Related articles by
Commentary
One Ecosystem 3: e24720
https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e24720 (16 Mar 2018)
https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e24720 (16 Mar 2018)
Other versions:
- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
Participatory mapping reveals biocultural and nature values in the shared landscape of a Nordic UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. People and Nature 4: 365.
DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10287
Spatiotemporal valuation of cultural and natural landscapes contributing to Pakistan’s cultural ecosystem services. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29: 41834.
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17611-2
Nature’s contributions to people in mountains: A review. PLOS ONE 14: e0217847.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217847
Advancing knowledge pluralism and cultural benefits in ecosystem services theory and application. Ecosystem Services 65: 101583.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101583
Understanding the diversity of values of “Nature’s contributions to people”: insights from the IPBES Assessment of Europe and Central Asia. Sustainability Science 14: 1267.
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-019-00716-6
Assessment of the spatial variability of selected soil chemical properties using geostatistical analysis in the north-western highlands of Ethiopia. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science 72: 1009.
DOI: 10.1080/09064710.2022.2142658
Ecosystem services or nature’s contributions? Reasons behind different interpretations in Latin America. Ecosystem Services 42: 101070.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101070
Cultural ecosystem services provision in response to urbanization in Cameroon. Land Use Policy 79: 641.
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.013
Towards an integrated framework for understanding social-ecological interactions: nature’s contributions to people meets cultural ecosystem services. Ecosystems and People 20: .
DOI: 10.1080/26395916.2024.2329576
Inequality in access to cultural ecosystem services from protected areas in the Chilean biodiversity hotspot. Science of The Total Environment 636: 1128.
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.353
Improving collaboration between ecosystem service communities and the IPBES science-policy platform. Ecosystems and People 16: 165.
DOI: 10.1080/26395916.2020.1766573
Do Conceptual Innovations Facilitate Transformative Change? The Case of Biodiversity Governance. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 8: .
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.612211
Disrupting and diversifying the values, voices and governance principles that shape biodiversity science and management. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 378: .
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0196
Do ecosystem service frameworks represent people’s values?. Ecosystem Services 46: 101221.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101221
Weaving notions of justice into urban ecosystem services research and practice. Environmental Science & Policy 109: 1.
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.021
Urban heat island mitigation by green infrastructure in European Functional Urban Areas. Sustainable Cities and Society 77: 103564.
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103564
Navigating pluralism: Understanding perceptions of the ecosystem services concept. Ecosystem Services 36: 100892.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.01.004
Integration matters: Combining socio-cultural and biophysical methods for mapping ecosystem service bundles. Ambio : .
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-023-01830-7
Philippine heritage bridging cultural ecosystem service and nature’s contribution to people in cultural landscapes: a correlational literature review. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development : .
DOI: 10.1108/JCHMSD-07-2023-0114
Framing natural assets for advancing sustainability research: translating different perspectives into actions. Sustainability Science 13: 1519.
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-018-0599-5
Leveraging Nature‐based Solutions for transformation: Reconnecting people and nature. People and Nature 3: 966.
DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10212
Non-Monetary Assessment and Mapping of the Potential of Agroecosystem Services in Rural Slovakia. European Countryside 12: 257.
DOI: 10.2478/euco-2020-0015
The use of focus groups in cultural ecosystem services research: a systematic review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10: .
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-01530-3
Disentangling ‘ecosystem services’ and ‘nature’s contributions to people’. Ecosystems and People 15: 269.
DOI: 10.1080/26395916.2019.1669713
The Concept of Cultural Ecosystem Services Should Not Be Abandoned. BioScience 69: 585.
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biz073
Participation and inclusiveness in the Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Nature Sustainability 2: 457.
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0290-6
Social Learning for Facilitating Dialogue and Understanding of the Ecosystem Services Approach: Lessons from a Cross-Border Experience in the Alboran Marine Basin. Sustainability 11: 5239.
DOI: 10.3390/su11195239
Tracing and building up environmental justice considerations in the urban ecosystem service literature: A systematic review. Landscape and Urban Planning 214: 104130.
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104130
Physiotherapy and ecosystem services: improving the health of our patients, the population, and the environment. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 39: 227.
DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2021.2015814
Incorporating Ecosystem Services in the Assessment of Water Framework Directive Programmes of Measures. Environmental Management 68: 38.
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-021-01478-7
Methodical Aspects of Soil Ecosystem Services Valuation. Agricultural Engineering 26: 39.
DOI: 10.2478/agriceng-2022-0004
Ecosystem services: A bridge or barrier for UK marine stakeholders?. Ecosystem Services 37: 100922.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100922
Ökosystemleistungen. Chapter 2: 25.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-65916-8_2
Debating Nature's Value. Chapter 10: 75.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99244-0_10
The Atlantic Forest. Chapter 16: 347.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-55322-7_16
Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. : 357.
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-822562-2.00130-4
Landscape Planning with Ecosystem Services. Chapter 1: 3.
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-024-1681-7_1
Urbánní zelená infrastruktura: Od kulturních ekosystémových služeb k biokulturní diverzitě. : .
DOI: 10.5507/prf.24.24464800
Debating Nature's Value. Chapter 2: 5.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99244-0_2
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories