Related articles by
Research Article
One Ecosystem 11: e172396
https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.11.e172396 (07 Jul 2026)
https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.11.e172396 (07 Jul 2026)
Other versions:
- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- FigsFigs
- TabsTabs
- DataData
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
-
Article metadata
-
Introduction
-
Material and methods
-
Step 1 : Identification of newly-artificialised areas in Wallonia between 2007 and 2018 and assigning their LULC classes
-
Data preparation and standardisation
-
Comparison between 2007 and 2018
-
-
Step 2: Ecosystem condition assessment, based on key abiotic soil and topography properties
-
Step 3 : Capacity matrix
-
Capacity Matrix Design
-
Priorisation of ES
-
Matrix Completion and Expert Input
-
-
Step 4 : Evaluating losses from land-take
-
-
Results
-
LULC classes transitions of newly-artificialised land parcels
-
Soil and topographic characteristics of converted areas
-
Matrix production
-
Loss of ES capacity from land-take and relative importance across ES
-
-
Discussion
-
Land-take estimates and loss of agricultural land
-
Landtake affects ecologically constrained areas
-
The impact on land-take on ES capacity
-
Methodological considerations on the matrix used
-
Relevance of SPUs (LULC categories and ecologically constrained areas)
-
ES prioritisation
-
Expert-based scoring
-
-
-
Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements
-
References
-
Supplementary files
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories