038/nature02719 K. F. Tieskens author 2014 Mapping the economic value of ecosystems on St Eustatius. 2014 UK Government author 2014 UK Overseas Territories Biodiversity Strategy. 2014 UK NEA author 2011 The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings 2011 UNEP author 2009 Sustainable coastal tourism—An integrated planning and management approach 2009 R. K.F. Unsworth author 2017 the Conversation UK, 25.09.2017 2017 10.13140/RG.2.2.15660.67203 Pieter van Beukering author 2014 The impact of invasive species on tourism 2014 J. A.C., van der Lely author 2013 The total economic value of nature on Bonaire 2013 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.05.001 P Verweij author 2015 Indicators, monitoring and assessment methods and capacityestimates. 2015 2544 Montserrat Vila author 2017 Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services 978-3-319-45121-3 2017 12 354 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.010 Poh Poh Wong author 1993 Tourism vs Environment. The case for coastal areas 978-94-011-2068-5 1993 Poh Poh Wong author 2005 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. current State and Trends 2005 10.1126/science.1132294 10.3390/ijerph120403926 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24719 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24719/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24719/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24719/download/xml/ The obligations of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 create a need for mapping and assessment of the state of biodiversity, ecosystems and their services in all European member states. Europe’s nine Outermost Regions (ORs) and 25 Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) are mainly islands, scattered around the globe. These territories contain unique flora and fauna and encompass diverse ecosystems, from coral reefs to rainforests. These highly diverse ecosystems provide multiple relevant ecosystem services from local to global scale. To date, the ecosystem services concept has so far received little attention in European ORs and OCTs. Therefore, our aims were (1) to analyse the current state of ecosystem services mapping and assessment in Europe’s overseas territories, (2) to identify knowledge gaps in the context of ecosystem service research and application and (3) to provide recommendations for future research and policy directions to fill these gaps. We conducted a systematic review of scientific literature for each of the ORs and OCTs, screening 1030 publications. The analysis resulted in 161 publications referring to ES mapping and assessment, of which most were conducted in the European Caribbean (31%) and Pacific (21%) territories. Results show that many ORs and OCTs are still blank spots in terms of ecosystem service mapping and assessment and that, despite many biodiversity studies referring to species’ abundance, little has been published on ecosystem services. Our systematic review highlights theknowledge lacking on dealing with invasive species, which pose major threats to native island biodiversity, ecosystem functions and ecosystem services. Further, it discusses knowledge gaps in (1) translation of information on island biodiversity and ecosystem functions into ES; (2) geographical coverage of mapping studies in most ORs and OCTs; (3) the lack of standardised approaches and integrated assessments to map, assess and value ecosystem services. Based on these results, future research and policy priorities could be adapted in order to focus on filling these gaps. To overcome current environmental policy challenges, it is crucial to address the ongoing decline in biodiversity, rising climatic and anthropogenic pressures on ecosystems and to maintain a sustainable ES flow to safeguard human well-being. Ultimately, ES mapping and assessment efforts will form the knowledge base for well-informed decision-making to protect Europe’s vulnerable overseas areas. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services European Union invasive species review study Hotspots of biodiversity and ecosystem services: the Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories of the European Union Ecosystem Service Mapping

10.3897/oneeco.3.e25477 2018-06-25 oneecosystem

Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Trento, Italy author Cortinovis, Chiara https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9612-4731 Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Trento, Italy author Geneletti, Davide https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5528-3365 2018-06-25 2018-06-25 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e25477 2018 10.1111/2041-210x.12899 10.1038/543315b 10.5751/es-06523-190264 10.1080/13563471003736910 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.021 10.1093/epirev/mxf007 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.003 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.011 10.1073/pnas.1231332100 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.002 Cartografia verde e mobilità sostenibile [Database of public green areas and sustainable mobility] Comune di Trento author 2010 text http://webapps.comune.trento.it/mapaccel/?project=generale&view=verde&locale=it 2010 Carta di uso del suolo [Land use map] Comune di Trento author 2017 text http://www.comune.trento.it/Aree-tematiche/Cartografia/Download/Carta-uso-del-suolo-Open-Data2 2017 Stradario del Comune di Trento [Street map of Trento] Comune di Trento author 2017 text http://www.comune.trento.it/Aree-tematiche/Cartografia/Download/Stradario-Open-Data2 2017 10.1016/j.envres.2004.10.009 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.017 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025 10.1080/0964056042000243249 10.2777/765301 European Commission author 2016 Urban Agenda for the EU 'Pact of Amsterdam' https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/urban-agenda-eu/what-urban-agenda-eu 2016 10.1038/ngeo866 10.1080/21513732.2011.617711 10.1142/s1464333215500350 10.4337/9781783471379.00019 10.4337/9781783478996.00025 10.1175/2010jamc2613.1 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019 GRASS GIS GRASS Development Team author 2017 text https://grass.osgeo.org/# 2017 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.011 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2007.232_3.x 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0 10.1017/CBO9780511750458 Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure R. Haines-Young author text https://cices.eu/ 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.002 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.007 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.016 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.029 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.004 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.062 10.1503/cmaj.081050 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.012 Mauro Lando author 2016 Alberi maestri nella città e nel territorio di Trento 978-88-86802-80-2 http://www.comune.trento.it/Comunicazione/Il-Comune-informa/Ultime-notizie/Alberi-maestri-anno-2017 2016 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.013 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.001 10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000275 10.1068/c12292j 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.005 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.10.008 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.003 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.001 Planet dump retrieved from https://planet.osm.org Open Street Map Contributors author 2017 text https://www.openstreetmap.org 2017 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018 10.1073/pnas.1502452113 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.015 Piano Generale di Utilizzazione delle Acque Pubbliche [General Plan of Public Water Uses] Provincia Autonoma di Trento author 2006 text http://pguap.provincia.tn.it/ 2006 Piste ciclabili [Map of cycle paths] Provincia Autonoma di Trento author 2010 text http://www.territorio.provincia.tn.it/portal/server.pt/community/sgc_-_geocatalogo/862/sgc_-_geocatalogo/32157 2010 Viabilità forestale [Map of forest tracks] Provincia Autonoma di Trento author 2013 text http://www.territorio.provincia.tn.it/portal/server.pt/community/sgc_-_geocatalogo/862/sgc_-_geocatalogo/32157 2013 Piano Urbanistico Provinciale [Urban Plan of the Autonomous Province of Trento] Provincia Autonoma di Trento author 2017 text http://www.urbanistica.provincia.tn.it/pianificazione/piano_urbanistico_provinciale/cartografia/pagina147.html 2017 Quantum GIS QGIS Development Team author 2017 text https://www.qgis.org/en/site/ 2017 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.005 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008 10.1080/21513732.2014.966149 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.014 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.008 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.014 I sentieri SAT del Trentino [SAT hiking trails in Trentino] Società Alpinisti Tridentini author 2017 text https://trentino.webmapp.it/#/?map=12/46.0614/11.1326 2017 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.025 Definite SPINlab Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam author 2016 text https://spinlab.vu.nl/support/tools/definite-bosda/ 2016 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.016 10.1080/21513732.2011.616534 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.003 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.016 10.2788/64369 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.005 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25477 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25477/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25477/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25477/download/xml/ This study explores the use of ecosystem service (ES) knowledge to support urban planning in the assessment of future scenarios. The case study concerns the prioritszation of brownfield regeneration interventions in the city of Trento (Italy). Alternative planning scenarios considering the conversion of existing brownfields into new urban parks are assessed and compared. The assessment focuses on two ES of critical importance for the city, namely microclimate regulation and nature-based recreation. The benefits of the different scenarios are quantified based on the number of expected beneficiaries broken down into different vulnerability classes and then compared through a multi-criteria analysis. Three combinations of criteria and weights reflect different planning objectives and related decision-makers’ orientations about what ES and beneficiary groups should be prioritised. The application demonstrates the potential for ES assessments to support urban planning processes in the specific phase of assessment and selection of alternatives, by meeting the requirements in terms of both sensitivity to small-scale changes in land uses or management activities and capacity to capture simultaneous variations in supply and demand of multiple ES. Being coherent with socially-orientated planning objectives, indicators based on ES demand and beneficiaries can effectively convey information about ES in planning decisions. Multi-criteria analysis is an effective way to integrate multiple ES assessments with other information about costs and benefits of planning scenarios, exploring diverse stakeholder perspectives and balancing competing objectives in a rational and transparent way. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers urban ecosystem services ecosystem service mapping and assessment brownfield regeneration planning scenarios multi-criteria analysis Mapping and assessing ecosystem services to support urban planning: A case study on brownfield regeneration in Trento, Italy Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.3.e25382 2018-07-10 oneecosystem

University of Trento, Trento, Italy author Geneletti, Davide https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5528-3365 University of Trento, Trento, Italy author Adem Esmail, Blal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1377-565X University of Trento, Trento, Italy author Cortinovis, Chiara https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9612-4731 2018-07-10 2018-07-10 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e25382 2018 project Enhancing ecoSysteM sERvices mApping for poLicy and Decision mAking ESMERALDA 642007 funder European Commission 10.13039/501100000780 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24490 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22509 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25477 Regional policy & outermost regions European Commission author text http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/themes/outermost-regions/ EuroVoc 4.7 - Multilingual Thesaurus of the European Union: Europe 7206 European Union author text http://eurovoc.europa.eu/drupal/?q=request&mturi=http%3A%2F%2Feurovoc.europa.eu%2F100277&language=en&view=mt&ifacelang=en 10.2785/53780 L. Kopperoinen author 2015 Deliverable 2.1. Clustering of EU Member States according to their prerequisites and needs to perform ES mapping and assessment. 2015 10.2779/75203 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25428 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:teotwa]2.0.co;2 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25499 10.3897/oneeco.3.e26719 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25508 10.1080/21513732.2017.1398185 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25470 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25382 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25382/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25382/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25382/download/xml/ A key task in the ESMERALDA project dealt with identifying appropriate case studies to test the 'flexible methodology' in its different stages of development. Case studies consist of working examples in which mapping and assessment of ecosystem services were applied to address specific decision-making problems. Testing is understood as an iterative process of co-learning that involves project partners and stakeholders, enabling the refinement of the 'flexible methodology' and the development of guidelines to support its application. Testing is conducted through a series of workshops in different European contexts, each addressing a different set of themes and regions. This paper illustrates the selection of case studies for testing the ESMERALDA 'flexible methodology' in its different stages of development. Particularly, case studies had to be selected in such a way that they are representative of: (i) the variety of existing conditions across the EU, in terms of data availability, spatial scale, levels of implementation of EU 2020 targets and expertise and experience in ES mapping and assessment; (ii) the geographical regions and biomes of the entire EU, including marine areas and the outermost regions; (iii) the variety of cross-EU themes relevant for ecosystem services, such as the Common Agricultural Policy, Green Infrastructure, Natura 2000 network, forestry strategy, water policy, energy, business and industry sectors and health; (iv) the variety of policy and planning processes that can be used to mainstream ecosystem services in real-life decisions, such as spatial and land use planning, water resource management, flooding under the EU climate adaptation action, energy policy, strategic environmental assessment, protected area planning. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem services ecosystem service mapping ecosystem service mapping and assessment biodiversity EU Biodiversity Strategy Identifying representative case studies for ecosystem services mapping and assessment across Europe Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.3.e26719 2018-07-12 oneecosystem

Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain author Santos, Fernando https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0861-4520 Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland author Viinikka, Arto Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland author Mononen, Laura Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands author M Brander, Luke https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5862-4030 Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland author Vihervaara, Petteri Flemish Institute for Technological Research VITO, Mol, Belgium author Liekens, Inge https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-7592 Fabis Consulting Ltd., Nottingham, United Kingdom author Potschin-Young, Marion 2018-07-12 2018-07-12 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e26719 2018 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831 ESMERALDA author M. Potschin author 2017 ESMERALDA http://www.esmeralda-project.eu/documents/5 2017 642007 R. Haines-Young author 2013 EEA https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaRev/GCComments/CICES_Report.pdf 2013 R. Haines-Young author 2018 CICES www.CICES.EU 2018 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016 L. Kopperoinen author 2018 ESMERALDA http://www.esmeralda-project.eu/documents/1/ 2018 642007 10.2779/75203 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023 J. Maes author 2018 One Ecosystem (in press) 2018 M. Potschin-Young author 2018 ESMERALDA http://www.esmeralda-project.eu/documents/5 2018 642007 10.3897/oneeco.3.e26719 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/26719/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/26719/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/26719/download/xml/ Identifying and applying the appropriate method for ecosystem services mapping and assessment is not trivial. To provide guidance in this task, this paper describes the creation of a database for existing studies on mapping and assessing ecosystems and their services, which records relevant information to the ecosystem studies (e.g. methods used, the scale, ecosystem type, ecosystem service categories) and other relevant attributes that need to be considered. This database, therefore, forms the basis for an online ecosystem service ‘methods finder’. Our results provide an overview of the database itself (883 entries until April 2018) and the consultation within the ESMERALDA consortium that shaped its development, as well as providing an overview of the final mapping and assessment methods describing their spatial distribution. This work helps identify the main gaps and opportunities for alignment and development of commonalities in analytical approach amongst the individual Member States. The results illustrate the different conditions, dimensions and geographical contexts in Europe, information that can be used as background to help the development of a flexible methodology for mapping and assessing ecosystem services in Europe. The paper concludes with a discussion on how the typology of methods can be used in initiatives that aim to integrate ecosystems and their services in decision-making and planning. This work highlights some challenges for future activities on mapping and assessment of ecosystem services in the EU. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Methods classification ecosystem services biophysical social economic Europe Creating an operational database for Ecosystems Services Mapping and Assessment Methods Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.3.e25494 2018-08-03 oneecosystem

Hamaarag, Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel author Lotan, Alon Hamaarag, Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel author Kost, Reuven Department of Entomology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel author Mandelik, Yael Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research, The National Institute of Oceanography, Haifa, Israel Natural Resources and Environmental Research Center, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel author Peled, Yoav Hamaarag, Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel author Chakuki, David School of Sustainability, Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya, Israel author Zemah-Shamir, Shiri Department of Tourism Studies, Ashkelon Academic College, Ashkelon, Israel author Ram, Yael 2018-08-03 2018-08-03 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e25494 2018 10.1094/pd-89-0303 10.1890/03-8024 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.10.014 10.1016/j.baae.2010.11.001 10.1371/journal.pone.0090082 10.3097/LO.201434 10.3897/ab.e12837 10.1038/nplants.2016.22 The social Survey 2014 Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) author text http://www.cbs.gov.il/reader/?MIval=cw_usr_view_SHTML&ID=988 Tourism and Hotel Services Statistics Quarterly Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) author text http://www.cbs.gov.il/reader/hotel/hot_nosim_new_eng.html 10.1080/02626667.2011.631013 10.1079/9780851994482.0000 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.01.002 10.1371/journal.pone.0021363 ArcGIS. 10.4 ESRI author 2016 text 2016 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.019 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01669.x 10.1126/science.1230200 10.1560/ijps.57.4.277 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.013 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.023 10.1111/ele.12082 10.1098/rspb.2013.2440 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721 10.1007/s10980-010-9540-8 10.1094/phyto.2004.94.5.505 Determining Conservation Hotspots Across Biogeographic Regions Using Rainfall Belts: Israel as a Case Study N. Levin author 2007 text Israel journal of ecology & evolution https://scholars.huji.ac.il/noamlevin/publications/determining-conservation-hotspots-across-biogeographic-regions-using-rainfall 2007 53 31 5 Alon Lotan author 2015 Prioritizing Ecosystem services in the Ramat Menashe Biosphere Region in Cooperation with local Communities 2015 Alon Lotan author 2017 Israel Ecosystem Assessment, Interim Report 2017 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023 MEA author 2005 Millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. 2005 C. D. Michener author 2007 The Bees of the World, second edition 2007 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x An Ecosystem Services Inventory: Lessons From the Northern Negev Long-Term Social Ecological Research (LTSER) Platform Daniel E. Orenstein author 2012 text Geography Research Forum 2012 32 96 118 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.009 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.001 10.1007/s13592-013-0242-5 10.1890/14-0910.1 10.1111/1365-2664.12574 10.1007/978-3-319-26218-5_3 10.3390/land4040938 Fernando Santos-Martín author 2018 Report on Social Mapping and Assessment methods Deliverable D3.1 2018 10.1007/978-1-4899-3324-9 10.1007/s10393-013-0870-2 10.1038/s41598-017-18007-4 UK-NEA author 2011 The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report 2011 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.08.011 10.1002/bies.201000075 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01110.x 10.1098/rspb.2008.0709 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25494 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25494/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25494/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25494/download/xml/ The Israel - National Ecosystem Assessment (I-NEA) project aims to present a comprehensive picture of the state and trends of Israel's ecosystem services across all ecosystems, by integrating existing data and information collected from a wide range of sources. Although there is a lack of information about the spatial distribution of ecosystem services’ provisioning in Israel, their mapping constitutes an important part of the assessment. In this paper, we present a national-scale mapping of three ecosystem services, each of them implemented using different methods: 1) Genetic resources service, mapped using spatial observations of the Crop Wild Relatives species; 2) potential of pollination service, which is provided by wild bees, mapped using an expert-based habitat model related to land use and land cover; and 3) cultural service of recreation, mapped by analysing the distribution of geotagged digital photographs uploaded to social media resources. The derived maps visualise, for the first time in Israel, the spatially distributed values of the three ecosystem services. Supply hotspots with high values for all three services were identified, as well as spatial differences amongst the ecosystem services. These national-scale maps provide overlooked insights and can be very useful for strategic discussions of stakeholders and decision-makers but should be regarded with caution given existing knowledge gaps and possible inaccuracies due to data scarcity and low resolution. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem services mapping national ecosystem assessment crop wild relatives wild bees cultural ecosystem services recreation geotagged photos ESMERALDA National scale mapping of ecosystem services in Israel – genetic resources, pollination and cultural services Ecosystem Service Mapping

10.3897/oneeco.3.e25499 2018-08-10 oneecosystem

Baltic Environmental Forum, Riga, Latvia University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia author Ruskule, Anda https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1580-8304 Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences, Valmiera, Latvia author Klepers, Andris Baltic Environmental Forum, Riga, Latvia University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia author Veidemane, Kristina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5497-3030 2018-08-10 2018-08-10 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e25499 2018 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.03.019 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.015 Decision-guide: selecting decision-support tools for marine spatial planning Center for Ocean Solutions author text http://www.centerforoceansolutions.org/sites/default/files/publications/cos_msp_guide_6.pdf 10.1080/14616680802000089 C. Cooper author 1998 Tourism. Principles and Practice 1998 C. Cooper author 2008 Contemporary Tourism. An International Approach 2008 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.038 10.1109/BALTIC.2012.6249166 EG Drakou author B Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 374 10.1080/21513732.2017.1417330 10.1111/2041-210X.12899 European Commission author 2012 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Blue Growth opportunities for marine and maritime sustainable growth. COM/2012/0494 final. 2012 European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (EP CEU) author 2008 Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) 2008 European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (EP CEU) author 2014 Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning 2014 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002. 10.1080/15022250216287 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.047 A. Grêt-Regamey author B. Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 374 10.1080/21513732.2011.647835 C. A. Gunn author 1979 Tourism Planning 1979 C. A. Gunn author 1993 Tourism Planning: Basics, Concepts and Cases 1993 Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES), Version 4.3. Report to the European Environment Agency R. Haines-Young author text www.cices.eu 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.008 L Kopperoinen author B Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 374 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.016 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.013 10.1016/0160-7383(79)90003-3 10.1016/0160-7383(90)90004-B J. Maes author 2013 Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 2013 J. Maes author 2014 Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: Indicators for Ecosystem Assessments Under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 2014 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.004 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.022 10.1080/21513732.2012.663792 10.3390/su9071037 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.009 10.5751/ES-05790-180344 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment author 2005 Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis report 2005 10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00080-1 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.03.038 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.008. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.033 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.01.009 D. Rink author I. Kowarik author 2005 Wild Urban Woodlands 2005 A. Ruskule author 2009 See the Baltic Sea. Unique assets we share 2009 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.011 S. L.J. Smith author 1995 Tourism Analysis: a Handbook 1995 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013 10.1080/21513732.2017.1398185 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.12.005 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.001 The measurement of place attachment: validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach D. R. Williams author 2003 text Forest Science 2003 49 6 830 840 10.4462/annbotrm-11807 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25499 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25499/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25499/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25499/download/xml/ Mapping of cultural ecosystem services (CES) in marine and coastal areas is still recognised as a conceptually and technically challenging task, due to the difficulties in establishing a link between the biophysical features of the coastal ecosystem and the supply of services such as recreation and tourism, bird watching and enjoyment of other assets of nature. This was also one of the major challenges in ecosystem service mapping for the Maritime Spatial Plan for Internal Waters, Territorial Waters and Economic Exclusive Zone of the Republic of Latvia. Suitability of the coastal areas for marine tourism and leisure activities was chosen as an indicator to map the CES – physical and experiential interactions. The method involved the compilation of field data from a survey of visitors at the beach and on coastal infrastructure, serving as the input for the multi-criteria assessment of CES. Four criteria were applied to assess the suitability of the coastal areas for marine tourism and leisure activities: i) accessibility; ii) proximity to densely populated areas; iii) suitability of the area for a particular (niche) tourism or leisure activity; and iv) recreational use. The selected criteria provide an overall assessment framework, which integrates the ecosystem service potential, benefiting areas, flow and demand aspects. The CES mapping and assessment results were applied to the maritime spatial planning for proposing areas of priority for tourism development, as well as assessing the impacts of the proposed solutions for other uses of the sea. The Latvian approach for mapping of the cultural services in coastal areas was selected as the ESMERALDA case study and examined at the stakeholder workshop in Prague, September 2016. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Cultural ecosystem services mapping and assessment maritime spatial planning tourism potential multi-criteria analysis Mapping and assessment of cultural ecosystem services of Latvian coastal areas Methods

10.3897/oneeco.3.e25380 2018-08-17 oneecosystem

Estonian University of Life Sciences, Chair of Environmental Protection and Landscape Management, Tartu, Estonia author Villoslada, Miguel https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7777-6577 University of Latvia, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, Riga, Latvia author Vinogradovs, Ivo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5760-8058 University of Latvia, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, Riga, Latvia Baltic Environmental Forum - Latvia, Riga, Latvia author Ruskule, Anda https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1580-8304 Baltic Environmental Forum - Latvia, Riga, Latvia University of Latvia, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, Riga, Latvia author Veidemane, Kristina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5497-3030 University of Latvia, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, Riga, Latvia author Nikodemus, Olgerts University of Latvia, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, Riga, Latvia author Kasparinskis, Raimonds https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3692-1621 Estonian University of Life Sciences, Chair of Environmental Protection and Landscape Management, Tartu, Estonia author Sepp, Kalev Baltic Environmental Forum - Lithuania, Vilnius, Lithuania author Gulbinas, Justas 2018-08-17 2018-08-17 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e25380 2018 project Enhancing ecoSysteM sERvices mApping for poLicy and Decision mAking ESMERALDA 642007 funder European Commission 10.13039/501100000780 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002 10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4_11 A. Boruks author 2001 Zemes izmantošana un kadastrs Latvijā 9984-9508-1-6 2001 408 James M Bullock author 2011 UK National Ecosystem Assessment. Understanding nature's value to society. Technical Report 2011 10.3097/lo.200915 CICES (2015) Version 4.3 towards a common classification of ecosystem services CICES author text http://cices.eu/ 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.04.005 10.7809/b-e.00114 10.1080/13504509.2016.1146176 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.005 Adsorption and migration of heavy metals in soil A Dube author 2001 text Polish journal of environmental studies 2001 10 1 1 10 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.12.001 10.1111/2041-210x.12899 European Commission author 2015 The State of Nature in the European Union: Report on the status of and trends for habitat types and species covered by the Birds and Habitats Directives for the 2007-2012 period as required under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive and Article 12 of the Birds Directive 2015 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001 10.1080/21513732.2017.1396257 10.4337/9781783471379.00019 10.1080/21513732.2018.1447016 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.025 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.012 10.1111/1365-2745.12014 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.066 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.011 Applying Ecosystem Services Approaches for Biodiversity Conservation: Benefits and Challenges Jane Carter Ingram author 2012 text S.A.P.I.EN.S 2012 5 1 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.024 10.1007/978-3-642-22285-6_2 10.1515/euco-2016-0006 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.007 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.006 10.1504/ijarge.2015.074094 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.024 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010 10.1007/s10113-011-0214-0 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.022 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01753.x 10.3097/lo.201648 Joachim Maes author 2011 A European assessment of the provision of ecosystem services. Towards an atlas of ecosystem services 2011 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.006 10.5751/es-09105-220239 10.1068/c12292j 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.005 10.2478/v10091-010-0003-7 10.3897/oneeco.2.e13718 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01250.x 10.3897/oneeco.3.e20713 10.1068/c22s 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.043 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.11.009 10.2478/v10132-011-0090-x 10.1073/pnas.0907284107 10.1080/21513732.2014.966149 S. Rūsiņa author S. Rūsiņa author 2017 Outstanding semi-natural grassland sites in Latvia: biodiversity, managment, restoration 2017 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.03.012 Analysis of the policies and regulatory framework influencing maintenance of grassland ecosystems in the Baltic States: Synthesis Report. LIFE Viva Grass. Baltic Environmental Forum Anda Ruskule author text http://vivagrass.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/7-2-5_policy-assessment_syntesis-report_october2016_final.pdf 10.3897/oneeco.3.e26719 J. Sarukhan author 2005 Millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. 2005 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.003 10.1016/j.cis.2013.10.005 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.006 10.1201/9781315372860-12 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.010 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.010 10.1016/j.baae.2005.01.001 TEEB author 2010 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB 2010 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.025 10.2788/91182 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.009 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.011 10.3846/aainz.2016.31 10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.016 Ulrich Walz author Benjamin Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 374 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.002 10.1080/01426397.2017.1316367 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.035 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25380 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25380/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25380/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25380/download/xml/ Throughout the second half of the 20th Century, the area of semi-natural grasslands in the Baltic States decreased substantially, due to agricultural abandonment in some areas and intensification in more productive soil types. In order to halt the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services provided by grasslands, the LIFE+ programme funded project, LIFE Viva Grass, aims at developing an integrated planning tool that will support ecosystem-based planning and sustainable grassland management. LIFE Viva Grass integrated planning tool is spatially explicit and allows the user to assess the provision and trade-offs of grassland ecosystem services within eight project case study areas in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. In order to ensure methodological adaptability, the structure of the LIFE Viva Grass integrated planning tool follows the framework of the tiered approach. In a multi-tier system, each consecutive tier entails an increase in data requirements, methodological complexity or both. The present paper outlines the adaptation of the tiered approach for mapping and assessing ecosystem services provided by grasslands in the Baltic States. The first tier corresponds to a deliberative decision process: The matrix approach is used to assess the potential supply of grassland ecosystem services based on expert estimations. Expert values are subsequently transferred to grassland units and therefore made spatially explicit. The data collected in the first tier was further enhanced through a Principal Components Analysis (PCA) in order to explore ES bundles in tier 2. In the third tier, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis is used to target specific policy questions. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem services grasslands tiered approach integrated planning A multitiered approach for grassland ecosystem services mapping and assessment: The Viva Grass tool Methods

10.3897/oneeco.3.e27110 2018-08-17 oneecosystem

Fabis Consulting Ltd., Barton In Fabis, United Kingdom author Potschin-Young, Marion Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research ZALF, Müncheberg, Germany author Burkhard, Benjamin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-9009 MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France author Czúcz, Bálint https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-7633 Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain author Santos, Fernando https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0861-4520 2018-08-17 2018-08-17 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e27110 2018 10.3897/ab.e12837 Note on definitions related to ecosystem conditions and their services based on different glossaries B. Czúcz author text https://bd.eionet.europa.eu/Reports/ETCBDTechnicalWorkingpapers/Definitions_ecosystem_conditions_and_services 10.2779/41384 M. Potschin author 2016 Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services 978-1-138-02508-0 http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9781138025080/ 2016 630 M. Potschin author 2016 OpenNESS Glossary (V3.0). Grant Agreement No 308428 http://www.openness-project.eu/glossary 2016 M Potschin-Young author 2018 Glossary for Ecosystem Service mapping and assessment terminology. Deliverable D1.4 EU Horizon 2020 ESMERALDA Project, Grant agreement No. 642007 http://www.esmeralda-project.eu/getatt.php?filename=ESMERALDA%20D1.4_14964.pdf 2018 49 10.3897/oneeco.3.e26719 10.3897/oneeco.3.e27110 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/27110/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/27110/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/27110/download/xml/ Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services (MAES) is a key EU initiative to synthesise vital environmental information and facilitate balanced policy decisions. As MAES integrates across many scientific and policy domains, the development of a common language and shared concepts is essential. Here we present a comprehensive MAES Glossary that was compiled in the ESMERALDA project; it is based on the integration of several previous glossaries and a wide-ranging consultation process. While there are several ecosystem services glossaries available from EU supported work such as Oppla, OpenNESS and ecosystem services related handbooks, the new material presented here focuses on mapping and assessment of ecosystem services and therefore more directly supports the MAES process. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystems Ecosystem Services Mapping Assessment Terminology ESMERALDA OpenNESS EU Biodiversity Strategy Glossary of ecosystem services mapping and assessment terminology Review Article

10.3897/oneeco.3.e24880 2018-08-20 oneecosystem

VITO, Mol, Belgium author Lauwaet, Dirk RIVM, Utrecht, Netherlands author De NIjs, Ton VITO, Mol, Belgium author Liekens, Inge https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-7592 VITO, Mol, Belgium author Hooyberghs, Hans VITO, Mol, Belgium author Verachtert, Els VITO, Mol, Belgium author Lefebvre, Wouter VITO, Mol, Belgium author De Ridder, Koen RIVM, Utrecht, Netherlands author Remme, Roy VITO, Mol, Belgium author Broekx, Steven https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0036-386X 2018-08-20 2018-08-20 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e24880 2018 project Enhancing ecoSysteM sERvices mApping for poLicy and Decision mAking ESMERALDA 642007 funder European Commission 10.13039/501100000780 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006 10.1007/s11709-009-0066-6 10.1177/0309133312461032 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.01.001 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.016 10.5194/gmd-9-4439-2016 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.104 10.3390/cli3020391 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.11.008 10.1175/2008JAMC1774.1 Water facilities for creation of comfortable urban micrometeorology N Nishimura author 1998 text Solar Energy 1998 64 4 197 207 10.1007/BF00119211 C. Rosenzweig author 2015 ARC3.2 Summary for City Leaders 2015 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.252 10.1080/014311698214884 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.031 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.08.029 10.5194/acp-13-8525-2013 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24880 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24880/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24880/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/24880/download/xml/ People living in cities experience extra heat stress due to the so-called Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect. To gain an insight into the spatial variability of the UHI for the Netherlands, a detailed map (10 m horizontal resolution) has been calculated that shows the summer-averaged daily maximal UHI situation. The map is based on a relationship between the UHI, mean wind speed at 10 m height and the number of people living within a distance of 10 km, derived from simulations of over 100 European cities with the extensively validated urban climate model UrbClim. The cooling effect of green and blue infrastructure is also taken into account in the map, based on these simulation results. The presented map will help local authorities in defining target areas for climate adaptation measures and estimate the impact of nature-based solutions. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Urban Heat Island Netherlands nature-based solutions UrbClim model Ecosystem services mapping A new method for fine-scale assessments of the average urban Heat island over large areas and the effectiveness of nature-based solutions Methods

10.3897/oneeco.3.e26722 2018-08-27 oneecosystem

MARETEC - Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal author Marta Pedroso, Cristina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3081-7807 MARETEC - Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal author Laporta, Lia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4178-4537 MARETEC - Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal author Gama, Ivo MARETEC - Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal author Domingos, Tiago 2018-08-27 2018-08-27 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e26722 2018 10.3197/096327118X15144698637513 10.1007/s10640-010-9418-x 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.066 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.014 Luke M. Brander author 2013 Guidance manual on value transfer methods for ecosystem services 978-92-807-3362-4 2013 Yvonne Cerqueira author 2015 Rewilding European Landscapes 978-3-319-12038-6 978-3-319-12039-3 2015 10.1111/1365-2664.12545 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.018 10.1002/eet.1661 European Commission author 2011 The EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 2011 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.011 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.05.023 10.1007/s10021-016-9986-x 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008 10.1007/s10021-014-9766-4 10.1007/s10980-015-0241-1 Roy Haines-Young author 2010 Proposal for a Common International Classification of Ecosystem Goods and Services (CICES) for Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting (V1) 2010 Applying Ecosystem Services Approaches for Biodiversity Conservation: Benefits and Challenges Jane Carter Ingram author 2012 text S.A.P.I.EN.S. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society 2012 M. Koetse author 2015 J. Bouma & P. Van Beukering (Eds.). Ecosystem Services: From Concept to Practice (pp. 108-131). doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107477612.009 2015 Protected areas: providing natural solutions to 21st Century challenges N. Lopoukhine author 2012 text S.A.P.I.EN.S. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society 2012 Análise de Rentabilidade das Áreas Submetidas a Regime Florestal. Henrique Machado author 2009 text Actas do 6.º Congresso Florestal Nacional. Ponta Delgada: Sociedade Portuguesa de Ciências Florestais 2009 883 889 MADRP author 2010 Programa de Desenvolvimento Rural do Continente 2007-2013. Versão de Março de 2010. 2010 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023 J. Maes author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 10.5424/fs/2016251-08122 Cost-benefit analysis of the Zonal Program of Castro Verde (Portugal): highlighting the trade-off between biodiversity and soil conservation C. Marta-Pedroso author 2007 text Soil and Tillage Research 2007 97 1 79 90 Cristina Marta-Pedroso author 2014 in: Azevedo J, Perera AH & Pinto MA (eds) "Forest Landscapes and Global Change - Challenges for Research and Management" 978-1-4939-0952-0 2014 Cristina Marta-Pedroso author 2014 Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Portugal. Final Report 2014 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.011 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.015 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.018 10.15287/afr.2015.335 10.5751/ES-03862-160123 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.012 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.015 Henrique M. Pereira author 2015 Rewilding European Landscapes 978-3-319-12039-3 2015 10.1007/s00267-012-9820-y 10.1177/0309133311423172 Marion Potschin author 2016 Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services 2016 10.1371/journal.pone.0148524 10.1093/biosci/biw004 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.03.005 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.008 Executive summary (full) Nicholas Stern author 2006 text Stern Review Report on the Economics of Climate Change http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130129110402/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/Executive_Summary.pdf 2006 TEEB author 2010 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. 2010 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.007 Frank Vermeulen author 2010 From Present to Past through Landscape 978-84-00-08908-5 2010 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00393-2 10.3897/oneeco.3.e26722 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/26722/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/26722/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/26722/download/xml/ Demonstrating economic benefits generated by protected areas is often pointed out as pivotal for supporting decision-making. We argue in this paper that the concept of ecosystem services (ES), defined as the benefits humans derive from ecosystems, provides a consistent framework to approach this issue as it links ecosystem functioning and benefits, including benefits with economic value. This study aimed at providing evidence on how to bring the economic value of protected areas to the decision-making process and contributing to extend current EU Member States' experience in mapping and assessing the economic value of ES in the context of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 (Action 5). In doing so, we used the Natural Park of Serra de S. Mamede (PNSSM), located in the Alentejo NUTS II region, as a case study. We followed a three-step approach to pursue our goals, entailing stakeholders' engagement for selecting relevant ES (through a participatory workshop), biophysical mapping of ES flows (based on a multi-tiered approach depending on data availability) and spatial economic estimation of such flows (using value transfer, willingness-to-pay and market price methods). Our results indicate that the ES with highest economic value are not always the ones with higher perceived value by stakeholders. For most ES, the economic value increased with increasing protection level within the park, except for the crop production service. Although no formal uncertainty or sensitivity analysis has been performed, the following range is based on a critical assessment of non-primary data used. We estimated the aggregate annual value of PNSSM to be 11 to 33M€/year (representing 0.1 to 0.3% of the regional NUTSII Alentejo Gross Domestic Product). Our findings reinforce the need to adopt mixes of monetary and non-monetary valuation processes and not to rely just on one approach or measure of value while bringing ES into protected areas management. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Protected areas ecosystem services economic valuation spatial assessment Economic valuation and mapping of Ecosystem Services in the context of protected area management (Natural Park of Serra de São Mamede, Portugal) Methods

10.3897/oneeco.3.e26363 2018-08-31 oneecosystem

MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Klebelsberg K. u. 3, H-8237 Tihany, Hungary European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 57 rue Cuvier, FR-75231 Paris, Paris Cedex 05, France author Czúcz, Bálint https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-7633 MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Klebelsberg K. u. 3, H-8237 Tihany, Hungary author Kalóczkai, Ágnes MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Klebelsberg K. u. 3, H-8237 Tihany, Hungary author Arany, Ildikó Milvus Group Association, Crinului Str. 22, 540343 Targu Mures, Romania author Kelemen, Katalin Milvus Group Association, Crinului Str. 22, 540343 Targu Mures, Romania author Papp, Judith Milvus Group Association, Crinului Str. 22, 540343 Targu Mures, Romania author Havadtői, Krisztina Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, European Commission, Place Charles Rogier 16, 1210 Saint-Josse-ten-Noode Brussels, Belgium author Campbell, Krisztina Milvus Group Association, Crinului Str. 22, 540343 Targu Mures, Romania author Kelemen, Márton MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Klebelsberg K. u. 3, H-8237 Tihany, Hungary author Vári, Ágnes https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5285-847X 2018-08-31 2018-08-31 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e26363 2018 Towards a national set of ecosystem service indicators: Insights from Germany C. Albert author 2016 text Ecological Indicators https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.050 2016 61 38 48 Towards a National Ecosystem Assessment in Germany: A Plea for a Comprehensive Approach. GAIA - C. Albert author 2017 text Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.1.8 2017 26 1 27 33 I. Arany author 2016 What is the way forward? Scenarios for the Niraj-Târnava Mică region with relation to ecosystem services. http://www.milvus.ro/ecoservices/images/MAES_LV_ENG.pdf 2016 I Arany author 2017 How much are nature’s gifts worth? - Summary study of the mapping and assessment of ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites of the Niraj-Târnava Mică region http://www.milvus.ro/ecoservices/images/MAES_ST_ENG.pdf 2017 74 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.05.013 10.13140/RG.2.1.4924.5841 10.1111/een.12247 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x rgdal: Bindings for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library R. Bivand author 2016 text R package version https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgdal 2016 v1 2 5 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.08.001 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002 ESMERALDA Integrated Ecosystem Assessment. C Brown author 2018 text One Ecosystem (in preparation) 2018 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.004 10.3097/LO.200915 10.3097/lo.201434 Mapping and assessing ecosystems services in the EU – The ESMERALDA coordination and support action approach of integration. B et al. Burkhard author 2018 text One Ecosystem (in preparation) 2018 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831 Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity B. J. Cardinale author 2012 text Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11148 2012 486 7401 59 67 10.1073/pnas.1231332100 D Compagnon author M Hrabanski author 2016 The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Meeting the challenges of biodiversity conservation and governance. ISBN 987-1-138-12125-6 2016 254 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008 B. Czúcz author M. and Potschin author 2016 OpenNESS Ecosystem Services Reference Book www.openness-project.eu/library/reference-book 2016 B Czúcz author 2017 Working paper on functional relationships between ecosystem characteristics and services in support of condition assessment. ETC/BD report to the EEA. https://bd.eionet.europa.eu/Reports/ETCBDTechnicalWorkingpapers/PDF/Functional_relationships_ecosystem_condition_assessments.pdf 2017 B Czúcz author Á Vári author 2017 Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites of the Niraj-Târnava Mică region. ISBN 978-973-0-24530-1 http://milvus.ro/ecoservices/images/maesprojectreport.pdf 2017 127-150. S. Díaz author 2015 Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002 2015 14 10.1126/science.aap8826 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.015 ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.2. ESRI author 2011 text Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute. http://resources.arcgis.com/ 2011 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-l 10.1590/s0104-59701997000200002 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008 On the importance of a broad stakeholder network for developing a credible, salient and legitimate tiered approach for assessing ecosystem services. A Grêt-Regamey author 2018 text One Ecosystem (in preparation) 2018 10.1073/pnas.1503751112 Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. R. Haines-Young author text http://www.cices.eu 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016 10.1371/journal.pone.0164460 raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling R. J. Hijmans author 2016 text R package version 2016 v2 5 8 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.024 Á. Kalóczkai author Á. Vári author 2017 Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites of the Niraj-Târnava Mică region. ISBN 978-973-0-24530-1 http://milvus.ro/ecoservices/images/maesprojectreport.pdf 2017 161-184 Bottom-up thinking—Identifying socio-cultural values of ecosystem services in local blue–green infrastructure planning in V. Kati author 2016 text Land Use Policy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.031 2016 50 537 547 E Kelemen author Á. Vári author 2017 Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites of the Niraj-Târnava Mică region http://milvus.ro/ecoservices/images/maesprojectreport.pdf 2017 61-84 K Kelemen author Á Vári author 2017 Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites of the Niraj-Târnava Mică region. ISBN 978-973-0-24530-1 http://milvus.ro/ecoservices/images/maesprojectreport.pdf 2017 185-219. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.006 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.004 D. A. Loorbach author 2007 Transition Management: new mode of governance for sustainable development. Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1765/10200 2007 C. Lyall author C. Lyall author 2005 New modes of governance, developing an integrated approach to science, technology, risk and the environment. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, England 978-0754641643 2005 MA author 2005 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis 2005 Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. J. Maes author 2013 text Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/knowledge/ecosystem_assessment/pdf/MAESWorkingPaper2013.pdf 2013 J. Maes author 2014 Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: Indicators for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. 2nd Report. http://catalogue.biodiversity.europa.eu/uploads/document/file/1230/ 2ndMAESWorkingPaper.pdf 2014 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.049 10.1371/journal.pone.0038970 Landscape ethnoecological knowledge base and management of ecosystem services in a Székely-Hungarian pre-capitalistic village system (Transylvania, Romania) Z. Molnár author 2015 text Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-11-3 2015 11 3 10.3897/oneeco.2.e13718 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.002 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.003 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.001 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.020 10.5751/es-03862-160123 Classes and methods for spatial data in R E. J. Pebesma author 2005 text R News https://cran.r-project.org/doc/Rnews/ 2005 5 2 9 13 Global use of ecosystem service models S. Posner author 2016 text Ecosystem Services 2016 17 131 141 10.1177/0309133311423172 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.001 Understanding the role of conceptual frameworks: Reading the ecosystem service cascade M. Potschin-Young author 2018 text Ecosystem Services 2018 29 428 440 Quantum GIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. QGIS author 2016 text Pisa http://qgis.osgeo.org 2016 10.1073/pnas.1310539110 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.043 Analysis of ecosystem services provision in the Colombian Amazon using participatory research and mapping techniques S. O.I. Ramirez-Gomez author 2015 text Ecosystem Services https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.009 2015 13 93 107 10.1073/pnas.0907284107 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.003 10.1007/s13593-015-0320-3 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.06.018 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.006 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004 Institutional Ecology, `Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. S. L. Star author 1989 text Social Studies of Science https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001 1989 19 3 387 420 10.1186/s13002-015-0036-0 10.5751/es-08345-210143 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.011 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.12.003 Á Vári author Á Vári author 2017 Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites of the Niraj-Târnava Mică region. ISBN 978-973-0-24530-1 http://milvus.ro/ecoservices/images/maesprojectreport.pdf 2017 85-126. 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.010 10.1007/s00267-011-9726-0 ESTIMAP: Ecosystem services mapping at European scale G. Zulian author 2013 text Scientific and Technical Research Reports). Publications Office of the European http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/111111111/30410 2013 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.005 10.3897/oneeco.3.e26363 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/26363/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/26363/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/26363/download/xml/ There is a broad diversity of concepts and methods used in ecosystem service (ES) mapping and assessment projects with many open questions related to the implementation of the concepts and the use of the methods at various scales. In this paper, we present a regional ES mapping and assessment (MAES) study performed between 2015 and 2017 over an area of ~900 km2 in Central Romania. The Niraj-MAES project supported by EEA funds and the Romanian government aimed at identifying, assessing and mapping all major ES supplied by the Natura 2000 sites nested in the valleys of the Niraj and Târnava Mică rivers amongst the foothills of the Eastern Carpathians. Major ES in this culturally and ecologically rich semi-natural landscape were determined and prioritised in cooperation with local stakeholders. Indicators for the capacities of individual services were modelled with a multi-tiered methodology, relying on the involvement of regional thematic experts. ES with appropriate socio-economic data were also evaluated economically. The whole process was supervised by a stakeholder advisory board endowed with a remarkable decision-making position, giving feedback and recommendations to the scientists at the critical nodes of the process, thus ensuring salience and legitimacy. In addition to simply presenting the dry facts about the approaches (assessment targets, methods) and outcomes, we also identify several key decisions on the design of the whole assessment process related to (1) the role of conceptual frameworks, (2) stakeholder involvement, (3) the selection of ES to assess (priority setting), (4) the development of models and indicators and (5) the interpretation of outcomes, for which we give a detailed description of the decision process. We found that conceptual frameworks can have a pivotal role in structuring and facilitating communication amongst the participants of a MAES project and that a broad and structured involvement of stakeholders and (local) experts creates a sense of ownership and thus can facilitate local policy uptake. We argue that priority setting and the development of indicators should be an iterative process and we also give an example how such a process can be designed, enabling an efficient participation of a broad range of experts and the collaborative development of simple ES models and indicators. Finally, we discuss several general issues related to the interpretation of results of any kind of MAES and the follow-up of regional MAES projects. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers MAES ecosystem assessment conceptual framework mapping transdisciplinarity ecosystem condition participatory approach How to design a transdisciplinary regional ecosystem service assessment: a case study from Romania, Eastern Europe Ecosystem Service Mapping

10.3897/oneeco.3.e29153 2018-09-05 oneecosystem

Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research ZALF, Müncheberg, Germany author Burkhard, Benjamin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-9009 European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Maes, Joachim https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-1607 Fabis Consulting Ltd, Barton In Fabis, United Kingdom author Potschin-Young, Marion Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain author Santos, Fernando https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0861-4520 University of Trento, Trento, Italy author Geneletti, Davide https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5528-3365 National Museum of Natural History and Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Bulgaria author Stoev, Pavel https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5702-5677 Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland author Kopperoinen, Leena https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1672-6087 Bucharest University, Bucharest, Romania author Adamescu, Cristian https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3056-8444 University of Trento, Trento, Italy author Adem Esmail, Blal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1377-565X MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary author Arany, Ildikó UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, United Kingdom author Arnell, Andy Malta College of Arts, Science and Technology, Paola, Malta author Balzan, Mario https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2016-3937 NINA - Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Oslo, Norway author Barton, David N. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6501-9381 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands author van Beukering, Pieter Kiel University CAU, Kiel, Germany author Lange, Sabine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4595-4292 CE3C – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes / Azorean Biodiversity Group and Universidade dos Açores, Angra do Heroísmo, Azores, Portugal author Borges, Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8448-7623 Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria author Borisova, Bilyana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3225-9514 Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, Netherlands author Braat, Leon University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands author M Brander, Luke https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5862-4030 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research - BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria author Bratanova-Doncheva, Svetla VITO, Brussels, Belgium author Broekx, Steven https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0036-386X UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, United Kingdom author Brown, Claire University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania author Cazacu, Constantin Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Adelaide, Australia author Crossman, Neville MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France author Czúcz, Bálint https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-7633 CzechGlobe - Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic author Danek, Jan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2445-7614 Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands author Groot, Rudolf de CNR - National Research Council of Italy, ISMAR - Institute of Marine Sciences (CNR-ISMAR), Venice, Italy Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania author Depellegrin, Daniel University of Patras, Department of Biology, Division of Plant Biology, Laboratory of Botany, Rio, Patras, Greece author Dimopoulos, Panayotis https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-9954 Ministry for Sustainable Development and Infrastructure, Luxembourg, Luxembourg author Elvinger, Nora EEA Copenhagen, Copennhagen, Denmark author Erhard, Markus University of Copenhagen UCPH , Copenhagen , Denmark author Fagerholm, Nora CzechGlobe - Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic author Frélichová, Jana ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland author Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8156-9503 Pensoft, Sofia, Bulgaria author Grudova, Margarita Fabis Consulting Ltd, Barton In Fabis, United Kingdom author Haines-Young, Roy Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden author Inghe, Ola Regional Environmental Center, Budapest, Hungary author Kallay, Tamas Croatian Agency for the Environment and Nature, Zagreb, Croatia author Kirin, Tamara University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria author Klug, Hermann https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0545-9721 University of Patras, Department of Biology, Division of Plant Biology, Laboratory of Botany, Rio, Patras, Greece author Kokkoris, Ioannis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-3445 Foundation for Sustainable Development, Wageningen, Netherlands author Konovska, Iskra Kiel University CAU, Kiel, Germany author Kruse, Marion https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0789-0045 Pensoft, Sofia, Bulgaria author Demirova, Iliyana Cyprus Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus author Lange, Manfred Flemish Institute for Technological Research VITO, Mol, Belgium author Liekens, Inge https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-7592 Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel author Lotan, Alon Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, Poland author Lowicki, Damian https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5964-2724 IRSTEA, Montpellier, France author Luque, Sandra MARETEC - Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal author Marta Pedroso, Cristina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3081-7807 Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, Poland author Mizgajski, Andrzej Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland author Mononen, Laura Foundation for Sustainable Development, Wageningen, Netherlands author Mulder, Sara Kiel University CAU, Kiel, Germany author Müller, Felix National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, Sofia, Bulgaria author Nedkov, Stoyan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-9815 Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria author Nikolova, Mariana Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden author Östergård, Hannah Pensoft Publishers & Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria author Penev, Lyubomir https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2186-5033 Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania author Pereira, Paulo Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Joensuu, Finland author Pitkänen, Kati University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany author Plieninger, Tobias ETHZ, Zurich, Switzerland author Rabe, Sven-Erik https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7375-7739 Salzburg University, ZGIS, Salzburg, Austria author Reichel, Steffen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5574-2453 IRSTEA, UR RECOVER, Aix-en-Provence, France author Roche, Philip https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4443-7434 NINA, Trondheim, Norway author Rusch, Graciela https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3769-8345 University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia Baltic Environmental Forum, Riga, Latvia Baltic Environmental Forum, Riga, Latvia author Ruskule, Anda https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1580-8304 Pensoft, Sofia, Bulgaria author Sapundzhieva, Anna Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia author Sepp, Kalev Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany author Sieber, Ina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2134-0429 The Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ljubliana, Slovenia author Šmid Hribar, Mateja https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5445-0865 Nature, Biodiversity and Landscape Protection Directorate Ministry of Environment, Bratislava, Slovakia author Stašová, Simona Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany author Steinhoff-Knopp, Bastian https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9926-8028 Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, Poland author Stępniewska, Małgorzata https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1052-648X Directorate General Environment of the European Commission, Brussels, Belgium author Teller, Anne CzechGlobe - Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic author Vackaru, Dava https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6185-200X Foundation for Sustainable Development, Wageningen, Netherlands author van Weelden, Martine Baltic Environmental Forum-Latvia BEF-LV, Riga, Latvia University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia author Veidemane, Kristina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5497-3030 University of Copenhagen UCPH, Copenhagen, Denmark author Vejre, Henrik Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) , Helsinki, Finland author Vihervaara, Petteri Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) , Helsinki, Finland author Viinikka, Arto Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia author Villoslada, Miguel https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7777-6577 ETHZ, Zurich, Switzerland author Weibel, Bettina European Commission – Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Zulian, Grazia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9951-6765 2018-09-05 2018-09-05 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e29153 2018 funder European Commission 10.13039/501100000780 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24490 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22509 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 10.3897/ab.e12837 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24134 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25477 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.018 10.3897/oneeco.2.e13714 European Commission author 2011 Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 2011 244 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25382 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14021 10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016 10.1080/21513732.2017.1415974 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25494 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 10.2779/12398 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25309 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14499 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25428 10.3897/oneeco.3.e27110 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25499 10.3897/oneeco.3.e26719 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24719 10.3897/oneeco.3.e26382 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25508 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25470 10.3897/oneeco.3.e29153 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/29153/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/29153/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/29153/download/xml/ The European Union (EU) Horizon 2020 Coordination and Support Action ESMERALDA aimed at developing guidance and a flexible methodology for Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) to support the EU member states in the implementation of the EU Biodiversity Strategy’s Target 2 Action 5. ESMERALDA’s key tasks included network creation, stakeholder engagement, enhancing ecosystem services mapping and assessment methods across various spatial scales and value domains, work in case studies and support of EU member states in MAES implementation. Thus ESMERALDA aimed at integrating various project outcomes around four major strands: i) Networking, ii) Policy, iii) Research and iv) Application. The objective was to provide guidance for integrated ecosystem service mapping and assessment that can be used for sustainable decision-making in policy, business, society, practice and science at EU, national and regional levels. This article presents the overall ESMERALDA approach of integrating the above-mentioned project components and outcomes and provides an overview of how the enhanced methods were applied and how they can be used to support MAES implementation in the EU member states. Experiences with implementing such a large pan-European Coordination and Support Action in the context of EU policy are discussed and recommendations for future actions are given. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 ecosystem services mapping assessment project Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in the EU - Lessons learned from the ESMERALDA approach of integration Short Communication

10.3897/oneeco.3.e28143 2018-09-13 oneecosystem

European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Polce, Chiara https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7065-8647 European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Maes, Joachim https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-1607 European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author ROTLLAN-PUIG, Xavier https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2046-0621 University of Mons, Mons, Belgium author Michez, Denis https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-1838 Unaffiliated, Teruel, Spain author Castro, Leopoldo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4635-6793 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden author Cederberg, Björn Municipal Museum Mariánské Lázně, Mariánské Lázně, Czech Republic author Dvořák, Libor https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4712-3679 National Biodiversity Data Centre, Waterford, United Kingdom author Fitzpatrick, Úna University of Liège, Gembloux, Belgium author Francis, Frédéric Unaffiliated, Elixhausen, Austria author Neumayer, Johann Università di Torino, Torino, Italy author Manino, Aulo Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Finland author Paukkunen, Juho https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8587-3035 Nicolaus Copernicus University, Lwowska, Poland author Pawlikowski, Tadeusz University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom author Roberts, Stuart Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic author Straka, Jakub University of Mons, Mons, Belgium author Rasmont, Pierre https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0891-2189 2018-09-13 2018-09-13 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e28143 2018 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.005 10.1126/science.1127863 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.014 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01669.x 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x IPBES author 2016 The assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production. Potts SG, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Ngo HT (Eds) 2016 552 10.2307/2346488 10.2307/2346300 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721 10.1016/j.baae.2013.06.003 10.1111/gcb.13867 A Nieto author 2014 European Red List of Bees 978-92-79-44512-5 2014 98 Steven J. Phillips author 2004 A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling 2004 655-662 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 10.1111/ecog.03049 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data S. J. Phillips author 2009 text Ecological Applications 2009 19 181 197 10.1371/journal.pone.0076308 10.1111/gcb.12577 10.3896/ibra.1.49.1.02 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05041.x Atlas of the European Bees: genus Bombus. 3d Edition. STEP Project, Atlas Hymenoptera, Mons, Gembloux. Pierre Rasmont author text http://www.atlashymenoptera.net/page.asp?id=169 10.3897/biorisk.10.4749 Atlas Hymenoptera. Université de Mons, Université de Liège Pierre Rasmont author text http://www.atlashymenoptera.net/ 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.009 10.2760/619793 10.5670/oceanog.2003.42 The dependence of crop production within the European Union on pollination by honey bees I. H. Williams author 1994 text Agricultural Zoology Reviews 1994 6 229 257 10.3390/land2030472 10.3897/oneeco.3.e28143 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/28143/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/28143/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/28143/download/xml/ Insect pollinators are a key component of biodiversity; they also play a major role in the reproduction of many species of wild plants and crops. It is widely acknowledged that insect pollinators are threatened by many environmental pressures, mostly of anthropogenic nature. Their decline is a global phenomenon. A better understanding of their distribution can help their monitoring and ultimately facilitate conservation actions. Since we only have partial knowledge of where pollinator species occur, the possibility to predict suitable environmental conditions from scattered species records can facilitate not only species monitoring, but also the identification of areas potentially vulnerable to pollinators decline. This data paper contains the predicted distribution of 47 species of bumblebees across the 28 Member States of the European Union (EU-28). Amongst the wild pollinators, bumblebees are one of the major groups contributing to the production of many crop species, hence their decline in Europe, North America and Asia can potentially threaten food security. Predictions were derived from distribution models, using species records with a spatial resolution of 10 km accessed from a central repository. Predictions were based on records from 1991 to 2012 and on a series of spatial environmental predictors from three main thematic areas: land use and land cover, climate and topography. These distributions were used to estimate the value of pollination as an ecosystem service. In light of the recent European Pollinators Initiative, this paper provides valuable information for a better understanding of where wild pollinators occur and it should be extended to other pollinator species. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Bombus insect pollinators species distribution model Maxent Europe Distribution of bumblebees across Europe Data Paper (Generic)

10.3897/oneeco.3.e29288 2018-10-03 oneecosystem

National Institute of Geophysics Geodesy and Geography, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria author Nedkov, Stoyan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-9815 Forest Research Institute - BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria author Zhiyanski, Miglena https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4843-6770 Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria author Borisova, Bilyana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3225-9514 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research - BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria author Bratanova-Doncheva, Svetla 2018-10-03 2018-10-03 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e29288 2018 10.3897/ab.e12837 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831 10.3897/oneeco.3.e21610 10.3897/oneeco.2.e13714 S. Frank author B. Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services ISBN 978-954-642-830-1 2017 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14021 10.3897/oneeco.2.e13738 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14062 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14499 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14808 10.3897/oneeco.2.e13718 10.1093/biosci/biw101 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14814 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14014 10.3897/oneeco.3.e23156 10.3897/oneeco.3.e29288 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/29288/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/29288/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/29288/download/xml/ text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Assessment frameworks ecosystems biophysical socio-cultural economic ESP SEE Mapping and assessment of ecosystem condition and ecosystem services across different scales and domains in Europe Editorial

10.3897/oneeco.3.e25434 2018-10-05 oneecosystem

University of Patras, Department of Biology, Division of Plant Biology, Laboratory of Botany, University Campus, 26504 Rio, Patras, Greece author Kokkoris, Ioannis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-3445 University of Patras, Department of Biology, Division of Plant Biology, Laboratory of Botany, University Campus, 26504 Rio, Patras, Greece author Dimopoulos, Panayotis https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-9954 Hellenic Agricultural Organization "Demeter", Forest Research Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece author Xystrakis, Fotios https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3318-2686 Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Biology, Department of Botany, GR-54124, Thessaloniki, Greece author Tsiripidis, Ioannis https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9373-676X 2018-10-05 2018-10-05 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e25434 2018 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2001.tb02622.x 10.1080/11263500802150357 M. Bordt author 2015 Land and ecosystem condition and capacity - Draft (Version 1.0) 2015 J. Braun-Blanquet author 1964 Pflanzensoziologie-Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde, 3 Auflage 1964 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831 10.1038/nature11148 V. Chrysopolitou author 2015 Deliverable Β7. Methodology on data compilation for evaluating the habitat and species status, from cell level to Natura network and national level – Final edition 2015 10.1038/387253a0 GC. Daily author 1997 Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems ISBN 1-55963-475-8 1997 10.1038/355422a0 H. Dierschke author 1994 Pflanzensoziologie: Grundlagen und Methoden 1994 P. Dimopoulos author 2014 Identification, Interpretation and Management of the Forest Habitat Types of Greece 978-960-9407-24-3 2014 P. Dimopoulos author 2017 Technical guide for mapping and assessment of ecosystem and their services in Greece 978-960-9407-42-7 2017 10.3897/oneeco.2.e13714 P. Dimopoulos author 2018 Methodology for monitoringand conservation status assessment of the habitat types in Greece ISBN 978-960-99033-2-5 2018 128 European Commission author 2011 Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM(2011) 244 2011 D. Evans author 2011 Assessment and reporting under article 17 of the Habitats Directive–explanatory notes & guidelines for the period 2007–2012 2011 R. Hassan author 2005 Millenium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis 2005 Conservation status assessment of habitat types and species for terrestrial areas protected under the «Νatura 2000» network at a national scale (unpublished data, available upon request) Hellenic Ministry of Environment and Energy author 2016 text 2016 Energy and Climate Change Hellenic Ministry of the Environment author 2014 Prioritized Action Framework (PAF) for Natura 2000 for the EU multiannual financing period 2014-2020 2014 75 Energy and Climate Change Hellenic Ministry of the Environment author 2014 National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan ISBN 978-960-7284-33-4 2014 132 10.1080/21513732.2017.1415974 10.1007/978-3-319-43042-3 10.1007/978-3-319-43042-3 J. Maes author 2018 Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: An analytical framework for ecosystem condition 2018 The ecology and economics of biodiversity loss: the research agenda C. Perring author 1992 text Ambio 1992 21 201 211 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02589.x 10.1007/s12210-018-0691-x 10.1002/9781118452592 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25434 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25434/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25434/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25434/download/xml/ This study presents a first, national scale approach on ecosystem condition assessment for Greece, through integrating the available surveillance and monitoring data for habitat types, at the plot level, within the Natura 2000 network. The study consists of two parts: (a) ecosystem condition assessment for ecosystem types in Greece, using the conservation degree at plot level as an indicator and (b) a large scale analysis of the forest types' condition using, as indicators, the pressures and typical plant species richness, as an exemplary case to interpret the outcomes of the assessment. The main results of this study revealed that: (i) the majority of the ecosystem types are in above good condition, with the higher percentages of bad condition recorded for wetlands, rivers and lakes, marine inlets and transitional waters, (ii) forest categories in their majority are at above-adequate condition, (iii) at forest ecosystem categories specific pressures (e.g. grazing, cultivations, forestry clearance) act as main drivers forecosystem condition change, (iv) Mediterranean deciduous forests are the most floristic-rich forest category, regarding typical plant species. Simultaneously, it is highlighted that already available datasets could be used for immediate and rapid framework assessments, which will guide future steps on ES studies, research and decision-making. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers conservation degree ecosystem services ESMERALDA habitat types monitoring MAES Natura 2000 pressures typical species richness National scale ecosystem condition assessment with emphasis on forest types in Greece Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.3.e25542 2018-10-15 oneecosystem

Interfaculty Department of Geoinformatics - Z_GIS, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria author Reichel, Steffen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5574-2453 Interfaculty Department of Geoinformatics - Z_GIS, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria author Klug, Hermann https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0545-9721 2018-10-15 2018-10-15 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e25542 2018 project Enhancing ecoSysteM sERvices mApping for poLicy and Decision mAking ESMERALDA 642007 funder European Commission 10.13039/501100000780 10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.054 10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.033 10.1080/09640568.2017.1301251 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.11.010 10.1038/387253a0 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2 R. de Groot author 1992 Functions of Nature. Evaluation of nature in environmental planning and decision making 1992 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.002 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014 European Commission author 2011 Our life insurance, Our Natural Capital: An EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/strategy/target2/index_en.htm 2011 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.10.009 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016 ISO author 2003 19115-1 - Geographic information -- Metadata 2003 140 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.001 10.1016/j.cageo.2014.04.016 10.1111/tgis.12171 10.3390/ijgi7040132 OGC author 2007 OpenGIS Catalogue Service Implementation Specification (ISO 19115), v2.0.2 http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/is 2007 219 OGC author 2010 OpenGIS Web Feature Service 2.0 (ISO 19142) WFS v2.0 http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/is 2010 253 OGC author 2010 OGC WCS 2.0 Interface Standard - Core, v2.0 http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/is 2010 53 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.019 10.3897/oneeco.3.e26719 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25542 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25542/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25542/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25542/download/xml/ text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers MAES methods case studies policy questions business questions An online method database for mapping and assessing ecosystem services Software Description

10.3897/oneeco.3.e29306 2018-10-19 oneecosystem

Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics; University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada author Bordt, Michael https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5634-2294 Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics; University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada author Saner, Marc 2018-10-19 2018-10-19 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e29306 2018 The Transformative value of Ecological Pragmatism. An Introduction to the Work of Bryan G. Norton HS Afeissa author 2008 text SAPIENS Online https://journals.openedition.org/sapiens/88 2008 N. Ash author 2010 Ecosystems and human well-being: a manual for assessment practitioners 2010 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00140-7 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004 10.1890/10-1510.1 Advancing Environmental-Economic Accounting Concept Note on Global Land Cover for Policy Needs: Supporting SDG Monitoring and Ecosystem Accounting M. Bordt author 2015 text Presented at the GEO-XII Plenary (Land Cover Side Event) http://www.earthobservations.org/uploads/425_geo12_land_cover_side_event_concept_note.pdf 2015 A framework for comparison of approaches, data, tools and results of existing and previous ecosystem accounting approaches in selected jurisdictions M. Bordt author 2015 text UNSD/UNEP/CBD http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/workshops/eea_forum_2015/97.%20SEEA%20EEA%20Tech%20Guid%207%20Compilation%20of%20data,%20tools%20and%20methods%20(09Dec2014).pdf 2015 M. Bordt author 2015 Handbook of Clean Energy Systems 2015 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.009 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.013 10.5751/ES-01610-110129 10.1073/pnas.0808772106 10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7 10.1073/pnas.1525002113 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.012 The Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services CICES author 2013 text European Environment Agency https://cices.eu/ 2013 Site complementarity between biodiversity and ecosystem services in conservation planning of sparsely-populated regions J. Cimon-Morin author 2015 text Environ. Conserv 2015 1 13 13 10.5751/ES-00171-040105 10.1073/pnas.0706559105 10.1890/080025 10.1017/S0376892911000506 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00273-2 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002 Developing conceptual framework for ecosystem mapping. M. Erhard author 2014 text European Environment Agency, Malaga http://projects.eionet.europa.eu/eea-ecosystem-assessments/library/draft-ecosystem-map-europe/es_mapping_draft_report-terrestrial-ecosystems/download/en/1/ES_mapping_DRAFT_report%20%28terrestrial%20ecosystems%29.pdf 2014 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014 R. H. Haines-Young author DG Rafaelli author 2010 Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis 2010 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005 Disaggregated contributions of ecosystem services to human well-being: a case study from Eastern Europe A. -I. Horcea-Milcu author 2016 text Reg. Environ. Change 2016 1 13 10 1007 Units of analysis IPBES author text https://www.ipbes.net/glossary/units-analysis 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.006 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.025 10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0540:ACTEMA]2.0.CO;2 Final ecosystem goods and services classification system D. Landers author 2013 text U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development 2013 600 13 Wealth Accounting and Valuation of Ecosystem Services (WAVES) G. -M. Lange author 2014 text World Ban http://www.wavespartnership.org 2014 10.1525/bio.2009.59.3.7 10.1525/bio.2012.62.12.4 MA author 2005 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment: Summary 2005 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023 10.1007/s00267-010-9428-z 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.002 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.001 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.003 10.5840/enviroethics199719141 How's Life? Measuring well-being OECD author 2011 text Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/book/9789264121164-eni 2011 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.11.003 Ecosystem services inclusive strategic environmental assessment. Environ. Impact Assess M. R. Partidario author 2013 text Rev 2013 40 36 46 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.005 10.1007/s10531-010-9838-5 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.019 A new map of global ecological land units—an ecophysiographic stratification approach. Association of American Geographers R. Sayre author 2014 text Association of American Geographer 2014 10.5670/oceanog.2017.116 10.1111/conl.12091 10.1002/env.1107 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.025 10.1038/4681029a 10.5751/ES-08490-210252 Guidance manual for TEEB country studies TEEB author 2013 text T.E.E.B. http://www.teebweb.org/publication/guidance-manual-teeb-country-studies-4/. 2013 10.1007/s10640-007-9176-6 The UK National Ecosystem Assessment - Synthesis of Key Findings UK DEFRA author 2011 text The UK National Ecosystem Assessment http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=ryEodO1KG3k%3d&tabid=82 2011 System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012 - Experimental Ecosystem Accounting. United Nations author 2014 text United Nations Statistics Division http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaRev/eea_final_en.pdf 2014 Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development United Nations author 2015 text United Nations https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld 2015 United Nations Statistics Division author 2008 System of National Accounts http://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/SNA2008.pdf 2008 755 Expert Group Meeting: Modelling Approaches and Tools for Testing of the SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting United Nations Statistics Division author 2013 text United Nations Statistics Division http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaRev/meeting2013/lod.htm 2013 Framework for the Development of Environment Statistics (FDES) 2013 United Nations Statistics Division author 2013 text United Nations Statistics Division http://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/doc13/BG-FDES-Environment.pdf 2013 Central Product Classification (CPC) Version 2.1. United Nations Statistics Division author 2015 text United Nations http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/regdntransfer.asp?f=284 2015 Advancing the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA) Experimental Ecosystem Accounting: Expert Forum Minutes United Nations Statistics Division author 2015 text United Nations http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/ceea/meetings/tenth_meeting/BK10a.pdf 2015 Technical Recommendations in support of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012–Experimental Ecosystem Accounting United Nations Statistics Division author text https://seea.un.org/ecosystem-accounting 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.021 10.1007/s00267-011-9726-0 10.3897/oneeco.3.e29306 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/29306/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/29306/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/29306/download/xml/ Ecological economists currently face an important opportunity to influence national policies and global awareness regarding ecosystems. Ecosystem services (ES) frameworks, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) and the System of Environmental Economic Accounting Experimental Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EEA) will influence how national measurement systems integrate the value of ecosystems and their services into national planning and monitoring progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Decision-makers are, however, faced with an embarrassment of riches. There is a multitude of ES frameworks, but no formal and integrative evaluation of the entire set exists. We review the IPBES, the SEEA EEA and 14 other ES frameworks using criteria designed to address operational and convergence considerations for national ecosystem accounting. While the frameworks reviewed incorporate many strengths, none fulfils all the criteria of a comprehensive national ecosystem accounting framework. We conclude with suggestions for conceptual, measurement and process developments to broaden the appeal, utility and acceptance of future frameworks. Considering these suggestions could substantially contribute to the development of ecosystem accounting frameworks that foster a constructive dialogue amongst the many disciplines, national contexts and viewpoints involved in understanding, measuring and making decisions about ecosystems. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Classification Convergence Critical natural capital Environmental accounting Environmental policy Frameworks A critical review of ecosystem accounting and services frameworks Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.3.e25482 2018-11-02 oneecosystem

UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, United Kingdom author Brown, Claire UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, United Kingdom author Burns, Abigail UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, United Kingdom author Arnell, Andy 2018-11-02 2018-11-02 2018 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 3 e25482 2018 Ecosystem and Human Well-Being – A Manual for Assessment Practitioners Neville Ash author 2010 text Island Press, Washington, Covelo, London 2010 264 Road-map for ecosystem assessment with good practice examples - A framework for an Integrated Ecosystem Assessment. Milestone MS22 Claire Brown author 2018 text EU Horizon 2020 ESMERALDA Project, Grant agreement No. 642007 http://www.esmeralda-project.eu/getatt.php?filename=ESMERALDA_MS22_Integrated%20Ecosystem%20Assessment_14851.pdf. 2018 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831 10.2779/39229 10.2779/75203 10.2779/055584 ESMERALDA author 2014 Enhancing ecoSysteM sERvices mApping for poLicy and Decision mAking: H2020 Coordination and Support Actions. Topic: Enhancing mapping ecosystems and their services. Call: SC5-10a-2014. 2014 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25309 Multifunctional assessment methods and the role of map analyse - Using an Integrated Ecosystem Service Assessment Framework Marion Potschin-Young author 2018 text Deliverable D4.8, EU Horizon 2020 ESMERALDA Project, Grant agreement No. 642007 http://www.esmeralda-project.eu/documents/1/ 2018 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25482 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25482/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25482/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/25482/download/xml/ This short communication presents an ecosystem assessment framework developed within ESMERALDA; a Horizon2020-funded EU project aimed at delivering a ‘flexible methodology’ to assist towards pan-European and regional Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem Services (MAES). The framework we present is closely aligned with assessment frameworks developed within the MAES (2014) and Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2010) initiatives. Mapping, fundamental to the work of MAES as well as ESMERALDA, is placed at the heart of a wider suite of activities carried out within ecosystem assessment. This enables flexibility in where and how integration takes place. Beyond the biophysical parameters at the core of the framework, emphasis is given to the inclusion of social and economic factors to ensure policy relevance. Consultation, both internal to the ESMERALDA Consortium and external - amongst those already conducting ecosystem assessments across Europe - helped guide the development of the framework. Online consultation will provide information about the development of guidance around the framework and initiate the collation of good practice examples. The framework and accompanying guidance will contribute towards a final guidance tool due at the end of the ESMERALDA project lifetime. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers A Conceptual Framework for Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Short Communication

10.3897/oneeco.4.e28720 2019-01-31 oneecosystem

AECP group, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland author Le Clec'h, Solen https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7886-2899 LETG Rennes, Rennes, France author Dufour, Simon AECP group, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland author Bucheli, Janic IRD, Bondy, France author Grimaldi, Michel AECP group, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland author Huber, Robert Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Belem, Brazil author Miranda, Izildinha IRD, Montpellier, France author Mitja, Danielle Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Belem, Brazil author Silva Costa, Luiz LETG Rennes, Rennes, France author Oszwald, Johan 2019-01-31 2019-01-31 2019 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 4 e28720 2019 10.1080/15481603.2015.1033809 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.02.005 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.066 The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy L. C. Braat author 2012 text Ecosystem Services 2012 1 1 4 L. Breiman author 1984 Classification and Tegression Trees (Boca Ratoned 1984 10.1007/s10113-017-1118-4 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.005 10.1007/978-2-8178-0184-1 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.007 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001 10.1080/13658810701812836 10.5194/isprsannals-ii-8-171-2014 Domac author 2004 Increasing the accuracy of vegetation classification using geology and DEM 2004 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x 10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.102 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.003 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00644-7 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.046 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.028 10.1007/s10980-013-9981-y 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.008 Developments in statistical approaches to spatial uncertainty and its propagation G. B.M. Heuvelink author 2002 text International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2002 16 2 11 113 10.1590/1809-43921998282166 Monitoramento da Floresta Amazônica Brasileira por Satélite – Projeto Prodes Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais INPE author text http://www.obt.inpe.br/prodes S. Jacobs author 2013 Ecosystem Services 2013 Sander Jacobs author B. Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 978-954-642-830-1 2017 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.020 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.05.056 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.002 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.015 Mapping carbon stocks in vegetation: prospects for the spatialization of an ecosystem service." S. Le Clec'h author 2013 text Bois Et Forets Des Tropiques 2013 316 35 47 10.1007/s10021-017-0145-9 10.1080/13658816.2018.1445256 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 10.1080/00401706.2000.10485984 10.1890/01-6016 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.024 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00475-7 10.19182/bft2011.307.a20484 Utilisation de la télédétection et de données socio-économiques et écologiques pour comprendre l'impact des dynamiques de l'occupation des sols à Pacajá (Brésil) J. Oszwald author 2012 text Revue Française de Photogrammétrie et de Télédétection 2012 198 8 24 J. Oszwald author X Arnauld de Sartre author 2014 Political Ecology des Services Ecosystémiques 978-2-87574-197-4 2014 10.3897/oneeco.3.e20713 10.3917/lig.774.0010 10.1126/science.1202400 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00359-3 10.1016/j.rse.2015.08.001 10.1371/journal.pone.0109643 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.09.003 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.038 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02307.x Y. Yohannes author International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) author 1999 Technical Guide 3 1999 10.3897/oneeco.4.e28720 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/28720/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/28720/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/28720/download/xml/ Ecosystem Service (ES) mapping has become a key tool in scientific assessments of human-nature interactions and is being increasingly used in environmental planning and policy-making. However, the associated epistemic uncertainty underlying these maps often is not systematically considered. This paper proposes a basic procedure to present areas with lower statistical reliability in a map of an ES indicator, the vegetation carbon stock, when extrapolating field data to larger case study regions. To illustrate our approach, we use regression analyses to model the spatial distribution of vegetation carbon stock in the Brazilian Amazon forest in the State of Pará. In our analysis, we used field data measurements for the carbon stock in three study sites as the response variable and various land characteristics derived from remote sensing as explanatory variables for the ES indicator. We performed regression methods to map the carbon stocks and calculated three indicators of reliability: RMSE-Root-mean-square-error, R2-coefficient of determination - from an out-of-sample validation and prediction intervals. We obtained a map of carbon stocks and made explicit its associated uncertainty using a general indicator of reliability and a map presenting the areas where our prediction is the most uncertain. Finally, we highlighted the role of environmental factors on the range of uncertainty. The results have two implications. (1) Mapping prediction interval indicates areas where the map's reliability is the highest. This information increases the usefulness of ES maps in environmental planning and governance. (2) In the case of the studied indicator, the reliability of our prediction is very dependent on land cover type, on the site location and its biophysical, socioeconomic and political characteristics. A better understanding of the relationship between carbon stock and land-use classes would increase the reliability of the maps. Results of our analysis help to direct future research and fieldwork and to prevent decision-making based on unreliable maps. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Deforestation ecosystem services prediction intervals reliability statistical modelling variability Uncertainty in ecosystem services maps: the case of carbon stocks in the Brazilian Amazon forest using regression analysis Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.4.e31420 2019-02-28 oneecosystem

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada author Bordt, Michael https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5634-2294 University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada author Saner, Marc 2019-02-28 2019-02-28 2019 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 4 e31420 2019 10.3897/oneeco.4.e31420 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/31420/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/31420/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/31420/download/xml/ For ecosystem measurement frameworks to be accepted, operationalised and implemented by diverse international communities, clear and agreeable concepts and classifications are essential. This paper analyses and develops two foundational typology challenges within ecosystem measurement: the classification of ecosystems and the classification of their services. Our aim is to determine if there is sufficient consensus to ascertain “Which ecosystems provide which services?” for standardised ecosystem accounting. This paper first compares classifications used in nine selected ecosystem assessments as input studies that make value statements about multiple ecosystems providing multiple ecosystem services. Given that these nine studies do not use identical concepts, classifications and terminologies, we develop “supersets” that can accommodate the diversity of classifications used in these input studies. Each input study is then corresponded to these new supersets. On the basis of this analysis, substantial consensus was found that some ecosystems are more likely to provide certain services than others are. However, for several ecosystem types, there was little or no consensus on which services they provide. Linkages for which there is consensus can serve as a checklist for future ecosystem services assessments. Both the framework of the supersets and the correspondence and visual methods developed will be useful for integrating information at different scales (for example, linkages from local, ecosystem-specific and ecosystem services-specific studies). This paper also provides guidance to future ecosystem services assessments to use, test and extend the current classifications of ecosystems and ecosystem services. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Classification Convergence Environmental accounting Environmental policy Frameworks Which ecosystems provide which services? A meta-analysis of nine selected ecosystem services assessments Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.4.e33368 2019-03-27 oneecosystem

Graduate School of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan author Kilonzi, Francisca Mutwa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7233-4865 Graduate School of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan author Ota, Takahiro 2019-03-27 2019-03-27 2019 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 4 e33368 2019 10.5751/es-10030-230201 10.5751/es-09812-220443 10.5751/es-09848-230115 10.5751/es-05295-180123 10.1080/08039410.2018.1427621 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.002 10.5751/es-01808-1102r02 10.2307/20159624 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.013 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.015 10.1186/1746-4269-2-22 10.1287/orsc.1070.0350 10.1007/978-3-540-76435-9_2617 10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7 10.1073/pnas.1525002113 10.1515/9783486827262 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008 What you know is who you know? Communication patterns among resource users as a prerequisite for co-management Beatrice Crona author 2006 text Resilience Alliance 2006 10.1073/pnas.1114773109 10.1080/08941920.2016.1257079 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002 10.1126/science.aap8826 10.1002/pad. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.10.006 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 Linton C. Freeman author 2004 The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science 2004 10.5751/es-04855-170303 10.1007/s10980-017-0531-x 10.1016/j.jfe.2007.09.002 10.15341/jbe(2155-7950)/03.06.2015/010 10.5751/es-08596-210249 10.2307/2999726 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.013 10.1177/1525822x11399400 Charles Iceland author 2008 ‘IDENTIFYING IMPORTANT ECOSYSTEM GOODS & SERVICES IN PUGET SOUND Draft Summary of Interviews and Research for the Puget Sound Partnership Prepared by 2008 Consideration of initial elements: Recognising indigenous and local knowledge and building synergies with science. IPBES/1/INF/5. Bonn, Germany. IPBES author 2013 text IPBES/1/INF/5 2013 10.4324/9781315651095 10.1017/s0376892916000308 10.1016/j.jom.2010.11.001 10.1017/s0032247414000436 10.1371/journal.pone.0056670 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.012 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25309 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.01.007 10.5751/es-08872-220149 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00073.x 10.5751/es-07483-200318 10.1177/000169939403700403 10.1007/s10668-005-9004-5 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.05.005 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013 10.5751/es-03652-150434 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.028 10.2307/1519766 10.1007/s13280-013-0386-6 10.1145/2501654.2501661 10.1007/s10310-012-0372-z 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.03.005 10.1371/journal.pone.0121431 TEEB author 2010 The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Ecological and economic foundations 2010 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006 10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.005 10.5751/es-06456-190238 10.1007/s10668-018-0226-8 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.007 Network capital in a multi-level world: Getting support from a personal communities B. Wellman author 2001 text Social Capital: Theory and Research 2001 233 273 10.1007/s11625-015-0296-6 10.4236/sn.2013.23013 10.1080/13416979.2017.1279706 10.5751/es-06316-190201 10.3897/oneeco.4.e33368 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/33368/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/33368/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/33368/download/xml/ Since the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, ecosystem science domain has made tremendous progress in the study of ecosystem services, but debates on neglected cultural ecosystem services (CES) have persisted. A recent approach established by the Intergovernmental Panel for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) identifies and advocates incorporation of the CES through the role of local knowledge across other ecosystem services. However, approaches and tools that enable engagement of CES are limited. In this study, we examine how cultural contexts influence the appreciation of different CES, by identifying the behavioural aspects and the indigenous knowledge that has evolved on the basis of Social Network Analysis (SNA). SNA measures the network of relations between people and groups developed traditionally for a long time and their relational values with natural resources and ecosystem services. Through a comprehensive literature review of scholarly research published in Scopus data base, this study explicitly illustrates the interrelationship between SNA and CES. Keywords associated with SNA and cultural ecosystem services including forests, fisheries and agriculture (farming) were used. It was found that various aspects of social network uphold relational values of cultural importance and enhance resilience in groups amidst the social changes and times as societies progress. For instance, in the case of homophily, actors who are attracted to one another chose to interact in their defined network (e.g. fishing network) forming a strong social capital. Consequently, they shared similar beliefs and values that were eventually handed to the next generation of the network which shaped their heritage and identity. Social learning networks in various communities were also found to play a key role in information exchange and knowledge sharing among members compared to information from foreign technical experts. To fully integrate CES into sustainable decision making, this review suggests incorporation of the analysis of social networks formed in different cultural contexts globally. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Social network analysis cultural ecosystem services cultural contexts IPBES Influence of cultural contexts on the appreciation of different cultural ecosystem services based on social network analysis Review Article

10.3897/oneeco.4.e26368 2019-04-18 oneecosystem

Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland author Vihervaara, Petteri Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland author Viinikka, Arto Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands author M Brander, Luke https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5862-4030 Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain author Santos, Fernando https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0861-4520 University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Joensuu, Finland author Mononen, Laura National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, Sofia, Bulgaria author Nedkov, Stoyan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-9815 2019-04-18 2019-04-18 2019 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 4 e26368 2019 10.3897/oneeco.4.e26368 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/26368/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/26368/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/26368/download/xml/ A broad array of methods have been developed and applied to map ecosystem services and their values at various geographic scales. For example, the ESMERALDA project developed methods for ecosystem service mapping across Europe. This paper describes how different methodological interlinkages can be used in ecosystem service mapping and assessment and how the integration of information can be facilitated to assist in decision-making processes related to sustainable use and protection of ecosystem services. This paper is based on a literature review and expert consultations throughout the project. The accumulation of knowledge in ecosystem assessment processes will be described through multiple steps: 1) data compilation, 2) analyses run via independent or linked methods applications and tools, 3) integration of information from multiple analyses and 4) finally, feeding into the decision-support frameworks. The challenges and possibilities of using combinations of various datasets and methods will be discussed. This workflow is demonstrated with real-world applications. In addition, technical pitfalls and challenges, as well as linkages to overall ecosystem assessments and policy questions, are analysed and discussed. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers biodiversity ecosystem services mapping ESMERALDA MAES Europe Methodological interlinkages for mapping ecosystem services – from data to analysis and decision-support Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.4.e35904 2019-06-03 oneecosystem

Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain author Santos, Fernando https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0861-4520 University of Trento, Trento, Italy author Geneletti, Davide https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5528-3365 Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research ZALF, Müncheberg, Germany Institute of Physical Geography and Landscape Ecology, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany author Burkhard, Benjamin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-9009 2019-06-03 2019-06-03 2019 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 4 e35904 2019 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24490 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22509 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25482 10.3897/ab.e12837 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831 10.3897/oneeco.3.e29153 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24134 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25477 10.3897/oneeco.3.e26363 European Commission author 2011 Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 2011 244 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25382 10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25434 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25494 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25309 10.3897/oneeco.3.e26722 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25428 10.3897/oneeco.3.e27110 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25542 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25499 10.3897/oneeco.3.e26719 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24719 10.3897/oneeco.3.e26382 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25508 10.3897/oneeco.4.e26368 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25380 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25470 The business of biodiversity: can we put a value on nature? Gareth Willmer author text https://horizon-magazine.eu/article/business-biodiversity-can-we-put-value-nature.html 10.3897/oneeco.4.e35904 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/35904/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/35904/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/35904/download/xml/ text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Mapping and assessing ecosystem services: Methods and practical applications Editorial

10.3897/oneeco.4.e34769 2019-06-03 oneecosystem

Forest is Life, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Gembloux, Belgium Biodiversity and Landscape, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Gembloux, Belgium author Maebe, Laura Forest is Life, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Gembloux, Belgium author Claessens, Hugues Biodiversity and Landscape, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Gembloux, Belgium author Dufrêne, Marc https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5664-9955 2019-06-03 2019-06-03 2019 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 4 e34769 2019 M. Alderweireld author 2015 Inventaire Forestier Wallon. Résultats 1994-2012 2015 236 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047716.45245.23 10.4267/2042/5384 10.1051/forest/19680302 10.1051/forest:19800201 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004 Aurélien Bansept author 2014 Protéger et valoriser l'eau forestière 2014 162 10.1016/j.ecocom.2012.11.001 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.002 Comprendre les perceptions, les usages et les significations de la forêt en 2005 Daniel Bodson author 2005 text Forêt Wallonne 2005 79 19 28 10.5751/ES-10087-230227 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.004 Forests, carbon and climate change: the UK contribution Mark Broadmeadow author 2003 text Forestry Commission 2003 48 1 12 10.5194/hess-8-286-2004 10.3097/LO.200915 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 10.3097/LO.201434 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.043 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24134 10.1093/forestry/cpu024 Andrew Church author 2014 UK national ecosystem assessment follow-on. Work Package Report 5: Cultural ecosystem services and indicators 2014 135 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2014.01.002 Vincent Colson author 2009 La fonction récréative des massifs forestiers wallons: analyse et évaluation dans le cadre d'une politique forestière intégrée 2009 277 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.038 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001 Gretchen C. Daily author 1997 Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems 978-155-96347-6-2 1997 39 10.1073/pnas.0804960105 ECOPLAN author 2016 Planning for Ecosytem Services: the ECOPLAN toolbox 2016 36 10.1111/gcb.12353 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.004 Julien Fiquepron author 2012 Des forêts pour l’eau potable: la forêt protège votre eau 2012 30 10.1111/conl.12084 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014 Nicolás Fontecilla Lechuga author 2012 Services écosystémiques des forêts pour l’eau: Étude de l’influence de la gestion forestière sur la valeur du service d’approvisionnement en eau potable. 2012 105 Forests and Water Guidelines: broadleaf woodlands and the protection of freshwaters in acid-sensitive catchments Z Gagkas author 2006 text BHS 9th National Hydrology Symposium, Durham, 2006 53 58 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.12.004 Katleen Gillijns author 2005 Erosion des sols en Belgique: Etat de la question 2005 74 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.012 Gérard Grosclaude author 1999 L'Eau - Tome 1 1999 204 10.1093/forestry/76.3.299 Christoph Hegg author 2006 La forêt et l'eau potable: Une étude bibliographique 2006 60 10.5751/ES-04119-160213 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.002 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.005 IPBES author 2018 The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia 2018 835 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.024 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.011 Floriane Jacquemin author 2015 Wal-ES. Carte de marginalité des sols de Wallonie (V2) 2015 11 10.1079/PAVSNNR20072017 Hans Joosten author 2002 Wise use of mires and peatlands: background and principles including a framework for decision-making 2002 304 10.5194/nhess-13-3095-2013 10.3097/LO.201435 10.1126/science.1140170 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588992.001.0001 10.1007/s10980-014-0014-2 EFOBEL un modèle de calcul de la séquestration du carbone par les forêts, selon les termes des Accords de Marrakech et les engagements de rapportage de la Belgique au Protocole de Kyoto Eric Laitat author 2004 text BASE 2004 8 1 27 40 10.5822/978-1-61091-497-0_5 10.1007/s10342-013-0701-6 La forêt: un outil de gestion des eaux Jacques Lavabre author 2000 text Forêt méditerranéenne 2000 21 146 153 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.015 10.1051/forest:2008034 10.1007/s10980-012-9720-9 Richard Lindsay author 2010 Peatbogs and carbon: a critical synthesis to inform policy development in oceanic peat bog conservation and restoration in the context of climate change. 2010 315 10.3390/su10093285 Comment révéler les multiples rôles de la biodiversité pour le bien-être individuel et collectif ? Un appel pour relancer la plateforme wallonne sur les services écosystémiques Laura Maebe author 2018 text Forêt.Nature 2018 147 22 34 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003 Pauline Marty author 2011 Gestion en forêt privée midi-pyrénéenne favorable à la ressource en eau captée 2011 16 10.1111/1365-2664.12085 10.1007/s00267-010-9428-z Millennium Ecosystem Assessment author 2005 Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis 2005 139 Kari Minkkinen author Maria Strack author 2008 Peatsland and climate change 978-952-99401-1-0 2008 98-122 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022 10.1890/080023 Thomas, R. Nisbet author 2008 Restoring floodplain woodland for flood alleviation. Final Report 2008 40 10.1675/063.034.0104 10.1016/0269-7491(94)00081-N 10.1051/forest:19810205 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.007 Hervé Piégay author 2003 Les forêts riveraines des cours d'eau: écologie, fonctions et gestion 2003 463 10.3390/rs11030354 Konda Rameshwer Reddy author 1976 Nitrification - Denitrification Reactions in Flooded Soil. 1976 153 10.1007/s11355-016-0298-2 10.5751/ES-01667-110128 L'estimation de la productivité des peuplements d'Epicéa commun en Ardenne. Jacques Rondeux author 1989 text Silva Belgica 1989 96 3 7 15 10.1023/A:1015822620431 10.1080/03071375.2015.1137432 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.003 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.007 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.006 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.020 Simon Standaert author 2011 Etude de l’impact socio-économique de la conservation et restauration de la nature dans les Hautes Fagnes 2011 104 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.041 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.06.019 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.037 10.1007/978-0-387-73033-2 A. Thill author 1988 Typologie et potentialités forestières des hêtraies naturelles de l'Ardenne Centrale 1988 135 10.1016/B978-0-12-419964-4.00018-4 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2015.03.018 M Vandewalle author 2009 Review paper on concepts of dynamic ecosystems and their services 2009 9 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.01.017 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.12.002 10.1080/21513732.2012.686120 Services-Les services écosystémiques en Wallonie Wal-ES author text http://webserver.wal-es.be/fr/services.html?IDC=5735 Les tourbières sont-elles des éponges régularisant l'écoulement? Cécile Wastiaux author 2008 text Bulletin de la Société géographique de Liège 2008 50 57 66 F. Weissen author 1991 Le fichier écologique des essences. Tome 2 1991 190 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.01.025 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.022 Ken Willis author 2003 Social & environmental benefits of forestry 2003 36 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.008 10.3897/oneeco.4.e34769 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/34769/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/34769/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/34769/download/xml/ In Western Europe, ecosystems have been shaped to maximise the supply of one specific biomass provisioning ecosystem service (ES), such as food or timber, with detrimental impacts on other ES. The ES approach has therefore been established to better understand the multiple interactions between human society and ecosystems. A variety of methods have been developed to assess ES and their relationships, for instance the ES matrix model based on land cover classes. This popular, flexible and simple method allows combining different data sources and easily comparing ES. However, in general, this method poorly takes into account landscape heterogeneity while abiotic factors and human activities seem to play an important role in ES supply. The objective of this paper is twofold: (1) to extent the methodology based on the ES matrix model by including abiotic factors and human activities and (2) to test the impacts of these two types of factors on ES supply and their relationships. The assessment focused on the capacity of the forest to supply six ES depending on six types of soil ranging from productive soils to more constraining or less productive soils (i.e. abiotic factors) and two contrasting forest management strategies (i.e. human activities). This amended ES matrix was applied on one hand, to map the supply of ES and their relationships in four municipalities in the Ardenne ecoregion (Southern Belgium) and on the other hand, to investigate the impacts of three scenarios (i.e. three different management strategies) on ES supply and their relationships. The amended ES matrix shows large differences in ES supply between the two forest management strategies on the more constraining and less productive soils, creating differences in the spatial pattern of ES. The changes in ES supply amongst the three scenarios and the current supply were quantified to identify the best management options. In conclusion, one particular forest is not like another in terms of ES supply and their relationships. To capture this heterogeneity, we propose an amended ES matrix including abiotic factors and human activities. The maps, based on this matrix, allow identifying the hotspots (i.e. high capacity to supply different ES) and coldspots (i.e. low capacity to supply different ES or strong trade-offs between provisioning ES and regulating/cultural ES). Forest management should be adapted to the abiotic conditions, in particular in the coldspots, to ensure a more balanced supply of ES. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Forest management abiotic factors land sparing versus land sharing framework ecosystem services supply ecosystem services relationship ecosystem services matrix The critical role of abiotic factors and human activities in the supply of ecosystem services in the ES matrix Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.4.e32704 2019-06-13 oneecosystem

Greek Biotope-Wetland Centre (EKBY), Thessaloniki, Greece author Hatziiordanou, Lena Greek Biotope-Wetland Centre (EKBY), Thessaloniki, Greece author Fitoka, Eleni Greek Biotope-Wetland Centre (EKBY), Thessaloniki, Greece author Hadjicharalampous, Elena Greek Biotope-Wetland Centre (EKBY), Thessaloniki, Greece author Votsi, Nefta Greek Biotope-Wetland Centre (EKBY), Thessaloniki, Greece author Palaskas, Dimitris European Topic Center - University of Malaga (ETC-UMA), Malaga, Spain author Malak, Dania 2019-06-13 2019-06-13 2019 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 4 e32704 2019 D. Abdul Malak author 2019 Enhanced wetland monitoring, assessment and indicators to support European and global environmental policy. SWOS Technical publication. https://www.swos-service.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/SWOS_Report_web.pdf 2019 10.1093/biosci/bit003 10.1073/pnas.0809658106 10.3097/lo.200915 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.008 10.3097/lo.201434 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98235.x 10.1023/a:1016136723584 Doğa Derneği author 2010 Mediterranean Basin Biodiversity Hotspot https://www.cepf.net/sites/default/files/resources/Donor%20Council/DC_Draft_Mediterranean_EP_Rev_27_July.pdf 2010 10.1007/s10531-011-0005-4 10.1007/s13593-015-0306-1 10.2800/629258 EEA author 2015 The European environment — state and outlook 2015: synthesis report 2015 10.2779/351581 Connectivity of Natura 2000 forest sites. JRC Executive report C. Estreguil author 2013 text European Commission. Joint https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/f520524b-ee69-4fcc-a71e-360c5448a38b/language-en 2013 10.6084/m9.figshare.1063300 10.2779/54125 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.12.009 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.024 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173529 10.1111/brv.12045 M. J. Green author 1997 State of the World’s Protected Areas at the End of the Twentieth Century. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas Symposium on ‘Protected Areas in the 21st Century: From Islands to Networks’ http://archive.org/details/stateofworldspro97gree 1997 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0499:PFBCPC]2.0.CO;2 R. H. Haines-Young author 2018 Fabis Consulting Ltd https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdf 2018 10.1080/13504509.2017.1361480 10.2800/78322 10.1016/s0273-1223(97)00050-4 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.019 10.2307/2641389 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01953.x 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.001 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.058 10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00100-9 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.016 J. Maes author 2013 An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/knowledge/ecosystem_assessment/pdf/MAESWorkingPaper2013.pdf 2013 J. Maes author 2014 Indicators for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/knowledge/ecosystem_assessment/pdf/2ndMAESWorkingPaper.pdf 2014 10.1007/s10980-014-0083-2 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023 Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: An analytical framework for ecosystem condition J. Maes author 2018 text Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/42d646b6-1c3a-11e8-ac73-01aa75ed71a1/language-en 2018 10.3897/natureconservation.22.13840 10.2307/2937059 MEA author 2005 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf 2005 10.1371/journal.pone.0135445 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.022 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.014 10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0001:alatcw]2.0.co;2 10.1080/21513732.2011.645557 Habitat assessment for ecosystem services in South Africa B. C. Ntshane author 2016 text International J. Biodiversity Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21513732.2016.1217935 2016 12 4 242 254 10.1080/02626667.2011.631188 ML Paracchini author 2008 High nature value farmland in Europe: an estimate of the distribution patterns on the basis of land cover and biodiversity data. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC47063 2008 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0851:awcwws]2.0.co;2 10.1080/21513732.2016.1260056 10.2307/176867 10.3897/oneeco.3.e27110 10.1016/j.baae.2010.06.009 10.3097/lo.200913 10.1016/s0006-3207(96)00145-0 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.027 10.12681/mms.23 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.06.011 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.047 10.3897/ab.e12837 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018 10.1098/rstb.2015.0269 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013 TEEB author P Kumar author 2010 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundation 2010 41-112 10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.008 Connectivity: Is the EU's Natura 2000 Network Only an Ecological Network on Paper? Jonathan Verschuuren author 2013 text Proceedings of Conference https://ssrn.com/abstract=2259608 2013 10.1016/j.jnc.2011.08.001 10.1080/22797254.2017.1330650 10.1080/21513732.2015.1006681 10.3897/oneeco.4.e32704 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/32704/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/32704/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/32704/download/xml/ A systematic approach to map and assess the “maintenance of nursery populations and habitats” ecosystem service (ES) (hereinafter called “habitat maintenance”) has not yet emerged. In this article, we present an ecosystem service framework implementation at landscape level, by proposing an approach for calculating and combining a series of indicators with spatial modelling techniques. Necessary conceptual elements for this approach are: a) ecosystem condition, b) supply and demand of the targeted ecosystem service and c) spatial relationships between the Service Providing Units (SPU) and the Service Connecting Units (SCU). Ecosystem condition is quantified and mapped based on two indicators, the Biodiversity State and the Anthropogenic Impact. Quantification and mapping of supply and demand are based on the hypothesis that high supply can be activated in strictly protected areas and that a demand is localised in the Natura 2000 sites (N2K), considering them as the Service Benefit Areas (SBA). Wetlands are assessed as SCU between the SBA and the landscape areas where the habitat maintenance ES is supplied. By assessing wetlands as SCU, we intent to highlight their role as biodiversity stepping stones and as green infrastructures. Overall, we conclude that the EU biodiversity policy demand for no net loss and for a coherent N2K network can be met by enhancing the delivery of the habitat maintenance ES. This approach can assist policy-makers in prioritisation of conservation and restoration targets, in line with the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 and the preparation of the post-2020 Strategy. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem services ecosystem condition habitat maintenance service providing units wetlands Natura 2000 Indicators for mapping and assessment of ecosystem condition and of the ecosystem service habitat maintenance in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.4.e36768 2019-08-19 oneecosystem

Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan author Kilonzi, Francisca Mutwa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7233-4865 Graduate School of Fisheries and Environmental Science, Nagasaki , Japan author Ota, Takahiro 2019-08-19 2019-08-19 2019 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 4 e36768 2019 10.3897/oneeco.4.e36768 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/36768/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/36768/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/36768/download/xml/ A better understanding of Ecosystem Services (ES) contributes to sustainable use while conserving the ecosystems mainly in resource-rich developing regions. This paper explores multilevel stakeholder perceptions on the most important ES provided by Aberdare Forest Ecosystem (AFE). The importance rank matrix model was employed to establish the ES preferences of 15 selected key organisations involved in AFE co-management. A two-way ANOVA inferential analysis was used to compare the differences in ES type importance. The results revealed statistically significant differences between provisioning, regulating and cultural ES. Regulating ES were identified as the most important compared to provisioning and cultural ES; a gradual stakeholder preference shift from forest tangible goods. Water, wildlife habitat, flood regulation, carbon intake and climate regulation were identified as the most important ES by all the stakeholders. Therefore, it is important to understand the gradual changes in ES preferences by various stakeholders involved in the co-management of natural resources. This knowledge could be important to the decision-makers in sustainable co-management planning for natural resources and to enhance sustainable utiliation of ES. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem services stakeholder perception protected forests Aberdare forest Matrix model Ecosystem service preferences across multilevel stakeholders in co-managed forests: Case of Aberdare protected forest ecosystem in Kenya Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.4.e37669 2019-09-16 oneecosystem

Faculty of sciences, Toho University, Funabashi, Japan author Noda, Akira Center for Environmental Remote Sensing, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan author Kondoh, Akihiko Center for Environmental Biology and Ecosystem Studies, National Institute for Environmental Studies,, Tsukuba, Japan Faculty of sciences, Toho University, Funabashi, Japan author Nishihiro, Jun 2019-09-16 2019-09-16 2019 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 4 e37669 2019 10.3897/oneeco.4.e37669 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/37669/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/37669/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/37669/download/xml/ In wet temperate regions, human activity has played an important role in shaping the size and distribution of grasslands. We examined change in land cover type and grassland area in a 9.2 × 22.3 km area of northern Chiba Prefecture, based on historical maps and documents for four time periods (1880s, 1950s, 1980s and 2000s). In the 1880s, conifer forests occupied the largest area (43.1%) amongst land cover types and grasslands accounted for 4.2% of the total area. However, literature available from the 1880s suggests that the understorey of conifer forests may have served as additional habitat for grasses. Thus, the habitat of grassland species is suggested to have covered up to 54% of the study area during this time period. By the 1950s, much of the grassland present in the 1880s had been changed to agricultural fields and paddies and grassland area had reduced to 2.9%. Residential development prior to and during the 1980s led to the conversion of forests and agricultural fields to grassland, increasing the grassland area to 11.6% of the study area. Finally, in the 2000s, grasslands had declined to 6.0% of the study area, likely due to conversion to residential areas. Despite these changes over time, 1.5% of the study area has remained as native forest or grassland for over 120 years. The spatial data presented herein are useful for conservation planning and studying the effect of historical land use change on biodiversity. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Land use change Historical map  Time series data  Biodiversity conservation GIS Japan Changes in land cover and grassland area over the past 120 years in a rapidly urbanised area in Japan Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.4.e37753 2019-10-02 oneecosystem

Arcadia SIT s.r.l., via Eleonora Duse 4, I-27029, Vigevano (PV), Italy author Caudullo, Giovanni https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4061-1204 European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Barredo, José I https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1541-456X 2019-10-02 2019-10-02 2019 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 4 e37753 2019 10.3897/oneeco.4.e37753 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/37753/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/37753/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/37753/download/xml/ Global warming is altering climate patterns and the frequency and magnitude of heat and drought events affecting ecosystems worldwide. One of the effects of these changes is tree mortality driven by heat and drought, which have effects in forest ecosystem functions, services and biodiversity. Therefore, systematic observations and georeferenced data on tree mortality is a fundamental prerequisite for a more comprehensive understanding of the complex interactions between climate and forests. Tree mortality is a complex process for which literature presents major knowledge gaps, making predictions on the fate of climate change challenging. Some of the gaps are due to limited spatio-temporal data on tree mortality. Despite extensive tree mortality and forest dieback, associated with drought and temperature stress, have been reported in Europe, a publicly available systematic collection of georeferenced data reporting tree mortality is lacking. The dataset presented in this paper is a contribution to mitigate the lack of information on tree mortality. Our dataset builds on scientific and peer-reviewed literature and provides a georeferenced set of documented tree mortality occurrences in the period 1970-2017 in Europe. The aim of this study is to describe the creation of the dataset and to provide the data file to interested users. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Tree mortality forest mortality drought heat climate change Europe A georeferenced dataset of drought and heat-induced tree mortality in Europe Data Paper (Generic)

10.3897/oneeco.5.e47715 2020-01-15 oneecosystem

Open University of Cyprus, School of Pure and Applied Sciences, Nicosia, Cyprus author Vogiatzakis, Ioannis https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7071-6950 Terra Cypria–the Cyprus Conservation Foundation, Limassol, Cyprus Open University of Cyprus, School of Pure and Applied Sciences, Nicosia, Cyprus author Zotos, Savvas Cyprus University of Technology, Department of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science, Limassol, Cyprus Open University of Cyprus, School of Pure and Applied Sciences, Nicosia, Cyprus author Litskas, Vassilis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0399-2063 Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark author Manolaki, Paraskevi KES Research Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus Open University of Cyprus, School of Pure and Applied Sciences, Nicosia, Cyprus University of Cyprus, Department of Biological Sciences, Nicosia, Cyprus author Sarris, Demetrios Cyprus University of Technology, Department of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science, Limassol, Cyprus author Stavrinides, Menelaos 2020-01-15 2020-01-15 2020 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 5 e47715 2020 10.3897/oneeco.5.e47715 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/47715/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/47715/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/47715/download/xml/ Ecosystems deliver a range of services that are important for human well-being. Although Ecosystem Services (ES) assessments have been carried out worldwide in different geographical areas, islands are still under-represented. This research presents the first set of indicators developed for Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) provided by the ecosystems of Cyprus, as required by the EU Biodiversity Strategy, along with the rationale behind the selection criteria. In total, 269 potential indicators were assessed in terms of data availability at the national/subnational level and their suitability for MAES and were classified using a "traffic light" system on the basis of overall suitability (i.e. conceptually and in terms of datasets). The results showed that 89 indicators (Green indicators) can be directly used for assessing ES in Cyprus. Amongst these 89 Green indicators, 28 are considered to be new additions to the EU MAES list, since they were proposed solely for Cyprus ecosystems, as a result of consultation with local stakeholders. Provisioning and cultural services could be adequately mapped, but lack of data was observed for several regulating services (e.g. erosion, pollution, carbon sequestration). Not all Green indicators, identified herein, are relevant for assessing ES provided by ecosystems in Cyprus, whereas Green indicators which measure similar ES might be redundant. For a given geographical context, there might be relevant (and important) indicators which are not included in the MAES list and this is why consultation with stakeholders is advisable. Knowledge gaps and needs for further improving MAES on the island are also discussed. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem services decision-making Mediterranean islands policy planning sustainability Towards implementing Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services in Cyprus: A first set of indicators for ecosystem management Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.5.e50452 2020-03-13 oneecosystem

U.S. Geological Survey, Lafayette, Louisiana, United States of America author Grace, James https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6374-4726 2020-03-13 2020-03-13 2020 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 5 e50452 2020 10.3897/oneeco.5.e50452 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/50452/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/50452/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/50452/download/xml/ It is possible that model selection has been the most researched and most discussed topic in the history of both statistics and structural equation modeling (SEM). The reason for this is because selecting one model for interpretive use from amongst many possible models is both essential and difficult. The published protocols and advice for model evaluation and selection in SEM studies are complex and difficult to integrate with current approaches used in biology. Opposition to the use of p-values and decision thresholds has been voiced by the statistics community, yet certain phases of model evaluation have been historically tied to reliance on p-values. In this paper, I outline an approach to model evaluation, comparison and selection based on a weight-of-evidence paradigm. The details and proposed sequence of steps are illustrated using a real-world example. At the end of the paper, I briefly discuss the current state of knowledge and a possible direction for future studies. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers structural equation modelling path models model evaluation model selection weight-of-evidence A 'Weight of Evidence' approach to evaluating structural equation models Review Article

10.3897/oneeco.5.e50540 2020-04-24 oneecosystem

University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium author Vrebos, Dirk https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8115-0304 University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium author Staes, Jan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8023-5421 VITO, Flemish Institute for Technological Research, Mol, Belgium author Broekx, Steven https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0036-386X VITO, Flemish Institute for Technological Research, Mol, Belgium author De Nocker, Leo University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium author Gabriels, Karen University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium author Hermy, Martin VITO, Flemish Institute for Technological Research, Mol, Belgium author Liekens, Inge https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-7592 University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium author Marsboom, Cedric PXL University College, Diepenbeek, Belgium University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium author Ottoy, Sam https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1216-9570 University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium author Van Der Biest, Katrien University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium author van Orshoven, Jos University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium author Meire, Patrick 2020-04-24 2020-04-24 2020 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 5 e50540 2020 10.1007/s10980-014-0085-0 10.1051/forest:2003042 10.1080/15481603.2015.1033809 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004 O. , Batelaan author 2007 Water 2007 B. Bollen author 2012 Optimalisatie van de bodemgeschiktheidskaart op basis van de drainage en textuurklasse. 2012 L. C. Braat author 2015 Mapping of ecosystems and their services in the EU and its member states (MESEU). Synthesis Report 2012–2015 2015 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.019 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.003 D. W., Cole author D. E. Reichle author 1981 Dynamic properties of forest ecosystems 1981 68 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001 10.3390/f6040859 10.1068/a43242 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005 L. De Nocker author 2010 "Actualisering van de externe milieuschadekosten (algemeen voor Vlaanderen) met betrekking tot luchtverontreiniging en klimaatverandering, studie uitgevoerd in opdracht van de Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij, MIRA. 2010 A GIS procedure for automatically calculating the USLE LS factor on topographically complex landscape units. P. J.J. Desmet author 1996 text Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 1996 51 5 427 433 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.009 J. D'Hooghe author 2012 Berekeningsmethode baten ruwvoeders. 2012 P. Duvigneaud author 1971 Productivity of forest ecosystems: proceedings of the Brussels Symposium 1971 11 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.009 A. Froment author 1971 Productivity of forest ecosystems: proceedings of the Brussels Symposium 1971 30 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.012 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.003 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.008 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.013 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.11.003 W. Huisman author 1990 Sound propagation over vegetation-covered ground. 1990 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.05.014 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.001 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.10.016 P. Lammar author P. Nicolopoulou-Stamati author 2005 Environmental Health Impacts of Transport and Mobility 2005 21 23 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.011 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.10.002 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.015 10.1186/1471-2458-8-206 10.1139/b77-320 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.006 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.06.008 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.049 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.024 10.1080/21513732.2012.663792 10.1007/s10531-012-0406-z B. Notebaert author 2006 Verfijnde erosiekaart Vlaanderen: eindrapport. KUL, Onderzoeksgroep Fysische en Regionale Geografie. 2006 10.1051/forest:19830102 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.011 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.003 A. Oosterbaan author 2006 Kleine landschapselementen als invangers van fijn stof en ammoniak. 2006 A. Oosterbaan author T. C.P. Melman author 2011 Ecosysteemdiensten in Nederland: verkenning betekenis en perspectieven. 2011 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.04.001 10.1111/ejss.12394 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.010 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.116 10.3897/oneeco.3.e20713 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.05.018 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00345-5 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.003 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.05.011 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.003 10.1007/s10980-015-0258-5 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2064:DALAWA]2.0.CO;2 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x S. M. Smart author 2012 Exploring the future: Phase 1—Scoping current and future use of spatial decision support tools (sDST) for integrated planning for land-use, biodiversity, and ecosystem services across England. 2012 J. Staes author P. H. Liotta author 2010 NATO Science for Peace and Security Series - E: Human and Societal Dynamics, Volume 69: Achieving Environmental Security: Ecosystem Services and Human Welfare 978-1-60750-578-5 2010 270 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.020 10.1016/j.trd.2008.04.003 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588992.003.0015 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.020 10.14214/sf.490 US EPA author 2009 Valuing the Protection of Ecological Systems and Services. 2009 E. Van Broekhoven author 2012 Overzicht van de boekhoudkundige resultaten van 749 land- en tuinbouwbedrijven Boekjaar 2012 2012 H. Van Gossum author 2014 Demonstratie van de baten van de natuur van het vliegveld van Malle en omgeving. 2014 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.08.029 A. Van Kerckvoorde author M. Stevens author 2014 Natuurrapport - Toestand en trend van ecosystemen en ecosysteemdiensten in Vlaanderen. 2014 10.1007/s12155-014-9444-6 K. Van Meerbeek author 2015 Low-input high-diversity systems: Potential for biomass and bioenergy production. 2015 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.040 Milieurapport: Koolstofvoetafdruk VMM author text https://www.milieurapport.be/systemen/vlaanderen/vlaanderen/koolstofvoetafdruk 10.1016/j.swaqe.2014.05.003 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.07.007 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.007 10.3897/oneeco.5.e50540 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/50540/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/50540/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/50540/download/xml/ Since the early 2000s, there have been substantial efforts to transform the concept of ecosystem services into practice. Spatial assessment tools are being developed to evaluate the impact of spatial planning on a wide range of ecosystem services. However, the actual implementation in decision-making remains limited. To improve implementation, tools that are tailored to local conditions can provide accurate, meaningful information. Instead of a generic and widely-applicable tool, we developed a regional, spatially-explicit tool (ECOPLAN-SE) to analyse the impact of changes in land use on the delivery of 18 ecosystem services in Flanders (Belgium). The tool incorporates ecosystem services relevant to policy-makers and managers and makes use of detailed local data and knowledge. By providing an easy-to-use tool, including the required spatial geodatasets, time investment and the learning curve remain limited for the user. With this tool, constraints to implement ecosystem service assessments in local decision-making are drastically reduced. We believe that region-specific decision support systems, like ECOPLAN-SE, are indispensable intermediates between the conceptual ecosystem service frameworks and the practical implementation in planning processes. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem services decision support system landscape planning land use change spatial analysis Facilitating spatially-explicit assessments of ecosystem service delivery to support land use planning Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.5.e51103 2020-04-30 oneecosystem

Institute of Physical Geography and Landscape Ecology, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany author Campagne, C. Sylvie https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2566-7827 INRAE, RECOVER unit, Aix-en-Provence, France author Roche, Philip https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4443-7434 Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Institute for Natural Resource Conservation, Dept. Ecosystem Management, 24118 Kiel,, Germany author Müller, Felix Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research ZALF, Müncheberg, Germany Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany author Burkhard, Benjamin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-9009 2020-04-30 2020-04-30 2020 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 5 e51103 2020 10.3897/oneeco.5.e51103 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/51103/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/51103/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/51103/download/xml/ With the Ecosystem Service (ES) concept's popularisation, the need for robust and practical methodologies for ES assessments has increased. The ES matrix approach, linking ecosystem types or other geospatial units with ES in easy-to-apply lookup tables, was first developed ten years ago and, since then, has been broadly used. Whereas detailed methodological guidelines can be found in literature, the ES matrix approach seems to be often used in a quick (and maybe even "quick and dirty”) way. Based on a reviewa of scientific publications, in which the ES matrix approach was used, we present the diversity of application contexts, highlight trends of uses and propose future recommendations for improved applications of the ES matrix.A total of 109 studies applying the ES matrix approach and one methodological study without concrete applications were considered for the review. Amongst the main patterns observed, the ES matrix approach allows the assessment of a higher number of ES than other ES assessment methods. ES can be jointly assessed with indicators for ecosystem condition and biodiversity in the ES matrix. Although the ES matrix allows us consider many data sources to achieve the assessment scores for the individual ES, in the reviewed studies, these were mainly used together with expert-based scoring (73%) and/or ES scores that were based on an already-published ES matrix or deduced by information found in related scientific publications (51%). We must acknowledge that 27% of the studies did not clearly explain their methodology. This points out a lack of method elucidation on how the data had been used and where the scores came from. Although some studies addressed the need to consider variabilities and uncertainties in ES assessments, only a minority of studies (15%) did so. Our review shows that, in 29% of the studies, an already-existing matrix was used as an initial matrix for the assessment (mainly the same matrix from one of the Burkhard et al. papers). In 16% of the reviewed studies, no other data were used for the matrix scores or no adaptation of the existing matrix used was made. However, the actual idea of the ES scores, included in the Burkhard et al.'s matrices published 10 years ago, was to provide some examples and give inspiration for one's own studies. Therefore, we recommend to use only scores assessed for a specific study or, if one wishes to use pre-existing scores from another study, to revise them in depth, taking into account the local context of the new assessment. We also recommend to systematically report and consider variabilities and uncertainties in each ES assessment. We emphasise the need for all scientific studies to describe clearly and extensively the whole methodology used to score or evaluate ES in order to be able to rate the quality of the scores obtained. In conclusion, the application of the ES matrix has to become more transparent and integrate more variability analyses. The increasing number of studies that use the ES matrix approach confirms its success, appropriability, flexibility and utility for decision-making, as well as its ability to increase awareness of ES. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers capacity matrix ecosystem services assessment tiered approach expert-based look-up table Ten years of ecosystem services matrix: Review of a (r)evolution Review Article

10.3897/oneeco.5.e50648 2020-05-04 oneecosystem

Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Dresden, Germany author Grunewald, Karsten https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5064-3843 Federal Agency for Nature Protection, Bonn, Germany author Schweppe-Kraft, Burkhard Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Dresden, Germany author Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Dresden, Germany author Meier, Sophie Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Dresden, Germany author Krüger, Tobias Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Dresden, Germany author Schorcht, Martin Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden, Dresden, Germany author Walz, Ulrich https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2001-2386 2020-05-04 2020-05-04 2020 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 5 e50648 2020 10.3897/oneeco.5.e50648 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/50648/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/50648/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/50648/download/xml/ Information on changes in the area of different ecosystems is needed in order to establish an accounting system for ecosystem conditions and services. Currently, there are no comprehensive field mappings for the German federal states that obey a uniform mapping system. To create a nationwide “ecosystem accounting”, it is necessary to develop a uniform system of ecosystem classifications that can consistently deal with diverse nationwide data sources on the extent and condition of ecosystems, some of which use their own forms of classification. Against this background, we present a concrete proposal on how to combine and blend GIS land-use and ecosystem data that is compatible with EU-wide approaches with other regularly collected data sources, for example, from sample-based surveys, so as to generate a complete, updatable picture of the state of Germany’s ecosystems. The area shares of ecosystem types (ETs) can be shown in maps. Allocation tables with different classes or levels (layers) enable an ecosystem extent accounting, which are used to help draw up balances (area balance, status balance, service balance) and can be further detailed, depending on the task at hand. First results and trends of areal changes of main and sub-ecosystem types in Germany, based on the proposed classification system, are presented and discussed. However, the brevity of the considered timeframe (the three periods 2012-2015-2018) does not yet allow us to pinpoint trends or migratory movements, as these may be masked by methodological changes in the classification of land use and land cover. Nonetheless, the presented system for accounting changes in ecosystem areas should be continued and developed in the future in order to create a useful tool for biodiversity monitoring in Germany. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers accounting area changes biodiversity classification CORINE land cover ecosystem service federal level habitat type monitoring Hierarchical classification system of Germany’s ecosystems as basis for an ecosystem accounting – methods and first results Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111 2020-06-02 oneecosystem

University of Trento, Trento, Italy author Geneletti, Davide https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5528-3365 University of Trento, Trento, Italy author Adem Esmail, Blal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1377-565X University of Trento, Trento, Italy author Cortinovis, Chiara https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9612-4731 MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary author Arany, Ildikó Malta College of Arts, Science and Technology, Paola, Malta author Balzan, Mario https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2016-3937 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands author van Beukering, Pieter CAU Kiel, Kiel, Germany Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany author Lange, Sabine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4595-4292 cE3c – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes / Azorean Biodiversity Group; Faculty of Agrarian and Environmental Sciences; University of the Azores, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal author Borges, Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8448-7623 Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria author Borisova, Bilyana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3225-9514 Flemish Institute for Technological Research VITO, Mol, Belgium author Broekx, Steven https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0036-386X Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research ZALF, Müncheberg, Germany Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany author Burkhard, Benjamin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-9009 cE3c – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes / Azorean Biodiversity Group & IVAR - Research Institute for Volcanology and Risk Assessment; Faculty of Sciences and Technology; University of the Azores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal author Gil, Artur https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4450-8167 Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden author Inghe, Ola Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland author Kopperoinen, Leena https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1672-6087 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Oslo, Norway Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany author Kruse, Marion https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0789-0045 Flemish Institute for Technological Research VITO, Mol, Belgium author Liekens, Inge https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-7592 Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, Poland author Lowicki, Damian https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5964-2724 Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, Poland author Mizgajski, Andrzej FSD, Wageningen, Netherlands author Mulder, Sara National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography - Bulgarian Academy of Scienses, Sofia, Bulgaria author Nedkov, Stoyan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-9815 Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden author Östergård, Hannah CE3C – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes / Azorean Biodiversity Group; Faculty of Agrarian and Environmental Sciences; University of the Azores, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal author Picanço, Ana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1188-6519 Baltic Environmental Forum, Riga, Latvia University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia author Ruskule, Anda https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1580-8304 Universidad Rey Juan Carlos de Madrid, Madrid, Spain author Santos, Fernando https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0861-4520 Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany author Sieber, Ina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2134-0429 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden author Svensson, Johan CZECHGLOBE Global Change Research Institute, CAS, Prague, Czech Republic author Vackaru, Dava https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6185-200X University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia Baltic Environmental Forum-Latvia BEF-LV, Riga, Latvia author Veidemane, Kristina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5497-3030 2020-06-02 2020-06-02 2020 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 5 e53111 2020 funder Horizon 2020 10.13039/501100007601 10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/53111/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/53111/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/53111/download/xml/ This paper analyses and compares a set of case studies on ecosystem services (ES) mapping and assessment with the purpose of formulating lessons learned and recommendations. Fourteen case studies were selected during the EU Horizon 2020 “Coordination and Support Action” ESMERALDA to represent different policy- and decision-making processes throughout the European Union, across a wide range of themes, biomes and scales. The analysis is based on a framework that addresses the key steps of an ES mapping and assessment process, namely policy questions, stakeholder identification and involvement, application of mapping and assessment methods, dissemination and communication and implementation. The analysis revealed that most case studies were policy-orientated or gave explicit suggestions for policy implementation in different contexts, including urban, rural and natural areas. Amongst the findings, the importance of starting stakeholder engagement early in the process was confirmed in order to generate interest and confidence in the project and to increase their willingness to cooperate. Concerning mapping and assessment methods, it was found that the integration of methods and results is essential for providing a comprehensive overview from different perspectives (e.g. social, economic). Finally, lessons learned for effective implementation of ES mapping and assessment results are presented and discussed.Graphical Abstarcat in Fig. 1. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers biodiversity EU Biodiversity Strategy comparative analysis ecosystem services MAES case studies Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy- and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of European case studies Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.5.e51816 2020-06-12 oneecosystem

University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria author Malcheva, Boika University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria author Nustorova, Maya Forest Research Institute - Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria author Zhiyanski, Miglena https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4843-6770 Forest Research Institute - Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria author Sokolovska, Maria Forest Research Institute - Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria author Yaneva, Rositsa https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4092-8340 Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia author Abakumov, Evgeny https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5248-9018 2020-06-12 2020-06-12 2020 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 5 e51816 2020 10.1139/w08-126 10.1007/s00792-013-0560-6 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.02.018 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.10.006 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.10.016 10.3390/biology2020533 10.1038/ismej.2013.1 V. Bogoev author 1999 Total number and biomass of soil microorganisms in the region of the Livingston Island, Bulgarian Antarctic Research, Life Science 954-642-070-0 1999 2 20-25 10.1016/j.funeco.2008.10.008 10.1080/00103624.2011.623027 10.1073/pnas.1300643110 10.1007/s00300-011-1084-0 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.02.017 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00154 10.1016/j.funeco.2011.12.002 Antibiotic complex, produced by an antarctic actinomycete strain S. anulatus 39 LBG09 D. Dimitrova author 2013 text Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 2013 19 2 72 76 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.01.014 10.1186/s40659-018-0206-3 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01068.x Taxonomic study on thermophilic strain Imbas-11A, producer of secondary metabolites A. Gushterova author 2002 text Bulgarian Antarctic Research, Life Science 2002 3 29-34 10.1007/s11274-004-2241-1 D. Gushterova author 1999 Bulgarian Antarctic Research, Life Science 954-642-070-0 1999 2 1-7 Investigation of the microflora in glaciers from the Antarctic D. Gushterova author 1999 text Bulgarian Antarctic Research, Life Science 1999 2 8 12 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.00982.x 10.1017/s0954102010000829 Antibiotic complex from Streptomyces Flavovirens 67, Isolated from Livingston Island V. Ivanova author 2002 text Bulgarian Antarctic Research, Life Science 2002 3 35 42 The abundance of microorganisms and substrate profile of heterotrophs from soils of different habitats of Livingston Island A. Kenarova author 2002 text Bulgarian Antarctic Research, Life Science 2002 3 15 20 Bacterial diversity and community structure in polygonal tundra soils from Samoylov Island, Lena Delta, Siberia. Susanne Liebner author 2008 text International Microbiology : the Official Journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology 2008 11 3 195 202 10.3103/s0096392518030124 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2009.02.006 10.1039/c0pp00009d 10.1128/aem.71.10.5710-5718.2005 Antarctic groups of microorganism M. Noustororva author 2001 text Journal of Balkan Ecology 2001 4 2 186 192 Investigations of the microflora in glaciers from the Antarctic M. Noustorova author 1999 text Bulgarian Antarctic Researchq Life Sciences 1999 2 8 12 Study of soils from the region of Livingston Island, Antarctica M. Noustorova author 2002 text Bulgarian Antarctic Research, Life Science 2002 3 21 28 Izolation and taxonomic study of Antarctic yeasts from Livingston Island for exopolysaccharide producting K. Pavlova author 2004 text Bulgarian Antarctic Research, Life Science 2004 4 27 34 Lipid composition and l-glucosidase production from Cryptococcus vishnlacii AL4 K. Pavlova author 2004 text Bulgarian Antarctic Research, Life Science 2004 4 9 22 Diversity of soil microbial communities in Livingston Island – Antarctica Y. Raykovska author 2005 text Ecological Engineering Environmental Protection 2005 1 28 35 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.11.007 Isolation and taxonomic investigation of yeast strains from the Antarctic I. Savova author 1999 text Bulgarian Antarctic Research, Life Science 1999 2 13 19 S. Shilev author 2008 Study on ecological properties of microflora and mesobiont fauna of soils polluted with heavy metals. Proceedings. 2008 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01360.x 10.1590/s1517-83822011000300012 10.1017/s0954102000000420 W. F. Vincent author 1988 Microbial ecosystems of Antarctica 1988 320 H. S. Vishniac author E. I. Friedmann author 1993 Antarctic Microbiology 1993 297–341 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00200.x 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01379.x 10.1038/ismej.2007.24 10.1038/ismej.2008.111 10.1038/ismej.2011.124 10.3897/oneeco.5.e51816 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/51816/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/51816/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/51816/download/xml/ The study is focused on microbiological analyses in polar soils in selected monitoring sites in Livingstone Island, Antarctica region. The analyses include determination of the quantity and qualitative composition of the heterotrophic block of soil microflora (non-spore-forming bacteria, bacilli, actinomycetes, micromycetes, bacteria absorbing mineral nitrogen), insofar as it plays a major role in the element cycling and soil formation processes. Aerobic (rapidly and slowly growing) and anaerobic groups of soil microorganisms were investigated and the biogenicity (total microflora) and the rate of mineralisation processes (mineralisation coefficient) were determined. Mostly non-spore-forming aerobic bacteria, followed by actinomycetes, are dominant in determining the biogenicity of the studied polar soils. The rearrangement of the microorganisms in the composition of the total microflora by degree of dominance indicates the participation of all the studied groups of microorganisms in most sites in the initial and final stages of the decomposition of organic matter. The mineralisation of soils is most active in sites with vegetation cover. The established pigmentation in aerobic microorganisms is probably due to their good adaptation and protection under extreme polar conditions, while the absence of oxygen impedes the formation of pigments. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers polar soils non-spore-forming bacteria bacilli actinomycetes micromycetes bacteria absorbing mineral nitrogen Diversity and activity of microorganisms in Antarctic polar soils Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.5.e53485 2020-06-15 oneecosystem

European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Maes, Joachim https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-1607 South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Pretoria, South Africa author Driver, Amanda https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8730-846X European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Geel, Belgium author Czúcz, Bálint https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-7633 Griffith University, Canberra, Australia author Keith, Heather https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5956-7261 Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand author Jackson, Bethanna https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9759-871X Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia author Nicholson, Emily https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2199-3446 Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands author Dasoo, Malik 2020-06-15 2020-06-15 2020 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 5 e53485 2020 10.1016/s1470-160x(01)00007-3 Australian Bureau of Statistics author http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4680.0.55.001 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831 I. Dickie author 2015 Scoping the natural capital accounts for peatland, work package 3 of Report NR0165 for Defra. 2015 36 10.3897/oneeco.2.e13714 A. Driver author 2015 Land and ecosystem accounting in KwaZulu‐Natal, South Africa. Discussion document for Advancing SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting Project 2015 107 EFTEC author 2015 Developing UK Natural Capital Accounts: Woodland Ecosystem Accounts. Report prepared for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) 2015 97 M. Eigenraam author 2013 Environmental-Economic Accounting: Victorian Experimental Ecosystem Accounts, Version 1.0. 78-1-74287-795-2 2013 23 Mark Eigenraam author 2016 Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Accounting: Port Phillip Bay. Report to the Commissioner for Environmental Sustainability. 978-1-76047-395-2 2016 Forest Enterprise England author 2017 Natural capital accounts 2017 32 10.3897/oneeco.4.e32704 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106492 Heather Keith author 2017 Experimental Ecosystem Accounts for the Central Highlands of Victoria 2017 118 10.1038/s41559-017-0309-1 J. Khan author 2015 UK Natural Capital – Freshwater Ecosystem Assets and Services Accounts 2015 31 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25434 Marjolein Lof author 2019 The SEEA-EEA ecosystem condition account for the Netherlands 2019 88 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25428 Jeanne L. Nel author 2015 National River Ecosystem Accounts for South Africa. Discussion document for Advancing SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting Project. 2015 82 10.1126/science.342.6157.420-a 10.1007/s10640-015-9921-1 Office for National Statistics author 2016 Scoping UK coastal margin ecosystem accounts 2016 37 Office for National Statistics author 2017 UK natural capital: developing UK mountain, moorland and heathland ecosystem accounts 2017 27 Office for National Statistics author 2018 UK natural capital: ecosystem accounts for urban areas. Initial natural capital accounts containing information about green space in urban areas 2018 27 Office for National Statistics author 2018 UK natural capital: developing semi-natural grassland ecosystem accounts 2018 41 10.1073/pnas.1406490112 10.1080/26395916.2019.1609581 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106453 B. Smith author 2017 Environmental-economic accounts for ACT State of the Environment Reporting: Proof of Concept 2017 61 Statistics Canada Environment Accounts and Statistics Division author 2013 Human Activity and the Environment. Measuring ecosystem goods and services in Canada 2013 122 R. Thackway author 2005 Vegetation Assets, States and Transitions (VAST): Accounting for vegetation condition in the Australian landscape 2005 18 UNEP-WCMC author 2017 Developing Ecosystem Condition Accounts for the EU and Member States 2017 81 UNEP-WCMC author 2017 Experimental Ecosystem Accounts for Uganda 2017 89 United Nations author 2014 System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012 — Experimental Ecosystem Accounting 978-92-1-161575-3 2014 198 United Nations author 2019 Technical recommendations in support of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012 — Experimental Ecosystem Accounting 978-92-1-161634-7 2019 209 10.1080/20964129.2018.1560233 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101044 T. Varcoe author 2015 Valuing Victoria’s Parks accounting for ecosystems and valuing their benefits: Report of first phase findings 2015 122 10.3897/oneeco.5.e47715 Wentworth Group author 2016 Accounting for Nature - A scientific method for constructing environmental asset condition accounts 978-0-9944577-3-8 2016 C. White author 2015 Developing ecosystem accounts for protected areas in England and Scotland: Main Report 2015 90 10.3897/oneeco.5.e53485 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/53485/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/53485/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/53485/download/xml/ Ecosystem condition accounts are part of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting – Experimental Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EEA). An ecosystem condition account contains aggregated statistical information about the overall abiotic and biotic quality of an ecosystem at a policy relevant spatial scale. This article reviews 23 publicly-accessible reports undertaken or commissioned by government agencies, academic and non-government organisations that discuss or present an ecosystem condition account. This analysis revealed that ecosystem condition is usually reported for one or more ecosystem types, but there is little consistency in the terminology used to define ecosystem types. All case studies report variables or indicators that measure specific ecosystem characteristics in order to make inferences about the overall condition of ecosystems. All studies included biotic indicators and almost all studies included species-based indicators in the condition account. The thematic aggregation of indicators into a single composite index (or in a few composite sub-indices) is not a standard practice, but applied in about half of the studies. The definition and use of a reference condition or reference levels for specific indicators against which the reported condition can be evaluated is not a standard practice, but was applied in about half of the studies. Based on this analysis, we suggest the revision of the SEEA EEA to propose a globally-consistent typology of ecosystem types; to recommend a list of ecosystem condition indicators according to an agreed classification; to provide further guidance on aggregation methods and on the development of an ecosystem condition index that can be used to compare ecosystem condition across ecosystem types and across different accounting areas; to provide further guidance on how best to set reference levels and reference conditions against which the past, current and future ecosystem condition can be assessed; and to propose a standard set of statistical tables for reporting the condition account. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers ecosystem condition ecosystem condition account System of Environmental-Economic Accounting experimental ecosystem accounting review indicators reference condition aggregation A review of ecosystem condition accounts: lessons learned and options for further development Review Article

10.3897/oneeco.5.e53677 2020-07-29 oneecosystem

Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovakia author Mederly, Peter https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7101-4336 Institute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovakia author Černecký, Ján Institute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia author Špulerová, Jana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1666-8369 Institute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia author Izakovicova, Zita https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2977-403X Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia author Ďuricová, Viktória Slovak Environment Agency, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia author Považan, Radoslav Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia author Švajda, Juraj https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4528-9963 Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovakia author Močko, Matej Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovakia author Jančovič, Martin Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovakia Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava, Slovakia author Gusejnov, Simona Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovakia author Hreško, Juraj Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovakia author Petrovic, Frantisek https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2364-3610 Institute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia author Štefunková, Dagmar Institute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia author Šatalová, Barbora Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovakia author Vrbičanová, Gréta Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovakia author Kaisová, Dominika Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovakia author Turanovičová, Martina Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovakia author Kováč, Tomáš Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovakia author Laco, Ivan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1313-6367 2020-07-29 2020-07-29 2020 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 5 e53677 2020 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.049 I. Arany author M. Potschin-Young author 2018 Multifunctional assessment methods and the role of map analyse - Using an Integrated Ecosystem Service Assessment Framework http://www.esmeralda-project.eu/documents/1/ 2018 186 10.1080/21513732.2017.1305992 MAES-related developments in the European Union BISE author text https://biodiversity.europa.eu/countries/countries-sections-v3##maes 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011 10.1126/sciadv.aax0903 10.2779/41957 10.3097/lo.201434 10.3897/ab.e12837 10.1080/17445647.2019.1689858 10.1007/978-3-540-36920-2_13 Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) CICES author text https://biodiversity.europa.eu/maes/common-international-classification-of-ecosystem-services-cices-classification-version-4.3 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008 10.1080/26395916.2019.1674383 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 10.1080/13504509.2016.1146176 10.3897/oneeco.2.e13714 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014 10.3354/cr01461 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001 10.1659/mrd-journal-d-10-00115.s1 10.1088/1748-9326/ab26f7 Uplatňovanie konceptu ekosystémových služieb v plánovacej a riadiacej praxi v Slovenskej republike – výsledky projektu OpenNESS na prípadovej štúdii Trnava Z. Izakovičová author 2017 text Životné prostredie http://publikacie.uke.sav.sk/node/6088 2017 51 4 198 204 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.007 J. P. Jäppinen author 2015 Towards a sustainable and genuinely green economy. The value and social significance of Ecosystem Services in Finland (TEEB for Finland). ISBN 978-952-11-4376-2 2015 144 10.1002/ehs2.1210 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25494 MEA author 2005 Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis 1-59726-040-1 2005 137 P. Mederly author 2019 Katalóg ekosystémových služieb Slovenska 978-80-8184-067-8 2019 215 Landscape Atlas of the Slovak Republic MoE SR author text http://geo.enviroportal.sk/atlassr/ 10.3897/oneeco.3.e29288 NEPA author 2017 Assessment of Ecosystems and Ecosystem Services in Romania 978-606-8038-23-0 2017 197 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.043 10.1073/pnas.0907284107 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105943 F. Santos-Martín author 2016 Spanish National Ecosystem Assessment: Socio-economic valuation of ecosystem services in Spain. Synthesis of the key findings 978-84-608-8776-8 2016 68 10.1038/s41598-019-43229-z 10.1093/biosci/biw101 10.3897/oneeco.2.e14814 STATdat. Public database - Statistical Office of the SR STATdat author text http://statdat.statistics.sk/cognosext/cgi-bin/cognos.cgi?b_action=xts.run&m=portal/cc.xts&gohome= TEEB author 2010 The economics of the ecosystem and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature 978-3-9813410-3-4 2010 36 10.1111/brv.12193 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.007 UK NEA author 2011 The UK National Ecosystem Assessment. Understanding nature´s value to society 978-92-807-3164-4 2011 1466 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25508 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.002 10.3897/oneeco.5.e53677 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/53677/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/53677/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/53677/download/xml/ This article provides an overview and results of the pilot national ecosystem services assessment in Slovakia. It follows the MAES process and past ecosystem services (ES) research in Slovakia and is based on original research methodology using spatial and statistical data. The initial step of national ES assessment resulted in the selection of significant ES for the evaluation process, where 18 ES in three groups were selected (five provisioning, 10 regulatory/maintenance and three cultural ES). An original assessment model provided the theoretical and methodological framework for national ES evaluation. The principal result is an assessment of the national landscape’s capacity for ES provision, based on evaluation of the landscape units and selected properties and indicators at the ecosystem level. These inputs included habitat types and watersheds, administrative units, natural topology, geology, soils, climate, water and biota. The ES capacity models were created and evaluated for each ES, for the main groups and, finally, for overall ES provision. The highest capacity to provide ES in Slovakia comes from natural and semi-natural ecosystems, mainly deciduous, mixed and coniferous forests which cover over 38% of Slovak territory. The water ecosystems and wetlands are also significant, followed by grasslands and permanent crops. The research highlights the crucial importance of the mountainous and sub-mountainous areas in Slovakia and confirms the significant contribution of the natural and semi-natural ecosystems for ensuring ES provision. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers ecosystem services MAES process national assessment valuation methods Slovakia National ecosystem services assessment in Slovakia – meeting old liabilities and introducing new methods Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.5.e55881 2020-09-03 oneecosystem

Memorial University of Newfoundland, Corner Brook, NL, Canada Natural Resources Canada, Corner Brook, NL, Canada author Eddy, Brian https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0262-2191 Transportation Planning, City of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada author Muggridge, Madison Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Corner Brook, NL, Canada author LeBlanc, Robert Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Corner Brook, NL, Canada author Osmond, Joanne Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Corner Brook, NL, Canada author Kean, Chelsea Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Corner Brook, NL, Canada author Boyd, Erica 2020-09-03 2020-09-03 2020 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 5 e55881 2020 10.3897/oneeco.5.e55881 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/55881/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/55881/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/55881/download/xml/ Integrating socio-economic dimensions in ecosystems analysis and management is becoming increasingly important, particularly from a mapping standpoint. A key challenge with such integration is reconciling different geospatial representations based on census and administrative frameworks with natural ecosystems boundaries.This article presents one method for addressing this challenge by mapping an information rich 'ecumene'. In this approach, communities are mapped as human habitats using natural boundaries as opposed to administrative-type boundaries, integrated with authoritative socio-economic data. To illustrate the benefits of this approach, two example applications are provided that: 1) map and estimate the population of the 'forest ecumene' of Canada, and 2) map labour force distribution patterns associated with the forest sector and its relation to forest areas in Canada. Benefits and limitations of this approach are discussed, from which a number of priority areas for future research are identified. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers ecumene ecosystems mapping socio-economic communities geospatial analysis economic geography An Ecological Approach for Mapping Socio-Economic Data in Support of Ecosystems Analysis: Examples in Mapping Canada’s Forest Ecumene Methods

10.3897/oneeco.5.e57117 2020-09-18 oneecosystem

UiT The Arctic university of Norway, Tromsø, Norway author Ancin-Murguzur, Francisco UiT The Arctic university of Norway, Tromsø, Norway author Hausner, Vera 2020-09-18 2020-09-18 2020 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 5 e57117 2020 Snow, Water, Ice and Permafrost in the Arctic (SWIPA); Summary for Policy-makers Arctic Monitoring author 2017 text 2017 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 10.5751/es-00342-050218 The EU-PolarNet ­White Papers Nicole Biebow author 2019 text 2019 10.1016/b978-0-12-411519-4.00006-9 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1053107 10.1002/asi.23329 10.1088/1748-9326/aafc1b Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) author 2013 Arctic Biodiversity Assessment: Report for Policy Makers 9789935431233 2013 10.1002/ecs2.2362 10.1007/s13280-014-0606-8 10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf 10.1007/s13280-012-0336-8 10.1037/1076-898X.10.3.188 10.5751/ES-07607-200332 textmineR: Functions for Text Mining and Topic Modeling. R package version 3.0.4. Tommy Jones author 2019 text 2019 10.1111/faf.12399 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100898 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7989 10.1038/nclimate2697 10.1111/1365-2745.12817 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00691.x 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240103.x 10.3402/gha.v2i0.2075 10.1126/sciadv.aaw9883 10.1186/s13750-018-0135-1 10.1111/ecog.03984 10.1080/23308249.2017.1416331 10.1111/ele.12380 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4291 10.1038/499401a udpipe: Tokenization, Parts of Speech Tagging, Lemmatization and Dependency Parsing with the 'UDPipe' 'NLP' Toolkit. R package version 0.8.3. Jan Wijffels author 2019 text 2019 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01185.x 10.1111/gcb.12964 10.3897/oneeco.5.e57117 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/57117/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/57117/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/57117/download/xml/ Climate change is affecting the biodiversity, ecosystem services and the well-being of people that live in the Arctic tundra. Understanding the societal implications and adapting to these changes depend on knowledge produced by multiple disciplines. We analysed peer-reviewed publications to identify the main research themes relating to the Arctic tundra and assessed to what extent current research build on multiple disciplines to confront the upcoming challenges of rapid environmental changes. We used a topic-modelling approach, based on the Latent Dirichlet Allocation algorithm to detect topics based on semantic similarity. We found that plant and soil ecology dominate the tundra research and are highly connected to other ecological disciplines and biophysical sciences. Despite the fivefold increase in the number of publications during the past decades, the proportion of studies that address societal implications of climate change remains low. The strong scientific interest in the tundra reflects the concern of the rapid warming of the Arctic, but few studies include the cross-disciplinary approach necessary to fully assess the implications of these changes for society. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Topic modelling research gaps climate change socio-economic system LDA Research gaps and trends in the Arctic tundra: a topic-modelling approach Short Communication

10.3897/oneeco.5.e54621 2020-09-29 oneecosystem

National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography - Bulgarian Academy of Scienses, Sofia, Bulgaria author Ihtimanski, Ivo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1204-1275 National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography - Bulgarian Academy of Scienses, Sofia, Bulgaria author Nedkov, Stoyan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-9815 Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria author Semerdzhieva, Lidiya https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9871-6485 2020-09-29 2020-09-29 2020 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 5 e54621 2020 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24490 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.005 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25477 10.3390/land7040112 10.1078/1618-8667-00002 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.121 10.1007/978-3-319-68303-4_10 R. Harrison author S. West author 2010 Understanding Heritage in Practice 2010 88-126 C. Kakoyannis author 2002 Assessing and evaluating recreational uses of water resources: Implications for an integrated management framework https://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr595.pdf 2002 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.015 10.1016/s0169-2046(00)00111-0 10.1560/ijee.57.1-2.151 10.1016/j.jort.2015.04.006 10.1038/srep34162 MA author 2005 Millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being 2005 10.2760/689989 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.12.004 10.1080/02827581.2010.485999 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.134 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018 10.1016/j.jort.2013.05.001 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.003 10.1300/j091v25n03_02 10.1371/journal.pone.0162372 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.003 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.022 10.2495/ST120171 World Heritage Convention UNESCO author 1972 text Standard-Setting at UNESCO http://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/ 1972 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101044 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102111 P. Wong author A. Lew author 2004 A companion to tourism 0-631-23564-7 2004 10.1080/14498596.2018.1494059 10.2788/64369 ESTIMAP: A GIS-based model to map ecosystem services in the European Union G. Zulian author 2014 text Annali di Botanica 2014 4 1 7 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.005 10.3897/oneeco.5.e54621 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/54621/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/54621/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/54621/download/xml/ Natural heritage includes natural features or natural areas of outstanding universal value. At a national level, this value refers to the importance of ecosystems which can be considered as the spatial units representing the natural heritage of the particular area in terms of their values to people. Nature-based outdoor recreation represents an important service that interests millions of people and contributes to connecting them to nature, but it may also cause negative impacts in the form of pollution, erosion and habitats loss. We apply the ESTIMAP recreation model which provides a framework for a spatially-explicit assessment of local outdoor recreation and use it to identify and assess the natural heritage as a source of recreation services at a national level in Bulgaria. At the first stage of the study, we identify the natural heritage and the data sources to represent it in a spatially-explicit way. Then, we apply the module for recreation potential to assess the potential of the natural heritage to provide a recreation ecosystem service. At the third stage, the accessibility of the natural heritage is assessed in order to specify how the potential identified at the previous step can be really used. Finally, the recreation potential and accessibility are integrated into the recreation opportunity spectrum in order to develop the maps representing the ecosystem service supply provided by the natural heritage. The results are presented in form of a recreation potential map that reveals the capacity of natural heritage to provide the recreation potential, map of the accessibility of the natural heritage and map of the recreation opportunity spectrum representing the combination between the first two maps. The maps will be used for the development of an innovative geospatial platform designed to facilitate the access of the Bulgarian natural heritage to the European common knowledge and innovation markets. The results on the accessibility and recreation opportunity spectrum contribute to the development of the model in areas which were not covered by previous applications at the EU scale. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem services ESTIMAP GIS recreation potential recreation opportunity spectrum hemeroby index tourism Mapping the natural heritage as a source of recreation services at national scale in Bulgaria Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.5.e58216 2020-11-09 oneecosystem

Griffith University, Queensland, Australia author Keith, Heather https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5956-7261 European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Geel, Belgium author Czúcz, Bálint https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-7633 Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand author Jackson, Bethanna https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9759-871X South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, South Africa author Driver, Amanda https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8730-846X Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia author Nicholson, Emily https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2199-3446 European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Geel, Belgium author Maes, Joachim https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-1607 2020-11-09 2020-11-09 2020 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 5 e58216 2020 10.3897/oneeco.5.e58216 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/58216/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/58216/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/58216/download/xml/ Ecosystem condition is a fundamental component in the ecosystem accounting framework as part of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting Experimental Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EEA). Here, we develop a conceptual framework and present a practical structure for implementing ecosystem condition accounts to contribute to the revision process of the SEEA EEA, focussing on six core elements: (1) developing a common definition of ecosystem condition, (2) establishing a conceptual framing for ecosystem condition, (3) portraying the role of condition within the SEEA EEA accounting system, (4) deriving an inclusive multi-purpose approach, (5) describing the components of condition accounts and (6) developing a three-stage structure for reporting accounts. We develop a conceptual framework for an inclusive condition account, building on an ecological understanding of ecosystems upon which definitions, concepts, classifications and reporting structures were based. The framework encompasses the dual perspectives of first, the interdependencies of ecosystem composition, structure and function in maintaining ecosystem integrity and second, the capacity of ecosystems to supply services as benefits for humans. The following components of ecosystem condition accounts are recommended to provide comprehensive, consistent, repeatable and transparent accounts: (1) intrinsic and instrumental values, together with ecocentric and anthropocentric worldviews; (2) a formal typology or classification of characteristics, variables and indicators, based on selection criteria; (3) a reference condition used both to compare past, current and future levels of indicators of condition and as a basis for aggregation of indicators; and (4) a three-stage approach to compiling accounts with increasing levels of information and complexity that are appropriate for different purposes and applications. The recommended broad and inclusive scope of ecosystem condition and the demonstrated practical methods for implementation of accounts will enhance the ecosystem accounting framework and thus support a wider range of current and potential applications and users. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers System of Environmental-Economic Accounting ecosystem accounting reference condition ecosystem integrity condition indicators A conceptual framework and practical structure for implementing ecosystem condition accounts Methods

10.3897/oneeco.5.e53504 2020-12-01 oneecosystem

University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia author Vinogradovs, Ivo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5760-8058 Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia author Villoslada, Miguel https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7777-6577 University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia author Nikodemus, Olgerts Baltic Environmental Forum, Riga, Latvia author Ruskule, Anda https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1580-8304 Baltic Environmental Forum, Riga, Latvia author Veidemane, Kristina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5497-3030 Baltic Environmental Forum, Vilnius, Lithuania author Gulbinas, Justas Baltic Environmental Forum, Vilnius, Lithuania author Morkvenas, Zymantas University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia author Kasparinskis, Raimonds https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3692-1621 Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia author Sepp, Kalev Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia author Jarv, Henri Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia author Klimask, Jaak University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia author Zarina, Anita University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia author Brumelis, Guntis Baltic Environmental Forum, Vilnius, Lithuania author Dotas, Arvydas Hnit-Baltic, Vilnius, Lithuania author Kryzanauskas, Audrius 2020-12-01 2020-12-01 2020 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 5 e53504 2020 7.2. Application of ecosystem services in spatial planning Christian Albert author 2017 text Mapping Ecosystem Services 2017 ARIES–Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services: A guide to models and data, version 1.0 KJ Bagstad author 2011 text ARIES report series 2011 1 10.1007/s10113-015-0756-7 The multiscale integrated Earth Systems model (MIMES): the dynamics, modeling and valuation of ecosystem services Roelof Boumans author 2007 text Issues in Global Water System Research 2007 2 10 11 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.014 10.3097/LO.200915 10.3897/ab.e12837 10.1890/080025 proposal for Regulation on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the Common Agricultural Policy European Comission author text https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52018PC0392 Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services European Environment Agency author 2015 text 2015 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.008 10.5751/ES-03392-150334 10.1080/21513732.2017.1396257 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.012 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.003 10.1016/j.agee.2010.01.003 10.1007/s10980-014-0126-8 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.014 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.024 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.013 10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.016 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.04.037 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.06.009 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.003 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.005 10.1007/s10980-012-9756-x 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.06.012 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.05.004 Heli Saarikoski author M. Potschin author 2016 OpenNESS Ecosystem Services reference book 2016 5 A multitiered approach for grassland ecosystem services mapping and assessment: The Viva Grass tool Miguel Villoslada author 2018 text One Ecosystem 2018 3 10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.016 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.02.015 10.3897/oneeco.5.e53504 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/53504/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/53504/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/53504/download/xml/ The area covered by low-input agroecosystems (e.g. semi-natural and permanent grasslands) in Europe has considerably decreased throughout the last century. To support more sustainable management practices, and to promote biodiversity and ecosystem service values of such agroecosystems a decision support tool was developed. The tool aims to enhance the operationalization of ecosystem services and address the challenge of their integration into spatial planning. The Viva Grass tool aims to enhance the maintenance of ecosystem services delivered by low-input agroecosystems. It does so by providing spatially explicit decision support for land-use planning and sustainable management of agroecosystems. The Viva Grass tool is a multi-criteria decision analysis tool for integrated planning. It is designed for farmers, spatial planners and policy makers to support decisions of management of agroecosystems. The tool has been tested to assess spatial planning in eight case studies across the Baltic States. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers ecosystem services decision-support tool agroecosystems spatial planning the Baltic States Integrating ecosystem services into decision support for management of agroecosystems: Viva Grass tool Software Description

10.3897/oneeco.6.e58218 2021-01-27 oneecosystem

European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Geel, Belgium author Czúcz, Bálint https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-7633 Griffith University, Canberra, Australia author Keith, Heather https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5956-7261 South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, South Africa author Driver, Amanda https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8730-846X Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand author Jackson, Bethanna https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9759-871X Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia author Nicholson, Emily https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2199-3446 European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Geel, Belgium author Maes, Joachim https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-1607 2021-01-27 2021-01-27 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e58218 2021 10.1016/s1470-160x(01)00007-3 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.08.019 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.057 Selection criteria for ecosystem condition indicators Bálint Czúcz author in press text Ecological Indicators in press Ecosystem accounting Limburg Province, the Netherlands Part I: Physical supply and condition accounts R. de Jong author 2016 text https://www.wavespartnership.org/en/knowledge-center/ecosystem-accounting-limburg-province-netherlands-part-1-physical-supply-and 2016 Defining biodiversity D. DeLong author 1996 text Wildlife Society Bulletin 1996 24 4 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.09.001 Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: Mapping and assessing the condition of Europe's ecosystems: Progress and challenges. M. Erhard author 2016 text Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg http://catalogue.biodiversity.europa.eu/uploads/document/file/1328/3rdMAESReport_Condition.pdf 2016 Assessment of wetland ecosystem condition across landscape regions: A multi-metric approach, Part A. D. Faber-Langendoen author 2012 text NatureServe https://www.natureserve.org/biodiversity-science/publications/assessment-wetland-ecosystem-condition-across-landscape-regions 2012 10.1111/j.1526-100x.2006.00112.x 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.007 A. B. Grobman author 1964 BSCS Biology 1964 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.111 10.2307/1313475 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.009 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.006 The IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology v1.01: Descriptive profiles for Biomes and Ecosystem Functional Groups, IUCN CEM, February 2020. David A. Keith author 2020b text IUCN https://iucnrle.org/static/media/uploads/references/research-development/keith_etal_iucnglobalecosystemtypology_v1.01.pdf 2020b The purpose, role and reporting of ecosystem condition accounts H Keith author 2020 text One Ecosystem 2020 this special issue 10.1111/brv.12359 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.030 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106317 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006 J. Maes author 2014 Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: Indicators for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 2014 J. Maes author 2018 Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: An analytical framework for ecosystem condition 2018 10.3897/oneeco.5.e53485 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.028 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.03.017 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x 10.1126/science.342.6157.420-a 10.1007/s10640-015-9921-1 Scoping UK coastal margin ecosystem accounts Office for National Statistics author 2016 text https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/environmentalaccounts/methodologies/scopingukcoastalmarginecosystemaccounts 2016 UK natural capital: ecosystem accounts for urban areas: Initial natural capital accounts containing information about green space in urban areas Office for National Statistics author 2018 text https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/environmentalaccounts/bulletins/uknaturalcapital/ecosystemaccountsforurbanareas 2018 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.184 10.1007/s10980-013-9983-9 Classification. In: The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ISSN 2161-0002) D Parrochia author text https://www.iep.utm.edu/classifi 10.1126/science.1229931 10.1073/pnas.1406490112 10.1080/26395916.2019.1609581 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.11.006 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00200.x 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.014 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.006 10.1177/030631289019003001 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.016 10.1890/070176 United Nations (UN) author 2012 System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012: Central Framework 2012 378 United Nations (UN) author 2014 System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012 — Experimental Ecosystem Accounting 978-92-1-161575-3 2014 198 United Nations (UN) author 2019 Technical Recommendations in Support of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012 – Experimental Ecosystem Accounting 978-92-1-161634-7 2019 209 10.2760/631588 Developing ecosystem accounts for protected areas in England and Scotland: Main Report C. White author 2015 text Department for Food, Environment & Rural Affairs/The Scottish Government 2015 London ESTIMAP: Ecosystem services mapping at European scale G. Zulian author 2013 text Publications Office of the European Union http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/111111111/30410 2013 10.3897/oneeco.6.e58218 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/58218/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/58218/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/58218/download/xml/ The UN System of Environmental-Economic Accounting Experimental Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EEA) aims at regular and standardised stocktaking on the extent of ecosystems, their condition and the services they provide to society. Recording the condition of ecosystems is one of the most complex pieces in this exercise, needing to be supported by robust and consistent guidelines. SEEA EEA defines the condition of an ecosystem as its overall quality, measured in terms of quantitative metrics describing both abiotic and biotic characteristics. The main objective of this paper is to propose a simple universal classification (typology) for these ecosystem condition characteristics and metrics, based on long standing ecological concepts and traditions.The proposed SEEA EEA Ecosystem Condition Typology (SEEA ECT) is a hierarchical classification consisting of six classes grouped into three main groups (abiotic, biotic and landscape-level ecosystem characteristics). In order to facilitate practical applications, SEEA ECT is cross-linked to the most relevant existing typologies for ecosystem characteristics currently used for other purposes. To ensure clarity and practicality, we identified potential overlaps between classes and also identified the most important groups of ‘ancillary data’ that should not be considered as ecosystem condition characteristics. We consider that this new typology for ecosystem condition will create a meaningful reporting structure for ecosystem condition accounts, thus facilitating its standardisation and broad application. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers ecosystem condition ecosystem characteristics ecological integrity classification ecosystem accounts System Of Environmental Economic Accounting Experimental Ecosystem Accounting SEEA EEA A common typology for ecosystem characteristics and ecosystem condition variables Review Article

10.3897/oneeco.6.e65582 2021-04-28 oneecosystem

Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland author Farrell, Catherine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2940-6445 University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland author Coleman, Lisa University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland author Kelly-Quinne, Mary IDEEA Group, Melbourne, Australia author Obst, Carl IDEEA Group, Melbourne, Australia author Eigenraam, Mark University of Limerick Kemmy Business School, Limerick, Ireland author Norton, Daniel National University Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland author O'Donoghue, Cathal University of Limerick Kemmy Business School, Limerick, Ireland author Kinsella, Stephen Natural Capital Ireland, Dublin, Ireland author Sheehy, Iseult Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland author Stout, Jane https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2027-0863 2021-04-28 2021-04-28 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e65582 2021 10.1093/oxrep/gry028 10.1038/s41893-020-0552-3 10.3897/oneeco.3.e29306 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011 A review of the range and value of ecosystem services from Irish forests. C. H. Bullock author 2016 text Irish Forestry https://journal.societyofirishforesters.ie/index.php/forestry/article/view/10846 2016 73 65 95 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831 10.1080/00750770903407989 10.1002/ldr.1149 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008 10.3897/oneeco.6.e58218 National Biodiversity Action Plan: 2017-2021. DAHG author 2017 text Department of Arts Heritage and Gaeltacht https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/ie/ie-nbsap-v3-en.pdf 2017 P Dasgupta author 2021 The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review 2021 Reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive: Explanatory notes and guidelines for the period 2013-2018 DG Environment author 2017 text Brussels https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/d0eb5cef-a216-4cad-8e77-6e4839a5471d/Reporting%20guidelines%20Article%2017%20final%20May%202017.pdf 2017 River Basin Management Plan for Ireland 2018-2021 DHPLG author 2018 text Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government www.housing.gov.ie 2018 Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services S. Díaz author 2019 text United Nations https://www.ipbes.net/system/tdf/spm_global_unedited_advance.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=35245 2019 10.2800/417530 10.1080/20964129.2018.1524718 Irish Natural Capital Accounting for Sustainable Environments: Stage 1 Feasibility Report C. A. Farrell author 2020 text EPA, Ireland https://www.epa.ie/researchandeducation/research/researchpublications/researchreports/Research_Report_322.pdf 2020 J. Fossitt author 2000 A guide to habitats in Ireland https://www.npws.ie/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/ 2000 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.016 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.003 10.3897/oneeco.5.e50648 10.1073/pnas.1503751112 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101118 10.1126/science.aaz8901 Natural capital assessments for Braithwaite, Glenridding and Staveley sub-catchments Cumbria Catchment Pioneer Pilot Project Phase I. A. Holt author 2017 text http://www.naturalcapitalsolutions.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Cumbria-Catchment-Pioneer-Pilot_phases-1_v2.compressed.pdf 2017 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.13.en 10.3897/oneeco.5.e58216 Incorporation of Ecosystem Services values in the Integrated Management of Irish Freshwater Resources: ESManage M. Kelly-Quinn author 2020 text EPA, Ireland https://www.epa.ie/pubs/reports/research/water/Research_Report_312.pdf 2020 The Changing Wealth of Nations 2018: Building a Sustainable Future G. -M. Lange author text https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/29001/9781464810466.pdf 10.2760/214137 10.1080/20964129.2019.1634979 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006 10.1111/1365-2664.12431 10.3897/oneeco.5.e53485 Frank Mitchell author 1997 Reading the Irish Landscape 1997 Assessing Market and Non-market Values of Pollination Services in Ireland: Literature review A. J. T. Murphy author 2019 text EPA https://www.epa.ie/researchandeducation/research/researchpublications/researchreports/Research_Report_275.pdf 2019 10.3318/bioe.2020.14 10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2014-0020 10.1073/pnas.1911439117 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)96870-9 10.3390/LAND9100348 10.1080/26395916.2019.1609581 Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. W. Steffen author 2015 text Science 2015 347 6223 System of Environmental Economic Accounting 2012— Central Framework. UN author 2014 text United Nations https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaRev/SEEA_CF_Final_en.pdf 2014 System of Environmental-Economic Accounting— Ecosystem Accounting Final Draft UNSD author 2021 text https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/52nd-session/documents/BG-3f-SEEA-EA_Final_draft-E.pdf 2021 10.1080/20964129.2018.1560233 Ireland’s Environment. B. Wall author 2016 text EPA, Ireland http://www.epa.ie/ebooks/soe2016/files/assets/basic-html/page-1.html# 2016 Ireland’s Environment – An Integrated Assessment 2020. B. Wall author 2020 text EPA, Ireland www.epa.ie 2020 10.3897/oneeco.6.e65582 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/65582/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/65582/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/65582/download/xml/ Ecosystem accounting is a tool to integrate nature into decision-making in a more structured way. Applying the use of nationally available datasets at catchment scale and following the System of Environmental Economic Accounting-Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA-EA) framework, we present results from a catchment case study in Ireland, highlighting findings specifically in relation to the development of ecosystem extent and condition accounts. In the absence of a national ecosystem map, CORINE landcover mapping formed the basic data for extent and type of ecosystems, distinguishing woodlands and forest, peatland and heathland, grasslands and cropland and urban areas, with limited coverage of linear freshwater rivers, hedgerows and coastal ecosystems. Additional remote sensing data provided higher resolution at catchment scale, while limited site-level survey data were available. Condition data gathered for reporting under the EU Water Framework Directive were available at sub-basin level for surface waterbodies. Data were available at national level for habitats reported for the EU under the Habitats Directive (59 habitats reported), covering ~ 25% of the study area. Data for ecosystem types outside of these reporting frameworks were in the form of ancillary data only, providing information on pressures, threats and intensity of use. Our findings in Ireland reflect work across the European region, highlighting the role of data gathering and stakeholder engagement. We outline some of the data gaps to provide information for future research and alignment of data for the purpose of NCA, both at catchment and national scale. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers SEEA-EA catchment scale ecosystem stocks ecosystem extent ecosystem condition ecosystem accounts Applying the System of Environmental Economic Accounting-Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA-EA) framework at catchment scale to develop ecosystem extent and condition accounts Case Study

10.3897/oneeco.5.e56536 2021-05-11 oneecosystem

Department of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Bohol Island State University, Bohol, Philippines Program on Biodiversity Assessment and Conservation, Research and Development Office, Bohol Island State University, Bohol, Philippines author Aureo, Wilbert https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7857-079X Institute of Renewable Natural Resources, College of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines author Reyes, Tomas Jr. Program on Biodiversity Assessment and Conservation, Research and Development Office, Bohol Island State University, Bohol, Philippines author Mutia, Francis Carlo Philippine National Herbarium, Botany and National Herbarium Division, National Museum of Natural History, T.M. Kalaw St., Manila, Philippines Biodiversity Program, Taiwan International Graduate Program, Academia Sinica and National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan author Tandang, Danilo Program on Biodiversity Assessment and Conservation, Research and Development Office, Bohol Island State University, Bohol, Philippines Department of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Bohol Island State University, Bohol, Philippines author Jose, Reizl 2021-05-11 2021-05-11 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e56536 2021 10.1023/A:1009710618040 V. B. Amoroso author 2013 Philippine Medicinal Ferns and Lycopods 2013 Philippine Phytogeography P. S. Ashton author 1993 text Asia Life Science 1993 2 1 1 8 10.1078/1433-8319-00044 10.12983/ijsres-2017-p0082-0090 Anurans species diversity and composition along the elevational gradient of the Balinsasayao Twin Lakes Natural Park, Negros Oriental, Philippines W. Aureo author 2019 text Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Science 2019 Co’s Digital Flora of the Philippines: plant identification and conservation through cybertaxonomy Julie Barcelona author 2013 text Philippine Journal of Science 2013 142 57 67 Aloys Bernatzky author 1978 Tree Ecology and Preservation 9780444599384 1978 10.1017/S0959270900002501 10.2307/1933494 10.4324/9781315659046 10.15031/vegsci.15.19 Vertical distribution and zonation pattern of woody vegetation on the Northwestern Slope of Mt. Mayon, Philippines I. E. Buot author 2008 text Asia Life Sciences 2008 2 17 189 205 10.3844/ajessp.2011.306.315 Tropical rainforest conservation: a global perspective R. T. Corlett author 2008 text Tropical Forest Community Ecology. Blackwell Scienc 2008 15 51 442 457 Co's Digital Flora of the Philippines author https://www.philippineplants.org/ 10.1111/jbi.12138 E. De Guzman author 1986 Guide to Philippine Flora and Fauna: Dipterocarps and Non-Dipterocarps 1986 3 414 DENR Administrative Order No. 11-17 author 2017 Updated National list of Threatened Philippine Plants and their Categories. 2017 P. B, Durst author 2016 Forest beneath the grass. Proceedings of the regional workshop on advancing the assisted natural regeneration for effective low-cost restoration Bohol, Philippine 9789251066393; 9251066396 2016 Tree condition and natural regeneration in disturbed sites of Bwindi Impenetrable Lowland natural park, southwestern Uganda G. Eilu author 2005 text Tropical Ecology 2005 46 1 99 111 10.5479/si.0081024X.95.57 Dipterocarpaceae of Bohol Island, Philippines E. Fernando author 2009 text Asia Life Sciences 2009 18 121 138 Flowering Plants and Ferns of Mt. Makiling. ASEAN-Korea Environmental Cooperation Unit (AKECU) E. S. Fernando author 2004 text National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University 2004 Forest formations and flora of the Philippines. College of Forestry and Natural Resources E. S. Fernando author 2008 text ASEAN-Korea Environmental Cooperation Unit 2008 Flora Malesiana author https://floramalesiana.org/new/ "Jaccard Index / Similarity Coefficient" From StatisticsHowTo.com: Elementary Statistics for the rest of us! Stephanie Glen author text https://www.statisticshowto.com/jaccard-index/ 10.1023/A:1008847704539 PAST. Paleontological Statistics. Version 2.07. Reference Manual Ø. Hammer author 2006 text Blackwell Publishing 2006 Biodiversity patterns and the conservation of mammals in the Philippines L. Heaney author 1993 text Asia Life Science 1993 2 261 274 10.5962/bhl.title.3419 The Climate and Hydrology of the Lake Balinsasayao Watershed, Negros Oriental, Philippines P. D. Heideman author 1987 text Silliman Journal 1987 34 82 107 10.1007/s11258-005-9049-4 M. Hicks author 2001 The National Parks and Other Wild Place of the Philippines 9781859741948 2001 10.1002/ecs2.1624 10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.000521 International Plant Name Index (IPNI) author https://www.ipni.org/ International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species author https://www.iucnredlist.org/ 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.02.002 10.1007/978-94-009-2107-8_12 10.1007/BF00044731 10.1007/s40974-017-0064-9 P. G. Lapitan author 2010 Biodiversity and Natural Resources Conservation in Protected Areas of Korea and the Philippines 978-89-6558-009-6-9350 2010 Native Trees on Mount Lantoy Key Biodiversity Areas (KBA), Argao, Cebu, Philippines Edgardo Lillo author 2019 text Philippine Journal of Science 2019 148 365 377 10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0 P. L. Jr. Malabrigo author 2016 BINHI: Tree for the Future, A Greening Legacy. Energy Development Corporation 2016 336 N. A. Mallari author 2001 Key conservation sites in the Philippines: A Haribon Foundation and Birdlife International Directory of important birds 971-596-405-5 2001 10.1038/35012251 S. McPherson author 2011 Field Guide to the Pitcher Plants of the Philippines 9780955891885 2011 61 10.5962/bhl.title.49412 Biodiversity Resource in Southern Philippines: Vital for Sustainable Management of Mountain Ecosystems. The International Forestry Review. Commonwealth Forestry Association N. Pampilona author 2005 text In: Innes, J.L., Edwards, I.K., & Wilford, D.J. (eds.). 2005 7 5 10.1007/978-1-4612-2500-3_18 10.22146/jik.10188 GIS-assisted Carbon Stock Assessment of Loboc-Bilar Mahogany Plantation, Bohol, Philippines T. D. Reyes author 2019 text Journal of Environmental Science and Management 2019 22 1 77 86 10.1088/1755-1315/449/1/012033 Tropical mountain forests-Distribution and general features. In: Gradstein SR, Homeier J, Gansert D. (eds). The Tropical Mountain Forest-Patterns and Processes in a Biodiversity Hotspot M. Richter author 2008 text Universitätsverlag Göttingen, Germany 2008 J. P. Rojo author 1999 Revised lexicon of Philippine trees. College, Philippines: Forest Products Research and Development Institute 1999 J. R. Rojo author 1997 Botanical identification handbook on Philippine dipterocarps. Laguna, Philippines: Forest Products Research and Development Institute 1997 97 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.05.013 F. M. Salvosa author 1963 Lexicon of Philippine Trees 1963 Species richness and diversity along an altitudinal gradient in moist temperate Lowland of Garhwal Himalaya C. M. Sharma author 2009 text Journal of American Science https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228591101 2009 5 5 119 128 10.2307/j.ctt2250vnb.6 D. N. Tandang author 2014 A Pictorial Handbook on Peat Swamp Flora of Agusan Marsh, Mindanao, Philippines 2014 322 10.24310/Actabotanicaabmabm.v42i2.2959 The Biodiversity of the Upper Imbang-Caliban Watershed, North Negros Forest Reserve, Negros Occidental, Philippines C. Turner author 2003 text Coral Cay Conservation, London www.coralcay.org 2003 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10046-X 10.13057/biodiv/d190624 T. C. Whitmore author 1984 Tropical Rain Forests of the Far East 0198541368, 9780198541363 1984 10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.000521 10.3897/oneeco.5.e56536 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/56536/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/56536/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/56536/download/xml/ Balinsasayao Twin Lakes Natural Park (BTLNP) is one of the protected areas on the Island of Negros Oriental which is enormously rich in biodiversity due to different Lowland types formed along its elevation gradient. This study was conducted to better understand the composition and diversity of plant species in the natural park to improve conservation and management efforts of these remaining forests which are currently under threat from eco-tourism and other anthropomorphic influences. Within the 18 randomly distributed nested plots, a total of 351 species of plants were recorded. Of these, 183 species were trees, 54 herbs, 51 shrubs, 41 pteridophytes and 22 vines. The result of hierarchical cluster analysis showed differences in plant composition along the elevation gradient. There were 30 (9%) threatened species (vulnerable, endangered and critically endangered) and most of which were found in the submontane Lowland. Furthermore, the species diversity increases from lowland to sub-montane and eventually decreases towards montane Lowland. These results not only indicate the importance of BTLNP, but also highlights the submontane as a special area of concern due to the higher concentration of threatened and endemic species. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers plant conservation species diversity Central Visayas community structure threatened species Floristic composition and community structure along the elevational gradient of Balinsasayao Twin Lakes Natural Park in Negros Oriental, Philippines Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.6.e62811 2021-05-14 oneecosystem

South Atlantic Environment Research Institute, Stanley, Falkland Islands author Bayley, Daniel https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7715-0387 South Atlantic Environment Research Institute, Stanley, Falkland Islands author Brickle, Paul Shallow Marine Survey Group, Stanley, Falkland Islands South Atlantic Environment Research Institute, Stanley, Falkland Islands author Brewin, Paul South Atlantic Environment Research Institute, Stanley, Falkland Islands author Golding, Neil South Atlantic Environment Research Institute, Stanley, Falkland Islands author Pelembe, Tara 2021-05-14 2021-05-14 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e62811 2021 10.3389/fmars.2019.00499 10.1890/10-1510.1 10.1111/gcb.15392 10.13140/RG.2.2.31988.24966 10.1007/s00300-020-02662-x 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.12.003 Valuation of energy use and greenhouse gas: Supplementary guidance to the HM Treasury Green Book on Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government BEIS author 2019 text Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy 2019 10.1111/1365-2664.12483 10.1007/s10811-010-9529-3 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.08.010 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2017.06.003 South Atlantic Natural Capital Assessment: Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Falkland Islands Dimitrios Bormpoudakis author 2019 text 2019 10.1038/387253a0 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00079-8 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002 Carbon Valuation in UK Policy Appraisal: A Revised Approach DECC author 2009 text Department of Energy and Climate Change 2009 10.1038/s41586-020-2146-7 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159 European Commission author 2020 Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions: EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 - Bringing nature back into our lives 9279207628 2020 Fisheries Statistics Falkland Islands Government author 2018 text FIG Fisheries Department 2018 22 Falkland Islands Biodiversity Framework FIG Environmental Planning Department author 2016 text 2016 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.05.004 10.1038/s41598-020-69258-7 10.4319/lo.2007.52.5.1838 Long-term coastal habitat mapping & monitoring handbook. Examples based on work undertaken in the Falkland Islands & South Georgia N. Golding author 2019 text DPLUS065 Coastal Habitat Mapping project 2019 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.12.022 Global ecology of the giant kelp macrocystis: From ecotypes to ecosystems Michael H Graham author 2007 text Oceanography and Marine Biology 2007 45 39 88 10.1038/nature10650 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.006 10.1111/ele.12393 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135561 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.010 10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00006-7 10.1038/ngeo2790 10.1073/pnas.1606102113 10.1080/08920750600860282 10.1016/j.ecss.2019.02.004 10.1002/9781119154051.ch22 10.1002/fee.1484 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.004 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.10.022 Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis MEA author 2005 text Island Press 2005 10.1371/journal.pone.0154735 10.1038/s41559-017-0319-z 10.3354/meps08523 Falkland Islands State of the Environment Report, Falkland Islands Government and Falklands Conservation Helen Otley author 2008 text 2008 10.1126/science.aai9214 10.1111/gcb.14706 10.1002/ecy.2798 10.1002/ecm.1366 10.1038/ncomms13757 10.1007/s00114-001-0283-x 10.3897/oneeco.2.e12290 10.1080/00318884.2019.1622920 10.1007/s12080-008-0034-0 Economic Survey of the Falkland Islands: Resources and Development Potential E Shackleton author 1976 text Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Report 1976 Falkland Islands Economic study E Shackleton author 1982 text Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Report 1982 10.1002/ece3.774 10.1038/s41558-019-0412-1 Understanding the value of land based tourists in the Falkland Islands Ness Smith author 2019 text South Atlantic Overseas Territories Natural Capital Assessment 2019 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.014 10.1017/S0376892902000322 10.1016/j.tree.2019.10.010 The Paris Agreement to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UNFCC author 2015 text 2015 10.1080/09670269300650251 10.1007/s10811-013-0173-6 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.03.017 10.3897/oneeco.6.e62811 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/62811/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/62811/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/62811/download/xml/ Kelp forests provide many important ecosystem services to people, including mitigating storm damage, cycling nutrients, and providing commercially-harvestable resources. However, kelp forests’ ability to sequester carbon dioxide, and therefore help regulate the climate, has until recently, been overlooked in assessments of the beneficial services they provide. In this study we incorporate updated knowledge on the potential of kelp to sequester ‘blue carbon’, and use the extensive kelp forests of the Falkland Islands as a case study to assess the value of kelp forest to society through multiple associated ecosystem services. Our analysis shows kelp forests provide a highly valuable range of direct and indirect services, which if managed correctly, will continue to benefit people, both now and in the future. The total estimated value of the Falkland Islands’ kelp system is currently equivalent to ~ £2.69 billion per year (or £3.24 million km-2 year-1). However, the true value of the kelp forest surrounding the Falkland Islands is likely to be higher still, given that our estimate does not account for elements such as associated scientific research, tourism, and cultural services, due to the necessary data currently being unavailable. Similarly, the full value of these highly biodiverse ecosystems in supplying habitat and food to a large range of associated species is crucial, yet extremely difficult to fully quantify. This study illustrates the importance of maintaining kelp ecosystems in a healthy state to ensure they continue to supply valuable ecological processes, functional roles, and ecosystem services, including their overlooked role as significant long-term carbon sinks. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers ecosystem services kelp macroalgae natural capital carbon sequestration Falkland Islands Valuation of kelp forest ecosystem services in the Falkland Islands: A case study integrating blue carbon sequestration potential Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.6.e63653 2021-05-17 oneecosystem

Laboratoire de Zoologie, Research institute for Biosciences, University of Mons, Place du Parc 23, 7000, Mons, Belgium author Vanderplanck, Maryse https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0110-8019 Laboratoire de Zoologie, Research institute for Biosciences, University of Mons, Place du Parc 23, 7000, Mons, Belgium author Michez, Denis https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-1838 Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland author Albrecht, Matthias Federation of Irish Beekeepers’ Associations, Tullamore, Ireland author Attridge, Eleanor Anses, Sophia Antipolis laboratory, Unit of Honey bee Pathology, 06902 Sophia Antipolis, France author Babin, Aurélie Botany, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland author Bottero, Irene Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom author Breeze, Tom Centre for Ecology, Evolution & Behaviour, Department of Biological Sciences, School of Life Sciences and the Environment, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, United Kingdom author Brown, Mark https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8887-3628 Anses, Sophia Antipolis laboratory, Unit of Honey bee Pathology, 06902 Sophia Antipolis, France author Chauzat, Marie-Pierre Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom author Cini, Elena CREA Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Via di Corticella 133, 40128 Bologna, Italy author Costa, Cecilia Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropology, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain author De la Rúa, Pilar https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0058-1402 Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden author de Miranda, Joachim CREA Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Via di Corticella 133, 40128 Bologna, Italy Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, The Italian National Research Council, Portici, Napoli, Italy author Di Prisco, Gennaro UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Community Ecology, 06120 Halle, Germany author Dominik, Christophe Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropology, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain author Dzul, Daniel Laboratoire de Zoologie, Research institute for Biosciences, University of Mons, Place du Parc 23, 7000, Mons, Belgium author Fiordaliso, William Laboratoire de Zoologie, Research institute for Biosciences, University of Mons, Place du Parc 23, 7000, Mons, Belgium author Gennaux, Sébastien Laboratoire de Zoologie, Research institute for Biosciences, University of Mons, Place du Parc 23, 7000, Mons, Belgium author Ghisbain, Guillaume https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2032-8081 School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland Botany, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland author Hodge, Simon Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Straße 4, 79106 Freiburg, Germany author Klein, Alexandra-Maria Department of Biology, Biodiversity, Lund University, Lund, Sweden author Knapp, Jessica Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland author Knauer, Anina Anses, Sophia Antipolis laboratory, Unit of Honey bee Pathology, 06902 Sophia Antipolis, France author Laurent, Marion https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9029-027X Laboratoire de Zoologie, Research institute for Biosciences, University of Mons, Place du Parc 23, 7000, Mons, Belgium author Lefebvre, Victor Department of Plant Protection, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia author Mand, Marika https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4898-5817 Laboratoire de Zoologie, Research institute for Biosciences, University of Mons, Place du Parc 23, 7000, Mons, Belgium author Martinet, Baptiste Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Bioscience Building, L69 7ZB, Liverpool, United Kingdom Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropology, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain author Lopez, Vicente CREA Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Via di Corticella 133, 40128 Bologna, Italy author Medrzycki, Piotr Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Straße 4, 79106 Freiburg, Germany author Pereira Peixoto, Maria Helena Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom author Potts, Simon https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2045-980X Laboratoire de Zoologie, Research institute for Biosciences, University of Mons, Place du Parc 23, 7000, Mons, Belgium author Przybyla, Kimberly Department of Plant Protection, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia author Raimets, Risto https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6299-4862 Department of Biology, Biodiversity, Lund University, Lund, Sweden author Rundlöf, Maj https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3014-1544 UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Community Ecology, 06120 Halle, Germany author Schweiger, Oliver Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom author Senapathi, Deepa Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropology, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain author Serrano, Jose https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1565-5216 Botany, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland author Stout, Jane https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2027-0863 Centre for Ecology, Evolution & Behaviour, Department of Biological Sciences, School of Life Sciences and the Environment, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, United Kingdom author Straw, Edward Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Straße 4, 79106 Freiburg, Germany author Tamburini, Giovanni Laboratoire de Zoologie, Research institute for Biosciences, University of Mons, Place du Parc 23, 7000, Mons, Belgium author Toktas, Yusuf INSECT Lab, Division of Functional Morphology, Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 18b, 11418, Stockholm, Sweden Laboratoire de Zoologie, Research institute for Biosciences, University of Mons, Place du Parc 23, 7000, Mons, Belgium author Gérard, Maxence https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2485-0662 2021-05-17 2021-05-17 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e63653 2021 10.1111/2041-210x.12035 10.1016/bs.aecr.2020.08.001 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0986 10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085356 Discover Life Bee Species Guide and World Checklist (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila). J. S. Ascher author text http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20q 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.02.024 10.1111/eea.12646 10.1139/z08-141 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2016.01.001 10.1007/s13593-015-0302-5 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02266-2 10.1371/journal.pone.0173109 10.21203/rs.3.rs-90439/v1. 10.1073/pnas.1314923110 10.1111/gcb.15379 10.1163/156854295X00186 10.1126/science.1230200 10.1016/j.cois.2017.05.016 10.1007/s13592-015-0352-3 10.1111/oik.05260 10.1038/s41598-018-33429-4 10.1111/ecog.05310 10.1111/gcb.14890 10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9 C. Hetru author P. T. Brey author 1998 Molecular mechanisms of immune response in insects 1998 40-66 Protocols for methods of field sampling. Deliverable D1.1 PoshBee Project, Grant Agreement No. 773921. S. Hodge author text https://poshbee.eu/getatt.php?filename=PoshBee+Deliverable+1.1+Protocols+for+Methods+of+Field+Sampling_v.2+FINAL_3104.pdf 10.1603/0046-225x-31.6.965 10.1111/j.1440-6055.2005.00469.x 10.5281/zenodo.3826598 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01211.x 10.1016/b978-0-08-030804-3.50012-1 Size, temperature and fitness: three rules J. G. Kingsolver author 2008 text Evolutionary Ecology Research 2008 10 251 268 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721 10.1016/j.cois.2018.02.011 10.1002/ece3.4784 10.1111/j.1479-8298.2005.00113.x 10.1111/1365-2435.13738 FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical and Continuous Maps K. McGarigal author 2012 text University of Massachusetts, Amherst http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html 2012 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment author 2005 Ecosystems and Human Well Being: Synthesis 2005 A. Nieto author 2014 European Red List of Bees 2014 10.1007/s10531-019-01893-7 10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.002135 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007 10.1038/nature20588 R: A language and environment for statistical computing R Core Team author 2017 text Vienna, Austria https://www.R-project.org/ 2017 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2016.11.002 tpsUtil program F. J. Rohlf author 2013 text Department of Ecology & Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook 2013 tpsDig F. J Rohlf author 2013 text Department of Ecology & Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook 2013 10.1890/120126 10.1111/1744-7917.12410 10.1371/journal.pone.0179535 10.1051/apido:2006019 10.1007/s00040-014-0351-9 C. H. Waddington author 1957 The strategy of the genes 1957 10.1242/jeb.200.3.543 10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.000553 10.3897/oneeco.6.e63653 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/63653/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/63653/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/63653/download/xml/ Current global change substantially threatens pollinators, which directly impacts the pollination services underpinning the stability, structure and functioning of ecosystems. Amongst these threats, many synergistic drivers, such as habitat destruction and fragmentation, increasing use of agrochemicals, decreasing resource diversity, as well as climate change, are known to affect wild and managed bees. Therefore, reliable indicators for pollinator sensitivity to such threats are needed. Biological traits, such as phenotype (e.g. shape, size and asymmetry) and storage reserves (e.g. fat body size), are important pollinator traits linked to reproductive success, immunity, resilience and foraging efficiency and, therefore, could serve as valuable markers of bee health and pollination service potential.This data paper contains an extensive dataset of wing morphology and fat body content for the European honeybee (Apis mellifera) and the buff-tailed bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) sampled at 128 sites across eight European countries in landscape gradients dominated by two major bee-pollinated crops (apple and oilseed rape), before and after focal crop bloom and potential pesticide exposure. The dataset also includes environmental metrics of each sampling site, namely landscape structure and pesticide use. The data offer the opportunity to test whether variation in the phenotype and fat bodies of bees is structured by environmental factors and drivers of global change. Overall, the dataset provides valuable information to identify which environmental threats predominantly contribute to the modification of these traits. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers bee decline bumblebee global change honeybee landscape ecology pesticides wing shape Monitoring bee health in European agro-ecosystems using wing morphology and fat bodies Data Paper (Generic)

10.3897/oneeco.6.e65578 2021-05-28 oneecosystem

European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Zulian, Grazia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9951-6765 Politecnico di Milano, Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Milano, Italy author Ronchi, Silvia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9793-0287 European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author La Notte, Alessandra https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6951-709X European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Vallecillo, Sara https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5105-6253 European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy author Maes, Joachim https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-1607 2021-05-28 2021-05-28 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e65578 2021 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.831 10.1007/978-3-030-54345-7_5 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006 10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.006 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32807f2aa5 Dossier statistico: Le escursioni dei lombardi Lorenzo Cavedo author text http://www.polis.lombardia.it/wps/portal/site/polis/DettaglioRedazionale/pubblicazioni/studi-e-documenti/studi-e-documenti-eupolis-lombardia/2017/dossier-statistico-escursioni-lombardi 10.3390/land7040112 10.1073/pnas.0706559105 John W. Creswell author 2003 Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches 2003 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025 Andrey I. Egorov author 2016 Urban green spaces and health http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/urban-health/publications/2016/urban-green-spaces-and-health-a-review-of-evidence-2016 2016 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.008 European Commission author 2011 Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM(2011) 244 final http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0244:FIN:EN:PDF 2011 The Multifunctionality of Green Infrastructure European Commission author 2012 text Science for Environment Policy 2012 March 1 36 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Agriculture and landscape European Commission author text https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/envir/landscape_en Guidance on a strategic framework for further supporting the deployment of EU-level green and blue infrastructure SWD(2019) 193 final European Commission author 2019 text https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/ecosystems/pdf/SWD_2019_193_F1_STAFF_WORKING_PAPER_EN_V4_P1_1024680.PDF 2019 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004. European Commission author 2020 EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing Nature Back into Our Lives. COM(2020) 380 Final 2020 Degree of Urbanisation EUROSTAT author text https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/degree-of-urbanisation/background and https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Territorial_typologies_manual_-_degree_of_urbanisation Population structure and ageing EUROSTAT author 2021 text EUROSTAT https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Population_structure_and_ageing#Slightly_more_than_three_persons_of_working_age_for_every_person_aged_65_or_over 2021 The Problem of Fit between Ecosystems and Institutions: Ten Years Later Carl Folke author 2007 text Ecology and Society 2007 12 1 10.1080/08941920.2013.820817 Impact of multi-stressors on ecosystem services and their monetary value. B. Grizzetti author 2017 text EU FP7 project MARS Contract No. 603378. Deliverable D5.1-3: Reports on stressor classification and effects at the European scale. http://www.mars-project.eu/index.php/deliverables.html 2017 M. Iacono author 2008 Access to Destinations: How Close Is Close Enough? Estimating Accurate Distance Decay Functions for Multiple Modes and Different Purposes 2008 I.Stat ISTAT author text http://dati.istat.it/ 10.1038/srep34162 10.2760/602928 10.2760/757183 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.026 OECD OECD author text https://data.oecd.org/pop/working-age-population.htm#indicator-chart 10.1787/d339918b-en 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.008 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.002 10.1007/978-3-642-03145-8 10.5751/ES-08605-210316 10.4135/9781848607934 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.01.004 10.1016/j.pecon.2016.11.005 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.016 United Nations author 2019 Technical Recommendations in support of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012 Experimental Ecosystem Accounting 2019 European Union, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Group, W. B. United Nations author 2014 System of Environmental Economic Accounting 2012— Experimental Ecosystem Accounting 2014 Ecosystem services accounting: Part I - Outdoor recreation and crop poll Ecosystem services accounting: Part I - Outdoor recreation and crop pollination. EUR 29024 EN; 110321. [In Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg]. https://doi.org/10.2760/619793 S. Vallecillo author 2018 text 2018 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.023 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016 Vertical interplay Among Scale Dependent Resource Regimes. O Young author 2006 text Ecology and Society 2006 11 1 10.2788/64369 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.005 10.1007/978-3-030-54345-7_2 10.3897/oneeco.6.e65578 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/65578/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/65578/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/65578/download/xml/ The implementation of a Green Infrastructure (GI) involves several actors and governance scales that need adequate knowledge support. The multifunctionality of GI entails the implementation of a cross-scale approach, which combines assessments conducted at different levels and active stakeholder engagement.This paper provides a methodology to implement a cross-scale approach to support the deployment of a Regional GI. The methodology was tested in Lombardy Region (north-west of Italy), considering three relevant territorial scales and relative strategic and planning policies. The continental level representing the overall policy-context; the regional level, with its key role for guaranteeing landscape coherence and connectivity and the local level where planning actions are effectively designed and implemented. The EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and the EU GI strategy were used as references for the continental level; at the regional level, a proposal of Regional GI was evaluated focusing on two Provinces (Varese and Lecco), three regional parks (Ticino, Adda Nord and Campo dei Fiori). At the local scale, the new development plan of the Municipality of Cassano d'Adda (Milan metropolitan area) was evaluated considering different possible scenarios.The regional GI was evaluated with respect to the capacity to provide Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES). CES were mapped using the ESTIMAP-recreation model. The model was adapted to the regional and local level with the active engagement of local stakeholders. Additionally, census data were analysed to obtain an overview of the equitable distribution of the CES amongst inhabitants.Results show that, in 78% of the census blocks of the study area, inhabitants have a high-value recreation resource within 4 km (31% within 4 km and 47% within 300 m). Unmet demand characterises 22% of the census blocks in the study area, clustered in zones with a high population density. The regional GI covers almost completely the two Provinces and the regional parks. In Varese Province: 68% of the territory is included in the regional GI, 82% of the census blocks local demand for recreation opportunities is met, but the population density is higher where the demand is unmet. The Province is characterised by a relatively old population (share of people older than 65 years 23.4%). In Lecco Province, 80% of the territory is included in the regional GI, in 96% of the blocks the local demand is met and the local population is relatively old (share of elderly population 22.12%).The three regional parks present significant differences, strongly influenced by the territorial context. The Campo dei Fiori Park is almost completely included in the regional GI. The entire local population has nature-based recreation opportunities in their close vicinity. Nevertheless, the population density is very low and citizens are relatively old. The majority of the Parco Adda Nord is included in the regional GI providing recreation opportunities to 90% of the census blocks within the Park boundaries. A total of 70% of Ticino Park is included in the regional GI, where local residents are relatively old (share of elderly population 23.78%) and 90% of local census blocks are close to nature-based opportunities.At local scale, we explored how the approach can be used to estimate changes in the CES potential provision and how this can be integrated into a site management plan.This paper demonstrated that the combination of studies in a cross-scale perspective enhances the understanding of GI multifunctionality. It provides a framework to adapt CES mapping models to the local setting with active stakeholders engagement. Moreover, it demonstrates that also highly urbanised areas, such as the Lombardy Region in Italy, can play a role in the deployment of a continental GI and can support biodiversity and nature protection. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers stakeholder engagement cross-scale approach cultural ecosystem services planning process Green Infrastructure Adopting a cross-scale approach for the deployment of a green infrastructure Case Study

10.3897/oneeco.6.e65751 2021-07-01 oneecosystem

cE3c – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & ABG - Azorean Biodiversity Group; Faculty of Sciences and Technology; University of the Azores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal Campus Do*Mar - International Campus of Excellence; University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain author Seijo Núñez, Cristina https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7268-936X MARE- Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre; Faculty of Sciences and Technology; University of the Azores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal author Calado, Helena National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis; University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, United States of America author McClintock, William https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6807-7608 IVAR - Research Institute for Volcanology and Risks Assessment; University of the Azores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal cE3c – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & ABG - Azorean Biodiversity Group; Faculty of Sciences and Technology; University of the Azores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal author Gil, Artur https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4450-8167 CICS.NOVA - Interdisciplinary Center of Social Sciences; Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities (NOVA FCSH), Lisbon, Portugal cE3c – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & ABG - Azorean Biodiversity Group; Faculty of Sciences and Technology; University of the Azores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal author Fonseca, Catarina 2021-07-01 2021-07-01 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e65751 2021 Regional Directorate for Air and Maritime Transport Azores Government author text https://portal.azores.gov.pt/en/web/drt/atividade-mar%C3%ADtimo-tur%C3%ADstica 10.1080/21513732.2018.1439103 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.12.003 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.08.010 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.01.019 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.12.004 10.3897/ab.e12837 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.003 10.1093/icesjms/fsn182 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.038 Directorate-General for Natural Resources, Safety and Maritime Services. Maritime Zones under Portuguese Sovereignty and / or Jurisdiction. DGRM author text https://www.dgrm.mm.gov.pt/en/web/guest/am-ec-zonas-maritimas-sob-jurisdicao-ou-soberania-nacional 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015 10.3750/aip2013.43.4.02 10.1080/21513732.2017.1417330 European Anglers Alliance. Marine Protected Areas and recreational fisheries: Sustainable management and benefits. EAA author text https://www.eaa-europe.org/european-parliament-forum/ep-recfishing-forum-2014-2019/09-october-2017-marine-protected-areas.html 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.04.025 Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 European Commission author 2011 text 2011 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002 10.3897/oneeco.2.e12290 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.03.030 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.001 10.1002/9781118445112.stat05720 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.09.002 10.1371/journal.pone.0067737 10.2760/757183 10.17169/fqs-11.3.1428 Millenium Ecosystem Assessment author 2005 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis 1-56973-597-2 2005 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.08.015 Demersal fishery off the Azores MR Pinho author 2009 text Boletim do Núcleo Cultural da Horta www.nch.pt/biblioteca-virtual/bol-nch18/Boletim_2009-p85.pdf 2009 18 82 102 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.017 10.1016/j.ecss.2016.05.022 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.02.010 10.7916/d8x92n95 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24719 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.07.011 10.1016/j.jnc.2017.01.005 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.06.008 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.001 10.3897/oneeco.6.e65751 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/65751/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/65751/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/65751/download/xml/ Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) in Europe’s Outermost Regions (ORs) and Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) is still underdeveloped compared to the European mainland. Most of those territories are small islands for which Marine and Coastal Ecosystems (MCE) constitute a significant resource and provide important provisioning, regulating and cultural Ecosystem Services (ES). Understanding the cultural dimension of ecosystems and considering the cultural benefits and values associated with them, demands methodological plurality, flexibility and creativity. This study focused on two activities related to recreational ES (recreational fishing and recreational SCUBA diving) that are particularly relevant to São Miguel Island (Archipelago of the Azores, Portugal). Stakeholders were interviewed using SeaSketch, a participatory mapping tool in which they indicated where they conduct recreational fishing and scuba diving, the relative value of those areas, in terms of preference over other areas and their willingness to relinquish them for the purpose of conservation. Responses were aggregated and represented in maps showing key areas for the provision of recreational ES around São Miguel. This approach can be used in the Azorean Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) process and other on-going conservation initiatives, to better understand the trade-offs between relevant socio-economic activities and to support negotiations between the government and groups of stakeholders. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers MAES social valuation recreational activities participatory mapping Mapping recreational ecosystem services from stakeholders' perspective in the Azores Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.6.e61357 2021-07-06 oneecosystem

Lomonosov Moscow State University Lomonosov, Moscow, Russia author Trifonova, Tatiana Vladimir State University, Vladimir, Russia author Mishchenko, Natalia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3643-3129 Vladimir State University, Vladimir, Russia author Shutov, Pavel 2021-07-06 2021-07-06 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e61357 2021 Raspisaniye Pogody LLC author text https://rp5.ru/docs/about/ru N. I. Bazilevich author 1986 Geographic patterns of the structure and functioning of ecosystems 1986 296 Assessment of the vegetation indices on Sentinel-2A images for predicting the soil productivity potential in Bursa, Turkey M. Dedeoglu author 2020 text ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT 2020 192 1 10.1111/gcb.12508 10.1016/j.gecco.2015.12.004 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.05.003 Automated construction of the boundaries of basin geosystems for the Volga Federal District O. P. Ermolayev author 2014 text Geography and Natural Resources 2014 3 33 39 10.5067/MODIS/MCD12C1.006 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60029-X. 10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00486.x 10.1080/01431160500219364 A. G. Isachenko author 1991 Landscape science and physical-geographical zoning 1991 366 SoilGrids: global gridded soil information. Soil project ISRIC — World Soil Information author 2017 text FAO https://soilgrids.org/ 2017 10.1134/S1064229315090069 Kudeyarov V. N. author 2007 Carbon pools and flows in terrestrial ecosystems of Russia 2007 315 10.1080/01431160802438530 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.10.018 Trends.Earth National Aeronautics and Space Administration author 2018 text NASA http://trends.earth/docs/en/about/general_info.html 2018 10.1111/gcb.12723 Eugene Pleasants Odum author 1983 Basic Ecology 1983 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60302-5 10.1016/j.jag.2015.04.021 10.1002/rse2.74 10.5067/MODIS/MOD17A2H.006 10.1186/s13717-018-0130-z 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105614 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.098 Development of a basin approach in pedological and environmental studies T. A. Trifonova author 2005 text Eurasian Soil Science 2005 38 9 931 937 River catchment basin as a self-organizing natural geosystem T. A. Trifonova author 2008 text Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya 2008 1 28 36 T. A. Trifonova author 2018 Ecological atlas of the Klyazma river basin. Man in the environment 2018 310 Assessment of soil and vegetation cover of the Klyazma river basin using remote sensing data T. A. Trifonova author T. A. Trifonova author 2018 text Ecology of River Basins: Proceedings of the 9th International Scientific and Practical Conference 2018 311–316 10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.09.004 10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.017 10.1038/35009084 10.1038/ngeo671 Annual and seasonal variations in gross primary productivity across the agro-climatic regions in India Roma Varghese author 2019 text ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMEN 2019 191 4 1 19 10.1080/01431160701241704 10.1186/s13717-015-0036-y Gross primary production estimation from MODIS data with vegetation index and photosynthetically active radiation in maize C. Wu author 2010 text J. Geophys. Res. 2010 115 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133803 10.3897/oneeco.6.e61357 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/61357/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/61357/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/61357/download/xml/ Environmental research addresses ecosystems of various hierarchical levels. One of the ecosystem types is the river basin. The basin approach has been applied in the research. We consider the river basin as a single ecosystem of complex landscape structure. The research objective was to assess the biological processes in various landscapes within a holistic natural geosystem – a catchment area. The Klyazma River Basin (a part of the Volga River of 40 thousand km2 area) was the research object. It is a complex combination of different landscapes, each marked by a diverse composition of geomorphological and soil-vegetation structures. According to the geomorphological structure and soil and vegetation cover, four landscape provinces and eight key sites have been identified in the studied catchment area where the ecosystem parameter have been measured. The study is based on remote sensing data and the Trends. Earth Land Degradation Monitoring. The calculation of productivity indicators (GPP, NPP) in carbon units and the land use structure analysis are based on Modis data. The soil organic carbon pool was determined by the UN FAO’s data, based on Trends. Earth and QGIS 2.18. The two-factor variance analysis ANOVA has been used for the data statistic processing. The cartographic analysis of the land use structure dynamics of the entire Klyazma Basin resulted in revealing the areas where various land transitions from one category to another have been identified. They are basically associated with the agricultural land overgrowth. The forest area increased by 9% during the period from 2001 to 2017. Considerable increase in the waterlogged, wetlands areas was observed in the eastern part of the Basin, in the Volga-Klyazma Province. The landscapes react differently to changes in climatic parameters and land use. Thus, the active revegetation of farmland by forests gives the increased rate of carbon accumulation in the soil. Landscapes covered with grasses and shrubs are more productive those covered with forest. On the other hand, woody biotopes are more stable in their development over time. Statistical analysis using the two-factor variation analysis ANOVA method resulted in demonstrating that phytoproductivity dynamics of the key sites does not depend on their productivity parameters nor on the site landscape structure, but is mainly determined by a time factor. In different landscapes the biological processes, characterising the organic matter dynamics in the form of plant production, organic matter accumulation and others are shown to differ both in rate and intensity and ambiguously respond to changes in climate parameters and land use. The river basin, as a single ecosystem, showed sufficient stability of the dynamic processes. This suggests that holistic natural ecosystems, such as catchment areas, have internal compensatory mechanisms that maintain the development stability for a long time, while unplanned land use remains the main damaging factor. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers landscapes river basin phytoproductivity dynamics remote sensing data carbon balance Organic matter temporal dynamics in the river ecosystem basin using remote sensing Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.6.e67320 2021-07-08 oneecosystem

U.S. Geological Survey, Lafayette, United States of America author Grace, James https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6374-4726 University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland author Steiner, Magdalena 2021-07-08 2021-07-08 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e67320 2021 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.028 10.1002/9781118619179 10.1890/11-0258.1 R. F. DeVellis author 2016 Scale development: Theory and applications 2016 26 10.1017/CBO9780511617799 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0503:ASEMAO]2.0.CO;2 10.1890/09-0464.1 10.3897/oneeco.5.e50452 10.1002/ecy.2962 10.1080/10705519909540118 10.1093/biomet/57.2.239 10.1002/ecy.1445 Analysis of ecological communities: Chapter 30 B. McCune author 2002 text MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA 2002 10.1017/CBO9780511542138.005 R Core Team author 2019 R: A language and environment for statistical computing https://www.R-project.org/ 2019 lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling Y. Rosseel author 2012 text Journal of Statistical Software http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/ 2012 48 1 36 10.1890/05-1051 10.1017/CBO9781139979573 10.1890/05-1051 Biodiversity effects on grape Quality depend on variety and management intensity M. Steiner author 2021 text Journal of Applied Ecology 2021 In Press G. R. VandenBos author 2007 APA dictionary of psychology https://dictionary.apa.org/scale-development 2007 10.3897/oneeco.6.e67320 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/67320/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/67320/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/67320/download/xml/ In this paper, we consider the problem of how to quantitatively characterise the degree to which a study object exhibits a generalised response. By generalised response, we mean a multivariate response where numerous individual properties change in concerted fashion due to some internal integration. In latent variable structural equation modelling (LVSEM), we would typically approach this situation using a latent variable to represent a general property of interest (e.g. performance) and multiple observed indicator variables that reflect the specific features associated with that general property. While ecologists have used LVSEM in a number of cases, there is substantial potential for its wider application. One obstacle is that LV models can be complex and easily over-specified, degrading their value as a means of generalisation. It can also be challenging to diagnose causes of misspecification and understand which model modifications are sensible. In this paper, we present a protocol, consisting of a series of questions, designed to guide the researchers through the evaluation process. These questions address: (1) theoretical development, (2) data requirements, (3) whether responses to perturbation are general, (4) unique reactions by individual measures and (5) how far generality can be extended. For this illustration, we reference a recent study considering the potential consequences of maintaining biodiversity as part of agricultural management on the overall quality of grapes used for wine-making. We extend our presentation to include the complexities that occur when there are multiple species with unique reactions. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers generalised responses latent variables multivariate responses statistical modelling structural equation modelling A protocol for modelling generalised biological responses using latent variables in structural equation models Review Article

10.3897/oneeco.6.e68408 2021-08-09 oneecosystem

Department of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia author Nizamutdinov, Timur https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2600-5494 Department of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia author Abakumov, Evgeny https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5248-9018 Arctic Research Centre of YANAO, Salekhard, Russia author Morgun, Evgenya 2021-08-09 2021-08-09 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e68408 2021 10.1515/opag-2020-0010 10.1515/opag-2020-0034 On the need to create a scientific station for polar agriculture in Yamal E. V. Abakumov author 2020 text Biosfernoye Khozyaystvo: Teoriya i Praktika 2020 12 66 74 The formation of Arctic agriculture in the USSR (Yamal) LV Alekseeva author 2017 text Bulletin of Nizhnevartovsk State University 2017 2 3 10 Heavy metals and hydrocarbons content in soils of settlements of the Yamal-Nenets autonomous Okrug II Alekseev author 2016 text Gigiena i Sanitariya 2016 95 9 818 821 Assessment of ecotoxicological state of soils of the Polar Ural and southern Yamal II Alekseev author 2017 text Gigiena i Sanitariya 2017 10 941 945 10.1657/1523-0430(2007)39[189:SACOCA]2.0.CO;2 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2006.00020.x G. P. Basharin author 1990 History of Farming in Yakutia (17th century - 1917). 1990 Determination of the humus of soils by IV Tyurin’s method NP Bel’chicova author 1965 text Agrochemical methods in study of soils. 4th ed. Moscow: Nauka 1965 75 102 Methods of soil analysis: chemical and microbiological properties Charles Allen Black author 1965 text ASA 1965 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.06.022 10.1016/S0016-7061(99)00045-2 Claudio Carlon author 2007 Derivation Methods of Soil Screening Values in Europe: A Review of National Procedures Towards Harmonisation: a Report of the ENSURE Action 9279052381 2007 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.04.013 Role of phosphorus in agriculture in Central Chernozem Region PA Chekmarev author 2011 text Research and Technical Advances of Agribusiness Sector 2011 10.1134/S106422931109002X Yamal District : encyclopedia N. F. Chistyakova author 2015 text Adm. of Municipal Formation of Yamal District 2015 Adsorption and migration of heavy metals in soil A Dube author 2001 text Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 2001 10 1 1 10 Heavy metal pollution and human biotoxic effects J Ogwuegbu Duruibe author 2007 text International Journal of Physical Sciences 2007 2 5 112 118 Struggle for the far north IG Eichfeld author 1933 text All-Union Institute of Plant Industry 1933 Sub-arctic farming Elvind Elstrand author 1979 text 1979 10.2307/212929 Nitrogen in agriculture of Western Siberia GP Gamzikov author 1981 text M.: Nauka 1981 Agriculture in Alaska GW Gasser author 1948 text Arctic 1948 1 2 74 83 Soil, cleaning of settlements, domestic and industrial waste, sanitary protection of soil 2. 1.7.020-94 GN author 1994 text 1994 54650-2011 Soils R GOST author 2003 text Determination of mobile compounds of phosphorus and potassium according to the Kirsanov method in modification CINAO 2003 Peter Gruhn author 2000 Integrated nutrient management, soil fertility, and sustainable agriculture: current issues and future challenges 0896296377 2000 10.1080/00139307509435816 10.1016/0025-326X(86)90057-3 10.1071/S96047 10.4141/S06-029 Soil Quality-Determination of Nitrate, Nitrite and Ammonium in Field Moist Soils by Extraction with Potassium Chloride Solution 14256–1 ISO author 2003 text International Organisation for Standardisation Geneva 2003 11047 DIN ISO author 1998 text Soil quality–determination of cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, nickel and zinc in aqua regia extracts of soil-flame and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometric methods. Berlin: German Institute for Standardization 1998 Use of the pipette method in the fineness test of molding sand Clarence E Jackson author 1935 text Part of Journal of Research of the N. Ational Bureau of Standards 1935 10.1016/0038-0717(76)90005-5 10.1007/s11356-019-04997-3 10.1080/09644019708414327 K. A. Juvelikyan author 2009 Methods of control and ranking of contaminated soils 2009 Mechanical and microaggregate composition of the soil, methods for its study NA Kachinsky author 1958 text AN USSR, Moscow 1958 10.1080/03650340802637733 Accumulation of heavy metals by winter rye and oat plants under the effect of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers and the long-term aftereffect of phosphorus fertilizers on soddy-podzolic soil EA Karpova author 2005 text AGROKHIMIIA 2005 4 Effect of fertilization on the content of heavy metals in soils of long-term field experiments AI Karpukhin author 2007 text AGROKHIMIIA 2007 5 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.11.013 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.06.021 I. S. Khantimer author 1974 Agricultural development of tundra regions 1974 Agroekologicheskaya otsenka zemel, proektirovanie adaptivno-landshaftnykh sistem zemledeliya i agrotekhnologii [Agroecological assessment of lands, designing adaptive-landscape farming systems and agricultural technologies] VI Kiryushin author 2005 text Methodological guide. Moscow: Federal State Scientific Institution “Rosinformgrotech 2005 10.1134/S1064229307070113 Maĭi︠a︡ Markovna Kononova author 2013 Soil organic matter: its nature, its role in soil formation and in soil fertility 1483185680 2013 V. V. Kozin author 1996 Geography of the Tyumen region 1996 10.1097/00010694-199803000-00001 Agroecological Evaluation of Lands and Design of Landscape-Adaptive Farming Systems and Agrotechnologies: Methodological Recommendations. VI Kiryushin and AL Ivanov, Eds., Moscow: Rosinformagrotekh, 2005. 784 p VN Kudeyarov author 2006 text AGROKHIMIIA 2006 8. Geographical Atlas of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District Y. N. Kvashin author 1999 text Moscow: Drofa. [in Russian] 1999 10.1080/00103629809370081 10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00129-1 10.1017/S0032247400008378 Mittheilungen aus dem agriculturchemischen Laboratorium der Versuchs-Station Kiel: III. Ueber die Bestimmung des Humus in Ackererden G Loges author 1883 text Die Landwirthschaftlichen Versuchs-Stationen 1883 28 1883 229 245 10.1111/gcb.12292 Sustainable development of the Russian Arctic zone: challenges & opportunities Daryana Maximova author 2018 text Arctic Yearbook 2018 2018 Agrochemistry VG Mineev author 2004 text M.: Kolos 2004 10.1007/978-94-007-1914-9_1 10.26110/ARCTIC.2019.104.3.001 Soil Biogeochemical Features of Nadym-Purovskiy Province (Western Siberia), Russia Dmitriy Moskovchenko author 2019 text Ecologia Balkanica 2019 11 2 Hygienic evaluation of soil in residential areas. [in Russian] 2. 1.7.730-99 MU author 1999 text 1999 10.1007/978-3-322-83425-6_6 Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods RL Mulvaney author 1996 text Soil Science Society of America Book Series 1996 1123 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.007 10.1515/geo-2020-0210 10.3390/en14144080 10.3390/min11070668 Effect of phosphorus fertilization on the concentration of total and algal-available phosphorus in different particle-size fractions in Norwegian agricultural soils Anne Falk Øgaard author 1996 text Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica B-Plant Soil Sciences 1996 46 1 24 29 Khimiya pochv (Soil chemistry) DS Orlov author 2005 text Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola 2005 A. V. Pavlov author 2005 Current Climate Changes in the North of Russia: Album of Small Scale Maps 2005 10.3390/en14133819 Sel'skohozyajstvennoe osvoenie Obskogo Severa [Agricultural development of the Ob North] GM Purtov author 1994 text Novosibirsk, RASKHN. Sib. otd-nie. NIISKH Sev. Zaural'ya 1994 Sheila M Ross author 1994 Toxic metals in soil-plant systems 0471942790 1994 Ezio Rusco author 2001 Organic matter in the soils of Europe: Present status and future trends 2001 Biological effects of heavy metals: an overview Rajesh Kumar Sharma author 2005 text Journal of Environmental Biology 2005 26 2 301 313 Soil physics course EV Shein author 2005 text Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow State University 2005 10.1007/s00334-012-0346-2 10.1515/opag-2020-0091 10.14430/arctic4402 CAVM Mapping Team author 2003 Circumpolar Arctic vegetation map 2003 10.1038/371783a0 The content of heavy metals in soils of the Yamal peninsula and the Bely Island VM Tomashunos author 2014 text Gigiena i sanitariia 2014 93 6 26 31 10.3389/fsufs.2021.663448 Problem of Northern Agriculture, materials of the Leningrad Emergency Session of Academy of Sciences of the USSR 25–30 XI1931 NI Vavilov author 1931 text Leningrad, Publishing House of Academy of Sciences, 15p 1931 10.1007/s00334-005-0016-8 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003 World reference base for soil resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps IUSS WORORKINGKING GROROUPUP WRB author 2014 text World Soil Resources Report 2014 106 10.31251/pos.v1i1.5 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.068 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.013 10.3897/oneeco.6.e68408 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/68408/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/68408/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/68408/download/xml/ Recently, questions about the return of the concept of Arctic agriculture in order to promote sustainable development of the northern regions and ensure food security have been raised more often. The re-involvement of previously-used and abandoned soils into agricultural usage can provide an essential contribution for the development of the Arctic regions. We conducted a comprehensive research of soils with different levels of abandonment in the central part of the Yamal Region (Russia) and compared their morphological features, chemical and physical properties, fertile qualities and the level of contamination with heavy and trace metals to background soils of the region. It has been noted that there are no evident features of cryoturbation processes in the profiles of abandoned agricultucal soils and regular changes in the redox regime, as a consequence of the presence of reductimorphic spots in the soil profiles, have been recorded. Soil organic matter (SOM) stock in the topsoil of abandoned soils is estimated as medium and has a similar level to the stocks of total organic matter in the agricultural soils of the Arctic circumpolar region (Norway, Sweden, and Finland). Statistically significant differences in the content of nutrients between abandoned and background soils were recorded which indicates stability of the soil nutritional state during different abandoned states. Particularly notable are the differences between the content of available forms of phosphorus. The results of the study revealed significant differences between soils of various periods of abandonment and the background soils of the Yamal Region. Abandoned soils can be used for ground and greenhouse agriculture, these soils having a high level of fertility and are not limited for use in agriculture by the level of contamination with heavy and trace metals. According to the character of trace metal contamination, abandoned and background soils are evaluated as uncontaminated on the base of Zc and Igeo indices values. Reuse of the previously abandoned soils can undoubtedly become the basis for increasing agricultural production and ensuring food security in the Yamal Region. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers postagrogenic soils permafrost nutrients pollution status Arctic Morphological features, productivity and pollution state of abandoned agricultural soils in the Russian Arctic (Yamal Region) Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.6.e70919 2021-09-03 oneecosystem

Departamento de Física, Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain author Casas-Mas, Enrique https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6055-692X Centro Oceanográfico de Canarias, Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain author Martín García, Laura https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1086-8762 Biodiversity and Conservation Research Group, IU-ECOAQUA, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Telde, Spain author Otero Ferrer, Francisco https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4841-1565 Biodiversity and Conservation Research Group, IU-ECOAQUA, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Telde, Spain author Tuya, Fernando Biodiversity and Conservation Research Group, IU-ECOAQUA, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Telde, Spain author Haroun, Ricardo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1348-692X Departamento de Física, Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain author Arbelo, Manuel https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6853-4442 2021-09-03 2021-09-03 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e70919 2021 funder European Commission 10.13039/501100000780 Cymodocea nodosa (ucria) ascherson (zannichelliaceae) y las praderas submarinas o sebadales en el archipielago canario J. Afonso-Carrillo author 1980 text Vieraea 1980 8 2 Sub-regional ecosystem variability in the Canary Current upwelling J. Aristegui author 2009 text H. Progress in Oceanography 2009 83 14 Spatial variation in the structural parameters of Cymodocea nodosa seagrass meadows in the Canary Islands: A multiscaled approach C. Barbera author 2005 text Botanica Marina 2005 48 2 Distribucin espacial de las comunidades bentnicas submareales de los fondos someros de Canarias. I: Las comunidades de sustrato blando de las costas de Tenerife J. Barquin-Diez author 2005 text Vieraea 2005 33 The transition zone of the Canary Current upwelling region E. D. Barton author 1998 text Progress in Oceanography 1998 41 4 Human-induced changes of the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa in Ria Formosa lagoon (Southern Portugal) after a decade S. Cabaço author 2014 text Cah. Biol. Mar 2014 55 Large-Scale Prediction of Seagrass Distribution Integrating Landscape Metrics and Environmental Factors: The Case of Cymodocea nodosa (Mediterranean-Atlantic) R. M. Chefaoui author 2016 text Estuaries and Coasts 2016 39 1 kuenm: an R package for detailed development of ecological niche models using Maxent Marlon E. Cobos author 2019 text PeerJ 2019 7 Global significance of seagrass fishery activity L. C. Cullen-Unsworth author 2018 text Science 2018 361 6401 The charisma of coastal ecosystems: Addressing the imbalance C. M. Duarte author 2008 text Estuaries and Coasts 2008 31 Novel methods improve prediction of species distributions from occurrence data J. Elith author 2006 text Ecography 2006 29 2 Ichthyofauna associated with Cymodocea nodosa meadows in the Canarian Archipelago (central eastern Atlantic): Community structure and nursery role F. Espino author 2011 text Ciencias Marinas 2011 37 2 A view of the Canary Basin thermocline circulation in winter V. Fiekas author 1992 text Journal of Geophysical Research 1992 97 C8 Occurrence of Halophila decipiens Ostenfeld on Tenerife, Canary Islands M. C. Gil-Rodriguez author 1982 text Aquatic Botany 1982 12 C Posidonia oceanica meadows are not declining globally. Analysis of population dynamics in marine protected areas of the Mediterranean Sea J. M. Gonzalez-Correa author 2007 text Marine Ecology Progress Series 2007 336 New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis C. H. Graham author 2004 text Trends Ecol Evol 2004 19 497503 A comparison of threats, vulnerabilities and management approaches in global seagrass bioregions A. Grech author 2012 text Environ. Res. Lett 2012 7 World atlas of seagrasses E. P. Green author 2003 text Choice Reviews Online 2003 Temporal Dynamics and Biomass Partitioning in Three Adriatic Seagrass Species: Posidonia oceanica, Cymodocea nodosa, Zostera marina P. Guidetti author 2002 text Marine Ecology 2002 23 Sensitivity of predictive species distribution models to change in grain size A. Guisan author 2007 text Divers Distrib 2007 13 332340 Associations of concern: Declining seagrasses and threatened dependent species A. R. Hughes author 2009 text Front. Ecol. Environ 2009 7 Global and local disturbances interact to modify seagrass palatability R. Jimenez-Ramos author 2017 text PLOS ONE 2017 12 8 Mediterranean seagrass vulnerable to regional climate warming G. Jorda author 2012 text Nature Climate Change 2012 2 11 Growth and sediment space occupation by seagrass Cymodocea nodosa roots N. Marbà author 2001 text Marine Ecology Progress Series 2001 224 Predicting the potential habitat of the harmful cyanobacteria Lyngbya majuscula in the Canary Islands (Spain) L. Martín-Garcia author 2004 text Harmful Algae 2004 34 Laura Martín-García author 2014 La distribución espacial de las comunidades bentónicas infralitorales de Canariasy su importancia en la gestión del medio marino 2014 245 Selection of metrics based on the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa and development of a biotic index (CYMOX) for assessing ecological status of coastal and transitional waters O. Mascaró author 2012 text Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 2012 114 717 M.M.A. author Ministerio Medio Ambiente. Dirección General de Costas author 2001 Plan de Ecocartografías del litoral español 2001 M.M.A. author Ministerio Medio Ambiente Secretaría de Estado de aguas y Costas. Dirección General de Costas author 2001 Plan de Ecocartografías del litoral español 2001 M.M.A. author Ministerio medio Ambiente Dirección general de Costas author 2003 Plan de Ecocartografías del litoral español 2003 M.M.A. author Ministerio Medio Ambiente Direccion General de Costas author 2004 Plan de Ecocartografías del litoral español 2004 M.M.A. author Ministerio Medio Ambiente Direccion General de Costas author 2005 Plan de Ecocartografías del litoral español 2005 M.M.A. author Ministerio Medio Ambiente Dirección General de Costas author 2005 Plan de Ecocartografías del litoral español 2005 Benefit transfer and the economic value of Biocapacity: Introducing the ecosystem service Yield factor V. Niccolucci author 2021 text Ecosystem Services 2021 48 October 2020 Seagrass ecosystem services Whats next? L. M. Nordlund author 2018 text Marine Pollution Bulletin 2018 134 September 2017 A Global Crisis for Seagrass Ecosystems R. J. Orth author 2006 text Bioscience 2006 56 Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions S. B. Phillips author 2006 text International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 2006 6 23 Sample selection bias and presenceonly distribution models: implications for background and pseudoabsence data S. J. Phillips author 2009 text Ecological Applications 2009 19 1 Distribution and reproductive phenology of the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa (Ucria) Ascherson in the Canary Islands J. Reyes author 1995 text Aquatic Botany 1995 50 2 Adjusted unit value transfer as a tool for raising awareness on ecosystem services provided by constructed wetlands for water pollution control: An italian case study A. Rizzo author 2021 text International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021 18 4 Offshore transport of organic carbon by upwelling filaments in the Canary Current System Y. Santana-Falcon author 2020 text Progress in Oceanography 2020 186 Extinction risk assessment of the worlds seagrass species F. T. Short author 2011 text Biol. Conserv 2011 144 Valuing nature-based recreation using a crowdsourced travel cost method: A comparison to onsite survey data and value transfer M. Sinclair author 2020 text Ecosystem Services 2020 45 July Habitat fragmentation has some impacts on aspects of ecosystem functioning in a sub-tropical seagrass bed J. L. Sweatman author 2017 text Mar. Environ. Res 2017 126 Generic limits in the seagrass family Zosteraceae P. B. Tomlinson author 2001 text Taxon 2001 50 2 Mapping ecosystem services: practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer A. Troy author 2006 text Ecological Economics 2006 60 2 Drastic decadal decline of the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa at Gran Canaria (eastern Atlantic): interactions with the green algae Caulerpa prolifera F. Tuya author 2013 text Aquat. Bot 2013 105 Economic assessment of ecosystem services: Monetary value of seagrass meadows for coastal fisheries F. Tuya author 2014 text Ocean and Coastal Management 2014 96 Decadal changes in the structure of Cymodocea nodosa seagrass meadows: Natural vs. human influences F. Tuya author 2014 text Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 2014 137 1 Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems M. Waycott author 2009 text Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2009 106 W. Wildpret author author 1987 Consejera de Agricultura y Pesca, Gobierno de Canarias 1987 The distribution and environmental requirements of large brown seaweeds in the British Isles C. Yesson author 2015 text Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 95 4 Valuing wetland ecosystem services based on benefit transfer: A meta-analysis of China wetland studies J. Zhou author 2020 text Journal of Cleaner Production 2020 276 10.3897/oneeco.6.e70919 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/70919/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/70919/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/70919/download/xml/ Cymodocea nodosa seagrass meadows provide several socio-economically ecosystem services, including nurseries for numerous species of commercial interest. These seagrasses are experiencing a worldwide decline, with global loss rates approaching 5% per year, mainly related to coastal human activities. Cymodocea nodosa, the predominant seagrass in the Canary Archipelago (Spain), is also exposed to these threats, which could lead to habitat loss or even local disappearance. In this case study, we estimated the potential economic value of Cymodocea nodosa seagrass meadows for local fisheries at an archipelago scale. Habitat suitability maps were constructed using MAXENT 3.4.1, a software for modelling species distributions by applying a maximum entropy machine-learning method, from a set of environmental variables and presence and background records extracted from historical cartographies. This model allows characterising and assessing the C. nodosa habitat suitability, overcoming the implicit complexity derived from seasonal changes in this species highly dynamic meadows and using it as a first step for the mapping and assessment of ecosystem services. In a second step, value transfer methodologies were used, along with published economic valuations of commercially-interesting fish species related to C. nodosa meadows. We estimate that the potential monetary value of these species can add up to more than 3 million euros per year for the entire Archipelago. The simplicity of the proposed methodology facilitates its repeatability in other similar regions, using freely available data and hence, being suitable for data-scarce scenarios. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Cymodocea nodosa seagrass meadows habitat suitability mapping ecosystem services value transfer methodology Canary Islands. Economic mapping and assessment of Cymodocea nodosa meadows as nursery grounds for commercially important fish species. A case study in the Canary Islands Case Study

10.3897/oneeco.6.e69119 2021-11-02 oneecosystem

Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany author Sieber, Ina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2134-0429 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität, Hannover, Germany author Hinsch, Malte https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5092-7686 FRCT - Regional Fund for Science and Technology (Regional Government of the Azores), Ponta Delgada, Portugal author Vergílio, Marta https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7248-8322 IVAR - Research Institute for Volcanology and Risk Assessment, University of the Azores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c) & Azorean Biodiversity Group, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of the Azores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal author Gil, Artur https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4450-8167 Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research ZALF, Müncheberg, Germany author Burkhard, Benjamin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-9009 2021-11-02 2021-11-02 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e69119 2021 10.1016/j.catena.2003.10.006 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004 10.1007/978-3-319-27288-7_3 10.3897/bdj.6.e27194 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106089 W. J. Conover author 1999 Practical nonparametric statistics http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/wiley032/98008521.html. 1999 10.1016/0304-3800(89)90001-x Socio-economic benefits of Natura 2000 in Azores Islands–a case study approach on ecosystem services provided by a special protected area A. Cruz author 2011 text Journal of Coastal Research Cruz, Benedicto et al. 2011 - Socio-economic benefits of Natura 2000.pdf 2011 1955 1959 Carta de Ocupação do Solo da Região Autónoma dos Açores J. V. Cruz author 2007 text 2007 CORINE Land Cover (CLC) 2018 European Environment Agency author 2019 text European Environmental Agency https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover/clc2018 2019 Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.1). FAO author 2009 text online. 2009 Land-cover/land-use mapping of Terceira Island (Azores, Portugal) by applying the Random Forest supervised classifier to 2017’s Sentinel-2 multispectral remote sensing data J. A. Fernández-Palacios author 2018 text 2018 Global Agro-ecological Zones Assessment for Agriculture (GAEZ 2008) G. Fischer author 2008 text IIASA, Laxnburg, Austria and FAO Rome, Italy 2008 10.1016/j.catena.2003.10.011 10.1007/s10841-010-9365-4 10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111 10.5721/EuJRS20124524. 10.1002/ldr.2770 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008 10.1007/978-3-540-69839-5_15 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.027 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.103 10.1371/journal.pone.0169748 Carta de Ocupacao do solo da regiao autonima dos acores. COS.A/2018 Jorge Hernâni author 2018 text 2018 IPCC author 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol4.html 2006 Soil atlas of Europe A Jones author 2005 text European Communities Off. for Official Publ. of the European Communities, Luxembourg 2005 10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 10.14358/pers.71.8.975 Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs Sven Lautenbach author 2010 text International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software. 2010 417 10.1007/978-3-540-48711-1_8 Regional ecosystem profile – Macaronesian Region. EU Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories L Madruga author 2016 text BEST, Service contract 07.0307.2013/666363/SER/B2, European Commission 2016 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25309 Serviço de Visualização (WMS) da Hidrografia - Região Autónoma dos Açores (RAA) - INSPIRE V Marcos author 2017 text Direção Regional do Ambiente/Secretaria Regional da Energia, Ambiente e Turismo/Governo dos Açores http://wssig3.azores.gov.pt/geoserver/hy-p/wms?service=wms&version=1.3.0&request=GetCapabilities 2017 10.1080/21513732.2012.663792 F. E.P. Mendonça author 2012 Servicos dos Ecossistemas na Ilha Terceira: estudo preliminar com ênfase no sequestro de carbono e na biodiversidade 2012 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.015 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.011 10.1515/msd-2015-0014 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.024 Delineating agriculture in the Neuse River Basin. Final report to NCDENR, Division of Water Quality for USEPA 319 program. D. L. Osmond author 2011 text - 2011 Raleigh, NC. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.021 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.012 10.1038/s41598-017-04282-8 10.1007/s00704-017-2295-2 Climate change and biodiversity in the European Union overseas entities J. Petit author 2008 text IUCN 2008 Plano de gestão da Região Hidrográfica dos Açores (rh9) 2016-2021 – Caracterização e Diagnóstico da Situação de Referência - Vol. 3 Terceira PGRH-Açores author 2015 text Região Autónoma dos Açores - Secretaria Regional da Agricultura e Ambiente – Direção Regional do Ambiente https://servicos-sraa.azores.gov.pt/grastore/DRA/PGRHA_20162021/PGRH-A_2016-2021_RT_Parte2_VOL3-TER.pdf 2015 10.3897/natureconservation.18.11523 The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the state of Minnesota S. Polasky author 2011 text Environmental and Resource Economics 2011 48 2 Modeling Phosphorus loading and lake response under uncertainty: A manual and compilation of export coefficients K. H. Reckhow author 1980 text - 1980 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.092 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.227 10.1111/ddi.12655 10.1371/journal.pone.0109643 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00087 R. Sharp author 2018 InVEST 3.5.0.post337+n70cca4fa258b User's Guide 2018 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.160 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24719 CROPWAT : a computer program for irrigation planning and management M. Smith author 1992 text Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 1992 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.001 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06203.x 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.013 USDA NRCS author 2004 National Engineering Handbook: Part 630—Hydrology. Chapter 9: Hydrologic Soil-Cover Complexes. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detailfull/national/water/manage/hydrology/?cid=stelprdb1043063 2004 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.020 10.1371/journal.pone.0091001 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141006 Scoping the potencial for outdoor microalgae production in the Azores Emanuel D. Xavier author 2016 text ARQUIPÉLAGO - Life and Marine Sciences 2016 33 57 70 10.2788/64369 10.3897/oneeco.6.e69119 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/69119/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/69119/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/69119/download/xml/ Modelling ecosystem services (ES) has become a new standard for the quantification and assessment of various ES. Multiple ES model applications are available that spatially estimate ES supply on the basis of land-use/land-cover (LULC) input data. This paper assesses how different input LULC datasets affect the modelling and mapping of ES supply for a case study on Terceira Island, the Azores (Portugal), namely: (1) the EU-wide CORINE LULC, (2) the Azores Region official LULC map (COS.A 2018) and (3) a remote sensing-based LULC and vegetation map of Terceira Island using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. The InVEST model suite was applied, modelling altogether six ES (Recreation/Visitation, Pollination, Carbon Storage, Nutrient Delivery Ratio, Sediment Delivery Ratio and Seasonal Water Yield). Model outcomes of the three LULC datasets were compared in terms of similarity, performance and applicability for the user. For some InVEST modules, such as Pollination and Recreation, the differences in the LULC datasets had limited influence on the model results. For InVEST modules, based on more complex calculations and processes, such as Nutrient Delivery Ratio, the output ES maps showed a skewed distribution of ES supply. Yet, model results showed significant differences for differences in all modules and all LULCs. Understanding how differences arise between the LULC input datasets and the respective effect on model results is imperative when computing model-based ES maps. The choice for selecting appropriate LULC data should depend on: 1) the research or policy/decision-making question guiding the modelling study, 2) the ecosystems to be mapped, but also on 3) the spatial resolution of the mapping and 4) data availability at the local level. Communication and transparency on model input data are needed, especially if ES maps are used for supporting land use planning and decision-making. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers InVEST ecosystem services modelling Islands geospatial data Assessing the effects of different land-use/land-cover input datasets on modelling and mapping terrestrial ecosystem services - Case study Terceira Island (Azores, Portugal) Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.6.e74170 2021-12-02 oneecosystem

Centre for Blue Governance, Department of Economics and Finance, Portsmouth Business School, University of Portsmouth, Richmond Building, Portland Street, PO1 3DE, Portsmouth, United Kingdom author Trégarot, Ewan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4483-4480 Centre for Blue Governance, Department of Economics and Finance, Portsmouth Business School, University of Portsmouth, Richmond Building, Portland Street, PO1 3DE, Portsmouth, United Kingdom author Failler, Pierre 2021-12-02 2021-12-02 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e74170 2021 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004 10.3897/oneeco.6.e62811 10.1080/21513732.2018.1425222 10.4324/9781849772075 Private Sector Uptake of Ecosystem Services Concepts and Frameworks - The Current State of Play BSR author 2013 text Business for Social Responsibility https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR_Private_Sector_Uptake_Ecosystem_Services.pdf 2013 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831 Mapping and assessment of ecosystem services related to Cymodocea nodosa meadows E Casas author 2021 text 2021 Report of the development application and participative validation of mapping tools E Casas author 2021 text 2021 Technical report on best practices guidelines for mapping, assessing, valuating and monitoring of ecosystem services E Casas author 2021 text 2021 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.025 Report on State of the Art of MAES in the participating regions E. Cillauren author 2019 text 2019 10.1038/387253a0 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002 P. Dasgupta author 2021 The Economics of Biodiversity: the Dasgupta Review 9781911680291 2021 10.1017/S0376892911000506 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005 R De Groot author B Burkhard author 2017 Mapping Ecosystem Services 978-954-642-829-5 2017 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 10.1016/j.tree.2014.09.004 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.364 Ecosystem-Based Management Tools Database Ecosystem-Based Management author text http://ebmtoolsdatabase.org/ 10.1016/j.agee.2008.03.013 P. Ehrlich author 1981 Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species 1981 305 10.4000/etudescaribeennes.4410 Constraints and Solutions for the implementation of MAES in European Overseas G Ferraro author 2021 text 2021 10.4000/etudescaribeennes.10485 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.012 Research for REGI Committee – Islands of the European Union: State of play and future challenges D Haase author 2021 text https://bit.ly/3l4iAX0 2021 CICES Version 4: Response to Consultation. R. Haines-Yong author 2012 text Centre for Environmental Management, University of Nottingham 2012 10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016 Red List of Ecosystems Feasibility Study in the European Overseas D Hessenberger author 2021 text 2021 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.011 Technical Report on Best Practice Guidelines for casting and profiling Ecosystem Services management tools in European Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories E Lagabrielle author 2021 text 2021 Réunion Island Case Study Booklet E Lagabrielle author 2021 text 2021 R. P. Lakerveld author 2012 Applying political ecology to ecosystem services. Operationalising an alternative approach to ecosystem services research, using an empirical case study in Odisha, India 2012 10.2779/75203 Martinique Case Study Booklet J. P. Maréchal author 2021 text 2021 10.1038/443027a Millenium Ecosystem Assessment author 2005 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-being - Synthesis 2005 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.009 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.015 10.1126/science.1202400 J Petit author 2008 Climate change and biodiversity in the European Union overseas entities 2008 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014 10.1007/s10531-008-9316-5 Mapping the Economic Value of Marine Ecosystem Services on Sint Maarten J Schmiedel author 2021 text 2021 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00561.x 10.15488/4279 Scientific research on mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services in the EU Overseas I Sieber author 2020 text 2020 Land Use changes and ecosystem services in French Guiana I Sieber author 2021 text 2021 TEEB author 2010 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB 2010 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143004 System of Environmental-Economic Accounting— Ecosystem Accounting Final Draft UNSC author 2021 text https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/52nd-session/documents/BG-3f- SEEA-EA_Final_draft-E.pdf 2021 How much are nature’s services worth? W. E. Westman author 1977 text Science 1977 197 960 964 10.3897/oneeco.6.e74170 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/74170/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/74170/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/74170/download/xml/ The paper presents the current policy needs and gaps identified in the European Union (EU) Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories to implement Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem and their Services (MAES) methodology. Then, a selection of the most appropriate tools and methods for mapping and assessing ecosystem services (biophysical, economic, socio-cultural – and decision-support) is provided to address local needs. Using a performance matrix to assess the effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of these tools, key factors required to facilitate the implementation of an ecosystem services framework are identified by considering local needs and possibilities in terms of data availability, mapping support, ecosystem services assessment and decision-support. Our results show how effective and accurate various methods (e.g. process-based models, integrated modelling and most Decision-Supporting Tools) can be, or how efficient other methods are (e.g. value transfer, spatial proxy methods and replacement cost) in data-scarce regions. Participatory approaches score well in terms of sustainability as they allow the assessment of multiple ecosystem services (covering the biophysical, economic and social-cultural components of the assessment) with local stakeholders' contribution, therefore contributing to the awareness-raising dimension. There is no one-size-fits-all approach. Instead, there is a need for flexible, guidance-based ecosystem services mapping and assessment approaches in the EU Overseas entities to facilitate MAES implementation and to adapt and integrate those methods into scenario analysis and decision-supporting tools for better uptake of MAES outputs at the decision-making and policy levels in the EU Overseas entities. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers European Union Overseas entities ecosystem services valuation tools decision-support policy needs MOVE project Adequacy of ecosystem services assessment tools and approaches to current policy needs and gaps in the European Union Overseas entities Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.6.e73269 2021-12-02 oneecosystem

Moscow Representative Office of A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia author Kyrylenko, Natalya Sevastopol State University, Sevastopol, Russia author Evstigneev, Vladyslav https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3064-2613 2021-12-02 2021-12-02 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e73269 2021 10.1029/2000JD900152 10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.08.001 10.5281/zenodo.56945 10.5194/bg-10-3943-2013 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2005.01.001 10.3390/rs10091389 10.1134/s0001437008050068 Photosynthetic properties of phytoplankton in the western part of the Black Sea during the autumn bloom Z. Z. Finenko author 2008 text Marine Ecological Journal 2008 7 4 75 84 10.1134/s0001437014050063 10.1002/joc.1499 10.1109/72.761722 V. A. Ivanov author 2011 Oceanography of the Black Sea 2011 210 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2017.11.001 10.1134/s0001437018030098 10.33075/2220-5861-2017-4-80-87 10.1016/j.rse.2004.08.014 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.06.002 10.1016/j.dsr.2018.08.001 10.1007/698_5_063 10.1016/s0278-4343(02)00018-3 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.12.013 10.1007/978-3-030-61895-7_8 10.1006/ecss.2000.0650 10.1175/1520-0450(1981)0202.0.co;2 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112375 10.3319/tao.2009.06.08.03(iwnop) 10.1080/01431161.2016.1211350 10.7868/s2073667318030085 10.1080/01431161.2013.866290 Estimation of long-term change in annual primary production of phytoplankton of different areas of the Black Sea shelf O. A. Yunev author 2011 text Ecological safety of coastal and offshore zones of the sea 2011 25 1 311 326 10.3897/oneeco.6.e73269 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/73269/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/73269/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/73269/download/xml/ In the present study, the results of independent component decomposition of satellite-derived chlorophyll a (Chla) patterns for the north-western part of the Black Sea are presented. The study has been carried out on the basis of the DINEOF-reconstructed dataset of 8-day average log-transformed Chla (alChla) patterns for 1997-2016. The alChla patterns were decomposed into six independent components of its spatio-temporal variability in the north-western shelf of the Black Sea. The independent components reflect the spatial distribution of alChla anomalies which are likely to be formed under the influence of sea circulation factors driven by wind. The paper presents the results of the analysis of the intra-annual variability of independent components. The interpretation of the patterns of intra-annual independent components variability is given, taking into account the seasonal variability of the wind factor, the flow of the Danube, the Dnieper and Southern Bug rivers and the fact of modulation of independent components dynamics by seasonal phytoplankton succession. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers independent component analysis chlorophyll a the Black Sea satellite-derived patterns Independent components of spatial-temporal structure of chlorophyll a patterns in the upper layer of the north-western shelf of the Black Sea Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.6.e65966 2021-12-07 oneecosystem

Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany author Dworczyk, Claudia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3160-4782 Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research ZALF, Müncheberg, Germany author Burkhard, Benjamin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-9009 2021-12-07 2021-12-07 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e65966 2021 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.049 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.013 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.014 10.1080/21513732.2015.1059891 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.007 10.1007/s10661-020-08816-y 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.07.002 10.3097/LO.200915 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 10.3097/LO.201434 10.3897/ab.e12837 10.3897/oneeco.5.e51103 10.5751/ES-06917-200117 10.1126/science.aaw3372 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.126 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.187 10.1007/s10980-018-0707-z 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25477 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106729 10.1007/s10980-015-0260-y Cultural Ecosystem Services – Framework, Theories and Practices Anna Dłużewska author 2016 text PROBLEMY EKOROZWOJU – PROBLEMS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 2016 12 1 101 110 Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Promotion of the use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC European Commission author 2009 text 2009 10.2779/41957 European Union author 2007 Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks 2007 10.2779/39229 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.004 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101326 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.016 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.002 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.130 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104493 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101273 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142565 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.002 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103702 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.007 Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. S. Díaz, J. Settele, E. S. Brondízio E.S., H. T. Ngo, M. Guèze, J. Agard, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, K. A. Brauman, S. H. M. Butchart, K. M. A. Chan, L. A. Garibaldi, K. Ichii, J. Liu, S. M. Subramanian, G. F. Midgley, P. Miloslavich, Z. Molnár, D. Obura, A. Pfaff, S. Polasky, A. Purvis, J. Razzaque, B. Reyers, R. Roy Chowdhury, Y. J. Shin, I. J. Visseren-Hamakers, K. J. Willis, and C. N. Zayas (eds.). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. IPBES author 2019 text 2019 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.007 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.008 10.5751/ES-06753-190317 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102051 10.1002/fee.2230 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.336 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.072 10.1080/20964129.2019.1634979 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.12.007 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.028 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.002 J. Maes author 2018 Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An analytical framework for mapping and assessment of ecosystem condition in EU 2018 Joachim Maes author 2020 Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: An EU ecosystem assessment 2020 Abraham H. Maslow author 1954 Motivation und Personality 978-8131711491 1954 10.5751/ES-05790-180344 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment author 2005 Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: Current State and Trends 1-55963-227-5 2005 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022 English dictionary [online]. Definition of capacity, demand, flow, potential, supply. Oxford University Press (OUP) author text https://www.lexico.com/ 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.002 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24487 10.1093/biosci/biu146 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006 10.3897/oneeco.3.e27110 10.1007/s10980-019-00826-7 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00093 10.1007/s10640-020-00445-w 10.1007/s13593-017-0484-0 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.033 10.1007/s11629-018-5124-x 10.1016/j.jnc.2016.03.001 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.017 10.3390/su11082227 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.235 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.003 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.014 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.002 Global Biodiversity Outlook 5 Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity author 2020 text https://www.cbd.int/gbo/gbo5/publication/gbo-5-en.pdf 2020 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.024 10.3390/w9090677 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013 10.1080/21513732.2017.1407362 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) author 2010 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. 9783981341034 2010 InVEST The Natural Capital Project (NatCap) author text https://naturalcapitalproject.stanford.edu/software/invest United Nations author 2019 Technical Recommendations in support of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012. Experimental Ecosystem Accounting 978-92-1-161634-7 2019 System of Environmental Economic Accounting - Ecosystem Accounting: Final Draft United Nations author 2021 text https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/52nd-session/documents/BG-3f-SEEA-EA_Final_draft-E.pdf 2021 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.023 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.012 10.1088/1748-9326/abb396 10.1111/cobi.12872 10.1371/journal.pone.0091001 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004 10.2785/19790 10.3897/ab.e12837 10.1111/cobi.13276 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.017 10.3097/LO.201649 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.005 10.1007/s12665-019-8318-9 10.1371/journal.pone.0136392 10.1007/s11252-019-0826-6 10.1007/s11356-018-3910-1 Estimap. Method factsheet. Grazia Zulian author 2016 text https://oppla.eu/sites/default/files/uploads/methodfactsheetestimap.pdf 2016 10.3897/oneeco.6.e65966 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/65966/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/65966/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/65966/download/xml/ People require multiple ecosystem services (ES) to meet their basic needs and improve or maintain their quality of life. In order to meet these needs, natural resources are exploited, threatening biodiversity and increasing the pressure on the Earth's ecosystems.Spatial-structural approaches are used to explain and visualise the spatial relationships and connections between areas that provide and benefit from ES. However, areas where the demand for these ES occurs are rarely considered in existing spatial approaches or equated with areas where people can use the benefits.In order to highlight the differences between these two areas, we would like to introduce the 'Service Demanding Area' (SDA) in an adapted spatial-structural approach.This approach relates SDA to already familiar ES provision and use units, namely Service Providing Areas (SPA), Service Connecting Areas (SCA) and Service Benefitting Areas (SBA) and can be used to schematically illustrate, understand and analyse the different forms of demand that can emerge.A literature review was conducted to provide an overview of the spatial mapping of ES demand. Three issues arose that should be addressed to improve the assessment of ES demand: 1) The term ES demand is not used consistently. To avoid confusion, it is important to clarify how ES demand is understood and how it differs from the other components of the ES concept (e.g. ES supply, ES potential, ES flow); 2) It is important to consider that ES demand is multi-faceted and is generated on different geographical scales, including the full range of stakeholders' perceptions, needs and desires which broadens the picture of societal demand for ES; 3) Meaningful interpretations between ES supply and demand need to be available to inform decision-makers about interventions for reducing ES trade-offs and mismatches. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers service providing area service benefitting area service demanding area service connecting area Conceptualising the demand for ecosystem services – an adapted spatial-structural approach Review Article

10.3897/oneeco.6.e71033 2021-12-13 oneecosystem

Wolfs Company, Amsterdam and Bonaire, Netherlands author Palacios, Elena Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands author van Beukering, Pieter https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7146-4409 The World Bank, Washington DC, Netherlands author van Zanten, Boris University of Aruba, Oranjestad, Aruba author Lacle, Francielle Wolfs Company, Amsterdam and Bonaire, Netherlands author Schep, Stijn Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands author Soellner, Inga 2021-12-13 2021-12-13 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e71033 2021 A multi-dimensional focus for the 2030 Agenda María José Abud author 2017 text UNDP 2017 M Beisheim author 2014 Transnational partnerships effectively providing for sustainable development? (Governance and limited statehood) 2014 10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7 Partha Dasgupta author 2021 The economics of biodiversity: the Dasgupta review: full report 2021 Opportunities and challenges for environmental statistics in Aruba Ruud Derix author 2014 text CBS Aruba 2014 10.1126/science.aap8826 10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111 10.1023/A:1025300804112 A roadmap for SDG implementation in Aruba Government of Aruba author 2018 text http://www.sustainablesids.org/knowledgebase/the-aruba-sdg-roadmap 2018 National Strategic Plan of Aruba 2020-2022 Government of Aruba author 2020 text https://www.deaci.aw/sustainable-development/ 2020 Sustainable Finance in EU Overseas Territories - An assessment of sustainable finance mechanisms in the Caribbean region L Hagedoorn author 2017 text JNCC 2017 10.1007/s11625-013-0214-8 A guide to SDG interactions: from science to implementation ICSU author 2017 text https://www.icsu.org/cms/2017/05/SDGs-Guide-to-Interactions.pdf 2017 Integrating Ecosystem Services into Development Planning. A stepwise approach for practitioners Marina Kosmus author 2011 text Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH http://www.aboutvalues.net/data/six_steps/integr_ecosys_serv_in_dev_planning_en.pdf 2011 Influence of coastal economic valuations in the Caribbean: enabling conditions and lessons learned Benjamin Kushner author 2012 text World Resources Institute Marine Ecosystem Services Partnership http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/pdf/influence_coastal_economic_valuations_caribbean_enabling_conditions_lessons_learned.pdf 2012 Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets David Le Blanc author 2015 text UN-DESA http://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2015/wp141_2015.pdf 2015 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment author 2005 Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf 2005 The Ocean and Us - How healthy marine and coastal ecosystems support the achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals C Neumann author 2015 text AGEDI Abu Dhabi, UAE/GRID-Arendal https://gridarendal-website-live.s3.amazonaws.com/production/documents/:s_document/9/original/Oceans_Us_19.05.16_Web-web.pdf?1483646256 2015 A draft framework for understanding SDG interactions M Nilsson author 2016 text ICSU https://www.icsu.org/cms/2017/05/SDG-interactions-working-paper.pdf 2016 10.1017/S0376892918000140 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, Aruba T Polaszek author 2018 text 2018 Ecosystem services: a guide for decision makers Janet Ranganathan author 2008 text World Resources Institute 2008 Natural capital accounting for the sustainable development goals Arjan Ruijs author 2018 text PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency 2018 Partnerships for Small Island Developing States SIDS Partnership author 2016 text Steering Committee on Partnerships for Small Island Developing States in collaboration with United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/2364Publication 2016 read.pdf 2016 10.1038/s41893-021-00698-3 Press release on the unanimous adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals UN author 2015 text https://www.un.org/press/en/2015/ga11688.doc.htm 2015 MAPS – A Common Approach to the UNDG’s policy support to the SDGs - An update on implementation UN author 2016 text https://www.un.org/ecosoc/sites/www.un.org.ecosoc/files/files/en/qcpr/doco-summary-brief-on-maps-march2016.pdf 2016 The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2019 UN author 2019 text https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2019.pdf 2019 Small Island Developing States UN DESA author n.d. text https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics/sids n.d. SDG Accelerator and bottleneck assessment UNDP author 2017 text 2017 Emerging Issues for Small Island Developing States. Results of the UNEP Foresight Process UNEP author 2014 text https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/2173emerging issues of sids.pdf 2014 System of Environmental-Economic Accounting—Ecosystem Accounting: Final Draft UN SEEA author 2021 text UN DESA. Report prepared by the Committee of Experts on Environmental-Economic Accounting 2021 Letter inviting to review and comment the draft Guidelines on Biophysical Modelling for Ecosystem Accounting. Period of global consultation 14 April – 14 May 2021. UN SEEA author 2021 text https://seea.un.org/sites/seea.un.org/files/documents/EEA/biophysical_guidelines_global_consultation_letter_final.pdf 2021 10.1080/15693430701526336 The Value Natural Capital for the Tourism Industry of Aruba. TEEB Aruba B van Zanten author 2018 text 2018 Protecting 30% of the planet for nature: costs, benefits and economic implications Anthony Waldron author 2020 text 2020 Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) for Local Community in Aruba E Wolfs author 2017 text 2017 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.010 10.3897/oneeco.6.e71033 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/71033/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/71033/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/71033/download/xml/ The economy and well-being in Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and other Subnational Island Jurisdictions (SNIJ) highly rely on marine and coastal ecosystem services (ESS). Moreover, SIDS and SNIJ share common challenges in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Building a fact-based solution to demonstrate the link between ESS and SDGs is essential for nature conservation and sustainable development in SIDS and SNIJ. In this study, we developed a 5-step approach to capture the contribution of ESS to the achievement of SDGs in Aruba by means of a shortlist of indicators, with the aim to provide information for optimal policy investments to implement the Aruba 2030 roadmap. The results numerically and spatially demonstrate the contribution of fisheries, nature-based tourism and local cultural recreational ESS to achieve SDG targets 14.7 (increase SIDS' economic benefits from sustainable use of marine resources), 8.9 (devise and implement policies to promote sustainable tourism) and 3.4 (promote mental health and well-being); and how investing in these key ESS could lead to multiplying co-benefits for other SDGs. This paper also discusses how the 5-step approach and the outcomes can be used to assist other SIDS and SNIJ in their ambitions to meet the SDGs. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Ecosystem Services Small Island Developing States Subnational Island Jurisdictions ecosystem services Sustainable Development Goals Linking ecosystem services and the Sustainable Development Goals in Small Island Developing States: the case of Aruba Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.6.e72881 2021-12-13 oneecosystem

Department of Ecological Science, A-Life, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands author Huisman, Seringe Department of Ecological Science, A-Life, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands author Jesse, Wendy Department of Ecological Science, A-Life, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands author Ellers, Jacintha Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands author van Beukering, Pieter https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7146-4409 2021-12-13 2021-12-13 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e72881 2021 ARGEOgraph author argeograph.nl/project/eustatius2013/eustatius2013_a3map.pdf 10.1126/science.aam5962 10.1016/s0308-597x(03)00041-1 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0623 10.4319/lo.2008.53.6.2695 B Berkowitz author 2014 The state of Antigononleptopus (Corallita) on St Eustatius in 2014 https://www.dcbd.nl/sites/default/files/documents/2014%20Corallita%20Report%20Briana%20Berkowitz%20FINAL.pdf 2014 The impact of invasive species on tourism P. van Beukering author 2014 text Institute for Environmental Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam http://www.wolfscompany.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/R14-32-Tourism-value-and-lionfish-final-report.pdf 2014 IVM Institute for Environmental Studies The non-use value of nature in the Netherlands and the Caribbean Netherlands Pieter Van Beukering author 2012 text https://www.dcbd.nl/sites/default/files/documents/R12-07%20Non%20use%20value%20BES%20Islands.pdf 2012 10.18174/460388 Critical Situation Analysis (CSA) of Invasive Alien Species (IAS) Status and Management J. M. Bullard author 2010 text Ministry of Agriculture, Lands, Forestry and Fisheries (MALFF) http://caribbeaninvasives.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/CSA-final-version-of-2011.pdf 2010 Naturalised and invasive alien plant species in the Caribbean Netherlands: status, distribution, threats, priorities and recommendations W. J. van der Burg author 2012 text Wageningen, Foundation DLO Research Institute Plant Research International https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/198282 2012 10.1614/ipsm-d-10-00088.1 10.2307/3237301 The Total Economic Value of Nature on St Eustatius J. A. Cado van der Lely author 2014 text Institute for Environmental Studies https://www.dcbd.nl/sites/default/files/documents/R14-12-The-total-economic-value-of-nature-on-St-Eustatius_0.pdf 2014 CBS author https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/figures/detail/83776ENG CBS author https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/figures/detail/84757ENG?q=Sint%20Eustatius 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.040 Chamber of Commerce & Industry author http://www.statiasabachamber.com/statiasaba/economy/economic-sectors 10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00806-8 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.03.034 10.1890/070151 10.1038/s41559-017-0186 Seas at the millennium: an environmental evaluation A. O. Debrot author 2000 text Flanders Marine Institute http://www.vliz.be/en/imis?refid=4515 2000 Climate change effects on the biodiversity of the BES islands A. O. Debrot author 2010 text Alterra Report 2010 1 39 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x A landscape Ecological vegetation map of Sint Eustatius (Lesser Antilles) John A. de Freitas author 2012 text Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 2012 3 3 10.1007/s10530-010-9811-y 10.1093/cz/zox009 10.1007/s10021-002-0151-3 10.1111/btp.12600 10.1002/eap.2257 Study on the ecology and possible control methods of the invasive plant species Antigonon leptopus (Corallita or Mexican Creeper) J. J. Ernst author 2007 text Dutch Caribbean Biodiversity Database https://www.dcbd.nl/document/final-report-corallita-pilot-project-study-ecology-and-possible-control-methods-invasive 2007 March 38 38 10.1038/s41598-018-35821-6 The local cultural and recreational value of nature on St Eustatius F. Fenkl author 2014 text Dutch Caribbean Biodiversity Database https://www.dcbd.nl/document/local-cultural-and-recreational-value-nature-st-eustatius 2014 June 10.1007/s10530-009-9627-9 10.1007/s10584-021-03176-z 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01525.x The social and ecological contexts of invasive plant management in the Caribbean Project Aim : Facilitate Decision Making Elizabeth Haber author 2016 text Utrecht University http://posters.geo.uu.nl/2016/The_social_and_ecological_contexts_of_invasive_plant_management_in_the_Caribbean-Haber_Vaas_Eppinga_vanLaerhoven_Rietkerk_Giezen_Driessen_Wassen-February2016.pdf 2016 325 2009 5939 5939 10.1111/btp.12939 10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108 10.1126/science.1244693 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00605 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01600.x Antigonon leptopus (coral vine) Invasive Species Compendium author text https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/112316 Climate Change 2013 - The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC author 2014 text IPCC http://zoobank.org/2c4e8e2e-4315-4a15-9d04-0b376fb53b8e 2014 1 1552 IUCN Red List author https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/10800/122936983 10.1111/gcb.15091 The tourism value of nature on saba and statia: Using a choice modelling method S. van de Kerkhof author 2014 text Institute for Environmental Studies https://www.dcbd.nl/document/tourism-value-nature-st-eustatius 2014 Sint Eustatius Strategic Development Pla A. Koene author text https://issuu.com/alexanderkoene/docs/statia_strategic_plan A study on the growing conditions, distribution andpropagation of Ipomoea sphenophylla on Sint Eustatius S. de Leeuw author 2014 text Dutch Caribbean Biodiversity Dtabase https://www.dcbd.nl/document/study-growing-conditions-distribution-and-propagation-statia-morning-glory-ipomoea 2014 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02366.x 10.22004/ag.econ.47850 10.2305/iucn.uk.2008.rlts.t8005a12881238.en 10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.000435 NOAA author https://library.noaa.gov/Collections/Digital-Docs/Foreign-Climate-Data/Netherlands-Antilles-Climate-Data 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01948-0 10.1079/9781786392145.0000 10.1007/s10530-014-0743-9 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.016 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002 Governance of ecosystem services on small islands: Three contrasting cases for St. Eustatius in the Dutch Caribbean Nico Polman author 2016 text Island Studies Journal https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/503759 2016 11 1 265 284 10.1111/gcb.13021 R. Stelten author 2009 The Golden Rock. Seventeenth-and eighteenth-century metal buckles from Oranje Bay, St. Eustatius https://studenttheses.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/18755?solr_nav%5Bid%5D=ae5972ba74a0b532d176&solr_nav%5Bpage%5D=23&solr_nav%5Boffset%5D=2 2009 Mapping the Economic Value of Ecosystems on St Eustatius K. Tieskens author 2014 text Institute for Environmental Sciences https://www.dcbd.nl/sites/default/files/documents/R14-13-Value-mapping-of-nature-on-St-Eustatius.pdf 2014 10.1088/1748-9326/aae31e 10.5751/es-09487-220401 10.1016/j.gecco.2016.05.003 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.015 10.1073/pnas.1504869112 10.1073/pnas.1600366113 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01400.x 10.1007/s10530-005-5841-2 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00636.x 10.3897/oneeco.6.e72881 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/72881/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/72881/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/72881/download/xml/ Invasive species are a worldwide threat to biodiversity, especially on Caribbean islands. Through their impact on the structure and functioning of ecosystems, they also affect ecosystem services. Therefore, invasive species can have profound socio-economic effects. On the Dutch Caribbean Island of St. Eustatius, the invasive perennial vine Coralita is present on roughly 33% of the Island. While ecological damage is evident, effective management strategies are still lacking. This study links the ecological, cultural and societal effects of the invasion to the economy of the Island by estimating the ecosystem service losses due to Coralita in monetary value. We have spatially assessed the economic value of five main ecosystem services (tourism, non-use value, carbon sequestration, archaeology and local cultural and recreational value) to the different habitats on the Island and estimated the loss of these values under three scenarios of Coralita cover: 0%, 3% and 36% dominant cover. The baseline scenario of 0% demonstrated a total ecosystem service value of $2.7 million per year, concentrated on the Quill volcano. The 3% and 36% scenario showed a yearly loss of $39,804 and $576,704, respectively, with the largest losses located on the northern and eastern slopes of the Quill. These areas should be prioritised for management and the known potential gain per area enables choice of strategy, based on cost-benefit considerations. To reduce further economic loss by Coralita, we urgently advise an immediate management strategy and ongoing research into eradication and restoration methods. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers BES Islands Coralita economic value invasive species spatial assessment scenario mapping Mapping the economic loss of ecosystem services caused by the invasive plant species Antigonon leptopus on the Dutch Caribbean Island of St. Eustatius Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.6.e74260 2021-12-13 oneecosystem

United Arab Emirates University, Biology Department, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates author Debouza, Nour ElHouda United Arab Emirates University, Biology Department, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates author Babu Thruppoyil, Shaijal United Arab Emirates University, Biology Department, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates author Gopi, Karthika United Arab Emirates University, Biology Department, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates author Zain, Sabika United Arab Emirates University, Biology Department, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates author Ksiksi, Taoufik 2021-12-13 2021-12-13 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e74260 2021 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00498.x 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01224.x 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02500.x Global Warming Driving Forces and Mitigation: Review Loiy Al-Ghussain author 2016 text 2016 Metabolic processes during seed germination Awatif S. Ali author 2017 text Advances in Seed Biology 2017 141 166 Mahamane Ali author 2012 Diversity of Ecosystems 2012 10.1080/09603120500105745 10.1007/s11104-012-1390-5 10.1111/j.1365-2486.1996.tb00057.x 10.1016/j.endeavour.2016.07.002 10.1007/978-981-10-3473-2_21 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.601.104 10.1007/s11099-013-0021-6 Recent advances in abiotic stress tolerance of plants through chemical priming: an overview Muhammad Arslan Ashraf author 2018 text Advances in Seed Priming 2018 51 79 10.1104/pp.95.2.390 10.1071/PP9880447 Carol C. Baskin author 1998 Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and, evolution of dormancy and germination 1998 10.1016/B978-012080260-9/50004-X 10.3389/fpls.2018.01768 Effects of Drought and Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide on Seed Nutrition and 15N and 13C Natural Abundance Isotopes in Soybean Under Controlled Environments Nacer Bellaloui author 2017 text Soybean: The Basis of Yield, Biomass and Productivity 2017 10.1017/S0960258500003226 Seed germination and dormancy. J. Derek Bewley author 1997 text The plant cell 1997 9 7 J. Derek Bewley author 2014 Physiology and biochemistry of seeds in relation to germination: 1 development, germination, and growth 2014 10.1104/pp.88.4.1310 10.1007/BF00017102 Improving the Yield and Nutritional Quality of Forage Crops Nicola M. Capstaff author 2018 text Frontiers in Plant Science https://doaj.org 2018 9 Vital signs of the planet NASA Global Climate Change author 2018 text URL: https://climate. nasa. gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/(дата обращения: 25.12. 2019) 2018 10.1614/WS-06-087R.1 10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05006-6 10.1104/pp.15.01992 The impact of a naturally occurring CO2 gas vent on the shallow ecosystem and soil chemistry of a Mediterranean pasture... Giancarlo Ciotoli author 2008 text International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2008 10.2307/2258276 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02103.x 10.21273/HORTSCI.31.3.341 10.1002/wcc.81 10.1007/s13280-015-0681-5 10.1089/omi.2011.0082 10.1007/BF00138846 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.08.012 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02028.x 10.1111/pce.12843 10.1111/pce.13618 10.1126/science.289.5487.2068 10.2135/cropsci1972.0011183X001200010003x 10.3389/fpls.2017.01147 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.10.030 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.11.004 10.1104/pp.69.2.327 10.1104/pp.113.232413 10.1017/S0960258519000035 10.1111/1365-2435.12532 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.07.036 SEED GERMINATION CHARACTERISTICS OF PHRAGMITES COMMUNIS: EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE AND SALINITY Mustapha Gorai author 2006 text Belgian Journal of Botany https://www.jstor.org/stable/20794596 2006 139 1 78 86 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00151.x 10.1007/978-981-13-1861-0_10 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00778.x 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00622.x 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.018 10.1023/A:1009896111405 10.1017/S0021859612000263 10.1029/2010RG000345 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.11.001 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.07.023 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.04.023 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01597.x 10.1111/jac.12195 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00494.x 10.1016/S1360-1385(96)10050-9 10.1073/pnas.97.24.12937 10.1007/s11738-012-1186-5 10.1093/treephys/tpw031 10.1007/s00572-006-0046-9 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.07.003 10.1006/anbo.1998.0663 Charles D. Keeling author Charles D. Keeling author 1989 Aspects of Climate Variability in the Pacific and the Western Americas 978-1-118-66428-5 https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/GM055p0165 1989 10.1111/ppl.12490 10.1515/biol-2018-0019 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.01.006 10.1007/s004420100656 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.11.1259 10.1071/FP07218 10.1023/A:1010434227671 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00870.x Paul J. Kramer author 1995 Water relations of plants and soils 1995 Plant roots and carbon sequestration Rajeew Kumar author 2006 text Current Science http://www.jstor.org/stable/24094284 2006 91 7 885 890 10.1021/jf00079a008 10.1007/s10725-007-9237-4 10.1016/j.mito.2014.04.002 10.1093/jxb/erp096 10.1093/aob/mcg109 Physiological regulation of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) growth in response to drought under elevated CO2 Dongxiao Li author 2013 text J. Food Agric. Environ 2013 11 649 654 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01874.x 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.09.020 10.1098/rspa.2009.0519 10.1007/s12665-009-0372-2 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00739.1 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.012 10.1111/nph.12691 Temperature Stress Tolerance and Increase in Antioxidative Enzyme Activities in Mycorrhizal Strawberry Plants Yoichi Matsubara author 2006 text https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE01130480 2006 10.1073/pnas.1815790116 10.1038/nclimate2621 10.1007/s13205-020-2104-y 10.1093/jxb/erz208 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00324.x 10.1080/01904160009382082 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 10.1139/W07-081 10.1073/pnas.1910501117 10.1270/jsbbs.56.93 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01033.x 10.1016/j.spjpm.2016.05.008 10.5772/intechopen.82681 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1969.tb03238.x 10.1073/pnas.0609492103 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.05.006 10.1038/nrmicro1987 10.1111/gcb.14714 10.1016/j.energy.2010.01.023 R. Larry Peterson author 2004 Mycorrhizas: anatomy and cell biology 2004 10.1007/s10295-010-0873-8 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x S. Rajendra Prasad author S. Rajendra Prasad author 2016 Microbial inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity 2016 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00566.x 10.1086/591988 10.1104/pp.103.036293 10.4324/9780203985328 Ascorbate and drought stress effects on germination and seedling growth of sorghum Narges Reiahi author 2013 text Int. J. Agron. Plant Prod 2013 4 5 901 910 The Rising Cost of Natural Hazards: Feature Articles Holli Reibeek author 2005 text NASA Earth Observatory 2005 10.1126/science.aas9313 10.1093/jexbot/49.329.1999 10.1029/2003GL017775 10.1016/j.micres.2011.03.003 Global warming: Feature articles Holli Riebeek author 2010 text NASA Earth Observatory 2010 Jose Rodriguez author 2020 Development of a test section featuring a flat plate conditioned for the study of fully developed turbulent boundary layers using PIV 2020 10.1016/0269-7491(94)90034-5 10.1073/pnas.1222463110 10.1073/pnas.1524527113 10.1016/j.agee.2015.02.002 Lost in translation: Physiological roles of stored mRNAs in seed germination Naoto Sano author 2020 text Plants 2020 9 3 10.1139/W09-031 10.1016/j.fbr.2012.01.001 10.1093/jxb/erp203 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103846 Drought-tolerance of wheat improved by rhizosphere bacteria from harsh environments: enhanced biomass production and reduced emissions of stress volatiles Salme Timmusk author 2014 text PlOS One 2014 9 5 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00508.x 10.1111/nph.13148 10.1038/nclimate2067 10.4161/psb.3.8.6186 10.1007/BF02919080 Irwin A. Ungar author 1991 Ecophysiology of vascular halophytes 1991 Seed germination and seed-bank ecology in halophytes. I. A. Ungar author 1995 text Seed Development and Germination 1995 599 628 10.17221/346/2010-PSE 10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.453 10.1007/978-1-4614-6372-6_2 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.01.021 Chlorophyll content, photosynthetic efficiency and genetic markers in two sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) genotypes under drought stress Marija Viljevac author 2013 text Acta Botanica Croatica; Zagreb 2013 72 2 Assessment of plant growth promoting activities and abiotic stress tolerance of Azotobacter chroococcum strains for a potential use in sustainable agriculture S. Viscardi author 2016 text Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 2016 16 3 848 863 10.1300/J411v13n01_09 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.07.016 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.02.009 10.1104/pp.83.3.573 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-10.x 10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00097-4 10.1007/s11104-020-04592-3 10.3390/agronomy10111752 10.1371/journal.pone.0130660 10.1038/s41598-017-14936-2 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107605 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00270.x 10.1104/pp.123.3.1143 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.243 10.1104/pp.122.4.1081 10.1007/s10725-012-9690-6 Relationships between glomalin-related soil protein in water-stable aggregate fractions and aggregate stability in citrus rhizosphere Qiang-Sheng Wu author 2013 text Int. J. Agric. Biol 2013 15 603 606 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.02.009 Effect of CCS technology for CO2 leakage on seed germination of C4 crops L. Xue author 2014 text Bul. Soil Water Conserv. 2014 34 307 310 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.10.025 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.004 10.1016/j.aquabot.2005.06.006 10.1017/S002185969700498X 10.2135/cropsci2012.01.0030 Increased carbon uptake under elevated CO2 concentration enhances water-use efficiency of C4 broomcorn millet under drought Dongsheng Zhang author 2021 text Agricultural Water Management 2021 245 10.1201/9780203740071-16 10.1016/0378-4290(93)90003-6 10.3897/oneeco.6.e74260 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/74260/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/74260/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/74260/download/xml/ Earth atmospheric CO2 concentration has risen by over 35% since 1750 and is presently increasing by about 2 parts per million (ppm) every year. Due to contributions from human activity, CO2 is projected to keep rising in the predictable future and to double sometime during this century if fossil fuels burning remains. As a result, air temperature is projected to rise from 2 to 5 °C by 2100. Following this rise in CO2, some ecosystems will face challenges in the next few decades as plants will live in warmer temperatures, higher evaporating demand and widespread changes in drought lengths and severity. To yield healthy crops and forests in changing climate surroundings, it is vital to define whether elevated CO2 disturbs seed germination and plant formation, but even more, the physiological traits conferring drought tolerance. Here, we review the current understanding on the role that CO2 plays on plant growth and seed germination, as well as its impact during the exposure of abiotic stresses like drought and salinity. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers global change climate change seed germination plants CO2 Plant and seed germination responses to global change, with a focus on CO2: A review Review Article

10.3897/oneeco.6.e65706 2021-12-16 oneecosystem

University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany author Schmidt, Katja University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany author Walz, Ariane 2021-12-16 2021-12-16 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e65706 2021 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.12.004 10.1098/rspb.2013.3330 10.1002/fee.1480 Grün in der Stadt – Maßnahmen zur Grün- und Freiraumentwicklung im Rahmen der Städtebauförderung BBSR author 2019 text https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/veroeffentlichungen/bbsr-online/2019/bbsr-online-12-2019.html 2019 White Paper: Green Spaces in the City BMUB author 2018 text https://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/publikationen/themen/bauen/wohnen/weissbuch-stadtgruen-en.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4 2018 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_11 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.003 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.002 Connecting Biodiversity and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation: Report of the Second Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Biodiversity and Climate Change CBD author 2009 text Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity 2009 10.1093/forestry/cpt053 10.1007/s10980-012-9833-1 10.1007/s11252-014-0377-9 10.21273/HORTTECH.10.1.40 Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums O. J. Dunn author 1964 text Technometrics https://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00401706.1964.10490181 1964 Klimareport Brandenburg DWD author 2019 text Deutscher Wetterdienst https://lfu.brandenburg.de/sixcms/media.php/9/Klimareport_Brandenburg_2019.3992071.pdf 2019 EEA author 2017 Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016 https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/climate-change-impacts-and-vulnerability-2016 2017 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.008 Urban Europe: Statistics on cities, towns and suburbs EUROSTAT author 2016 text Eurostat http://www.gbv.de/dms/zbw/870322052.pdf 2016 10.1080/13511610.2011.592062 10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.016 10.1007/978-3-319-43314-1_18 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138182 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.04.003 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.010 10.1007/s10113-015-0759-4 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101634 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.002 10.1007/s00704-008-0017-5 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02238.x IPCC author 2014 Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014 10.1111/geb.12404 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.104 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.01.005 10.1006/jema.2001.0491 10.1038/nclimate1463 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.007 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.05.013 C. C. Konijnendijk author 2013 Benefits of urban parks: a systematic review. http://www.academia.edu/download/31392618/ifpra_report.pdf 2013 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090843 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.004 10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 10.1093/biosci/bix079 Gutachten zum Masterplan 100% Klimaschutz Potsdam 2050 LHP author 2017 text https://www.potsdam.de/sites/default/files/documents/170904_masterplan.pdf 2017 LHP author 2021 Stadtteile im Blick 2020 https://www.potsdam.de/stadtteile-im-blick 2021 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.007 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126481 10.1007/s004840050119 10.1007/s00484-006-0061-8 10.1007/s00484-009-0261-0 10.1007/BF00866252 10.1038/s41558-020-0813-1 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.12.014 10.1080/13574800802452658 10.2737/NRS-RN-38 10.1186/2047-2382-1-13 Effects of urban tree management and species selection on atmospheric carbon dioxide David J. Nowak author 2002 text Journal of Arboriculture. 28(3): 113-122. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/18815 2002 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.019 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.006 INITIAL GUIDANCE TO OBTAIN REPRESENTATIVE METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS AT URBAN SITES Tim R. Oke author 2006 text World Meteorological Organization https://library.wmo.int/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=9262#.YX6k_Rwxnb0 2006 10.1080/01426397.2011.560474 10.1007/s10980-020-01004-w 10.1201/b16750 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.11.003 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.242 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008 Urban areas: In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. A. Revi author 2014 text Cambridge University Press 2014 10.1108/14676370710817183 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126777 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.01.004 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-16-00044.1 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.001 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.001 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.002 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.002 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.01.005. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.002 10.1038/nature12914 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.001 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.013 10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_6 10.1371/journal.pone.0204684 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.02.006 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.004 10.1007/s11252-009-0107-x 10.4172/2157-7625.1000116 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.07.009 VDI 3787: Environmental meteorology - Climate and air pollution maps for cities and regions VDI author 1999 text 1999 10.5751/es-08266-210131 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.023 10.5751/ES-10854-240204 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.018 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.03.006 10.1038/s41598-020-74559-y 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126700 10.1038/s41598-017-04242-2 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.011 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.051 10.3897/oneeco.6.e65706 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/65706/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/65706/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/65706/download/xml/ Climate change adaptation is essential to mitigate risks, such as extreme weather events triggered by global warming and amplified in dense urban environments. Ecosystem-based adaptation measures, such as urban greening, are promoted in cities because of their flexibility and their positive side effects, such as human health benefits, ecological effects, climate mitigation and a range of social benefits. While individual co-benefits of greening measures are well studied, often in public green spaces, few studies quantify co-benefits comprehensively, leaving social benefits particularly understudied. In this study, we perform biophysical and socio-cultural assessments of co-benefits provided by semi-public, residential greening in four courtyards with varying green structures. We quantify effects on thermal comfort, biodiversity, carbon storage and social interaction. We further assess the importance of these co-benefits to people in the neighbourhood. Subsequently, we weight the results from the biophysical assessments with the socio-cultural values to evaluate how even small differences in green structures result in differences in the provision of co-benefits. Results show that, despite relatively small differences in green structures, the residential courtyards with a higher green volume clearly generate more co-benefits than the residential yards with less green, particularly for thermal comfort. Despite differences in the valuation of co-benefits in the neighbourhood, socio-cultural weights did not change the outcome of the comparative assessment. Our results highlight that a deliberate management strategy, possibly on neighbourhood-scale, could enhance co-benefits and contribute to a more sustainable urban development. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers courtyards PET biophysical assessment socio-cultural valuation climate adaptation Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change through residential urban green structures: co-benefits to thermal comfort, biodiversity, carbon storage and social interaction Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.6.e76838 2021-12-22 oneecosystem

Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland author Farrell, Catherine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2940-6445 University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland author Coleman, Lisa University of Limerick Kemmy Business School, Limerick, Ireland author Norton, Daniel University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland author Kelly-Quinne, Mary IDEEA Group, Melbourne, Australia author Obst, Carl IDEEA Group, Melbourne, Australia author Eigenraam, Mark National University Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland author O'Donoghue, Cathal University of Limerick Kemmy Business School, Limerick, Ireland author Kinsella, Stephen Natural Capital Ireland, Dublin, Ireland author Smith, Fiona Natural Capital Ireland, Dublin, Ireland author Sheehy, Iseult Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland author Stout, Jane https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2027-0863 2021-12-22 2021-12-22 2021 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 6 e76838 2021 10.1111/rec.12415 10.5194/bg-10-7623-2013 10.1038/s41893-020-0552-3 10.1111/j.1654-109x.2011.01151.x A Bonn author 2016 Peatlands restoration and ecosystem services: science, policy and practice. 2016 Bord na Mona author 2016 Biodiversity Action Plan 2016-2021 http://biodiversityactionplan.bordnamona.ie/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/BioDiversity-Plan-LR.pdf 2016 10.1080/00750770903407989 10.1117/12.898573 Mapping land use on Irish peatlands using medium resolution satellite imagery J Connolly author 2018 text Irish Geography 2018 51 2 10.3318/bioe.2021.09 10.3897/oneeco.6.e58218 The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review. Partha Dasgupta author 2021 text London: HM Treasury https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/final-report-the-economics-of-biodiversity-the-dasgupta-review 2021 10.1126/science.aax3100 Natural capital accounting in support of policymaking in Europe EEA author 2019 text EU, Luxembourg https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/natural-capital-accounting-in-support 2019 10.1080/20964129.2018.1524718 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.013 10.1111/rec.13613 10.3897/oneeco.6.e65582 10.1023/a:1022097203946 Irish Natural Capital Accounting for Sustainable Environments: Stage 1 Feasibility Report C A Farrell author 2020 text EPA, Ireland https://www.epa.ie/researchandeducation/research/researchpublications/researchreports/Research_Report_322.pdf 2020 J Fossitt author 2000 A guide to habitats in Ireland https://www.npws.ie/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/ 2000 10.1111/rec.13035 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101118 10.1126/science.aaz8901 Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC author 2021 text Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/#FullReport 2021 J. Joosten author A Bonn author 2016 Peatland restoration and ecosystem services: science, policy and practice 2016 10.1111/gcb.15654 D A Keith author 2020 IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology 2.0 : descriptive profiles for biomes and ecosystem functional groups 978-2-8317-2077-7 https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/49250 2020 10.3897/oneeco.5.e58216 10.1177/0309133310365595 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.05.036 10.2760/757183 10.3897/oneeco.5.e53485 10.1111/j.1365-2664.1998.tb00004.x 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.007 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101327 The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland.Volume 1: Summary Overview NPWS author 2019 text NPWS https://www.npws.ie/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/NPWS_2019_Vol1_Summary_Article17.pdf 2019 10.1108/sampj-04-2014-0020 Tomorrow’s landscapes: studies in the after-uses of industrial cutaway peatlands in Ireland F Renou author 2006 text Suoseura 2006 57 4 97 107 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.014 The ecological future of industrially milled cutaway peatlands in Ireland R Rowlands author 2000 text Aspects of Applied Biology 2000 58 263 269 System of Environmental-Economic Accounting— Ecosystem Accounting Final Draft. UNSD author 2021 text https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/52nd-session/documents/BG-3f-SEEA-EA_Final_draft-E.pdf 2021 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.012 Accounting for ecosystems and their services in the European Union (INCA). Final report from phase II of the INCA project aiming to develop a pilot for an integrated system of ecosystem accounts for the EU. Statistical Report V Vysna author 2021 text Publications Office of the European Union https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/7870049/12943935/KS-FT-20-002-EN-N.pdf/de44610d-79e5-010a-5675-14fc4d8527d9?t=1624528835061 2021 10.1007/978-3-319-99244-0_4 10.3897/oneeco.6.e76838 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/76838/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/76838/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/76838/download/xml/ The United Nations System of Environmental and Economic Accounting - Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EA) is a geospatial approach, whereby existing data on ecosystem stocks and flows are collated to show changes over time. The framework has been proposed as a means to track and monitor ecosystem restoration targets across the EU. Condition is a key consideration in the conservation assessment of habitats protected under the EU Habitats Directive and ecosystem condition accounts are also integral to the SEEA EA. While SEEA EA accounts have been developed at EU level for an array for ecosystem types, condition accounts remain the least developed. Collating available datasets under the SEEA EA framework, we developed extent and rudimentary condition accounts for peatland ecosystems at catchment scale in Ireland. Information relating to peatland ecosystem sub-types or habitat types was collated for peatland habitats listed under Annex I of the EU Habitats Directive, as well as degraded peatlands not included in EU nature conservation networks. While data relating to peatland condition were limited, understanding changes in ecosystem extent and incorporating knowledge of habitat types and degradation served as a proxy for ecosystem condition in the absence of more comprehensive data. This highlighted the importance of the ecosystem extent account, which underpins all other accounts in the SEEA EA framework. Reflecting findings at EU level, drainage, disturbance and land conversion were identified as the main pressures affecting peatland condition. We highlighted a number of options to gather data to build more robust, time-series extent and condition accounts for peatlands at varying accounting scales. Overall, despite the absence of comprehensive data, bringing information under the SEEA EA framework is considered a good starting point, with the integration of expert ecological opinion considered essential to ensure development of reliable accounts, particularly when working at ecosystem sub-type (habitat type) and catchment scale. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers peatlands ecosystem accounting condition account reference condition restoration. Developing peatland ecosystem accounts to guide targets for restoration Case Study

10.3897/oneeco.7.e78028 2022-01-10 oneecosystem

Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia author Abakumov, Evgeny https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5248-9018 Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia author Kushnov, Ivan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8018-7359 Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia author Nizamutdinov, Timur https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2600-5494 Tembotov Institute of Ecology of Mountain Territories, Russian Academy Sciences, Nalchik, Russia author Tembotov, Rustam https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2342-4653 2022-01-10 2022-01-10 2022 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 7 e78028 2022 10.3897/oneeco.7.e78028 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/78028/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/78028/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/78028/download/xml/ The globalisation and omnidirectional character of anthropogenic processes has challenged scientists around the world to estimate the harmful effects of these processes on ecosystems and human health. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is one the most infamous group of contaminants, originated both from natural and anthropogenic processes. They could transport to high latitudes and altitudes through atmospheric long-distance transfer and further enter ecosystems of these vulnerable regions by deposition on terrestrial surfaces. An interesting object for tracking transboundary contamination processes in high mountain ecosystems is called cryoconite. Cryoconite, a dark-coloured supraglacial sediment which is abundant in polar and mountain environments, is considered as a storage of various pollutants, including PAHs. Thus, it may pose a risk for local human health and ecosystem through short-distance transfer. Studied cryoconite sediments were collected at the surface of Skhelda and Garabashi glaciers, Central Caucasus high-mountain region, as well as mudflow, moraine material and local soils at the Baksan Gorge in order to examine levels of their contamination. We analysed the content of 15 priority polyaromatic compounds from the US EPA list and used the method of calculation of PAHs isomer ratios with the purpose of identifying their source. To estimate their potential toxicity, Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) equivalents were calculated. Maximum concentration was defined for NAP (84 ng×g-1), PHE (40 ng×g-1) and PYR (47 ng×g-1), with the minimum concentration for ANT (about 1 ng×g-1). The most polluted material is a cryoconite from Garabashi glacier because of local anthropogenic activities and long-distance transfer. High-molecular weight PAHs are dominated in PAHs composition of almost all samples. The most common sources of PAHs in studied materials are combustion processes and mixed pyrolytic/petrogenic origin. Toxicity levels of separate PAHs did not exceed the maximum permissible threshold concentrations values in most cases. However, the sum of PAHs in BaP equivalents exceed the threshold values in all samples, in some of them more than twice. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers Central Caucasus glaciers soils polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons pollution cryoconite Cryoconites as biogeochemical markers of anthropogenic impact in high mountain regions: analysis of polyaromatic pollutants in soil-like bodies Research Article

10.3897/oneeco.7.e77584 2022-01-31 oneecosystem

Frederick University, Nicosia, Cyprus author Kounnamas, Constantinos https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6797-2080 Frederick University, Nicosia, Cyprus author Marios, Andreou 2022-01-31 2022-01-31 2022 One Ecosystem 2367-8194 7 e77584 2022 10.3897/oneeco.7.e77584 https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/77584/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/77584/download/pdf/ https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/77584/download/xml/ Troodos National Forest Park is located in the centre of Troodos mountain range and it is one of the most important natural environments of Cyprus. It has been included to the Natura 2000 network of the Island due to its important natural ecosystems and its great biodiversity. Based on the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES 5.1), 36 ecosystem services have been identified in the area. The majority of ecosystem services are concentrated at the Troodos peak and the nearby areas. The same pattern applies for the Cultural Services. Provisioning and Regulation-Maintenance services are concentrated at the centre and western part of the site. The site’s habitat types were mapped and their distribution in the area is presented in respective maps. Carbon stored in plants was 622,705 tonnes in total (73.18 t C per ha), calculated as per habitat type (according to Directive 92/43/EEC - Habitats Directive) and as per TESSA habitat classification. Seven TESSA and 10 Annex I habitat types were identified. The largest part of the site is dominated by Evergreen Broadleaf Forests (7799 ha), followed by Mixed Forests (624 ha) and Deciduous Broadleaf Forests (60 ha). The carbon stock included in AGB (Above Ground Biomass), BGB (Below Ground Biomass), Dead Wood & Litter and SOM (Soil Organic Matter) was evaluated for each habitat type. The annual carbon biomass removal (roundwood and fuelwood) is 80.82 t C y-1 (0.009 t C y-1 per ha), while the carbon sequestered in Troodos National Forest Park is 11,880.33 t CO2 eq y-1 (0.38 t C y-1 per ha). The information produced serves as a useful tool to competent authorities for raising awareness on the importance of ecosystem services and increase the public’s support in the area’s conservation. text/html en_US Pensoft Publishers carbon storage Cyprus ecosystem services protected area Troodos Mapping and assessment of ecosystem services at Troodos National Forest Park in Cyprus Case Study cGFnZT0xJnNldD1vbmVlY29zeXN0ZW0mZnJvbT0mdW50aWw9Jm1ldGFkYXRhX3ByZWZpeD1tb2Rz