Class;"Class descriptor";"Scores and weight of the criteria within the particular value class" 5;"very high80-100%";"A=3 (25%); B=3 (25%); C=2 or 3 (15 or 25%); D=2 or 3 (15 or 25%)The highest value of accessibility with high or moderate other values" 4;High65-80%;"A=2 or 3 (15 or 25%); B=2 or 3 (15 or 25%); C=2 or 3 (15 or 25%); D=1-2 (5 or 15%)Existing recreational use is low, but close to the sea-coast there is a larger settlement or site has public accessibility and special infrastructure facilities for certain sea-based tourism or leisure activities (e.g. birding, kitesurfing, angling, boating, nudist beach etc.) – these are amongst the best sites for practising certain activities (not necessarily mass-tourism related)" 3;Moderate40-60%;"A=3 (25%); B=1-2 (5 or 15%), C=1-2 (5 or 15%); D=1 (5%)Existing recreational use is low and the site is far (>5 km) from larger settlements. This site is not amongst the best for certain tourism & leisure activities, but it has good public access and there is a parking lot. Mainly extensively used for traditional activities." 2;Low25-40%;"A=1-2 (5 or 15%); B=1 (5%); C=1-2 (5 or 15%); D=1 (5%)Existing recreational use is low and typically seasonal (between 100-300 visits per day to 1 km as a maximum in high season); it is far from larger settlements, but there are some separate tourist accommodations or private buildings nearby. There is a lack of special infrastructure and amenities, which makes accessibility limited." 1;"very low0-20%";"A=1 (5%); B=1 (5%); C=1 (5%); D=1 (5%)Other sites with low or very low (<100 visits per day in high season) existing recreational use far from larger settlements, without direct public access from main roads and lack of any specific recreational infrastructure. However, these sites contain nature and landscape quality value and provide important connections between popular places e.g. for long-distance coastal hiking."