One Ecosystem :
Research Article
|
Corresponding author: Anastasiia Kirillovna Kimeklis (kimeklis@gmail.com)
Academic editor: Joachim Maes
Received: 14 Mar 2022 | Accepted: 07 Jun 2022 | Published: 21 Jun 2022
© 2022 Anastasiia Kimeklis, Grigory Gladkov, Rustam Tembotov, Arina Kichko, Alexander Pinaev, Sergey Hosid, Evgeny Andronov, Evgeny Abakumov
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Kimeklis AK, Gladkov GV, Tembotov RH, Kichko AA, Pinaev AG, Hosid SL, Andronov EE, Abakumov EV (2022) Microbiome composition of disturbed soils from sandy-gravel mining complexes with different reclamation approaches. One Ecosystem 7: e83756. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.7.e83756
|
|
Activities connected to mineral mining disrupt the soil layer and bring parent rock material to the surface. It leads to altering the environmental conditions and leaves behind vast areas of disturbed lands. Returning these lands to natural ecosystems is an important contemporary challenge, which can be acquired by reclamation practices. Soil microbiome composition reflects changes happening to disturbed lands; thus, its analysis is a powerful tool for evaluating the disturbance degree and estimating the effect of the implementation of reclamation techniques. Additionally, factors connected to the characteristics of a particular geographical region have a certain impact on the microbiome and should be taken into account. Thereby, studies of soil microbiomes of disturbed soils of different origins are essential in understanding the dynamics of soil restoration. Here, we focus on soil microbiomes from two sandy-gravel mining complexes in mountainous areas with a moderate continental climate of the Central Caucasus. These quarries share the same parent rock material, but differ in benchmark soil type and reclamation approach - one was left for passive recovery and the other was technically reclaimed with overburden material. Comparative analysis of microbiome composition, based on sequencing of 16S rRNA gene libraries, showed that region and disturbance are the key factors explaining microbiome variation, which surpass the influence of local factors. However, the application of reclamation techniques greatly reduces the dissimilarity of soil microbiomes caused by disturbance. Linking of soil chemical parameters to microbiome composition showed that the disturbance factor correlates with a lack of organic carbon. Other chemical parameters, like pH, ammonium, nitrates and total carbon explain microbiome variability on a smaller scale between sampling sites. Thus, while regional and disturbance factors reflected differentiation of soil microbiomes, soil chemical parameters explained local variation of certain groups of microorganisms.
16S rRNA, amplicon library sequencing, disturbance factor, open-pit mining, quarry, reclamation techniques, soil microbiome
One of the global ecology and soil science problems is land degradation (
The effect of degraded land transformations can be assessed by analysis of chemical and biological soil properties (
There are huge areas of degraded soil in the Central Caucasus regions. As specified in the government statement (
Sampling sites were located in the foothills of the Central Caucasus in two regions – Urvan (Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, Russia) and Progress (Stavropol Krai, Russia) (Fig.
In each region, we found an abandoned territory of a quarry, located on a deposit of sand and gravel mixture. Both territories consist of multiple differently-aged pits and rock dumps. The first mining complex was found in the Urvan District of Kabardino-Balkaria near the terrace of the eponymous river, which flows between two quarry pits. The deposits in this area have been developed since 1958. The benchmark soil type for this area is Umbric Gleyic, which remains undisturbed near the riverbanks. Abandoned quarry pits showed signs of passive recovery with spontaneous overgrowth by Populus, Hippophae and reed. The second mining complex was found in the Kirovsky District of Stavropol Krai near the Malka River. The field has been developed since the 2000s. The flat lands surrounding the quarry complex belong to the Phaeozem soil type and are completely converted for farming purposes. Thus, the nearest benchmark soil for this territory is Agrisol. Of course, Agrisol itself is a disturbed soil (
For the analysis we did not consider the time of the last extraction of minerals on the sites or the expansion of the extraction zone, just the fact of mining, which by itself had a negative impact on the soil, being a factor of disturbance. A similar assumption was applied to the reclamation factor; we considered reclamation practices as present in the Progress region and absent in the Urvan region. As disturbed soil no longer shares the same type as benchmark soil from the same region, we considered the regional factor instead of the soil type factor as determining the difference between Progress and Urvan soils. To estimate differences connected to local variation of vegetation and chemical parameters factors, we took biological replicates within one site from as diverse ecotopes as possible (e.g. different plant cover).
Profiles of weakly developed soils of quarries usually consist of two horizons: W - accumulated humic material and C - parent rock underneath, usually the overburden material (
Sampling was conducted in August 2020. In the Urvan region, we collected samples at the three sites: UQ1 and UQ2 - two neighbouring quarry pits: one fully abandoned at the time of collecting, the other partly functional and UB - benchmark soil near the river (Fig.
For all dried soil samples, chemical analysis was performed, including measuring of pH, organic carbon (OC), ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3-), mobile phosphorus (P2O5) and potassium (K2O), as previously described in
From each sample of the frozen soil, total DNA was extracted in quadruplicate and consequently used for the construction and sequencing of the 16S rRNA amplicon libraries using Illumina MiSeq (Illumina, Inc., USA) as described in
Two mining complexes from Urvan and Progress were based on different soil types - Phaeozem and Umbric Gleyic, which determined variation in some soil chemical parameters, which we attribute to the region factor. Differences between disturbed and benchmark soils, which we classify as disturbance factor, are also reflected in some chemical parameters (Table
Sample description and soil chemical variables with post-hoc Tukey HSD for region and disturbance factors. Letters encryption: U - Urvan, P - Progress, B - benchmark, Q - quarry. P-values given in bold designate statistically significant influence of a certain factor: region - differences between Urvan and Progress samples, disturbance – between benchmark and primary soils in quarries.
Region |
Site |
Soil cut |
Temp, C |
pH |
TC, % |
OC, % |
P2O5, mg/kg |
K2O, mg/kg |
NH4, mg/kg |
NO3, mg/kg |
Urvan |
Benchmark |
|||||||||
UB |
1 |
33 |
7.6 |
12 |
1.89 |
17.7 |
173.2 |
15.84 |
5.2 |
|
2 |
30 |
7.5 |
11 |
2.71 |
40.1 |
389.6 |
37.34 |
0.01 |
||
3 |
34.5 |
7.6 |
13 |
2.69 |
32.3 |
288.6 |
25.59 |
0.01 |
||
Quarry |
||||||||||
UQ1 |
1 |
32 |
7.7 |
15 |
0.29 |
34.4 |
259.7 |
44.96 |
0.01 |
|
2 |
25.4 |
7.4 |
20 |
0.56 |
69.9 |
360.8 |
79.93 |
0.01 |
||
3 |
35.7 |
7.4 |
17 |
0.34 |
43 |
274.2 |
54.46 |
0.01 |
||
4 |
37.4 |
8 |
28 |
0.45 |
35.2 |
303 |
38.5 |
0.01 |
||
UQ2 |
1 |
40 |
8 |
18 |
0.41 |
16.1 |
173.2 |
23.76 |
0.01 |
|
2 |
38 |
7.9 |
17 |
0.36 |
30.9 |
303 |
36.55 |
0.01 |
||
3 |
28 |
7.7 |
18 |
0.41 |
44.1 |
346.3 |
38.14 |
0.01 |
||
Progress |
Benchmark |
|||||||||
PB |
1 |
29 |
7.1 |
25 |
2.56 |
14 |
404 |
13.83 |
15.6 |
|
2 |
25 |
6.9 |
23 |
2.21 |
14.5 |
389.6 |
12.37 |
33.32 |
||
Quarry |
||||||||||
PQ1 |
1 |
27 |
7.5 |
32 |
0.78 |
12.4 |
331.9 |
4.75 |
8.47 |
|
2 |
25 |
7.5 |
21 |
0.63 |
15.1 |
404 |
6.46 |
7.8 |
||
3 |
26 |
7.6 |
27 |
0.65 |
14 |
317.5 |
5.3 |
13.49 |
||
PQ2 |
1 |
28 |
7.5 |
15 |
0.78 |
41.9 |
692.6 |
29.91 |
0.01 |
|
2 |
26.5 |
7.5 |
16 |
0.79 |
42.8 |
678.2 |
32.04 |
0.01 |
||
3 |
27 |
7.5 |
15 |
0.74 |
43 |
793.7 |
30.16 |
1.15 |
||
PQ3 |
1 |
30 |
7.3 |
25 |
0.87 |
25.5 |
606.1 |
12.67 |
5.2 |
|
2 |
31 |
7.4 |
24 |
0.81 |
80.9 |
894.7 |
29.18 |
0.56 |
||
3 |
30.5 |
7.2 |
27 |
0.82 |
21.2 |
606.1 |
18.4 |
0.33 |
||
p-value for Tukey HSD test |
||||||||||
Region |
0.00293 |
0.00096 |
0.01465 |
0.57106 |
0.40963 |
0.00081 |
0.00235 |
0.00238 |
||
Disturbance |
0.93055 |
0.02319 |
0.11788 |
0.00015 |
0.2228 |
0.10595 |
0.20609 |
0.00245 |
A total of 84 libraries (four replicates for each of 21 soil cuts) of 16S rRNA gene were sequenced, resulting in 1768209 reads, which split into 10976 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) or phylotypes. Minimum reads count per library was 7397, maximum 36229, mean - 21050. Reads not assigned on the phylum level (0.09% of the total count) were deleted from the dataset. From the remaining reads, 96.77% were attributed to class, 87.29% - to order, 70.03% - to family, 40.02% - to genus and 2.11% - to species. Microbiomes of different regions shared more than half (65.3%) of the total read count (Table
Distribution of phylotypes (expressed in number of ASVs) between soil samples.
Total |
Urvan |
Progress |
|||||||
Urvan |
Common |
Progress |
Benchmark |
Common |
Quarry |
Benchmark |
Common |
Quarry |
|
ASV Count |
6113 |
1625 |
3238 |
1917 |
711 |
5110 |
534 |
1064 |
3265 |
% of total reads |
20.7 |
65.3 |
14 |
17.4 |
55.9 |
26.7 |
2.9 |
85.7 |
11.3 |
Alpha diversity indexes, calculated for individual sites, had little variation, but some significant differences were observed. For both regions, we detected significant differences between benchmark and disturbed samples for the inverted Simpson index, which represents the probability that two randomly-selected sequences belong to different phylotypes (Fig.
Unlike alpha-diversity, beta-diversity revealed differences between samples in a more defined manner. PERMANOVA showed that microbiomes of quarry and benchmark samples differ significantly for both regions - with R2 = 0.26 (p-value = 0.001) for Urvan and R2 = 0.11 (p-value = 0.002) for Progress. Its values also show that disturbance is a greater factor of explained variability in microbiomes for the soils in Urvan than in Progress. Data visualised by NMDS matches with PERMANOVA, as we can see three distinct groups:
For the Urvan region, samples from both quarry pits group closer together, while benchmark samples are separated from them. On the other hand, for the Progress region, separation of microbiomes of benchmark and disturbed soils is less apparent.
Apart from differences between sites, we also investigated differences between biological replicates within one site. Analysis of multivariate homogeneity of group dispersions showed significantly higher distance to centroids values between replicates at Urvan sites (ANOVA p-value < 0.001) than for Progress sites (Suppl. material
The most abundant phyla across all samples were typical of soil microbiomes - Actinobacteriota, Acidobacteriota, Alpha- and Gamma- proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, Crenarchaeota, Firmicutes, Verrucomicrobiota, Planctomycetota, Chloroflexi, Myxococcota and Gemmatimonadota (Fig.
On the family level, we still see that major groups are present in all samples, but their abundance differs between samples (Suppl. material
Statistically significant differences at the genus level between microbiomes from different sites were assessed by DESeq2 analysis, which estimates dependence between the mean read count (baseMean) and the variance of a phylotype between a set of samples. The outcome is expressed in a log2FoldChange value, which indicates how much the phylotype abundance has shifted between the compared samples. The higher the modulo value of log2FoldChange, the higher is the shift. Positive or negative values of log2FoldChange indicate the direction in which the shift occurs. We applied DESeq2 to detect shifts between regions (Fig.
Plots for DESeq analysis results. Dots represent phylotypes (ASVs), on the Y-axis is their baseMean and, on the X-axis, log2FoldChange value. The further the dot is from zero, the stronger the shift between compared groups, with negative values meaning more of the certain ASV in one group and positive - in the other.
Only phylotypes with baseMean equal to 10 reads or more were left in the analysis, with log2FoldChange adjusted p-value < 0.05. With this cutoff region, comparisons revealed that there are 45 phylotypes, which are more abundant in Urvan and 164 - in Progress (Fig.
Comparisons between benchmark/quarry samples show different phylotype distributions in the two regions. In Urvan, there are 37 phylotypes which are more prevalent in the benchmark samples and 106 - in the quarry (Fig.
Several trends could be highlighted from the DESeq2 analysis data. Shifts of phylotypes quantities are the most contrasting between regions. Within regions, contrast between quarry and benchmark is more pronounced in Urvan than in Progress. Quarry microbiomes of both Urvan and Progress regions have a larger proportion of minor phylotypes in comparison to benchmark microbiomes. In all comparisons, phylotypes with higher baseMean values had lower modulo values of log2FoldChange, while phylotypes with low baseMeans have higher modulo values of log2FoldChange.
Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) was used to link beta-diversity of microbiomes from all sites with soil chemical properties. Biological replicates of microbiomes from different sites allowed us to build a significant model (ANOVA p-value = 0.002). For this analysis, temperature data were scaled to the deviation from the day’s mean to level the differences between sampling days. The most significant factors were pH (p-value = 0.003), OC (p-value = 0.009), ammonium (p-value = 0.006) and scaled temperature (p-value = 0.032) (Table S7). According to the VIF test, these factors were not multicollinear, meaning their values cannot be linearly predicted from each other and their effect on sample microbiomes in this model was independent (Suppl. material
Plots for CCA analysis, the further the dot is from the arrow, the more it is influenced by the factor. Dot - a microbiome of a single soil cut or a single phylotype. TC – total carbon, OC – organic carbon, temp – temperature scaled to day’s mean.
The CCA plot on Fig.
We also used CCA to show the connection between microscale (chemical parameters) and macroscale (region, disturbance) factors and their influence on microbiome composition. If we put on the CCA plot only phylotypes, significantly changing between regions (detected by DESeq, Suppl. material
Fig. S6b (Suppl. material
Analysis of 16S rRNA gene libraries is often based on the negative binomial distribution, which has some limitations. These methods make a Type I error in assessing changes in the microbial community at high taxonomic levels (
This work is a continuation of the research on the microbiomes of soils from different climate zones, recovering from anthropological damage, primarily mining of parent rock material (
In our previous studies from the quarries of northern regions, we observed that primary soils of quarries are colonised by photosynthetic bacteria – Cyanobacteria and Chloroflexi (
Factors that influence microbiome composition can be put into hierarchical categories, based on their complexity and scale of effect (
Another effect that happens with soil disturbance is the adaptation of microorganisms to the new conditions. It was shown that, in treated soils, relevance of abundant microorganisms (bacteria and fungi) is reduced and the relevance of low-abundance microorganisms is increased (
The content of the most measured chemical parameters, including OC, phosphorus and nitrates was low across all sampling sites, which is typical for the local soils (
Benchmark soil in Progress - Agrisol - was the only soil showing the prevalence of nitrates over ammonium, which is typical for agricultural soils (
Using several biological replicates with varying chemical parameters allowed us to create a reliable model of factors influencing the microbial community. The key factor defining soil disturbance in both regions was OC, which revealed the same phylotypes from the two regions reacting to its content - Nitrososphaeraceae in benchmark soil and Nitrososphaeraceae, Azospirillaceae, Cellulomonadaceae, Vicinamibacteraceae, Nocardioidaceae and Chitinophagaceae in quarries. Members of Azospirillaceae were reported to be associated with plants and to be involved in carbon and nitrogen cycles (
Traditionally, microorganisms are divided by their life-history strategy into fast-growing copiotrophs (or r-strategs) and slow-growing oligotrophs (K-strategs) (
Here, we described factors influencing the microbiome composition of disturbed soils. The disturbance factor acts on the macroscale level and shapes the microbiome of unreclaimed soil in almost the same way as the soil type factor. Vegetation brings diversity on the microscale level and has a higher impact on the unreclaimed soils. Applying reclamation techniques reduces the effect of disturbance and vegetation on the microbiome, but does not eliminate it. Soil chemical parameters help to explain variation for some groups of microorganisms, regardless of macroscale factors. In the Central Caucasus region, soil disturbance can be linked to the loss of organic carbon, which reduces the presence of major representatives of Firmicutes and facilitates the growth of minor representatives from Acidobacteriota, Actinobacteriota, Bacteroidota and Proteobacteria.
We are grateful to Olga Hosid for proofreading of the manuscript.
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation in accordance with agreement № 075-15-2022-322 date 22.04.2022 on providing a grant in the form of subsidies from the Federal budget of the Russian Federation. The grant was provided for state support for the creation and development of a World-class Scientific Center “Agrotechnologies for the Future”.
A.K.K. - sampling, DNA isolation, soil chemical data analysis, manuscript preparation, G.V.G. - sampling, microbiome sequencing data analysis, manuscript preparation, R.H.T. – choice of study objects, sampling, A.A.K. - construction and sequencing of the 16S rRNA amplicon libraries, A.G.P. - construction and sequencing of the 16S rRNA amplicon libraries, S.L.H. – manuscript proofreading, E.E.A. – project conceptualisation, manuscript proofreading, E.V.A. – project conceptualisation, manuscript proofreading, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Code used for data processing and analysis