;"Socio-cultural valuation";"Biophysical and economic valuation";"Expected future changes in the services4" "Importance perceived by the population1 (%) and the most common justifications";"Importance perceived by economic stakeholders2 (%) and sectors most affected3";"Economic value (million EUR/year)" methodology;capacity5;"actual use6";"actual use / capacity ratio";trend;uncertainty "Wood and timber";45%;"raw materials, livelihood, building materials, oxygen production, clean air";52%;"logging, wood processing, plant production, livestock farming";"capacity: based on average annual increase during the economic life cycle of forests, without discounting";4.4;3.3;75%;"slight increase";small "actual use: based on logging data" "Natural forage and fodder";28%;"livestock production, livelihood";28%;"livestock farming, plant production";"based on market off-take of grazing sheep and cattle populations";–;3.1; ;"slight increase";small "Wild plants and mushrooms";44%;"health, medicine, food, livelihood, recreation";32%;"(there was none amongst sectors consulted)";"average quantities calculated based on the number of collection permits issued, multiplied by average buying-in prices per species";–;1.4; ;"strong decline";large "Honey and pollination" "Honey and nectar";41%;"pollination, health, food, healing properties, livelihood, experience";26%;"livestock farming (beekeeping)";"capacity: based on the estimated annual quantity of honey that can be collected on average in different habitats of the area";1;0.8;80%;constant;medium "actual use: number and average production of registered bee colonies" Pollination;40%;"livestock farming, plant production"; ;–;  "Water retention" "Water regulation";72%;"basic needs, water quality, health, wildlife, food, livelihood (fishing), recreation";72%;"all sectors"; ;–; ;"slight decline";large "Erosion control";25%;"landslides, soil erosion control, basis for food production";38%;"livestock farming"; ;–;  "Carbon sequestration (climate protection)";40%;"climate change as a global problem";46%;"livestock farming, plant production";"drawing on the methodology of the Romanian national greenhouse gas inventory, based on emission-trading market prices7 ";1.3;1.3; ;"slight increase8";small8 "Touristic attraction and local identity" Tourism;49%;"livelihood, potential for development, acquiring knowledge, experience, beauty, clean environment, valuable natural environment";48%;"food retail, catering, tourism, livestock farming, plant production";"based on the number of visitors in the area and the amount of money spent by them for touristic or recreational purposes";–;3.6; ;constant;small "Local identity";48%;"respect for traditions, emotional bond, national self-awareness";62%;"food retail, catering, tourism, plant production"; ;–; ;–;– "1: % of respondents who ranked the specific service amongst the 5 most important" "2: mean dependence score assigned by business actors (% of the maximum score)" "3: sectors that assigned a score of above 50%" "4: the average trends of expected changes in the four possible scenarios (for a detailed description of the scenario planning process see Arany et al. 2016, and Kalóczkai et al. 2017)" "5: estimated economic value of ecosystem service capacities per year" "6: estimated economic value of current actual use in the year 2015" "7: carbon sequestration, similarly to other regulating services, is ""used"" without conscious human involvement, which is why actual use can be considered equivalent to capacity" "8: carbon sequestration, a service difficult to interpret at the local level, was not included in the scenario planning process, but the results obtained for the ""wood and timber"" service in terms of trends and uncertainty can be considered valid for this service, too"