|
One Ecosystem :
Research Article
|
|
Corresponding author: Silvena Boteva Boteva (sbboteva@biofac.uni-sofia.bg)
Academic editor: Joachim Maes
Received: 22 Mar 2025 | Accepted: 17 May 2025 | Published: 06 Jun 2025
© 2025 Silvena Boteva, Ivan Traykov, Boyanka Angelova, Anelia Kenarova
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Boteva S, Traykov I, Angelova B, Kenarova A (2025) Restoration of high-mountain lakes: effects on nutrient concentrations and biological communities. One Ecosystem 10: e153673. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.10.e153673
|
|
Lakes worldwide are under severe pressure from increasing anthropogenic impacts and global warming, creating a growing demand for restoration efforts and sustainable lake management strategies. However, there has been limited practice in restoring high-altitude lakes, particularly those under protected status. This paper focuses on passed lake restoration with special emphasis on the effects of restoration on lake ecosystems. Restoration efforts in four lakes within Rila National Park, Bulgaria, were carried out in two steps: macrophyte harvesting followed by sediment removal. These were immediately followed by a monitoring programme to evaluate the effects of human activities. The most significant effects on nutrient concentrations (PO4-P, NO3-N, TP and TN) and chlorophyll-a levels were observed one week after the restoration, with these effects diminishing one year later. Changes in bacterial metabolism were characterised by a reduction in metabolic activity, a shift from preferential utilisation of carbohydrates and polymers to an increased use of carboxylic acids and a decrease in functional richness and diversity, followed by partial recovery. Some of the changes observed in lake environments and biotic components were attributed to seasonal shifts, while others were linked to the implementation of human activities. We conclude that the initial steps of lake restoration were effective, with minimal to negligible environmental impact. However, the long-term effectiveness of restoration remains uncertain, so the monitoring programme will continue to address still unresolved questions, particularly to distinguish between seasonal and anthropogenic effects on ecosystems.
lake restoration, macrophyte harvesting, sediment removal, nutrients, chlorophyll-a, Biolog Ecoplate, high-mountain lakes
Eutrophication is a natural process that occurs as aquatic ecosystems age, but human activities can greatly accelerate its progression (
Mountain lakes are often regarded as some of the least disturbed aquatic ecosystems due to their remoteness. However, recent international studies reveal that high-mountain lakes are increasingly impacted by human activities on both local and global scales, making eutrophication a growing concern. Key anthropogenic drivers include global warming (
Mountain lakes are important for their biodiversity and the ecosystem services they provide. They also hold significant cultural and socioeconomic value, serving as hubs for various human activities. This creates a dilemma for lake managers, who must balance preserving the lakes’ natural state with accommodating traditional human uses. Human activities, whether in the short or long term, often lead to substantial ecological changes (
The Rila Mountains are a popular tourist destination in Bulgaria. The most visited area is the cirque of the Seven Rila Lakes, located within Rila National Park at elevations between 2,095 m and 2,535 m. The lakes are situated one above the other, interconnected by small streams. Their accessibility attracts over 2,000 tourists daily during the summer season (https://biodiversity.bg/bg/Rilska-misiya-prebroyavane-na-turisti-na-Sedemte-rilski-ezera.p1707). Tourist-induced soil erosion (
This study aimed to assess the effects of restoration activities on the lakes' physical environments and the more rapidly responsive biological components, specifically phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria. Phytoplankton responds to increased nutrient levels by increasing its biomass, while bacteria adjust their metabolism, based on the quantity and quality of available organic matter. Phytoplankton productivity supports aquatic life, while microorganisms serve as the primary pathway for transferring organic matter to higher trophic levels (
In the study, chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) was used as an indicator of phytoplankton biomass, while the Biolog Ecoplate™ (Biolog Inc., Hayward, CA, USA) was employed to assess the ability of heterotrophic bacterial communities to utilise 31 different carbon sources before and after lake restoration. The use of Biolog EcoPlates for the functional analysis of microbial communities through the inoculation of natural microbial samples was first described by
Sampling site and sampling procedure
The study focused on four (Bliz, Tri, Rib and Dol) of the Seven Rila Lakes, a high-mountain group of glacial origin located in the northwest Rila Mountains, Bulgaria (Fig.
Map of the Seven Rila Lakes cirque, northwest Rila Mountains, Bulgaria (https://osmap.org/#map=15/2596309.12/5191591.09/0).
The restored lakes are situated in the lower part of the watershed and exhibit different hydro-morphological characteristics, which are presented in Table
Hydro-morphometric characteristics of the studied Rila Lakes (
|
Lake |
Altitude (m) |
Area (ha) |
Volume (m3) |
Max. depth (m) |
Watershed area (ha) |
|
Bliznaka (Bliz)
|
2,243 |
9.1 |
590 |
27.5 |
205 |
|
Trilistnika (Tri)
|
2,216 |
2.6 |
54 |
6.5 |
223 |
|
Ribnoto (Rib)
|
2,184 |
2.3 |
38 |
2.5 |
251 |
|
Dolnoto (Dol)
|
2,095 |
5.9 |
240 |
11.0 |
281 |
Sampling surveys were conducted in August 2015, October 2021 and in July 2022 (before restoration activities) to calculate the mean biotic and abiotic values typical of the pre-restoration period. The post-restoration effects were assessed through surveys conducted in August 2023 (approximately one week after restoration), October 2023 (one month after restoration) and October 2024 (one year after restoration). Sampling was done at three points in the area of the treated areas in the littoral zone of the lakes. Water samples for chemical and microbiological analyses were kept and transported at 4°C. Samples for microbiological analysis were taken and kept in sterile containers.
Water physico-chemical properties
Dissolved oxygen (DO; mg O2/l), water temperature (T; ˚C), pH and electrical conductivity (EC; μS/cm) were measured in situ using hand-held meters (WTW and Hanna), following Bulgarian State Standards BDS EN 25814 (DO), BDS ISO 10523 (pH) and BDS EN 27888 (EC), respectively. In the laboratory, a part of water samples was filtered through glass fibre filters (Whatman GF/F; 0.7 μm) before analysing ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N in μg/l; ISO 7150/1), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N in μg/l; 1.14773.0001) and phosphate phosphorus (PO4-P in μg/l; EN ISO 6878). Unfiltered samples were used for total nitrogen (TN in μg/l; 1.14773.0001) and total phosphorus (TP in μg/l; EN ISO 6878). Chlorophyll-a (Chl-a; μg/l) concentration was determined according to ISO 10260. All colourimetric analyses were carried out on the CECIL CE 3021 spectrophotometer.
Inorganic nitrogen (IN) was calculated as the sum of NO₃-N and NH₄-N concentrations. Organic phosphorus (OP) and organic nitrogen (ON) concentrations were determined by subtracting the respective inorganic forms from the TP and TN concentrations, respectively.
The trophic state classification was based on chlorophyll-a as a better predictor of algal biomass than either of the two indices and the trophy scale of
Bacterial metabolic profiles
Biolog EcoplateTM set (Biolog Inc., Hayward CA, USA; https://www.biolog.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/00A-012-Rev-F-EcoPlate-IFU.pdf) was used to assess bacterial metabolic capacity, utilising 31 Ecoplate carbon sources (B1 – H4), with each microplate run in triplicate. EcoplateTM carbon sources (CSs) were categorised into five carbon guilds (CGs), including carbohydrates (CH), polymers (Polym), carboxylic acids (CA), amino acids (AA) and amines (Amin) (
\(AUC=\displaystyle \sum {OD_n + OD_{n+1}\over 2*(t_{n+1} - t_n)}\)
where ODn and ODn+1 represent the optical densities at two consecutive measurements at times tn and tn+1 (
AWCD was calculated as:
\(AWCD=\displaystyle \sum {AUC_i\over N}\)
where AUCi is the area under the curve of the i-th CS and N is the number of CSs (N = 31) in the EcoplateTM set (
The CS richness (R) and Shannon-Weaver diversity (Hʹ) indices were calculated as:
R = number of utilisable Ecoplate CSs
\(H'=\displaystyle \sum p_i*ln(p_i)\)
where pi is the ratio between the AUC of the i-th CS to the sum of AUCs of all EcoplateTM CSs (
Statistical analyses
Each data point in the paper represents the mean value of the respective parameter ± standard deviation. Repeated-measures ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test, was performed to examine the significance of the differences in lake parameters (abiotic and biotic) between pre- and post- restoration times. Pearson correlation analysis was applied to assess the relationships between the studied metrics. Redundancy analysis (similarity index: Euclidean) was used to ordinate the lakes according to their physical environments and CLPPs. A two-way PERMANOVA (perm.: 9999, similarity index: Euclidean) was performed on CLPP data to determine whether significant effects occurred by ‘lake identity’ and ‘sampling time’ as explanatory factors and if there were any interactive effects between them. The Similarities Percentages Procedure (SIMPER) of CLPPs was used to determine the CSs that contributed the most to the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity amongst the lakes between the pre- and post- restoration periods, as well as between each pair of sampling occasions. The above statistics were performed with the PAST package (
The physico-chemical parameters of the lakes are summarised in Suppl. material
Overall, one year after the end of the restoration activities, various nutrient changes were observed. At that time most of the nutrient concentrations have returned to the pre-restoration levels except PO4-P in Bliz and Tri. (Fig.
Water concentrations of a) phosphate phosphorus (PO4-P), b) inorganic nitrogen (IN), c) total phosphorus (TP) and d) total nitrogen (TN) for lakes during the post-restoration period (August 2023, October 2023 and October 2024) expressed as percentage of the respective pre-restoration value. Bars represent the standard deviations of the means.
In order to evaluate the overall changes in lake environments, non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) was conducted. The pre-restoration lake environments clustered closely together along the right side of Axis 1, except for Dol. The primary factors contributing to the variability along this axis were NO3-N and T (Fig.
Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination, based on a Euclidean similarity matrix of lake physico-chemical parameters. Symbols represent the water environment of Bliz (blue dot), Tri (coral quadrate), Rib (green diamond) and Dol (brown triangle) in pre-restoration period (pre), August (A23) and October (O23) 2023 and October 2024 (O24). Two-dimensional stress = 0.11.
Biotic responses
Lake biotic responses to restoration activities were evaluated by measuring Chl-a concentrations and bacterial metabolic activity and functional profiles. Chl-a served as a proxy for phytoplankton biomass, while bacterial metabolic activity reflected the microbiome ability to adapt and tolerate environmental changes.
a. Changes in chlorophyll-a content
The mean Chl-a concentrations during the pre-restoration period were 2.71 ± 0.27 µg/l (Bliz), 2.08 ± 0.21 µg/l (Tri), 1.71 ± 0.17 µg/l (Rib) and 6.58 ± 0.66 µg/l (Dol). These values classified the lakes as oligotrophic (Bliz, Tri and Rib) and mesotrophic (Dol).
Different trends were recorded in the lakes after restoration activities compared to the Chl-a status before their restoration (Fig.
Water concentrations of chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) during the post-restoration period (August and October 2023 and October 2024) expressed as percentage of the respective pre-restoration Chl-a concentration. Bars represent the standard deviations of the means.
Pearson correlation analyses showed that Chl-a concentrations correlated significantly with different numbers of environmental factors across sampling occasions (Suppl. material
b. Changes in bacterial functional profiles
Changes in bacterial metabolism were expressed by set of parameters such as average metabolic activity (AWCD), functional profile (CLPP) and indices of functional richness (R) and diversity (Hʹ).
- AWCD
During the pre-restoration period, the AWCD was recorded as 1.97 ± 0.14 SU (Bliz), 1.80 ± 0.07 SU (Tri), 2.47 ± 0.13 SU (Rib) and 2.19 ± 0.10 SU (Dol). Restoration activities generally reduced AWCD, except for Tri and Dol in August 2023, where bacterial metabolic activity increased by 66% (Tri) and 30% (Dol) (Fig.
Bacterial a) metabolic activity (AWCD) and b) carbon guild (CG) utilisation rates. AWCD of post-restoration period (August and October 2023 and October 2024) was expressed as percentage of the respective pre-restoration AWCD. CG utilisation was expressed as percentage of the respective AWCD. Bars represent the standard deviations of the means.
Pearson correlation coefficients revealed a relatively low number of significant relationships between AWCD and water metrics, with these relationships being temporally dependent (Suppl. material
- CLPPs
AWCD was generated by utilisation of 30 CSs (C3; carboxylic acid 2-Hydroxy benzoic acid was not utilisable at all) divided into five chemically distinct CGs: CH (9 CSs), Polym (4 CSs), CA (9 CSs), AA (6 CSs) and Amin (2 CSs). The utilisation of the CGs is shown in Fig.
Within CGs, aquatic bacteria utilised CSs at varying rates (0.11 – 7.89 SU) and these abilities changed over time, creating different functional profiles (CLPPs) of bacterial communities. Some CSs were unutilisable (C3), while the utilisation of others was dependent on both time and lake (G4, G3, B1, C1, D1, A3, E3, A4 and D4). In contrast, certain CSs (A2, D2, E2, B3 and B4) were the most preferred throughout the monitoring period (Suppl. material
Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination, based on a Euclidean resemblance matrix, calculated from the functional profiles (CLPPs) of lake bacteria. Symbols represent the CLPPs of Bliz (blue dot), Tri (coral quadrate), Rib (green diamond) and Dol (brown triangle) in pre-restoration period (pre), August (A23) and October (O23) 2023 and October 2024 (O24). Two-dimensional stress = 0.17.
The ordination plot revealed closely-clustered CLPPs from the pre-restoration period and October 2024, indicating a high degree of similarity both amongst the lakes and between these two sampling occasions. In contrast, the CLPPs from August and October 2023 were more dispersed, with those from October 2023 forming two distinct groups (Bliz + Tri and Rib + Dol) located far apart from each other. The counterclockwise shift in CLPP locations on the ordination plot was associated with changes in the utilisation of CGs, transitioning from CH and Polym in the pre-restoration period to CA, Polym and AA in the post-restoration period.
PERMANOVA followed by SIMPER was conducted to compare the main factors influencing on CLPPs and to identify the most variable CSs. PERMANOVA revealed that sampling time (F = 3.34; p = 0.0011) and lake identity (F = 2.06; p = 0.0016), but not the interaction between the two factors (F = 0.99; p = 0.48) significantly influenced on CLPP dissimilarity, assessed between pre- and post- restoration periods (Suppl. material
The rate of changes in bacterial metabolism was evaluated also by indices of functional richness (R) and diversity (Hʹ) (Suppl. material
The restoration strategy for Bliz, Tri, Rib and Dol lakes was aligned with their protection status and included a series of actions such as gravelling hiking trails, macrophyte harvesting and sediment removal. These measures aimed to achieve specific targets for reduction of the macrophyte biomass in the lakes without increasing nutrient concentrations or deteriorating water quality. This study assessed the success of lake restoration efforts and their impact on ecosystem functions by addressing three primary objectives:
Changes in nutrient concentrations
Many studies have reported that macrophyte harvesting and/or sediment removal lead to increased nutrient concentrations in the water, attributing this effect to sediment resuspension (
Time dynamics of nutrients and high NO3-N content did not influence on the trophic states of the lakes, assessed by Chl-a content, classifying them as oligotrophic (Bliz), oligo-mesotrophic (Tri and Rib, depending on sampling time) and mesotrophic (Dol). The low primary productivity of high-mountain lakes is well-documented, attributed to strong phosphorus control (
The application of an ordination technique (NMDS) indicated overall shifts in lake environments, driven by changes in some primary determining factors. These factors shifted from T, NO3-N and COD (pre-restoration period) to T (August and October 2023), PO4-P and NH4-N (August 2023 – October 2024) and COD (October 2024). While variations in some factors, such as water T, can be attributed solely to seasonal changes, others result from the complex interplay of seasonal and human impacts. A general trend of changes in lakes’ environment was observed, except in Dol, where environmental shifts were minimal and the lake's recovery in October 2024 was closest (compared to the other lakes) to its pre-restoration state. Overall, macrophyte and sediment removal did not dramatically alter lakes’ nutrient and trophic states, although some shifts in the water parameters were recorded, likely due to seasonal variability and, to a lesser degree, human activities.
Biological responses
Biological variables are direct indicators of environmental quality, offering a clear representation of how changes in physical environments affect ecosystem life. This study evaluated restoration success and its effects on lake ecosystem by analysing two components of food webs that respond rapidly to environmental changes: phytoplankton biomass expressed as Chl-a and bacterial metabolic activity.
Chl-a response to restoration
Macrophyte harvesting and sediment removal have been widely used in lake management to expand clear water areas and remove decaying plant materials, along with sources of nutrients and oxygen demand. However, previous studies have identified an increased risk of algal blooms following macrophyte harvesting (
Bacterial response to restoration
Heterotrophic bacterial communities play a crucial role in sustaining life in high-altitude lakes (
AWCD and CLPP
Bacterial functioning changed after restoration, as evidenced by: 1) changes in AWCD; 2) shifts in CLPPs, manifested by: i) preferential utilisation of CA over Polym and CH and ii) a counterclockwise relocation of bacterial functional profiles in the NMDS ordination plot; and 3) a decrease in metabolic richness and diversity. We assumed that some of these changes reflected seasonal variations, others resulted from human activities and, most likely, a combination of both factors was responsible.
The AWCD increase in August 2023 was anticipated, coinciding with the peak of phytoplankton proliferation during the mid-summer (
During the monitoring period, the relationships between AWCD and Chl-a (used as a proxy for phytoplankton biomass - a source of organic carbon for heterotrophic bacteria) were insignificant and shifted from positive (pre-restoration period and August 2023) to negative (October 2023 and 2024). The absence of a significant relationship was expected, as many authors highlight, on one hand, the importance of algal exudates and cell lysates, rather than algal biomass, as the primary sources of organic carbon for bacteria (
The changes in bacterial functioning were more clearly reflected by alterations in their CLPPs than by AWCDs. Bacterial metabolism is known to mirror the nutrient pool, accounting not only for the total organic carbon quantity, but also the chemical composition of this nutrient pool (
Additionally, the CLPP results indicated that bacteria prioritised specific CSs from each carbon group. Notably, all 10 of these CSs accounted for approximately 50% of the dissimilarity in CLPPs (SIMPER; 32.97%) between the pre- and post-restoration periods. Variations in their utilisation rates may reflect the stability of the organic carbon pool, influenced by both seasonal and human factors. Significant impacts on bacterial functionality could disrupt biochemical cycling and trophic relationships in affected environments. However, this does not appear to be the case, as CLPP ordination and SIMPER analysis indicated functional convergence (functional recovery) between bacterial communities from the pre-restoration period and October 2024.
Macrophyte harvesting and sediment removal did not significantly deteriorate water quality for the monitoring period — stronger impacts were observed only one week after restoration. In the longer term (October 2024), the lakes showed reduced values in some abiotic (PO4-P, TP, IN and TN) and biotic (Chl-a) parameters compared to pre-restoration conditions. Overall, most adverse effects appear to be short-lived and relatively minor when compared to the longer-term benefits of small-scale restoration activities even in the mountain lakes. This monitoring programme will continue in the future in order to identify the long-term effects of the restoration activities.
This study is financed by the European Union-NextGenerationEU, through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria, project SUMMIT BG-RRP-2.004-0008-C01.
European Union-NextGenerationEU, through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria
SUMMIT BG-RRP-2.004-0008-C01
Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski"
All authors whose names appear on the submission: made substantial contributions to the conception, implementation and analysis of the work; revised the work critically for important intellectual content; approved the version of the manuscript to be published; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The authors confirm that this manuscript is original and has not been published or is currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.
This paper was initiated and conceptualised by Anelia Kenarova who also led the writing and statistical analysis process. The sampling and laboratory work was conducted by Silvena Boteva, Ivan Traykov and Boyanka Angelova. All authors jointly and equally contributed to its completion and final structure.
Water physico-chemical characteristics of the Seven Rila Lakes at pre-restoration (mean of August 2015, October 2021 and July 2023) and post-restoration (August and October 2023 and October 2024) periods. Results are shown as mean and (standard deviation).
Pearson correlation analysis per sampling occasion. Significant correlations are bolted.
Community level physiological profiles of aquatic bacteria. The colour scale of carbon utilisation rates is calculated on the respective AWCD. Red: utilisation rates below 30%, orange: rates between 31% and 100%, blue: rates between 101% and 130% and green: rates above 131%.
Two-way PERM/test of bacterial metabolic capacity, based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities of community level physiological profiles (CLPPs) between pre- and post-restoration periods.
SIMPER analysis identifying the carbon sources that contributed most significantly to the overall average dissimilarity amongst the community level physiological profiles (CLPPs) between pre- and post-restoration periods.
Indices of bacterial (a) functional richness and (b) Shannon-Weaver diversity at post-restoration time (August and October 2023 and October 2024) calculated as percentages from the respective pre-restoration values.