Related articles by
Research Article
One Ecosystem 11: e206925
https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.11.e206925 (18 Sep 2026)
https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.11.e206925 (18 Sep 2026)
Other versions:
- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- FigsFigs
- TabsTabs
- TaxaTaxa
- DataData
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
-
Article metadata
-
Introduction
-
Literature review: an evidence synthesis
-
Rationale for a structured narrative synthesis
-
Conceptual frameworks
-
Capital, cascade/chain-based and ecosystem/flow-level co-production
-
Human–nature interaction and meaning-based framings
-
Governance, access and value-mediated framings
-
Accounting-boundary framings
-
-
Method families
-
-
Methodology
-
Expert-elicited co-production relevance matrix
-
Selection of co-production case-study examples
-
-
Results
-
Expert-elicited co-production relevance across ecosystem types and services
-
Case studies
-
Troodos Mountains, Cyprus: comparative cost–benefit assessment in mountain terraced agroecosystems
-
Northern German croplands: enhanced indicator framework for cropland provisioning services
-
Peloponnese, Greece: spatial prioritisation for post-fire forest restoration
-
Trento, Italy: urban green infrastructure for heat and runoff regulation
-
Triglav National Park, Slovenia: protected landscapes and commons governance
-
-
-
Discussion
-
Where explicit co-production assessment is most relevant in integrated ecosystem assessments
-
Which capitals matter and where they enter the ES assessment chain
-
Matching assessment approaches to ecosystem types, services and decision contexts
-
Implications for integrated ecosystem assessment, ecosystem accounting and decision-making support
-
Limitations and future research
-
-
Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements
-
References
-
Supplementary files
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories