Related articles by
Research Article
One Ecosystem 7: e84925
https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.7.e84925 (16 Sep 2022)
https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.7.e84925 (16 Sep 2022)
Other versions:
- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- FigsFigs
- TabsTabs
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
-
Article metadata
-
Introduction
-
Lessons learned
-
There are different accounting clusters of ES (1)
-
ES actual flow is determined by the interaction between ecological supply and socio-economic demand (2)
-
Users of ES can be domestic or global (3)
-
Ecological supply and socio-economic demand can mismatch- I: the ES unmet demand (4)
-
Ecological supply and socio-economic demand can mis-match- II: the ES overuse (5)
-
Ecological supply and socio-economic demand can mismatch- III: the missed ES flow (6)
-
Linkages between ecosystem condition and ecosystem services (7)
-
Ecosystem accounts can be harmonised with environmental and economic accounts (8)
-
There is a path in moving from ES assessment to ES accounting (9)
-
Ecosystem services are not “intermediate” by default (10)
-
How to account for intra-ES, inter-ES and final ES (11)
-
In assessing ES, the approach can be “fast-track” or can be based on modelling (12)
-
-
Conclusions
-
References
-
Endnotes
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories